An economist calculated the cross-price elasticity of demand for nicknacks and gizmos and got -0.5 .

What can she conclude about the relationship between these two goods based on this elasticity?

Choose 1 answer:
(A) they are necessities
(B) they are complements
(C) they are substitutes
(D) they are unrelated goods
(E) they are normal goods

Question

An economist calculated the cross-price elasticity of demand for nicknacks and gizmos and got -0.5 .

What can she conclude about the relationship between these two goods based on this elasticity?

Choose 1 answer:
(A) they are necessities
(B) they are complements
(C) they are substitutes
(D) they are unrelated goods
(E) they are normal goods

Accepted Answer

∻Solution∻ ‖ a ⋮ Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand: The cross-price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded for one good to a change in the price of another good. It is calculated using the formula: $E_{xy} = \frac{\% ext{ change in quantity demanded of good } x}{\% ext{ change in price of good } y}$. ‖ ‖ b ⋮ Interpretation of the Coefficient: A negative cross-price elasticity of demand indicates that the two goods are complements, meaning that an increase in the price of one good leads to a decrease in the quantity demanded of the other good. ‖ ‖ c ⋮ Conclusion Based on the Coefficient: Since the economist calculated the cross-price elasticity of demand for nicknacks and gizmos as -0.5, this suggests that the two goods are complements. ‖ ∻Answer∻ ⚹ (B) they are complements ⚹ ∻Key Concept∻ ⚹ Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand for Complements ⚹ ∻Explanation∻ ⚹ A negative cross-price elasticity of demand indicates that the goods in question are complements, as the demand for one decreases when the price of the other increases.◊What impact does a negative cross-price elasticity of demand between nicknacks and gizmos suggest about their relationship in a macroeconomic perspective?⍭ Generate me a similar question◊⚹

Sia