Asksia AI LOGO

Sia

Question
World History
Posted 5 months ago
How did Admiral Chester Nimitz displease the US Congress during World War II?
O He insisted the US should focus on the Pacific rather than the European theater
O He refused to take the US fleet into battle immediately after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
O He did not want to drop the atomic bomb in order to convince the Japanese leadership to surrender.
He promoted and implemented a "no surrender" policy among US troops in the Pacific.
Sign in to unlock the answer
Answer from Sia
Posted 5 months ago
Here is your solution:

#(a)# 
Admiral Chester Nimitz was a key figure in the Pacific Theater during World War II. As a fleet admiral of the United States Navy, he played a significant role in directing naval operations against Japan. The options provided suggest various actions that could have displeased Congress, but historical records primarily show Nimitz as a competent and successful commander who was instrumental in the US victory in the Pacific.


#(b)# 
The assertion that Nimitz insisted the US should focus on the Pacific rather than the European theater is not entirely accurate. While Nimitz was certainly focused on the Pacific as his command responsibility, the overall US military strategy, known as "Europe First," prioritized defeating Germany before Japan. This strategy was agreed upon by the highest levels of US leadership, including President Franklin D. Roosevelt and military chiefs, not just Nimitz alone.


#(c)# 
Regarding the claim that Nimitz refused to take the US fleet into battle immediately after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, it is important to note that the US fleet was significantly damaged by the attack, and immediate offensive action was not feasible. Nimitz was appointed as the Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet shortly after the attack and was responsible for rebuilding the fleet and formulating a strategy to counter Japan.


#(d)# 
The decision to drop the atomic bomb was made by President Harry S. Truman and his advisors, not by Admiral Nimitz. While military leaders had input into the decision-making process, the ultimate decision to use atomic weapons was a political one, taken at the highest level of government.


#(e)# 
The "no surrender" policy is not accurately attributed to Nimitz. The US military did encourage its troops to fight tenaciously, but the policy of unconditional surrender applied to the Axis powers, not to individual US troops. The concept of "no surrender" was more a reflection of Japanese military culture than that of the United States.
Answer
None of the options provided accurately describe how Admiral Chester Nimitz displeased the US Congress during World War II.
Key Concept
Admiral Chester Nimitz's leadership in the Pacific Theater during World War II
Explanation
Nimitz was a key naval strategist and leader for the United States in the Pacific during World War II, but the specific actions listed in the question do not accurately reflect his relationship with Congress or his command decisions.

Not the question you are looking for? Ask here!

Enter question by text

Enter question by image

Upgrade to Asksia Pro

Join a AskSia's Pro Plan, and get 24/7 AI tutoring for your reviews, assignments, quizzes and exam preps.

Unlimited chat query usages
Strong algorithms that better know you
Early access to new release features
Study Other Question