I have a question that confused me for a while, you're already said that we can't trust our tools to predict or know the things or events that happened in the past for many reasons, then in the next videos you've said the histories with full confidence, without repeating this fact, so did its really true? or even partially true?.

Question

Accepted Answer

∻Answer∻ ⚹ The histories I present are based on the best available evidence and scholarly consensus, but they are not free from potential errors or revisions as new information comes to light. ⚹ ∻Key Concept∻ ⚹Historical Interpretation and Evidence⚹ ∻Explanation∻ ⚹In AP World History, we rely on a combination of primary and secondary sources to construct narratives about the past. While we strive for accuracy, historical interpretations are subject to change with new discoveries and scholarly debates. Thus, while I may present histories with confidence, it is with the understanding that our knowledge is based on current evidence and may be revised.⚹◊What factors contribute to the reliability or lack thereof in historical sources used in AP World History?⍭ Generate me a similar question◊

Sia