In 2:30, how could we trust what others say about the past when they weren't there?\

Question

In  2:30, how could we trust what others say about the past when they weren't there?\

Accepted Answer

∻Answer∻ ⚹ We can trust what others say about the past by critically analyzing primary and secondary sources for their reliability, bias, and perspective. ⚹ ∻Key Concept∻ ⚹ Historical Sources and Evidence ⚹ ∻Explanation∻ ⚹ Historians rely on a variety of sources to understand the past, including primary sources (created at the time being studied) and secondary sources (created after the event by those studying the past). To trust what others say about the past, historians critically evaluate these sources by considering their origin, purpose, context, and audience. They look for corroboration among different sources and assess the credibility of the authors. By understanding the biases and perspectives of each source, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced picture of the past. ⚹◊How can corroborating evidence from multiple primary sources help us trust historical accounts even when the individuals weren't present at the time⍭ Generate me a similar question◊

Sia