What can the reader reasonably infer from the final paragraph?
The Supreme Court case that ruled segregation to be unconstitutional was known as Browder v. Gayle.

Martin Luther King Jr. participated in the boycott.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott achieved its goal a year after it began.

On December 20th, 1956, the fight for full civil rights was finally over.

Question

What can the reader reasonably infer from the final paragraph?
The Supreme Court case that ruled segregation to be unconstitutional was known as Browder v. Gayle.


Martin Luther King Jr. participated in the boycott.


The Montgomery Bus Boycott achieved its goal a year after it began.


On December 20th, 1956, the fight for full civil rights was finally over.

Accepted Answer

Here is your solution: #(a)# ⚹ The Supreme Court case that ruled segregation to be unconstitutional was not known as Browder v. Gayle. The landmark case that declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional was Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, decided in 1954. Browder v. Gayle was a related case that ended segregation on public buses in Montgomery, Alabama. ⚹ #(b)# ⚹ Martin Luther King Jr. did indeed participate in the Montgomery Bus Boycott. He was a key leader in the civil rights movement and his involvement helped to galvanize public support for the boycott. ⚹ #(c)# ⚹ The Montgomery Bus Boycott did achieve its goal approximately a year after it began. The boycott started on December 5, 1955, and ended successfully with the desegregation of the Montgomery public buses on December 20, 1956, following the district court's ruling in Browder v. Gayle, which was upheld by the Supreme Court. ⚹ #(d)# ⚹ The statement that "On December 20th, 1956, the fight for full civil rights was finally over" is not accurate. While the Montgomery Bus Boycott was a significant victory, it was just one of many battles in the larger civil rights movement. The fight for full civil rights continued with other events and legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. ⚹ ∻Answer∻ ⚹ The reader can reasonably infer from the final paragraph that Martin Luther King Jr. participated in the boycott and that the Montgomery Bus Boycott achieved its goal a year after it began. However, the reader cannot infer that the Supreme Court case was known as Browder v. Gayle (it was Brown v. Board of Education for school segregation) or that the fight for full civil rights was over on December 20th, 1956. ⚹ ∻Key Concept∻ ⚹ The Montgomery Bus Boycott was a pivotal event in the Civil Rights Movement, and Martin Luther King Jr. played a significant role in it. ⚹ ∻Explanation∻ ⚹ The boycott led to a Supreme Court decision that desegregated buses in Montgomery, but it was not the end of the civil rights struggle, which continued with further actions and legislation. ⚹◊What role did the Montgomery Bus Boycott play in the broader Civil Rights Movement in the United States?⍭ Generate me a similar question◊

Sia