Why were Rivers more effective than the oceans or Seas in agriculture.? Like why didn't you see Black Sea or Lake Superior civilization or something like that. Since almost all major cities are by a river or ocean so both are obviously effective.

Question

Accepted Answer

∻Answer∻ ⚹ Rivers were more effective than oceans or seas in agriculture because they provided a consistent and reliable source of fresh water, which is essential for irrigation and sustaining crops. Additionally, rivers often deposited nutrient-rich silt during floods, which enhanced soil fertility. This is why many early civilizations, such as those in Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley, and China, developed along river valleys. In contrast, oceans and seas, while important for trade and transportation, did not offer the same agricultural benefits due to their saltwater content and the less predictable nature of their tides and currents. ⚹ ∻Key Concept∻ ⚹ The importance of river valleys in the development of early agricultural societies. ⚹ ∻Explanation∻ ⚹ Rivers provided a steady supply of fresh water necessary for irrigation, which allowed for the cultivation of crops. The annual flooding of rivers like the Nile, Tigris, and Euphrates deposited nutrient-rich silt onto the land, making it highly fertile and suitable for agriculture. This led to the growth of stable, prosperous civilizations. Oceans and seas, while crucial for trade and cultural exchange, did not offer the same agricultural advantages due to their saltwater and the challenges of managing coastal agriculture. ⚹◊How did the presence of rivers contribute to the development of early civilizations in AP World History⍭ Generate me a similar question◊

Sia