QF5213 Cheatsheet · Financial Management

National University of Singapore · cheat sheet for the final exam. Final Test, Saturday 14 November 2026 (Week 13). Full QF5213 study guide →

A4 landscape · 7pt · 6 columns · two print sidesQF5213 · NUS · v2
QF5213
Financial Management
National University of Singapore · postgraduate · Semester 1, AY2026/27
Open-Book Exam Sheet
Final methods · Side 1 of 2
rules · formulas · decisions
QF5213 cheatsheet QR code – open the full QF5213 study guide
Full guide + ask Sia
about QF5213
SIDE 1/2   EXAM MAP → TVM · APPRAISAL · CASH FLOWS · ANALYSIS · OPTIONS · SECURITIESPaper notes allowedMethod sheet · traceable to C1–C9

0 · Exam Mapcourse data · final mode 2026

Assignments 20%Midterm 40%Final 40%
Published weights total 100%; Final Test covers all topics.

“Open book but only hard copies.” (QF5213 course page (final test mode, 2026)) · “Examplify. Block internet. Open book.” (QF5213 course page (final test mode, 2026))

ComponentWeightFormat
Group Assignments20%three submissions
Midterm Test40%2 h · MCQ · through Bonds
Final Test40%2 h · MCQ · all topics

1 · Date Every Cash FlowC2 · core setup

>t=012n−CF₀+CF₁+CF₂+CFₙmove all amounts to one date
Sign first, date second, formula third.

single sumFVₜ = PV(1+r)ᵗ
PV = FVₜ/(1+r)ᵗ

uneven streamPV = Σ CFₜ/(1+r)ᵗ

Exam decision: moving right compounds; moving left discounts. For m compounding periods per year use r/m and mt together. Continuous: FV = PV·eʳᵗ.

PromptSet-upCheck
amount due laterdiscount to t=0PV<FV for r>0
deposit todaycompound to target dateFV>PV for r>0
uneven streamPV every signed flow separatelyall terms share one date
monthly/semiannualdivide rate; multiply periodsunits match

Why time has value: current money can earn interest, inflation reduces future purchasing power, and promised payment may fail. Simple interest adds the same dollar amount each period; compound interest earns on accumulated interest. More frequent positive compounding raises FV but lowers the PV needed to reach a fixed future amount.

Independent check: value an uneven stream at t=0, then compound that total to the final date. It must match compounding each individual flow to that date. A one-period counting error breaks this equality.

Goal and control · C1

2 · Level StreamsC3 · formula choice

ordinarydue01n−112n
Due shifts every payment one period earlier; multiply the ordinary value by 1+r.

ordinary annuityPV = C[1−(1+r)⁻ⁿ]/r
FV = C[(1+r)ⁿ−1]/r

annuity duePV or FV = ordinary value × (1+r)

perpetuitieslevel: PV = C/r
growing: PV = C₁/(r−g), requiring g<r

Trigger words: “end”, “next month/year” → ordinary; “today”, “immediately”, “beginning” → due. A deferred perpetuity is first valued one period before its first payment, then discounted to today.

UnknownRearrange / interpretation
loan payment CC = PV ÷ annuity factor
savings targetC = FV ÷ FV annuity factor
balance after k paymentsPV at k of remaining instalments
due streamordinary value ×(1+r)

Amortisation: each instalment splits into interest = opening balance×period rate and principal = payment−interest; new balance = old balance−principal. Early instalments carry more interest because the balance is larger.

3 · Make Rate Match PaymentC3 · APR/EAR

APR quoteEARpaymentratecompoundroot
Different clocks? Convert quote → EAR → rate per payment period.

EAR = (1 + APR/m)ᵐ − 1
payment-period r = (1+EAR)¹ᐟᵏ − 1

BasisWhat earns interestImplication
Reducing balancebalance still owedquote and true period rate align
Flatoriginal principal throughouttrue cost much higher
Annual restbalance reset yearlybetween the two

4 · Appraisal Rule HierarchyC4 · decision marks

discount every incremental CFNPV > 0?acceptrejectyesnomutually exclusive → highest NPV
NPV is the value rule; the other measures diagnose return, speed or scarcity.

net present valueNPV = CF₀ + Σₜ₌₁ⁿ CFₜ/(1+r)ᵗ
accept independent project if NPV>0

return and scarcityIRR solves NPV=0; accept conventional project if IRR>r
PI = PV(inflows)/initial outlay; accept if PI>1

MethodUseFailure mode
NPVdollars of valueforecast/rate quality
IRRpercentage returnranking conflict; multiple roots
PIbenefit per $ under a capnot the unconstrained rank
Paybackliquidity speedignores later CFs; simple form ignores TVM

Ranking conflict: for mutually exclusive projects, use the higher NPV. Find crossover as IRR of year-by-year differences. More than one sign change can produce multiple IRRs: report the range where NPV>0. Unequal lives, if repeatable: common life or EAA = NPV/annuity factor.

What each edge case asks

Independent projects: accept every NPV>0 project if funds are available. Mutually exclusive: selecting one removes the other, so dollar value wins. Capital rationing: rank benefit per constrained dollar with PI, then choose the feasible bundle that maximises total NPV. Unequal lives: use EAA/common life only if repetition is realistic; otherwise compare ordinary NPVs.

hurdle from financing mixWACC = w_d r_d(1−T) + w_e r_e

Multiple-IRR diagnostic: −10,000, +26,000, −16,500 changes sign twice and has IRRs of 10% and 50%; NPV is positive only between them (at 25%, +240). State the acceptable rate band, not one misleading IRR.

Payback interpolation: full years before recovery + unrecovered amount at start of recovery year / that year's cash flow. Discounted payback uses present values first. Both ignore every flow after recovery and depend on an arbitrary cutoff.

5 · Build the Project Cash FlowC5 · classification core

INITIALasset + install+ ΔNWC= outflowOPERATINGafter-tax margin+ dep. shieldeach periodTERMINALOCF + SV+ tax effect+ NWC returnwith project − without project
Sort first; discount only the resulting net flow in each dated block.

operating cash flowOCF = (Revenue−cash costs)(1−T) + T·Dep

after-tax salvageATSV = SV − T(SV−BV)

ItemRule
Sunk costexclude: occurs either way
Opportunity costinclude best forgone use
Erosion / complementsinclude induced loss / gain
Allocated overheadonly the incremental part
Interest / dividendsexclude: WACC already prices financing
Net working capitaloutflow when tied up; inflow on release
Depreciationnot cash; include its tax shield

Exam test: would this cash move if the project were rejected? If no, include it; if yes anyway, exclude it; if only part changes, include only that increment. Below-book salvage makes (SV−BV) negative, so the formula adds a tax credit.

Three-block assembly

CF₀ = −(asset price + freight + installation) − ΔNWC₀
CFₜ = OCFₜ − later capital spending − ΔNWCₜ
CFₙ adds ATSV + release of NWC

Two equivalent OCF routes: from cash margin, use (R−cash costs)(1−T)+T·Dep; from operating profit after tax, add depreciation back. Do not add both the full depreciation and its shield. Credit sales enter cash flow when collection occurs, not merely when accounting revenue is booked.

Classification traps: research paid last year is sunk even if it feels project-related; rent forgone on owned space is an opportunity cost only if an alternative tenant/use exists; cannibalised contribution is charged only when the launch causes it; extra complementary sales are credited; a shared overhead allocation is excluded unless total firm cash overhead changes.

6 · Risk Around the Base NPVC6 · analysis

pricevolumecostlongest NPV range = research first
Sensitivity moves one input at a time; scenarios move linked inputs together.

NPV response ratio = %ΔNPV / %Δinput

break-even volumeAccounting Q = (fixed cost + depreciation)/(price−variable cost)
EAC = initial outlay / annuity factor
Financial Q = [EAC + fixed(1−T) − T·Dep] / [(price−variable)(1−T)]

Accounting break-even sets profit=0; tax cancels. Financial break-even sets NPV=0 and charges the required return, so it is higher whenever r>0. Compare expected volume with the correct line and state the safety margin.

ToolChangeAnswer
Sensitivityone input; rest fixedwhich forecast drives NPV?
Scenariolinked inputs togetherwhat does a coherent state do?
Break-evensolve sales/volumewhere does profit or NPV reach zero?

Course plant: price $2,600→$2,450 moves NPV $15.77m→−$10.31m; response ≈28.7% of NPV per 1% price change. Research the longest bar first.

7 · Trees & FlexibilityC7 · fold back

chooseΣp×payoffΣp×payoff← max □ · mean ○ · discount
Squares are decisions; circles are chance. Never average a choice.

option value = NPV with flexibility − NPV without flexibility

Delaycompare every launch-date NPV after discounting it to today
Abandontake salvage when it beats continuing
Expandscale a successful branch without scaling the failed one

8 · Common StockC8 · valuation

0D₁D₂P₂fast growth: price alonestable g starts
Forecast early dividends; terminal price uses the first stable-growth dividend.

required return: rₛ = r_f + β(market risk premium)
zero growth: P₀ = D₁/rₛ
constant growth: P₀ = D₁/(rₛ−g), g<rₛ
two-stage: P₀ = Σ Dₜ/(1+rₛ)ᵗ + Pₙ/(1+rₛ)ⁿ
Pₙ = Dₙ₊₁/(rₛ−g)

MethodUse / bridge
P/Epositive, meaningful earnings
P/Sloss-making firm; revenue positive
P/Bmarket price against net assets
EV/EBITDAenterprise value → + excess cash − debt → equity; ÷ shares
Free cash flowdiscount at WACC → same enterprise-to-equity bridge

Trap: the growth model uses D₁, not D₀. A takeover premium over the last trade is not proof of fairness; compare with an independent intrinsic value.

Price directions: higher risk-free rate, beta or market premium raises rₛ and lowers price; stronger dividends or sustainable growth raises price. Never force g≥rₛ into the constant-growth formula.

9 · BondsC9 · pricing/yields

coupon = YTM → parPYTM
Price and required yield move oppositely; the curve is convex.

Price = C[1−(1+y)⁻ⁿ]/y + F/(1+y)ⁿ
current yield = annual coupon / price

PositionRate order
Premiumcoupon rate > current yield > YTM
Parcoupon rate = current yield = YTM
Discountcoupon rate < current yield < YTM

Semiannual: n=2×years; C=annual coupon/2; y=quoted YTM/2. Calculator RATE returns the half-year rate; double for quoted YTM, compound for EAR. Long maturity/small coupon → greater price risk; short maturity/large coupon → greater reinvestment risk.

https://www.asksia.ai/cheatsheet/nus-qf5213 · Full QF5213 study guide → · side 1/2
Shared by ________
AskSiaForward this to your tutorial group
v2 · 2026-10-16 · Final Test, Saturday 14 November 2026 (Week 13).
Check your unit's exam rules for any limit on what may be brought in.
QF5213
Financial Management · Worked Drills
National University of Singapore · calculator-ready routes and traps
Open-Book Exam Sheet
Five worked examples · Side 2 of 2
numbers carried to decision
QF5213 cheatsheet QR code – open the full QF5213 study guide
Full guide + ask Sia
about QF5213
SIDE 2/2   WORKED ROUTES → CHECKS → TRAPS → FAST METHOD CHOOSERShow signs + datesExamples retain the guide's data

10 · Worked 1: Project Appraisalcourse worked example

Given: pay $50,000 now; save $18,000 at each year-end for 4 years; r=9%. Find NPV, IRR, payback and decide.

01234−50,000+18,000 each year
Ordinary annuity: outlay at t=0 is already a present value.

Carry the numbers through

AF₄,₉% = [1−1.09⁻⁴]/0.09 = 3.23972
PV savings = 18,000×3.23972 = $58,314.96
NPV = 58,314.96−50,000 = +$8,314.96

IRR solves 50,000 = 18,000×AF₄,IRR
IRR = 16.37% > 9%
payback = 50,000/18,000 = 2.78 years

Accept: NPV is positive and IRR clears the hurdle. Payback describes recovery speed, not value, and ignores later cash after recovery.

Calculator checkEntry
cash-flow signCF₀ = −50,000
repeated inflow18,000 for four periods
NPV / IRRI=9 for NPV; solve IRR separately

What the three answers do

NPV states the wealth added today; it is the decision answer. IRR states the project's percentage return and agrees here because this is a conventional outflow-then-inflow stream. Payback is a liquidity description. If this project competed with another, the higher NPV would decide even if the rival IRR were higher.

Direction checks: a higher discount rate lowers the annuity factor and NPV; an earlier saving raises value; changing the sign of CF₀ breaks both NPV and IRR. At r=IRR the annuity PV must equal exactly $50,000. At 9% it exceeds the cost by $8,314.96, matching the stated NPV.

general equal-inflow routeNPV = −outlay + C·AFₙ,ᵣ
IRR: solve outlay/C = AFₙ,IRR
payback = outlay/C only when C is level

Timing variants: first saving today → multiply the ordinary value by 1.09. Delayed stream → value it one period before its first payment, then discount to t=0.

Multiple-choice eliminators: NPV cannot be $58,314.96—that is the PV of benefits before the cost. An IRR below 9% conflicts with the positive NPV for this conventional stream. A payback of four years ignores that three full $18,000 receipts already exceed the $50,000 outlay.

11 · Worked 2: Final-Year CashC5 worked example

Given at year 5: revenue $110,000; cash costs $50,000; tax depreciation $12,000; tax 30%. Equipment cost $200,000, book value $60,000, sold for $45,000. Release $20,000 NWC.

OCFafter-tax salvageNWC45,60049,50020,000total year 5 = 115,100
Terminal cash = operating flow + after-tax disposal + working-capital recovery.

1 · Operating cash flow

OCF = (110,000−50,000)(1−0.30) + 0.30(12,000)
= 42,000 + 3,600 = $45,600

2 · After-tax salvage

loss = 45,000−60,000 = −$15,000
ATSV = 45,000−0.30(45,000−60,000)
= 45,000+4,500 = $49,500

3 · Assemble

year-5 CF = 45,600+49,500+20,000
= $115,100

The sale below book creates a $4,500 tax credit. The original $200,000 does not reappear in year 5; it was a time-0 outflow. NWC comes back because inventory and receivables run down and payables settle.

SV>BVtax on gain lowers salvage
SV<BVtax credit raises salvage
SV=BVno tax adjustment

Alternative OCF audit

EBIT = 110,000−50,000−12,000 = $48,000
EBIT(1−T)+Dep = 48,000×0.70+12,000
= 33,600+12,000 = $45,600

This agrees with the cash-margin-plus-shield route, so the tax and depreciation treatment is internally consistent. The $12,000 depreciation is never a payment; it first lowers taxable profit and is then added back.

Classification audit

NumberWhy it enters
110,000final-year incremental cash revenue
50,000incremental cash operating cost
12,000sets tax shield; not a cash outflow
60,000 BVtax comparison only
45,000 SVcash disposal proceeds
20,000 NWCrelease of prior investment
200,000 costalready paid at t=0; absent at year 5

12 · Worked 3: Two Break-EvensC6 worked example

Given: line costs $40m; 5-year straight-line depreciation to zero; price $500; variable cost $300; fixed cost $6m/year; T=20%; r=8%; forecast 75,000 units.

forecast70,00075,00082,614profit=0NPV=0
Forecast clears accounting break-even but misses the value-creating threshold.

Accounting line

Dep = 40m/5 = $8m; contribution = 500−300 = $200
Qᴀ = (6m+8m)/200 = 70,000 units

Financial line

AF₅,₈% = 3.9927; EAC = 40m/3.9927 = $10.0183m
fixed after tax = 6m×0.8 = $4.8m
dep. shield = 8m×0.2 = $1.6m
Qғ = (10.0183+4.8−1.6)m/(200×0.8)
= 82,614 units

Test the forecast

annual CF at 75,000 = (15m−6m−8m)×0.8+8m = $8.8m
NPV = 8.8m×3.9927−40m = −$4.86m

Reject at 75,000: the project reports accounting profit yet destroys value. The financial line is the correct decision hurdle because it includes the required return.

At 75,000AmountMeaning
Revenue$37.5m75,000×$500
Variable cost$22.5m75,000×$300
Contribution$15.0mcovers fixed + capital charge
Accounting profit before tax$1.0m15−6−8
NPV−$4.86mrequired return not earned

Why tax cancels in accounting break-even: after-tax profit is pretax profit×(1−T); setting it to zero still sets pretax profit to zero. Financial break-even instead works with after-tax cash and therefore includes the after-tax contribution, after-tax fixed cost and depreciation shield.

Safety margins: forecast−accounting line = 5,000 units; forecast−financial line = −7,614. Test price, cost and volume one at a time; use a scenario when inputs move together.

13 · Worked 4: Option to WaitC7 worked example

Given: r=9%. Start now: cost 600, then 260/year for 3 years. Wait one year: cost 640 at year 1, then 290/year for 3 years. Compare at time 0.

NOW−600260 × 3WAIT−640290 × 3discount year-1 NPV back once
Values dated at different start years cannot be compared directly.

Start today

AF₃,₉% = 2.5313
NPV₀(now) = −600 + 260(2.5313)
= −600+658.14 = 58.14

Wait

NPV₁(wait) = −640 + 290(2.5313)
= −640+734.08 = 94.08 at year 1
PV₀(wait) = 94.08/1.09 = 86.31

Decision and option value

86.31 > 58.14 → wait
option value = 86.31−58.14 = 28.17

The tempting wrong comparison is 94.08 against 58.14. That overstates waiting because the first figure is dated one year later. For any timing table, calculate at launch and then restate every result to time 0.

NodeOperation
decision □keep the highest dated value
chance ○Σ probability × branch value
one step leftdiscount one period

Timing audit

QuantityDateComparable at t=0?
58.14todayyes
94.08year 1 launchno
86.31todayyes

Interpret the option: waiting costs more and starts cash receipts later, but the larger annual inflow more than compensates after all values are dated consistently. The option adds 28.17 today; it is not the full delayed-project value.

General route: for each possible start year s, calculate NPV at s from that start's cost and subsequent flows; divide by (1+r)ˢ; choose the highest present value. For a staged tree, repeat this date discipline at every node while moving from right to left.

Related options: abandon when salvage exceeds the continuation value at that node; expand only on the successful branch; stop after a failed trial when “do not invest” dominates. Option value is always the flexible project value less the otherwise identical inflexible value.

14 · Worked 5: Two-Stage StockC8 worked example

Given: D₀=$1.00; growth 20% for two years, then 5% forever; required return 10%.

PV D₁PV D₂PV P₂1.0911.19024.992terminal component ≈ 92% of value
Most value sits in the terminal price, so stable growth deserves the hardest check.

Project dividends

D₁ = 1.00×1.20 = $1.20
D₂ = 1.20×1.20 = $1.44
D₃ = 1.44×1.05 = $1.512

Terminal price at year 2

P₂ = D₃/(r−g) = 1.512/(0.10−0.05)
= $30.24

Discount every component

PV(D₁)=1.20/1.10 = $1.091
PV(D₂)=1.44/1.10² = $1.190
PV(P₂)=30.24/1.10² = $24.992
P₀ = 1.091+1.190+24.992 = $27.27

Constant 5% growth from the start would give 1.05/0.05 = $21.00; the two fast-growth years add $6.27. P₂ uses D₃ because that is the first dividend in the stable phase, but P₂ is discounted for two years, its valuation date.

g≥rconstant-growth formula invalid; use staged growth
no dividendsdiscount free cash flow at WACC; bridge EV to equity
loss-makingP/S cross-check; P/E is not meaningful

Three date traps

Dividend input: D₀ has just been paid, so grow once to obtain D₁. Terminal numerator: P₂ uses D₃, the first stable-growth payment. Discount exponent: P₂ is a year-2 value even though its numerator is D₃, so divide by 1.10², not 1.10³.

Reasonableness: the spread r−g is 5%; a small change in either input moves the $30.24 terminal price sharply. About 92% of current value is terminal, so scrutinise stable growth.

constant-growth cross-checkD₁ if 5% from start = 1.00×1.05 = $1.05
P₀ = 1.05/(0.10−0.05) = $21.00
fast-growth increment = 27.27−21.00 = $6.27

15 · Method ChooserC2–C9 · fast recall

What is repeating?one sum /uneven CFsequal CFsfiniteforever /stable gPV eachannuityperpetuityProject? → incremental CF → NPV firstBond/share? → PV promised/expected cash
Shape identifies the formula; the decision rule identifies the verdict.
Question wordingRoute
same payment, fixed nordinary/due annuity
payment foreverperpetuity; growing only if g<r
quoted rate, different payment frequencyAPR → EAR → matching period rate
accept or reject projectincremental after-tax CF → NPV
budget capPI ranking, then maximise total NPV
profit=0 vs NPV=0accounting vs financial break-even
staged uncertaintytree: max choices, average chances, discount
temporary high dividend growthtwo-stage DDM + terminal price
bond price or yieldcoupon annuity + par; solve y if price given

16 · Last-Minute Error GridFAQs + worked tips

sign CF₀ negative; do not discount itrate period = cash-flow periodexclude sunk and financing flowsterminal value dated before discountingstate accept/reject and the rule used
Five checks before selecting the multiple-choice option.

Bond order: premium → coupon > current yield > YTM; discount → coupon < current yield < YTM. Semiannual RATE is a half-year rate. IRR: inspect sign changes; one quoted root may be meaningless. Working capital: invest when required, recover at end. Depreciation: add the shield, not depreciation as a cash inflow.

Agency recall: approve a perk when stake×cost < private benefit; raise the stake to align incentives.

Fast bond check: compare coupon rate with required yield before calculating. Coupon>yield predicts premium; coupon<yield predicts discount. If the calculated price lands on the wrong side of par, inspect the periodic rate, coupon frequency and cash-flow signs.

https://www.asksia.ai/cheatsheet/nus-qf5213 · Full QF5213 study guide → · side 2/2
Shared by ________
AskSiaForward this to your tutorial group
v2 · 2026-10-16 · Final Test, Saturday 14 November 2026 (Week 13).
Five worked routes · formulas and values from the course guide

Want one for YOUR exact syllabus?

Sia is your free desktop study agent. Drop your National University of Singapore QF5213 slides — Sia builds a sheet tailored to YOUR exam. Better than this library because it knows YOUR materials.

↓ Download Sia · Free