Marketing Management
Sem 1 2026 · Side 1 of 2
2-hr exam 50% + marketing plan
0 · How to Use Thisread first
Postgrad strategic marketing. Assessed by a 2-hr final exam (50%) + a semester-long group Marketing Plan (Part A situation analysis 10% · Part B recommendations 20% · presentation 10% · best-5-of-8 seminar quizzes 10%). No exam hurdle.
The marked skill is running the marketing-planning process end-to-end — diagnose, segment, position, then design a mix that delivers value. Side 1 = strategy (concept, situation, STP, the plan); Side 2 = the mix + metrics. Textbook: Kotler, Keller & Chernev (17e).
1 · Marketing & ValueW1
Marketing = understanding, creating & delivering value — the constant that survives a changing environment. Market orientation puts the customer (not the product or sales push) at the centre of every decision.
Core Process of Marketing (the unit's organising loop): Diagnostics (read the market) → Strategy (design a customer-driven strategy) → Tactics (implement value-delivering activities) → Build Relationships (delighted customers become advocates) → Capture Value (keep it profitable & sustainable).
New Marketing Realities: four market forces → new firm capabilities + a new competitive landscape → the need for holistic marketing. AI is now central but a "double-edged sword" — sloppy AI use draws consumer backlash.
1b · Customer-Delivered Valueanalysis tool
Value = a customer's perception of net benefits for the costs incurred (Chen & Dubinsky 2003). Used as an actual analysis tool:
customer valueValue = Total Customer Benefit − Total Customer Cost
Benefit = product + services + personnel + image
Cost = monetary + time + energy + psychological
Each customer has their own value model — some cost-driven, some benefit-driven. This is why we segment.
1c · Strategy vs Tacticsthe spine
Strategy = the what & why (the game plan: STP, value proposition). Tactics = the how (the marketing-mix activities that execute it). The exam constantly tests whether you can tell them apart and link them.
2 · The Marketing Planthe assessed spine
The whole subject maps onto a two-part group plan for one real client (an NFP, a school, or a haircare brand):
part A → part BA · Situation analysis (~2000w) — diagnose
B · Recommendations (~4000w) — objectives, STP,
mix, implementation, metrics
Part A = environment + customer + competitor research framing the challenge. Part B = SMART objectives → STP → proposed 7Ps mix → delivery plan with milestones & commercial implications (cost vs benefit, feasibility). AI allowed to plan & build visual mock-ups only, with disclosure. Everything you revise for the exam is the same toolkit you apply in the plan — learn it once, use it twice.
3 · Situation AnalysisW3 · Part A
Split the environment into two layers, then map both onto SWOT:
Macro-environment → PESTLE — external, largely uncontrollable, feeds O & T:
- Political · Economic · Socio-cultural
- Technological · Legal · natural Environment
Micro-environment — "closer" to the firm, more direct influence, feeds S & W: Company, Suppliers, Distributors, Customers, Competitors. Company strengths run beyond resources to brand equity, customer loyalty & marketing agility (how fast a firm iterates between sensing & executing — Kalaignanam et al. 2021).
The split is about control: you can shape the micro environment but only respond to the macro. That is why macro forces become opportunities/threats, micro factors strengths/weaknesses.
3b · SWOTsynthesise
| Helpful | Harmful | |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | Strengths | Weaknesses |
| External | Opportunities | Threats |
S/W come from the micro scan; O/T from PESTLE. SWOT is a synthesis, not a list — it should point to the strategy.
3c · Micro Detailcompany & chain
Suppliers are a key link in the value chain, sometimes treated as partners (supplier transparency can itself be a strength). Distributors shape reach & experience; customers & competitors set the playing field. The point of the micro scan is to find controllable levers the firm can pull.
4 · Porter's Five ForcesPorter 1985 · attractiveness
Assesses the structural attractiveness of a segment/industry — high forces = low profit potential:
- Threat of new entrants — barriers, mobility
- Supplier power — concentration, switching cost
- Buyer power — choice, price sensitivity
- Threat of substitutes — alternatives meeting the need
- Competitive rivalry — # & aggression of rivals
Competitor analysis can be made quantitative via a weighted competitive-strength table (resource × importance weight × strength rating → overall score; Avery & Gupta). The exam value: it forces you to rank rivals on what matters, not just list them.
4b · Consumer AnalysisW2 · feeds Part A
5-stage decision process: problem recognition → information search → evaluation → purchase → post-purchase.
Buying roles: initiator · influencer · decider · buyer · user (+ gatekeeper/payer) — the buyer is often not the user, which changes who you target.
Involvement: high vs low → extended / limited / routine problem-solving.
Influences: social (reference groups — membership/aspirational/dissociative; opinion leaders), personal (life-cycle, Big Five personality, lifestyle, self-concept), cultural (culture as a "codebook"; brand communities/tribes), situational (place, time, mood). Social Practice Theory (Shove): consumption = meanings + competences + materials — used to design behaviour change.
5 · STP — the Strategic CoreW4
STP = Segmentation → Targeting → Positioning; the three stages work together (the "cake" analogy). It converts a broad market into chosen segments, prioritised targets, and a distinctive position — the strategy that the mix then executes.
Output = the value proposition, sitting at the strategy↔tactics hinge. Get STP right and the mix almost designs itself; get it wrong and no amount of clever tactics rescues it. Segments without targeting is just description; targeting without positioning is a target you can't win.
5b · Why Segment?the logic
One offer can't serve everyone well. Segmentation lets the firm match a tailored value proposition to a group whose perceived costs & benefits are similar — raising relevance, willingness-to-pay and efficiency of spend. A good segment is measurable, substantial, accessible, differentiable & actionable.
6 · Segmentationtwo approaches
Ad-hoc (top-down, firm-driven) — four common bases:
- Demographic — age, income, life-stage
- Geographic — region, climate, density
- Psychographic — values, lifestyle, personality
- Behavioural — benefits sought, usage, loyalty
5-step routine: define market → select variables → aggregate → run statistical routines → build personae. Criticised for portraying consumers "as if they were strangers" defined only by firm-chosen variables — the firm decides who exists, then markets to its own construct.
Bottom-up, "found in the wild": segments are naturally-occurring human groups surfaced by cultural intermediaries (opinion leaders, bloggers, influencers, "cool hunters"). 4 steps: establish deviance → prototyping → anchoring → vaccination. Canonical examples: "lumbersexuals," "fur parents."
7 · Targetingprioritise
"All customers are not created equal" — choose whom to prioritise & whom to ignore; put scarce resources on the highest-payoff segment. Select using three lenses (Gupta 2014): segment characteristics (size, growth, profit), competition (intensity), company fit (objectives, competencies).
Breadth spectrum (broad → narrow): undifferentiated (mass) → differentiated → concentrated (niche) → micromarketing → local → individual. Narrower = more relevance & loyalty but smaller volume & higher risk.
Persona = "the poster child of your segment" — demographics, behaviours, goals, pain points, channels. It keeps the team honest about who they're really designing for.
7b · Strategic vs Tacticaltargeting
Strategic = customising the offer to needs (compatibility & attractiveness). Tactical = reaching those customers cost-efficiently, matching values to profiles. The two must agree — no point targeting a segment you can't profitably reach.
7c · Build a PersonaPart A · optional
A persona makes the target segment vivid & decision-ready. Pin: demographics, behaviours, goals, pain points, motivations, preferred channels & devices. It anchors later choices — messaging, media, the customer journey — so the whole mix speaks to one believable person, not an abstraction.
8 · Positioningdistinctive place in the mind
Positioning = designing the offering & image to occupy a distinctive place in the target's mind; needs a frame of reference (the competitive set).
POP vs POD: Points of Parity = "table stakes" you must match to be considered; Points of Difference = what makes you the chosen one. Win on POD while covering POP.
Perceptual map — plot target perceptions on two opposed attribute axes relevant to the target; aim to stand alone (clear POD), not cluster with rivals. Build several maps on different attribute pairs if useful.
8b · Positioning Statementinternal doc, not a slogan
templateFor [target], [brand] is the [category]
that is the [POD] so they can [end benefit]
because [reason to believe].
Must be unique, memorable & credible. It is an internal compass, not ad copy. Part B requires two statements — current vs new (repositioning).
8c · Repositioningwhen & why
= redesigning the offer/image to shift the place in the mind. Driven by declining performance or environmental shifts; costly for established brands (many launch a new product/brand instead). Triggered by changes in POD, competitive frame, target market, product characteristics or value proposition. Existing customers may resist a shift they didn't ask for.
9 · Setting ObjectivesPart B
Marketing objectives must be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely (assignment caps at ≤2). Monetary goals (income, margin, ROI) vs strategic goals (sales volume, awareness, retention, social welfare for NFPs).
Objectives turn the diagnosis into a measurable target the mix must hit, and the metric you'll later track — they bridge Part A to Part B.
9b · Frame of Referencepositioning depends on it
No position exists in a vacuum — it's always relative to a competitive set. Pick the frame deliberately: a narrow frame makes your POD sharper but the market smaller; a broad frame grows the market but blurs difference. Get the frame wrong and the whole position misfires.
10 · The 7Ps Mixtactics
The marketing mix is the tactical layer that executes STP. 4Ps + 3 service Ps:
7PsProduct · Price · Place · Promotion
+ People · Physical evidence/Presence · Process
Treated as a "cake" — the elements are interdependent: change one P and there are implications for the others (an interaction table is taught). The mix must be internally consistent and aligned to the position. A premium price needs a premium product, selective place & aspirational promotion — mismatch any P and the offer feels incoherent.
11 · Implementation & Controlclose the loop
Part B "delivery plan" = a step-by-step action plan with short- & long-term milestones, visual mock-ups, and commercial implications (cost vs benefit, feasibility — e.g. an "impactful use of a $10–15K budget" for an NFP client).
Control closes the loop with marketing metrics (Side 2 §19) — market share, satisfaction/CLV/NPS, ROMI — reported on a dashboard. "If you can't measure it you can't improve it" (Drucker).
11b · The Client Planin practice
The group plan runs on one real client (NFP / school / haircare). Part A is researched, given verbal feedback in a progress meeting, then refined over the break; Part B builds straight on it. Live-partner groups can pitch at the end-of-semester competition. The skill rewarded is a coherent thread: the SWOT justifies the STP, the STP justifies the mix, the mix hits the objective.
12 · Strategy Checklistexam recall · side 1
- Marketing = create & deliver value; value = benefits − costs
- Core Process: diagnose → strategy → tactics → relationships → capture
- Macro = PESTLE → O/T · Micro = company/suppliers/etc → S/W
- Porter's 5 = segment attractiveness
- STP before the mix; feral = bottom-up via cultural intermediaries
- POP = table stakes · POD = why chosen
- Objectives are SMART; ≤2 in the plan