BUSN1010 Cheatsheet · Analytics in Business

University of Newcastle · memory aid cheat sheet for the final exam. Semester 2 final exam period, 16–27 November 2026. Full BUSN1010 study guide →

A4 landscape · two sides · six columns · ink + yellowBUSN1010 · Semester 2, 2026
BUSN1010
Analytics in Business
Memory Aid · University of Newcastle · Undergraduate
BUSN1010 cheatsheet QR code – open the full BUSN1010 study guide
Full guide + ask Sia
about BUSN1010
SIDE 1/2   EXAM MAP · METHOD CHOICE · FORMULAS · ASSUMPTIONSMEMORY AIDS2 2026 · Methods first

0 · Exam MapCOURSE DATA · BRIEF

Quizzes 30%Project 40%Final 30%
ComponentWeightFormat
Online Quizzes30%Individual online quizzes
Group-Based Analytics Project40%Group report + pre-recorded online presentation
Final Examination30%Restricted open book; one double-sided A4 memory aid

“This course has a RESTRICTED OPEN BOOK examination.” “The memory aid is a single double sided A4 sheet of handwritten or typed notes for use during the examination.” University of Newcastle 2026 Handbook, BUSN1010

1 · Answer SpineALL CHAPTERS

>DefinedecisionLabeldataChoosemethodCheckresultInterpretlimits
Exam sequence: decision → labels → method → independent check → bounded business claim.
Write before calculatingWrite after
Observational unit; variable and role; unit/category; population; comparisonResult in original units; uncertainty; practical consequence; scope limit
Sampling/model conditions; exact denominatorWhat changed data or design would change the action?

Sample mean · descriptive estimatex̄ = (1/n) Σᵢ₌₁ⁿ xᵢ

More rows do not repair exclusion of the relevant population. Separate a sample description, a population claim and a causal claim.

Exam move Carry one labelled observation from raw row to final sentence; a changed unit or denominator reveals the first broken link.

Sampling gate

PopulationSampleClaim limit
Variable, population and sample must remain separate analytical roles.

Variable: a characteristic recorded for each unit that can take different values or categories. Sample: the observed population subset used to estimate or compare its features.

2 · Describe Without HidingC2

Frequency distribution: counts or proportions across values, categories or intervals. It preserves category order or class meaning and exposes clustering, gaps, tails and unusual values.

Median: middle ordered observation; half at or below and half at or above. It resists distortion by a small number of extremes. Standard deviation: typical distance from the arithmetic mean, in the variable’s original units.

Sample standard deviations = √[Σᵢ₌₁ⁿ(xᵢ − x̄)² / (n − 1)]
Spread around x̄; sample degrees-of-freedom divisor.

QuestionUse/checkTrap
Composition or categories?Frequency table/display; preserve counts or proportionsAggregation hides a group
Quantitative shape?Distribution + centre + spreadCentre reported alone
Skew/extremes?Median plus full shapeMean treated as “typical”
Variability?SD with mean and unitsDifferent scales compared raw
same centrespread differs
Equal centres can conceal operationally important variation; inspect shape and spread together.

Chart/data audit

Before trusting displayAsk
ScaleDoes the axis or binning change the apparent difference?
RowsWhat is one observation? Are groups comparable?
SummaryAre centre, dispersion and shape all visible?
ScopeObserved records only, or a supported population claim?

When summaries conflict: return to ordered values or the frequency display. Explain whether skew, gaps or rare extremes pull the mean away from the median; then state how the spread changes the operational comparison. Do not call an isolated unusual value an error without checking its source.

Report centre and dispersion together, in the original transaction, time, cost or demand units.

3 · Spreadsheet + Power BIC3

Tidy data: each variable is a column, each observation a row, each value one cell. Cell reference: a formula address whose relative/absolute behaviour controls copying. Filter context: the active subset of data and relationships when a measure or visual is evaluated.

>RawdataTidytableCheckedformulaView +claimfilter · type · aggregationcopied reference · traceability
Prepare a clean analysis table, control calculations, then turn the view into reproducible evidence.
FailureDiagnostic check
Dashboard changes after filterRecord active subset and relationships; recompute a small case
Copied formula driftsInspect relative/absolute row and column behaviour
Unexpected totalCheck data type, grouping and aggregation level
Correct-looking visualTrace every filter, formula and transformation to the question

Standard score · software cross-checkz = (x − μ) / σ
Distance from μ in population standard-deviation units.

Software output is not self-validating. Preserve raw data, document transformations, check calculations, and state what the visual permits a manager to conclude.

Reproducibility ticket

Question + unitRaw source preserved
Variable typesTransformations logged
Formula copied correctlyFilter context named
Small case recalculatedClaim bounded

Declare → connect → check → conclude. Declare the data and decision scope; connect each formula or view to the business question; test the assumption most vulnerable to the active filter; conclude whether the action is intact, narrowed or requires a different choice.

For a dashboard claim, preserve the labels and denominator through every recode and subset. Compare the unfiltered result with the filtered view, then state whether the difference is intended business segmentation or an analysis defect.

Exam move If a value changes, isolate whether the cause is the business subset, formula, data type or aggregation before interpreting it.

4 · Probability RulesC4

Event: specified set of outcomes. Name events in words before symbols. A complement excludes the event; a union answers either-event; an intersection answers both-event. Remove overlap when events are not disjoint.

Conditional probabilityP(A | B) = P(A ∩ B) / P(B)
Condition B fixes the reference set and denominator.

Independence: learning that one event occurred does not change the probability of the other. Treat independence as a model claim to be checked, not a synonym for disjoint events.

>>>All outcomesCondition B: denominatorA ∩ B: numerator
Condition first, then count the joint event inside that restricted group.
Words in questionSet operationCheck
not AComplementEverything outside A
A or BUnionRemove shared overlap
A and BIntersectionBoth conditions hold
A given BConditionalDenominator is B
Independent?Compare conditional and unconditionalDoes knowing B alter A?

Do not reverse the question

P(cancel |dissatisfied)P(dissatisfied |cancel)different denominators→ different questions
Reversing the condition is invalid unless base rates and the joint event justify equality.

Transfer check: change one feature of the process, then recheck the event definitions, denominator and independence claim. Preserve conditions that did not change; revise only the calculation or interpretation that depends on the changed fact.

EvidenceClaim
P(A | B) differs from P(A)Knowing B changes A; independence is not supported
Condition reversedA new question; recalculate using the new reference group

5 · Random VariablesC5

Random variable: numerical mapping from uncertain outcomes to values. Define the value, support and process before choosing a distribution. Expected value: probability-weighted long-run average under the stated model.

Expected valueE(X) = Σₓ xP(X = x)
Keep the payoff/cost/demand unit attached to each x.

Normal standardisationz = (x − μ) / σ
Positive z is above μ; magnitude is distance in σ units.

ModelUse whenAssumption alarm
Binomial countFixed number of comparable trials; X counts successesChanging success probability or dependent outcomes
NormalContinuous, symmetric bell-shaped process specified by μ and σSmall discrete count or wrong process mechanism
General discrete XPossible numeric outcomes and probabilities are statedProbabilities/support incomplete
>Define process + supportFixed comparabletrials → binomialContinuous +symmetric→ normal
A familiar numerical fit cannot repair a distribution that mismatches the random mechanism.

Interpret probability in business units. Expected value describes a long-run average, not a guaranteed single outcome.

6 · EstimationC6

Sampling distribution: distribution of a statistic across repeated samples from the same sampling process. Standard error: its standard deviation.

Confidence interval for meanx̄ ± zα/2 · σ/√n = estimate ± critical value × SE

StatisticStandarderrorInterval +scope
Estimator → standard error → interval, interpreted only for the supported population.

7 · Hypothesis TestsC7

Null hypothesis: parameter claim used as the reference model. State null and alternative in parameter language; set the decision rule before calculation; then check conditions and compute.

One-sample test statisticz = (x̄ − μ₀) / (σ/√n)
Observed difference from μ₀, scaled by the null standard error.

P-value: assuming the null model, probability of a statistic at least as incompatible with that model as observed. It is not P(H₀ true) and not the chance that a business action succeeds.

Null +conditionsEstimate +p-valueBusinessimportancereport as three distinct claims
Statistical evidence does not replace effect size, cost or operational importance.
StageWhat earns the line
FrameParameter, H₀/H₁, direction, population
ConditionsSampling/model assumptions and denominator
EvidenceEstimate, uncertainty, test statistic, p-value
DecisionApply the preset rule; use cautious language
ActionCompare effect with business consequences

8 · Regression + ForecastsC8

Simple linear predictionŷ = b₀ + b₁x  ·  residual e = y − ŷ

Correlation is unit-free direction/strength of linear association. Slope b₁ is fitted response change per one predictor unit, within the model. Inspect residual structure and extremes; state the prediction domain.

e = y − ŷprediction domain only
Plot, interpret coefficients in units, inspect residuals, then limit prediction and causal language.
ReviewBoundary
AssociationDoes not assign cause
InterceptInterpret only if x = 0 is meaningful
SlopeAttached to response/predictor units and fitted design
ForecastSeparate trend, recurring seasonality and horizon
ExtrapolationNeeds added stability/design evidence
https://www.asksia.ai/cheatsheet/uon-busn1010 · Full BUSN1010 study guide →
Forward this to your tutorial group
MEMORY AIDYour exam allows one A4 memory aid. Check the course outline for sides and format before you print.
Shared by ________
v2 · 2026-10-16
Semester 2 final exam period, 16–27 November 2026.
BUSN1010
Analytics in Business · Worked Drills
Memory Aid · University of Newcastle · Undergraduate
BUSN1010 cheatsheet QR code – open the full BUSN1010 study guide
Full guide + ask Sia
about BUSN1010
SIDE 2/2   FIVE WORKED CASES · TRAPS · METHOD CHOOSER · FAST RECALLMEMORY AIDS2 2026 · Drills

W1 · Sampling ClaimC1 WORKED

Case. A retailer wants to explain declining repeat purchases but has a convenience sample of recent app users and no observations from former customers.

recent appusers observedformer customersnot observedsample ≠ target population
Selection coverage is the first broken link; extra rows from the same frame do not repair it.
StepWorked resolution
1 DefineDecision: explain declining repeat purchases. Unit: customer. Name variable roles and units.
2 CheckPopulation relevant to repeat purchases includes former customers; the convenience sample excludes them.
3 ConcludeDescribe observed recent app users only; do not generalise explanation to all customers or claim cause.
4 Change neededA sampling design covering the relevant population, including former customers.

If a quantitative variable is observedx̄ = (1/n)Σxᵢ   describes the sample; representativeness governs population scope.

Answer line “The observed sample can describe ___, but it cannot support ___ because ___ is excluded.”

Sampling error vs design error

Random uncertaintySelection/measurement limit
May shrink with an appropriate larger sampleCan remain even with many rows
Quantified by SE/CI under assumptionsRequires changed coverage, measurement or design

Always state which error your method addresses.

One-line definitions

SESD of a statistic’s sampling distribution
CIRepeated-sampling range designed to capture a parameter at a stated long-run rate
SlopeFitted response change per predictor unit
ResidualObserved response minus fitted response
Practical significanceOperational/economic importance of an estimated effect

When unsure, identify the first unsupported move and repair only the inference that depends on it.

W2 · Same Mean, Different RiskC2 WORKED

Case. Two stores report the same average transaction value. One has a tightly grouped customer mix; the other combines many small purchases with rare large orders.

tight storesmall + rare largeequal mean ≠ equal shape/spread
Compare the distribution, median and standard deviation before treating the stores as alike.
StepWorked resolution
1 DisplayBuild a frequency display that preserves transaction scale and unusual values.
2 CentreThe shared mean alone is insufficient; report median where extremes distort “typical”.
3 SpreadCompute and interpret SD in transaction-value units; compare clustering and tail.
4 DecideOperational variability differs even if average transaction value matches.

Spread checks = √[Σ(xᵢ − x̄)²/(n − 1)]

Trap “Same average” is not “same customer mix”. A centre without shape and spread can hide the managerial difference.

Spreadsheet verification

Raw rowsHand checkSW check
Recalculate a small case; inspect formula references, filters, types and aggregation if results disagree.
Preserve raw dataDocument recoding
Name filter contextTrace copied references
Check unitsBound final claim

Debug in order: verify tidy rows and data types; test the copied reference; record the filter; inspect aggregation; reproduce one small total. Change one feature at a time.

If the number changes when…Investigate
A filter is appliedSubset and relationships in filter context
A formula is filled down/acrossRelative versus absolute reference behaviour
A visual groups recordsObservation level and aggregation

W3 · Conditional DirectionC4 WORKED

Case. A service team confuses the chance that a dissatisfied customer cancels with the chance that a cancelled account belonged to a dissatisfied customer.

P(cancel |dissatisfied)denominator:dissatisfiedP(dissatisfied |cancel)denominator:cancelledsame intersectiondifferent reference group
The numerator may involve the same joint event, but the denominator changes the meaning.

Write the condition firstP(A | B) = P(A ∩ B)/P(B)  ≠  P(B | A) in general

StepWorked resolution
1 NameA = cancellation; B = dissatisfaction. Keep the outcome words attached.
2 RestrictFor “cancel given dissatisfied”, restrict the reference set to B.
3 CountUse the joint event A ∩ B as numerator and B as denominator.
4 InterpretRead result as a proportion within dissatisfied customers; do not reverse.
5 IndependenceAsk whether knowing dissatisfaction changes cancellation probability.

Answer line “Among customers in B, the probability of A is ___.” The opening phrase protects the denominator.

Probability error clinic

ErrorRepair
Adds either-event counts with overlapIdentify and remove intersection
Multiplies automaticallyCheck whether conditioning/independence is justified
Treats disjoint as independentAsk whether learning one event changes the other
Reverses A and BRewrite the conditioning group in words

Changed-assumption drill: if the events or reference group change, redraw the restricted set before recalculating. If only one condition changes, preserve unrelated facts and state whether the business action remains, narrows, or requires a different choice.

Among [condition B],the probability of [event A] is …
Use the sentence as a final denominator check.

W4 · Choose the Random ModelC5 WORKED

Case. A manager treats a count of customer responses as normally distributed although the process has a small number of trials, changing success probabilities and dependent outcomes.

Count of successes?Fixed nBinarySame pIndep.any failed condition:do not force binomial or normal
Match the outcome definition and process assumptions before using a familiar distribution.
StepWorked resolution
1 Define XNumber of customer responses; state its possible values and unit.
2 DiagnoseSmall fixed count alone does not justify normal; changing p and dependence break comparable-trial logic.
3 Reject shortcutDo not repair the wrong mechanism by a numerical fit.
4 Re-designSpecify a process/model whose assumptions match the trials before probability calculation.

If outcomes and probabilities are validE(X) = Σₓ xP(X=x)  ·  probability-weighted long-run average

If a normal model is justifiedz = (x − μ)/σ  ·  distance from μ in σ units

Trap Expected value is a long-run centre, not the response guaranteed on the next trial.

Distribution decision

Observed variableFirst check
Discrete countSupport, fixed trials, success definition, p, dependence
Continuous valueShape, symmetry, μ/σ meaning, relevant domain
Payoff/cost tableAll possible x and P(X=x); probabilities match process

Interpretation ticket: name X and its units; justify the process; show the calculation; report probability, standardised distance or long-run average—not a guaranteed outcome.

ProcessModel +calculationBusinessunits
Define process → choose model → interpret the result in its original business unit.

W5 · Narrow Interval, Weak ScopeC6 WORKED

Case. A business reports a narrow confidence interval from a large transaction file, but the transactions come from a single promotional day and are not representative of ordinary demand.

narrow sampling uncertaintysingle promotion day ≠ ordinary demandselection limit remainsprecision is not representativeness
A tight interval can be precise for an irrelevant sampling process.

Interval calculationx̄ ± zα/2(σ/√n)  =  estimate ± critical value × SE

StepWorked resolution
1 TargetParameter concerns ordinary demand, not only the promotional day.
2 Sampling modelRepeated samples must arise from the same relevant process; here coverage is misaligned.
3 PrecisionLarge file may reduce SE under its model and produce a narrow interval.
4 BoundaryCI does not absorb selection bias, measurement error or an irrelevant population.
5 RepairCollect a representative sampling process for ordinary demand, then estimate.

Answer line “The interval is narrow under ___, but the population claim fails because ___.”

Test interpretation drill

Case. A campaign team declares success because a test is statistically significant although the estimated improvement is too small to cover implementation cost.

Statisticalevidenceestimate · p-valuePracticalimportanceeffect · cost · actionboth needed for a recommendation
A test decision and a managerial decision answer different questions.
Report separatelyCorrect boundary
Estimate + uncertaintyWhat effect was observed and how precisely?
P-value under H₀Not the probability H₀ is true
Operational consequenceDoes effect cover cost or matter in context?

9 · Method ChooserFAST RECALL

If asked to…Choose / writeFirst trap
Describe observed quantitative valuesFrequency shape + centre + spread; x̄, median, s as appropriateCentre alone
Standardise an observationz = (x−μ)/σWrong μ/σ or model
Find long-run average of discrete XE(X)=ΣxP(X=x)Incomplete support/probabilities
Condition on an eventP(A|B)=P(A∩B)/P(B)Reversing denominator
Estimate a population meanx̄ ± critical value × SESelection/design error
Test a mean claimH₀/H₁, conditions, z, p-value, effect, consequenceP-value misread
Predict a responseŷ=b₀+b₁x; residual y−ŷExtrapolation/causal claim
Audit dashboard outputTidy rows, references, filter context, aggregation, manual checkTrusting display
>What is the task?DescribeProbabilityInferencePredictAuditDecide
After choosing, name assumptions, calculate, cross-check and interpret within population/design scope.

10 · Regression + Forecast ClinicC8

Scenario. Sales and advertising rise together over time, while the fitted line also absorbs expansion into new stores and a strong seasonal peak.

trend + season+ store expansionassociation ≠ cause
Time trend, recurring seasonality and store expansion can move with both variables.
WriteDo not write
“Within the fitted data, one predictor unit is associated with b₁ response units.”“Advertising caused b₁ more sales.”
Residual = observed − predicted; inspect pattern and extremes.“A fitted line proves stability outside the observed range.”
https://www.asksia.ai/cheatsheet/uon-busn1010 · Full BUSN1010 study guide →
Forward this to your tutorial group
MEMORY AIDYour exam allows one A4 memory aid. Check the course outline for sides and format before you print.
Shared by ________
v2 · 2026-10-16
Semester 2 final exam period, 16–27 November 2026.

Want one for YOUR exact syllabus?

Sia is your free desktop study agent. Drop your University of Newcastle BUSN1010 slides — Sia builds a sheet tailored to YOUR exam. Better than this library because it knows YOUR materials.

↓ Download Sia · Free