Accounting for Decision Making
Side 1 of 2 · In-Semester Test
closed book · CVP & budgeting
0 · Exam Blueprintread first
Two closed-book sit-downs. This side = the In-Semester Test (25%, 60 min, Modules 1–5 / Ch 1–3) — the management / decision-making half: CVP + budgeting + the intro. MCQ + short answer.
Flip over = the Final (50%, 120 min, Modules 6–13) — the financial half. The final is a MANDATORY 45% hurdle: score <45% on it and you FAIL the unit even if your aggregate is ≥50% (transcript caps at 49).
Both tests are closed book — this is a from-memory revision tool, not a bring-in. Marks come from setting the calculation up right: recognise the type, grab the formula, lay out the schedule.
1 · What Accounting IsM1–2 · Ch1
Accounting = identifying, measuring, recording & communicating economic information so users can make informed decisions — "the language of business."
Financial vs management
| Financial | Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Users | external | internal |
| Rules | standards, audited | none, flexible |
| Focus | past / historical | future / plans |
| Output | the statements | CVP, budgets |
CVP & budgeting (this side) are MANAGEMENT accounting; the three statements (flip side) are FINANCIAL. Students mislabel because BUSS1030 teaches them in the reverse of the usual order — management first, financial second.
1b · Structures & ConceptsCh1
| Form | Liability | Legal entity? |
|---|---|---|
| Sole trader | unlimited | no |
| Partnership | unlimited, joint | no |
| Company | limited | yes |
Pick on liability, capital access, control, continuity, tax. A sole trader is a separate ACCOUNTING entity but NOT a separate legal entity — entity concept ≠ legal separation.
Five core concepts: entity (business separate from owner) · transaction (exchange, from a source document — invoice, receipt, EFT) · monetary unit (recorded in $) · historical cost (record at the amount exchanged when it occurred). Trap: land bought for $100k stays at $100k even if now worth $130k — cost is verifiable, market value isn't.
Business types: service (sells time) · merchandising (buys & resells goods, holds inventory) · manufacturing (converts raw materials). The structure choice and business type set which budgets and statements apply.
2 · Ethics & the PlanM2–3 · Ch1–2
AU bodies (CAANZ, CPA, IPA) adopt APES 110. Five fundamental principles: Integrity · Objectivity · Professional competence & due care · Confidentiality · Professional behaviour. Apply the framework: spot threats, use the reasonable & informed third-party test.
The business plan
3 purposes: (1) organise the business; (2) be a benchmark for actual performance; (3) help obtain funding.
5 parts: description · marketing plan · operating plan · environmental-management plan · financial plan.
Trap: examiners separate the 3 purposes from the 5 parts — don't conflate them. A short-answer "discuss each" wants a definition plus how it contributes to success.
3 · Cost BehaviourM3 · Ch2 · CVP input
| Cost | In total | Per unit |
|---|---|---|
| Variable | changes w/ volume | constant |
| Fixed | constant | falls as vol ↑ |
| Mixed | has both a fixed & a variable part | |
Relevant range · the activity band where these behaviour assumptions hold.
Trap: the word "constant" flips — variable is constant PER UNIT (varies in total); fixed is constant IN TOTAL (varies per unit). Never unitise a fixed cost for a decision. (BUSS1030 does NOT examine high-low or cost-estimation methods.)
4 · CVP AnalysisM3 · Ch2 · HEAVY
A planning tool: how volume, price, variable cost & fixed cost drive profit. Everything hangs off the contribution margin — what each unit gives towards fixed costs first, then profit.
Core CVP formulasCM/unit = Price − VC/unit (P − V)
CM ratio = CM/unit ÷ Price
Profit = CM/unit × units − Fixed costs
BE units = Fixed costs ÷ CM/unit
BE $ = Fixed costs ÷ CM ratio (or BE units × P)
Target units = (Fixed + target profit) ÷ CM/unit
Target $ = (Fixed + target profit) ÷ CM ratio
MoS = actual sales − break-even sales
MoS % = MoS ÷ actual sales
At break-even, total CM exactly = total fixed costs, so profit = 0. Below it = loss; above it, every extra unit adds one CM to profit.
4b · CVP Workedauthor's numbers
Set-up: Harbour Candles sells a boxed candle for $40; variable cost $24/box; fixed costs $240,000/yr.
- (a) CM/unit = 40 − 24 = $16
- (b) CM ratio = 16 ÷ 40 = 0.40 (40%)
- (c) BE units = 240,000 ÷ 16 = 15,000 boxes
- (d) BE $ = 240,000 ÷ 0.40 = $600,000 (= 15,000 × $40 ✓)
- (e) Profit at 20,000 boxes = 16×20,000 − 240,000 = $80,000
- (f) Units for $100,000 profit = (240,000+100,000) ÷ 16 = 21,250 boxes
- (g) MoS at 20,000 = 20,000 − 15,000 = 5,000 boxes (25%)
CM income statement
| Sales (20,000×$40) | 800,000 |
| − Variable (20,000×$24) | (480,000) |
| Contribution margin | 320,000 |
| − Fixed costs | (240,000) |
| Net income | 80,000 |
The contribution-margin format groups by behaviour (variable then fixed), not by function — it's the management view that feeds CVP. Every box past break-even adds its full $16 CM to profit: at 21,250 boxes profit is exactly the $100k target; at 20,000 it is $80k.
After-tax targets (if asked): gross up first — required pre-tax profit = after-tax ÷ (1 − tax rate), then use the normal target-units formula. Want $70k after 30% tax ⇒ pre-tax = 70,000 / 0.70 = $100,000 ⇒ units = (240,000+100,000)/16 = 21,250 boxes. The tax sits outside the core CVP machinery — gross up, then plug in as usual.
4c · Sensitivity Rulesclassic short-answer
Change ONE parameter, hold the rest — state the direction of (a) profit and (b) break-even. Break-even moves opposite to CM.
| Change | CM/unit | Profit | BE |
|---|---|---|---|
| VC/unit ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
| Price ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
| Fixed ↑ | — | ↓ | ↑ |
| Volume ↑ | — | ↑ | — |
Worked: if Harbour's VC rises $24→$26, CM falls 16→14 ⇒ BE rises 15,000 → 240,000/14 = 17,143 boxes and profit at 20,000 drops to 14×20,000−240,000 = $40,000. A fixed-cost change moves BE but leaves CM untouched.
Trap: answer BOTH halves — students give profit but forget BE moves the opposite way; and a fixed-cost change does NOT affect CM/unit.
5 · BudgetingM4 · Ch3 · EXAMINED
A budget = a quantitative, forward-looking plan expressing the business plan in $. Why: plan · coordinate · communicate · motivate · control (the benchmark for actual results).
Master-budget sequence
The chain (start with sales)Sales budget
→ Purchases budget (with desired ending inventory)
→ Cash-collection schedule
→ Cash budget
→ Projected income statement
Key identitiesSales $ = units × selling price
Purchases = sales + desired end inv − beg inv
Cash in month = Σ(sales × that month's collect %)
Closing cash = opening + receipts − payments
Trap — cash ≠ revenue. Revenue is recognised when earned (accrual); cash only when received. Credit sales hit revenue now but cash later. Bad-debt % is lost cash — never add it back.
5b · Sales & Purchasesauthor's numbers
Set-up: Ridgeway Bikes expects unit sales of 500 (Apr), 600 (May), 700 (Jun) at $300; ending inventory = 20% of next month's sales; opening April inventory 100 units.
Sales budget
Apr 500×$300 = $150,000; May $180,000; Jun $210,000 ⇒ quarter $540,000. This is revenue earned/billed — NOT cash received.
Purchases (units)
Purchases = sales + desired end inv − beg inv
| Apr | May | |
|---|---|---|
| Sales units | 500 | 600 |
| + End inv (20% next) | 120 | 140 |
| − Beg inv | (100) | (120) |
| = Purchases | 520 | 620 |
Trap: ending inventory uses next month's sales; subtract (don't add) beginning inventory. End inv of one month = beg inv of the next.
Rearranged inventory identity: Beginning + Purchases = Sales + Ending. The purchases budget just solves it for purchases — buy enough to cover this month's sales AND restock to the desired ending level. A merchandiser buys finished goods; a service business has no purchases budget at all.
For June: sales 700 + end inv (20% of July, say 20% × 800 = 160) − beg inv 140 = 720 units. Multiply purchase units by cost/unit for the dollar purchases budget that feeds the cash-payments schedule.
5c · Cash Collectionsauthor's numbers
Converts credit sales into cash actually received by applying the collection pattern with a lag. Sum every inflow that LANDS in the target month.
Cash in month M= cash% × Sales(M)
+ Σ over each lag k: credit% × Sales(M−k) × collect%(k)
Set-up: Ridgeway sales $150k (Apr), $180k (May), $210k (Jun); all on credit; collected 60% in the month of sale, 30% next month, 8% third month, 2% bad debt.
| Collected in | From | $ |
|---|---|---|
| Jun · 60% Jun | 0.60×210k | 126,000 |
| Jun · 30% May | 0.30×180k | 54,000 |
| Jun · 8% Apr | 0.08×150k | 12,000 |
| = June cash | 192,000 |
The 2% never arrives — it's bad debt, not carried forward. June cash ($192k) ≠ June sales ($210k): the gap is the receivables build-up.
#1 error: mis-lagging — putting "month after sale" collections in the wrong column; or collecting 100% and ignoring the bad-debt remainder; or forgetting the immediate cash-sales portion when some sales are for cash.
Mixed cash & credit: if sales are, say, 50% cash / 50% credit, the cash half is collected in full in the month of sale and only the credit half is lagged. Build the schedule one source-month at a time, then sum down each collection column.
5d · Projected Incomeaccrual basis
The performance benchmark (the cash budget is the liquidity benchmark). Built on accrual sales (from the sales budget), NOT the cash-collection figures.
| Budgeted sales | 540,000 |
| − Budgeted COGS | (324,000) |
| Gross profit | 216,000 |
| − Operating expenses | (150,000) |
| Budgeted net income | 66,000 |
Trap: never feed the cash-collection numbers into the projected income statement — use accrual sales revenue. Actual vs budget = the variance you investigate (BUSS1030 stays at "compare & explain", no formal variance formulas).
The projected income statement is accrual: revenue when earned, expenses when incurred — so depreciation appears here but not in the cash budget, and credit sales appear in full even though the cash arrives later. Pair it with the cash budget to see both performance and liquidity before the period starts.
5e · Cash Budgetliquidity benchmark
Cash budget identityOpening cash
+ Total receipts (from the collection schedule)
− Total payments
= Closing cash
Worked (June): opening $40,000 + collections $192,000 − payments $200,000 = closing $32,000.
If closing falls below the minimum the budget flags a shortfall → delay payments, accelerate collections, cut spending, draw on finance, or inject owner capital. A surplus ⇒ repay or invest. The cash budget is what tells the owner when they can pay a bill — something the income statement hides.
Then compare actual results to this budget benchmark, investigate the differences, and revise the plan — the planning loop the whole master budget exists to serve.
5f · Budget Trapsdon't lose marks
- Cash ≠ revenue — accrual sales now, cash collected later
- Ending-inventory % uses next month's sales; subtract beginning inventory
- Bad-debt % is lost cash — don't carry it forward
- Line the collection lags up to the right month
- Projected income statement uses earned sales, never collections
- Depreciation is NOT a cash payment in the cash budget
IST Formula Beltmemorise
CM/unit = P − V · CM ratio = CM ÷ P
Profit = CM/unit × units − Fixed
BE units = Fixed ÷ CM/unit
BE $ = Fixed ÷ CM ratio
Target units = (Fixed + profit) ÷ CM/unit
Target $ = (Fixed + profit) ÷ CM ratio
MoS = actual sales − BE sales
MoS % = MoS ÷ actual sales
Sales $ = units × price
Purchases = sales + end inv − beg inv
Cash(M) = Σ(sales × collect %)
Closing cash = open + receipts − payments
Direction CardMCQ reflexes
- VC/unit ↑ ⇒ CM ↓ ⇒ profit ↓, BE ↑
- Price ↑ ⇒ CM ↑ ⇒ profit ↑, BE ↓
- Fixed ↑ ⇒ CM same, profit ↓, BE ↑
- Higher CM ratio ⇒ fewer sales $ to break even
- Variable cost = constant per unit; fixed = constant in total