USyd · BUSS2000 · Leading and Influencing in Business

BUSS2000: nail every assessment, not just read the notes

Your complete guide to University of Sydney's leading and influencing in business unit. See where the marks are, work real practice questions, and study with an AI tutor that knows BUSS2000.

6 credit points Level 2 undergrad Offered S1 / S2 ~35% exams Business School

Sia generates BUSS2000 practice questions, works through them step by step, and quizzes you on the material the heaviest assessments weight most heavily.

Which thesis is stronger?

Sharpen your argument

Pick one · the reasoning is revealed after you answer

A manager wants to raise a team's intrinsic motivation, so proposes: 'Attach a cash bonus to every task; people are most motivated when each action pays.' Using Self-Determination Theory, which response is the strongest critique?

Why this one wins

Self-Determination Theory (Deci and Ryan) locates intrinsic motivation in three needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness.

Tangible, contingent extrinsic rewards can be experienced as controlling, shifting the perceived locus of causation outward and undermining autonomy.
Well-established findings show contingent rewards can crowd out intrinsic motivation for tasks that were already intrinsically interesting.
So the strongest critique (option index 1) is that per-task cash risks undermining the very intrinsic motivation the manager wants to build.

The weaker choice: Assuming more reward always means more motivation. Self-Determination Theory distinguishes controlling from informational rewards; contingent cash on already-interesting work often reduces, not raises, intrinsic motivation. watch this!

your whole grade
Where your grade comes from Exams 35% · Assignment 30% · Presentations 20% · Participation 10% · Quizzes 5%

One exam decides 35% of your grade. This whole page is built around that.

Overview

What BUSS2000 is, and where it sits

BUSS2000 is the University of Sydney Business School's second-year leadership and self-management core. Unlike the analytical commerce units, it is a reflective and applied unit built on the Bloom-Fink framework (Describe, Analyse, Apply, Evaluate) that structures every assessment. Theme 1 turns the lens inward (individual differences, personality and emotional intelligence, motivation and goal-setting, career values and ethics); later themes turn outward to leading and influencing others.

The work is writing and presentation, not calculation. The major individual assignment applies design-thinking and Theme-1 theory to a critical self-analysis and career road-map, and a team presentation tests applied communication. The final exam is two open-ended reflective essay questions rather than problem-solving, so the whole unit rewards structured argument grounded in the module theories.

It builds the self-leadership and interpersonal foundation that later management, strategy and professional-practice units assume.

How it differs from its first-year siblings. Where the quantitative commerce core (economics, quantitative methods) rewards derivation and calculation, BUSS2000 rewards reflective and applied writing against the module's behavioural-science theories. The skills are complementary halves of the degree.

Official outline: sydney.edu.au · BUSS2000 outline. Always treat the official outline and the exam timetable as authoritative.

Difficulty & time commitment

Is BUSS2000 hard, and how much time does it take?

BUSS2000 is manageable if you keep a weekly rhythm and treat the back half as the main event. The pattern is consistent: it starts gently and steepens, and the heaviest assessment is the part that separates grades.

Difficulty
2.6 / 5
Moderate. Gentle early, demanding back half. Hard to fail with steady work; a top grade takes consistent practice.
Coursework
65%
Coursework carries most of the grade. The heaviest single component is the exam at 35%.
Weekly time
~9 hrs
Around 9 hours per week including class, across lectures, study and assessment.
Theme 1 (understanding yourself)reflective, front-loaded
Themes 2 to 3 (leading and influencing others)applied, presentation-heavy

The difficulty curve and the assessment weighting point the same way: the back half is harder and worth more. Front-loading effort there is the highest-return decision in the unit.

Is this unit for you

Who tends to do well, and who tends to struggle

You will likely do well if

  • You engage honestly with the reflective work and can turn self-analysis into structured, theory-backed argument.
  • You reference the module theories (Self-Determination Theory, goal-setting, emotional intelligence, personality frameworks) precisely rather than writing generic opinion.
  • You treat the group presentation and continuous engagement seriously, since together they are a large share of the grade.

You may struggle if

  • You dismiss it as a soft unit and write unstructured reflection with no theory; the rubrics reward the Describe-Analyse-Apply-Evaluate structure.
  • You skip workshops and miss the 80% attendance eligibility requirement for the engagement mark.
  • You leave the reflective final under-practised, expecting a factual exam rather than two open-ended essays.
do this ↘
What top students do differently
  • Use the Bloom-Fink cycle explicitly in every assessment: describe the experience, analyse with a named theory, apply it, then evaluate.
  • Ground each reflection in a specific module reading or framework rather than general self-talk.
  • Rehearse the presentation for genuine oral-communication marks, not just content coverage.

Syllabus

The 11 topics, topic by topic

The exam-weight marker on each topic shows where the marks concentrate. The amber topics carry the highest exam weight.

T1 · Reflection & the Bloom-Fink Framework

Module 1 · Why BUSS2000 is different · blended learning & graduate qualities · self-leadership · the Bloom-Fink reflection framework (Describe → Analyse → Apply → Evaluate) that structures every assessment.

Lower exam weight

T2 · Individual Differences: Personality & Emotional Intelligence

Module 2 · Theories of human behaviour (Freud, behaviourism, social-cognitive) · cognitive ability · personality (Big Five, HEXACO, MBTI critique, bright vs dark traits) · emotional intelligence (Salovey & Mayer four-branch model).

Lower exam weight

T3 · Motivation & Goal-Setting

Module 3 · What motivation is · goal-setting theory (SMART) · self-efficacy · self-determination theory (intrinsic vs extrinsic continuum; autonomy-competence-relatedness) · power of small wins · meaningful work.

Lower exam weight

T4 · Career Goals, Values & Ethics

Module 4 · Career theories (boundaryless/protean, job mobility) · SMART career goals · values & value congruence (person-organisation fit) · ethical frameworks for resolving workplace dilemmas.

Lower exam weight

T5 · Diversity & Culture

Module 6 · Diversity (surface vs deep, iceberg) · culture & socialisation · social categorisation, perception & discrimination (cognitive vs structural) · stereotypes · dual-pathway model · cultural competence (5-element development).

Lower exam weight

T6 · Team & Group Processes

Module 7 · Groups vs teams & team types · models of group development (Tuckman & Jensen 5-stage; Gersick punctuated-equilibrium; IPO) · roles, norms, cohesion · social loafing, groupthink, conflict · the bad-apple problem.

Lower exam weight

T7 · Managing Perceptions & Conflict

Module 8 · Perception & attribution biases (fundamental attribution error, self-serving bias, halo effect, stereotyping) · managing task vs relationship vs process conflict in teams.

Lower exam weight

T8 · Leadership, Power & Influence

Module 9 · Leadership theories (trait, behavioural, situational/contingency, transformational) · authentic/ethical leadership & leading with humility · French & Raven's six bases of power · influence strategies.

Lower exam weight

T9 · Communication & Feedback

Module 10 · Persuasive communication (ethos/pathos/logos) · the communication process · receiving messages & active listening (listening blocks) · giving and receiving feedback.

Lower exam weight

T10 · Career Sustainability: Managing Relationships & Stress

Module 11 · Stress & work-related stress · Karasek (1979) job demands-control model · mindfulness & wellbeing (Good et al. 2016) · the corporate athlete and sustainable high performance.

Lower exam weight

T11 · Job Search & Employability (Theme 2 & 3 in Practice)

Modules 5 & 12 · Marketing yourself (tailored resume/cover letter, VMock) · interview types · behavioural questions & the STAR method · motivational questions linking back to Theme-1 self-knowledge.

Lower exam weight

How it's assessed

Assessment structure

ComponentWeightFormat & timing
Early Feedback Task (EFT) Online Quiz5%Online quiz, 20 MCQ on content + readings from Modules/Workshops 1–3; due end of Week 3; readings may be assessed.
Unit Engagement10%Preparation (weekly quiz + pre-workshop tasks), attendance and active participation; eligibility gate = attend ≥80% (10 of 12) workshops; assessed from Week 3; unexcused absence = 0 for that workshop.
Design the Future YOU30%Individual written assignment applying design-thinking + Theme 1 (understanding self) theories/readings to a critical self-analysis and career road-map (strengths, values, ethics, person-organisation fit).
Team & Individual Presentation20%Live team presentation (incl. Q&A) in workshop on a Theme 2/3 topic; team mark 15% + individual mark 5% (oral communication & presentation); ~4–5 per team; every member must present.
Final Exam35%Closed-book, formal exam period; 2 hours + 10 minutes reading; TWO open-ended reflective essay questions; one A4 single-sided handwritten note sheet permitted; covers any module/reading (exam date subject to confirmation against the official USyd S2 2026 timetable).
Early Feedback Task (EFT) Online Quiz5%
Online quiz, 20 MCQ on content + readings from Modules/Workshops 1–3; due end of Week 3; readings may be assessed.
Unit Engagement10%
Preparation (weekly quiz + pre-workshop tasks), attendance and active participation; eligibility gate = attend ≥80% (10 of 12) workshops; assessed from Week 3; unexcused absence = 0 for that workshop.
Design the Future YOU30%
Individual written assignment applying design-thinking + Theme 1 (understanding self) theories/readings to a critical self-analysis and career road-map (strengths, values, ethics, person-organisation fit).
Team & Individual Presentation20%
Live team presentation (incl. Q&A) in workshop on a Theme 2/3 topic; team mark 15% + individual mark 5% (oral communication & presentation); ~4–5 per team; every member must present.
Final Exam35%
Closed-book, formal exam period; 2 hours + 10 minutes reading; TWO open-ended reflective essay questions; one A4 single-sided handwritten note sheet permitted; covers any module/reading (exam date subject to confirmation against the official USyd S2 2026 timetable).
  • Pass on a weighted average of at least 50%. Any component eligibility requirement is noted per component; confirm against the official unit outline.
read this! If you read nothing else

This is a coursework unit. Coursework carries 65% of the grade and the final exam is the single heaviest piece at 35%, so steady work across the semester decides your result more than any one sitting.

How to actually pass it

A weekly rhythm, two checklists, and the traps to avoid

The unit rewards consistency over cramming, and practice over re-reading. Here is the loop that works, then what to have nailed before each exam.

The weekly loop

Before the workshop
Complete the pre-work and weekly quiz and read the module theory so you can apply it, not just recall it.
In the workshop
Participate actively; attendance and contribution feed the engagement mark and the 80% eligibility gate.
Across the semester
Keep a reflection log tied to module theories so the major self-analysis assignment writes from evidence, not memory.

Before the mid-semester checklist

Before the final heaviest topics

  • Prepare to write two open-ended reflective essays: rehearse applying named theories to a scenario, not reciting facts.
  • Build a one-page map of the core Theme-1 theories (personality, emotional intelligence, motivation, Self-Determination Theory, goal-setting) with a worked application of each.
  • Practise the Describe-Analyse-Apply-Evaluate structure under timed conditions.
  • Revisit the assignment feedback so the exam essays avoid the same rubric gaps.

The mistakes that cost marks

01

Writing opinion instead of theory. The rubrics reward reflection structured through named module frameworks. Generic self-talk without theory sits at the bottom of the marking scale.

02

Missing the attendance gate. The engagement component requires attending at least 80% of workshops. Skipping them forfeits both the mark and eligibility.

03

Treating the final as factual. The final is two open-ended reflective essays. Preparing for a fact-recall exam leaves you unready for applied argument under time pressure.

Teaching team

Who teaches BUSS2000

The bios below are factual. We do not rate lecturers; any star ratings are submitted by students who have taken BUSS2000.

Lead Coordinator

Professor Helena Nguyen

BUSS2000 Lead Coordinator in the University of Sydney Business School.

Student ratingNo student ratings yet
Co-coordinator

Mesepa Lafaialii-Paul

BUSS2000 Co-coordinator in the University of Sydney Business School.

Student ratingNo student ratings yet
Head Tutor

Dr Juan Pablo Morales Sepúlveda

BUSS2000 Head Tutor in the University of Sydney Business School.

Student ratingNo student ratings yet

Teaching team as listed in the unit materials reviewed. AskSia does not rate lecturers; star ratings are submitted by students who have taken BUSS2000.

Where it fits

Prerequisites, related units & why it matters

Second-year Business School core unit; check the handbook for the current enrolment sequence. No quantitative prerequisite.

Why it matters beyond the grade. The self-leadership, influence and applied-communication skills underpin later management, strategy and professional-practice units and the graduate roles (consulting, management, human resources) that value them.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is BUSS2000 hard?

It is a lower-moderate unit. There is no mathematics and no single make-or-break exam, but marking is qualitative and can feel harsh, so the difficulty is in writing precise, theory-grounded reflection to rubric rather than in technical content.

How is BUSS2000 assessed?

A 5% early-feedback quiz, 10% unit engagement (with an 80% workshop-attendance requirement), a 30% individual written assignment, a 20% team-and-individual presentation, and a 35% reflective final exam. The components sum to 100%.

Is there an exam?

Yes, a 35% final exam, but it is two open-ended reflective essay questions with a single handwritten note sheet permitted, not a problem-solving paper.

How much maths is involved?

None. BUSS2000 is a reflective and applied leadership unit; the skills assessed are structured writing, applied behavioural theory and oral presentation.

What separates a credit from a distinction?

Applying named module theories precisely through the Describe-Analyse-Apply-Evaluate structure, rather than writing general reflection, is what lifts marks under these rubrics.

Study BUSS2000 with Sia

Work through the core topics and the rest of the unit with a tutor that knows it and quizzes you on the topics the assessments weight most heavily.

Start studying with Sia