What is the difference between antislavery and abolition?
Choose 1 answer:
A
Antislavery advocates wanted to confine slavery to the border
states, while abolitionists wanted an immediate end to slavery
everywhere.
B
Antislavery advocates did not want slavery to spread any further
(for example, to new states admitted to the Union) while
abolitionists wanted an immediate end to slavery everywhere.
C
Antislavery advocates believed that slavery was morally wrong,
while abolitionists did not.

Question

Accepted Answer

∻Answer∻ ⚹ The correct answer is B: Antislavery advocates did not want slavery to spread any further (for example, to new states admitted to the Union) while abolitionists wanted an immediate end to slavery everywhere. ⚹ ∻Key Concept∻ ⚹ The antebellum period in the United States saw a significant division between those who were antislavery and those who were abolitionists. Antislavery advocates aimed to prevent the expansion of slavery into new territories and states, while abolitionists sought the complete and immediate end of slavery. (KC-5.2.II) ⚹ ∻Explanation∻ ⚹ Antislavery advocates were primarily concerned with stopping the spread of slavery into new territories and states, believing that containing it would eventually lead to its demise. In contrast, abolitionists were more radical, demanding the immediate and total abolition of slavery throughout the United States. This distinction is crucial in understanding the different approaches to addressing the issue of slavery in the 19th century. ⚹◊What was the primary goal of abolitionists in the United States during the 19th century?⍭ Generate me a similar question◊⚶[{"title": "Debunking the myth of the Lost Cause: A lie embedded in American history - Karen L. Cox", "video_link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP0_wnaW-a0"}, {"title": "Why Lincoln ended slavery", "video_link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu9xoWDYGAc"}]⚶

Sia