Monash University · FACULTY OF BUSINESS LAW

BTF5955 · Business and Company Law

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
Business Law14 Chapters7-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 6 of 13 · BTF5955

Consumer Law, Data Protection & Privacy

Topic 6 introduces the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) — above all the prohibition on misleading or deceptive conduct (s 18 ACL), plus unconscionable conduct, the consumer guarantees and the regulator (the ACCC) — and gives an introduction to data-protection and privacy law under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the Australian Privacy Principles (OAIC). It draws on Concise Australian Commercial Law Ch 14, and s 18 problems are a common short-answer/IRAC item.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) — Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
  • 02Misleading or deceptive conduct — ACL s 18: strict (no intention required); test is the effect on the ordinary/reasonable target audience
  • 03Remedies for s 18: injunction, damages, corrective orders — but NOT pecuniary penalties for s 18 itself
  • 04False or misleading representations — ACL s 29: specific prohibited representations, which do attract pecuniary penalties
  • 05Unconscionable conduct — ACL ss 20–22; consumer guarantees — ACL ss 51–61 (e.g. acceptable quality s 54, due care and skill s 60)
  • 06Unfair contract terms — ACL ss 23–28: a term in a standard-form consumer/small-business contract may be void if unfair
  • 07Regulator: the ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission)
  • 08Data protection & privacy: the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), the 13 Australian Privacy Principles, the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme; regulator OAIC
Worked example · free

IRAC on misleading or deceptive conduct: a 'free forever' app

Q [6 marks]. A software company markets a mobile app with the headline 'Free forever — no charges, ever.' In fact, after 30 days the app automatically begins charging users a monthly fee unless they cancel, a condition disclosed only in fine print several screens deep. Many users are charged before they realise. Using IRAC, advise whether the company has engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law. (Fresh facts — 6 marks.)
  • +1Issue. Has the company engaged in conduct that is misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law?
  • +2Rule. ACL s 18 prohibits a person, in trade or commerce, from engaging in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive. It is strict — no intention to mislead is required — and the test is objective: the overall impression the conduct creates on the ordinary or reasonable members of the target audience. Remedies include injunctions, damages and corrective orders (but s 18 itself does not attract pecuniary penalties).
  • +2Application — in trade or commerce and the overall impression. Marketing an app to the public is plainly conduct in trade or commerce. The dominant message 'Free forever — no charges, ever' conveys, to an ordinary consumer, that the app is permanently free. The automatic charging after 30 days directly contradicts that impression, and burying the condition several screens deep in fine print does not correct the misleading headline — a prominent claim is not cured by obscure qualification.
  • +1Application — strictness; Conclusion. Because s 18 is strict, it does not matter whether the company intended to mislead; the effect on the reasonable audience governs. The headline is likely to mislead or deceive, so s 18 is contravened. Conclusion: the company has very likely engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct, and the ACCC (or an affected consumer) could seek injunctions, corrective advertising and damages — though not a pecuniary penalty under s 18 alone (a s 29 false-representation claim could add penalties).
The company has very likely contravened s 18. Marketing the app is conduct in trade or commerce, and the headline 'Free forever' creates the overall impression, on an ordinary consumer, that the app is permanently free — an impression flatly contradicted by the automatic post-30-day charging and not cured by fine print buried several screens deep. Section 18 is strict, so the absence of intent is irrelevant. Remedies include injunctions, corrective orders and damages (a pecuniary penalty would require a provision such as s 29, not s 18 itself).
Sia tip — For a s 18 problem, lock onto two things: it is strict (intention is irrelevant), and the test is the overall impression on the ordinary target audience — a bold headline is not saved by buried fine print. Note that s 18 does not carry penalties, while s 29 does. Ask Sia to set you fresh misleading-conduct scenarios and to check you applied the objective 'overall impression' test rather than asking about intention.
Glossary

Key terms

Misleading or deceptive conduct (s 18 ACL)
A prohibition on conduct, in trade or commerce, that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive. It is strict (no intention required); liability turns on the objective effect of the conduct on the ordinary/reasonable target audience. Remedies: injunction, damages, corrective orders — not pecuniary penalties.
False or misleading representations (s 29 ACL)
A prohibition on specific false or misleading representations (about quality, standard, price, testimonials, sponsorship/approval and the like). Unlike s 18, contravention of s 29 attracts pecuniary penalties.
Consumer guarantees (ACL ss 51–61)
Automatic, non-excludable guarantees on goods and services — for example acceptable quality (s 54), fitness for a disclosed purpose (s 55), and for services due care and skill (s 60). Remedies depend on whether the failure is major or minor. They cannot be contracted out of against a consumer.
Unconscionable conduct (ACL ss 20–22)
Prohibits unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce: s 20 reflects the general-law standard and s 21 sets a statutory standard, with s 22 listing factors a court may consider (such as bargaining strength and whether undue pressure was used).
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
The 13 principles in Schedule 1 to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) governing how APP entities collect, use, disclose, secure, and allow access to and correction of personal information. The regulator is the OAIC.
Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme
Under the Privacy Act, an obligation on covered entities to notify affected individuals and the OAIC of eligible data breaches likely to result in serious harm.
FAQ

Consumer Law, Data Protection & Privacy FAQ

What must be proved for misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18?

Three things: the conduct was in trade or commerce; the conduct was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive; and (for damages) it caused loss. The key features are that s 18 is strict — you do not have to prove the business intended to mislead — and that the test is objective, asking what overall impression the conduct would create on the ordinary or reasonable members of the target audience. A prominent claim is generally not saved by a qualification buried in fine print.

What is the difference between s 18 and s 29 of the ACL?

Section 18 is a broad, general prohibition on misleading or deceptive conduct, and it does not itself attract pecuniary penalties — the remedies are injunctions, damages and corrective orders. Section 29 targets specific false or misleading representations (about things like quality, price, testimonials or sponsorship) and does attract pecuniary penalties. In practice a regulator often pleads both: s 18 for the broad conduct and s 29 to unlock penalties for the specific representations.

Can a business exclude the ACL consumer guarantees?

No. The consumer guarantees in the ACL (such as acceptable quality of goods under s 54 and due care and skill in services under s 60) are automatic and non-excludable against a consumer, so a contract term purporting to exclude, restrict or modify them is ineffective. This is why an exclusion clause in a consumer contract cannot sign away the statutory guarantees — a point that links Topic 6 back to the exclusion-clause analysis in Topic 4.

Can Sia help me with consumer-law and privacy problems in BTF5955?

Yes, as a study aid. Sia can walk you through a s 18 misleading-conduct analysis on fresh facts, distinguish s 18 from s 29, explain the consumer guarantees and the Australian Privacy Principles, and check whether your IRAC answer applied the objective 'overall impression' test. It explains the method and checks your reasoning; it does not do your graded assessment, and Monash academic-integrity rules apply.

Study strategy

Exam move

Make s 18 your anchor for Topic 6 and drill its two defining features until they are automatic: it is strict (intention is irrelevant) and it is judged by the objective overall impression on the ordinary target audience, so buried fine print rarely cures a bold claim. Keep a clear map of the ACL provisions — s 18 (misleading conduct, no penalties), s 29 (false representations, penalties), ss 20–22 (unconscionable conduct), ss 51–61 (consumer guarantees, non-excludable) — and know the ACCC is the regulator. For the privacy layer, be able to name the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), the 13 Australian Privacy Principles and the OAIC at a high level. Practise on fresh advertising/pricing scenarios by writing visible IRAC answers, and remember to check whether an exclusion clause is defeated by the consumer guarantees. When a step won't click, ask Sia to explain it a different way and to set you a fresh misleading-conduct problem; it teaches the method and checks your reasoning, and it never substitutes for your own graded work.

Working through Consumer Law, Data Protection & Privacy in BTF5955? Sia is AskSia’s AI Business Law tutor — ask any BTF5955 Consumer Law, Data Protection & Privacy question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how BTF5955 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 14 of your Monash University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your BTF5955 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 7-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$25/ month
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
Unlock the full BTF5955 Bible + 14 Monash University subjects解锁完整 BTF5955 Bible + Monash University 14 门科目
$25/mo