GPA Guarantee: Score A+ under Finals

Lecture Transcription |LMS sync |Live Tutor Q&A
50% OFFAll plan

ECF1100 Cheatsheet · Microeconomics

Monash University · Cheatsheet for the final exam. Monash Semester 2 final assessment period, 2–18 November 2026 (check your personal exam timetable). Full ECF1100 study guide →

A4 landscape · 7pt body · 6 columns · two-side revision sheetECF1100 · Monash · S2 2026
ECF1100
Microeconomics
Monash Business School · Monash University · undergraduate
ECF1100 cheatsheet QR code – open the full ECF1100 study guide
Full guide + ask Sia about ECF1100
SIDE 1/2   EXAM REVISION SHEET · definitions → formulas → decisionsSemester 2 · 2026Side 2: five drills · judgement cards · traps

0 · Exam Mapcourse.json · S2

Exercise 20%Quiz/Test 30%Examination 50%

Permitted materials: not confirmed for this offering in the course materials we hold — check the exam instructions on the LMS.

Source: captured Semester 2 assessment surface; live instructions control examination conditions and timetable.

ComponentWeightControl
Exercise20%Current Moodle
Quiz/Test30%Current quiz operation
Examination50%Monash examination period

1 · Welfare: Three LensesC1 · prosperity

LivingstandardsIncomedistributionPlanetaryboundaryqualified welfare claim
Source figure redrawn: growth, distribution and environmental pressure stay analytically separate.

Growth rateg = (y₁ − y₀) / y₀

Living standards are material and non-material conditions for meeting needs and pursuing valued lives. Income distribution is how income or wealth is divided. A planetary boundary is a biophysical limit beyond which environmental-system risk can rise sharply.

If the prompt gives…Do this
Mean incomeCalculate growth; do not infer distribution
Income sharesIdentify who gained proportionally
GDP per personName omitted distribution, unpaid activity and ecological costs
MeasureSplit 3Find gapsQualify
Answer path: calculate, separate, identify missing evidence, then qualify.
Recall → An average cannot answer a distribution question.

Recite-and-check rule

A positive g establishes growth only in the named variable. It does not establish stable prices, shared household gains, improved unpaid activity or lower environmental pressure.

ClaimEvidence still needed
Living standards improvedMaterial and non-material conditions, not income alone
Gains were sharedDistribution across people or groups

2 · Production & IncentivesC2 · technology

Prod. fnAvg prod.Opp. costInnov rentfeasibility ≠ adoption ≠ distribution
Source figure redrawn: feasible output must be linked to costs and incentives.

Production function: feasible output–input relationship under a stated technology. Opportunity cost: value of the best feasible alternative forgone. Innovation rent: temporary return above the next-best opportunity from an advantage.

Average product of labourAPᴸ = q / L  → output per labour unit

MethodCheckInterpret
Compare techniquesSame input basisHigher output alone may not lower unit cost
ChooseDemand, quality, capacityTechnical feasibility does not fix ownership or adoption
Explain rentNext-best opportunityTemporary gain from advantage
q/LTechnique Aq/LTechnique Buse one denominator
Decision picture: standardise by the paid input before ranking techniques.

3 · Time, Work & WellbeingC3 · scarcity

Time budgetc = m + w(T − t)

c = consumption; m = non-labour resources; w = wage; T = discretionary time; t = free time. The slope is −w: each extra free hour costs w of feasible consumption.

cfree time tm + wTslope = −wfrontier = feasible, not prescribed
Source figure redrawn: the wage is the opportunity cost of an hour of free time.
ChangeMechanismCaution
w risesSubstitution and income effects can opposeDo not assert hours' direction without preferences
m risesPurchasing power changesRelative price conceptually fixed
Observed hoursMay be constrainedContracts, care or job scarcity may bind

4 · Strategic InteractionC4 · games

Best response: highest-payoff action given others' actions. Nash equilibrium: no player gains from unilateral deviation. Social dilemma: individually attractive choices produce a collectively worse outcome.

Best-response conditionuᵢ(aᵢ*, a₋ᵢ*) ≥ uᵢ(aᵢ, a₋ᵢ*)

Firm BFirm A8, 82, 1212, 25, 5HighLowHighLow
Source matrix redrawn: circle best responses; their intersection is the equilibrium.
StepQuestion
1Given each B action, which A payoff is larger?
2Given each A action, which B payoff is larger?
3Where do best responses coincide?
4Is that cell also jointly best?
EquilibriumstableJoint outcomeefficient / fair?separate tests
Trap picture: stability never proves efficiency or fairness.
Recall → Equilibrium is a stability claim.

5 · Institutions & BargainingC5 · rules

Institution: rule, convention or organisation structuring interaction and enforcement. Reservation option: outcome if agreement fails. Bargaining power: capacity to secure more surplus.

Joint surplusS = V − Rᴬ − Rᴮ

RᴬV − Rᴮfeasible agreement setrules + power select a point
Source figure redrawn: outside options bound the bargain; power divides the surplus.
Do not collapseMeaning
Surplus sizeTotal gain from agreement
Surplus divisionWho receives that gain
Voluntary agreementDoes not prove equal power or justice

6 · Firms & Employment RentsC6 · contracts

Firm: organisation coordinating production through ownership, authority and contracts. An incomplete contract cannot specify or enforce every action and contingency. Employment rent is job value above the next-best alternative after relevant costs.

Employment rentRₑ = w − c − z

rent Rₑcost coutside zwage w = Rₑ + c + zlarger fallback z → smaller rent
Source figure redrawn: identify job costs and the outside option before reading the gap.
If X changesDirect effect, all else fixed
w risesEmployment rent rises
job cost c risesEmployment rent falls
outside value z risesEmployment rent falls
rent positiveMay motivate effort; monitoring and power still matter
Action notfully specifiedRent makesjob valuableEffort +supervisionincentive mechanism, not full welfare verdict
Mechanism picture: incomplete contracting makes rents and supervision consequential.

Answer structure: name the unobservable action, calculate rent from wage, costs and fallback, then link losing the job to effort, authority and monitoring. Keep power and conditions in the conclusion.

7 · Customers & Market PowerC7 · price setting

Willingness to pay is a buyer's maximum exchange amount. Markup is price above marginal cost, in dollars or relative terms.

Price elasticity of demandεᴰ = %ΔQᴰ / %ΔP

|ε| < 1inelastic|ε| = 1unit elastic|ε| > 1elasticP↑ → R↑R stableP↑ → R↓revenue ≠ profit; costs still matter
Source decision figure redrawn: magnitude classifies responsiveness; costs are separate.
SignalPrediction
Closer substitutesDemand becomes more responsive; markup pressure rises
ε negativePrice and quantity move oppositely
Profitable markupDoes not prove customer value or social efficiency

8 · Supply, Demand & EquilibriumC8 · market

Demand curve: buyer quantity choices against price, other conditions fixed. Supply curve: seller quantity choices against price, other conditions fixed. Competitive equilibrium: planned demand equals planned supply.

Market clearingQᴰ(P*) = Qˢ(P*)

DSP*Q*Qᴰ = Qˢ
Source figure redrawn: solve the common price, then verify quantity in both curves.
Market-solving routineExam check
Set Qᴰ = QˢSame price variable and units
Solve for P*Sign and plausibility
Substitute for Q*Both equations return same Q
InterpretState held-fixed conditions
price changes → moveother factor → shift
Decision picture: price changes move along a curve; other conditions shift it.

Comparative statics

ShiftP*Q*
Demand right↑↑
Demand left↓↓
Supply right↓↑
Supply left↑↓
Both shiftOne outcome may be ambiguous: identify it

Two-shift logic

If demand and supply both shift, analyse each change separately before combining them. When both push an outcome in the same direction, that outcome is determinate; when they push it in opposite directions, its sign is ambiguous without magnitudes. State which curve moved, what was held fixed and whether the prompt describes a movement or a shift.

9 · Credit Across TimeC9 · credit

Intertemporal choice trades resources across dates. The interest rate prices purchasing-power movement across dates under stated compounding and risk. Credit rationing restricts lending quantity or access rather than adjusting price alone.

Present valuePV = FV / (1 + r)ᵗ

PVFVt periods at rdiscount future amount back
Source timeline redrawn: rate period, time period and compounding must match.
Before calculatingAfter calculating
Match t to rState certainty/risk assumptions
Separate observed and derived valuesCheck units and direction
Predict PV < FV when r>0Name collateral, fees or access limits
Interest rateprice of transferRationingquantity / accessone rate does not explain both
Comparison figure: credit access can be constrained even without a price change.

10 · Externalities & Public GoodsC10 · policy

External effect: a cost or benefit borne outside the transaction. Public good: non-rival and difficult to exclude non-payers. A Pigouvian instrument aligns private incentives with marginal external effects.

Social marginal costSMC = PMC + MEC

MECSMCPMCcostQ
Source figure redrawn: marginal external cost lifts the relevant cost curve.
IdentifyfailureFindwedgeMatchtoolTestlimitsefficient Q also needs marginal benefitpolicy can fail as well as markets
Method figure: diagnose the failure before choosing and stress-testing policy.
https://www.asksia.ai/cheatsheet/monash-ecf1100 · Full ECF1100 study guide →
Shared by ________
AskSiaForward this to your tutorial group
v2 · 2026-10-25 · side 1/2
Monash Semester 2 final assessment period, 2–18 November 2026 (check your personal exam timetable).
Check your exam instructions on the LMS for what you may bring; use this sheet to revise and self-test.
ECF1100
Microeconomics
Monash Business School · Monash University · undergraduate
ECF1100 cheatsheet QR code – open the full ECF1100 study guide
Full guide + ask Sia about ECF1100
SIDE 2/2   SELF-TEST DRILLS · answer path → judgement → trap checkEXAM REVISION SHEETFive source-numbered drills · fast recall

11 · Method Chooserall chapters

What must be found?FeasiblechoiceStrategicoutcomeMarketoutcomeSocialbenchmarkfrontieropp. costbestresponsesQᴰ = QˢelasticitySMCpolicyassume → calculate → interpret
Chooser: classify the task before selecting a formula or diagram.
If you see…Do this
Change over timeUse g; name the variable and base
Input/output techniquesCompare q/L or unit cost on one basis
Time and wageWrite c=m+w(T−t); interpret slope
Payoff matrixCircle each player's best response
Outside optionsCompute joint surplus, then discuss division
Demand/supply equationsSet equal, solve, substitute twice
Future amountDiscount using matching r and t
External damageAdd MEC to PMC; still compare with benefit
DefinevariablesWriteruleCalculate+ checkInterpret+ limitone visible line per analytical job
Universal answer path: make the decision visible before the arithmetic.

Representation check

Before calculation, make a three-column scratch table: symbol · unit · observed/derived. Predict the answer's direction. After calculation, run one boundary or limiting-case check and write the economic sentence the number supports. This separates translation errors from arithmetic and prevents a polished number from answering the wrong question.

Prompt verbRequired output
CalculateFormula, substitution, number and unit
CompareCommon basis plus direction and magnitude
ExplainMechanism from incentive/rule to behaviour
EvaluateResult, distribution, assumptions and counterfactual

12 · Exam-Morning Planstudy strategy

    13 · Drill 1: TechniquesC2 worked example

    Prompt. Technique A makes 100 units with 10 labour hours; B makes 130 with 16. Labour costs $30/hour; other costs equal. Compare unit labour cost.

    Answer pathA: (10×$30)/100 = $300/100 = $3.00/unit
    B: (16×$30)/130 = $480/130 ≈ $3.69/unit

    $3.00per unit$3.69per unitAB
    Computed check: A has lower labour cost per unit despite B's higher output.
    Earn the conclusionWhat to say
    ComparisonA is cheaper on this input
    Not establishedTotal cost, output quality or capacity value
    TrapMore output ≠ higher productivity per paid input
    Cost eachtechniqueDivide byoutputRank onsame basisNamemissingdo not rank by q alone
    Answer route: cost, standardise, rank, qualify.

    14 · Drill 2: Time BudgetC3 worked example

    Prompt. 80 discretionary hours per fortnight; wage $25/hour; $200 non-labour funds. Write consumption as a function of free time t.

    Answer pathwork = 80 − t
    c = 200 + 25(80 − t)
    c = 2,200 − 25t

    2,20080 hslope −25each free hour costs $25 consumption
    Computed line: intercept $2,200; slope −$25 per free hour.

    15 · Drill 3: Best ResponsesC4 worked example

    Prompt. Two firms choose High or Low price. Payoffs: H/H 8,8; L/H 12,2; H/L 2,12; L/L 5,5. Find equilibrium.

    Firm BFirm A8, 82, 1212, 25, 5HighLowHighLowLow is each firm's best response
    Computed matrix: Low/Low is the mutual-best-response cell.

    Answer pathIf B=High: A gets 12 from Low > 8 from High.
    If B=Low: A gets 5 from Low > 2 from High.
    By symmetry B also chooses Low.
    Nash equilibrium = Low/Low, payoff 5,5.

    ClaimVerdict
    Low is dominantYes: best against either rival action
    Low/Low is stableYes: no profitable unilateral deviation
    Low/Low maximises joint payoffNo: H/H gives 16 versus 10
    H/H is equilibriumNo: either firm can gain by cutting
    Stable:5 + 5 = 10Jointly higher:8 + 8 = 16social dilemma: private incentives block H/H
    Judgement card: separate unilateral stability from the joint-payoff comparison.

    Robustness check: one strict best response for each player gives one intersection here. If a changed payoff makes actions tie, mark both as best responses and re-check every cell; do not carry the old equilibrium across.

    16 · Bargaining Judgement CardsC5 · C6 transfer

    Rᴬ rises → feasible surplus shrinksagreement interval
    Changed-case check: stronger fallback shifts the lower bound and reduces surplus.

    17 · Drill 4: Linear MarketC8 worked example

    Prompt. Demand Qᴰ=100−2P; supply Qˢ=20+2P. Find competitive equilibrium.

    Answer path100 − 2P = 20 + 2P
    80 = 4P → P* = 20
    Qᴰ = 100 − 2(20) = 60
    Qˢ = 20 + 2(20) = 60

    2060E(60,20)DS
    Computed graph: both equations return Q=60 at P=20.
    CheckPass condition
    AlgebraSame P in both planned quantities
    SubstitutionQᴰ and Qˢ both equal 60
    InterpretationConditional on specified curves and competitive assumptions
    Do not claimThat equilibrium proves efficiency under external effects
    D →P↑ Q↑D ←P↓ Q↓S →P↓ Q↑S ←P↑ Q↓both shift → identify the ambiguous outcome
    Fast-recall comparative statics: predict direction before doing algebra.

    18 · Market TrapsC7 · C8 limits

    TrapRepair
    Price changed, so demand shiftedThat is movement along demand
    |ε|>1 means profit falls when price risesRevenue likely falls locally; profit needs cost
    Markup proves valueIt does not prove customer value or social efficiency
    Equilibrium is unconditionalName competition, information, external effects and held-fixed factors

    If both curves move

    Decompose the problem into a demand-only and a supply-only prediction. Combine arrows only after identifying whether each pushes P* and Q* in the same or opposite directions. Same-direction arrows determine the sign; opposite arrows mean the net effect needs shift magnitudes.

    EvidenceClassification
    Own price changes, other factors fixedMovement along curve

    19 · Drill 5: External CostC10 worked example

    Prompt. At 100 units, private marginal cost is $12 and marginal external damage is $5 per unit. What social marginal cost guides the benchmark?

    Answer pathSMC = PMC + MEC
    SMC = $12 + $5
    SMC = $17 per unit at Q=100

    MEC $5PMC $12SMC $17 per unit
    Computed stack: the external damage belongs in the marginal social cost.
    What followsWhat does not follow
    The relevant cost benchmark is $17The efficient quantity is 100
    Private and social incentives diverge by $5The damage estimate is automatically justified
    A Pigouvian instrument may align incentivesAny one policy must dominate regulation or bargaining
    Socialmarginal costMarginalbenefitsetequalcost alone cannot locate efficient Q
    Decision picture: the benchmark quantity needs marginal benefit as well as SMC.

    20 · Policy ChooserC10 judgement

    Diagnose failureExternal effectmarginal wedgePublic goodfree-rider issuetax/subsidyrule/bargainpublicprovisiontest info · enforcement · equity
    Source policy route redrawn: match the tool to the failure, then test implementation.
    If you see…Ask…
    Varying damages across firmsDoes a uniform standard preserve marginal incentives?
    Few parties, clear rightsCould bargaining address the external effect?
    Non-rival, hard to excludeIs public provision the relevant comparison?
    Tax equal to damageIs MEC known and enforceable?

    21 · Classic Trapsall chapter limits

    Tempting shortcutCorrect response
    Mean rose → everyone better offCheck distribution, prices, households and environment
    Higher output → cheaper techniqueStandardise output by paid input or unit cost
    Higher wage → hours must riseSubstitution and income effects can oppose
    Nash equilibrium → good outcomeStability is not efficiency or fairness
    Voluntary bargain → equal powerInspect outside options, rules and division
    Positive job rent explains everythingConditions, effort, monitoring and search duration matter
    Elastic demand → profit direction knownElasticity gives revenue direction; profit needs cost
    Market clears → socially efficientCheck competition, information and external effects
    One interest rate → full credit storyAdd risk, collateral, fees and unequal access
    External cost found → efficient Q foundCompare SMC with marginal benefit
    Translationwrong actorwrong variableCalculationsign / unitdenominatorInterpretationoverclaimmissing limitrepair the first failed line
    Error log: classify the first divergence before copying a full solution.

    22 · Formula Recall Gridten checkpoints

    TaskCheckpointMeaning
    Growthg=(y₁−y₀)/y₀proportional change
    ProductionAPᴸ=q/Loutput per labour unit
    Timec=m+w(T−t)feasible consumption
    Gameuᵢ(aᵢ*,a₋ᵢ*)≥uᵢ(aᵢ,a₋ᵢ*)unilateral best response
    BargainS=V−Rᴬ−Rᴮjoint agreement surplus
    JobRₑ=w−c−zvalue above fallback
    Demandεᴰ=%ΔQᴰ/%ΔPresponsiveness
    MarketQᴰ(P*)=Qˢ(P*)planned quantities equal
    CreditPV=FV/(1+r)ᵗdiscount across dates
    ExternalitySMC=PMC+MECprivate + external cost
    unitssignboundarypredictcheck
    Verification loop: predict direction, calculate, then test units, sign and boundary.
    https://www.asksia.ai/cheatsheet/monash-ecf1100 · Full ECF1100 study guide →
    Shared by ________
    AskSiaForward this to your tutorial group
    v2 · 2026-10-25 · side 2/2
    Monash Semester 2 final assessment period, 2–18 November 2026 (check your personal exam timetable).
    Check your exam instructions on the LMS for what you may bring; use this sheet to revise and self-test.

    Want one for YOUR exact syllabus?

    Sia is your free desktop study agent. Drop your Monash University ECF1100 slides — Sia builds a sheet tailored to YOUR exam. Better than this library because it knows YOUR materials.

    ↓ Download Sia · Free