Australian National University · FACULTY OF LAW

BUSN7052 Chap.2 Legislation, Precedent and Statutory Interpretation

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 2 of 13 · BUSN7052

Legislation, Precedent and Statutory Interpretation

Statutes and cases are the two primary sources of Australian law, and this chapter shows how each is made and read. It traces a bill from cabinet approval to commencement, explains delegated legislation and the ultra vires limit, and sets out the doctrine of precedent: what binds, what merely persuades, and how courts reverse, overrule or distinguish.

It then builds a working method for statutory interpretation, combining the literal, golden and mischief rules with the purposive approach in s 15AA, extrinsic material under s 15AB and the Latin maxims.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Passage of a bill and commencement in the ACT

  • 02

    Regulations, ordinances, by-laws and ultra vires

  • 03

    Ratio decidendi, obiter dicta and binding authority

  • 04

    Common law and equity, courts and tribunals

  • 05

    Purposive interpretation under s 15AA

  • 06

    Ejusdem generis, noscitur a sociis and expressio unius

Worked example · free

Which earlier decision binds an ACT Magistrate?

Q [5 marks]. An ACT Magistrate must decide a negligence point. A New South Wales appeal decision favours the plaintiff; a High Court judge, in a remark not needed for that decision, favoured the defendant; and the ratio of an ACT Supreme Court decision favours the defendant. Which bind? The marks shown here are a pacing aid and not a University allocation.
Precedent in the ACT court pathThe High Court binds the ACT Supreme Court, which binds the Magistrates Court; decisions from other States are persuasive only; the ratio binds and obiter does not.High CourtACT Supreme CourtACT Magistrates CourtbindingbindingOther StatespersuasiveRatio bindsObiter persuades
Solid arrows show binding authority running down the ACT path from the High Court; the dashed arrow shows decisions from other States arriving only as persuasive authority, and the left boxes separate binding ratio from obiter.
  • +2The ACT Supreme Court sits directly above the Magistrates Court, because the ACT has no intermediate court, so its ratio binds.
  • +1A High Court remark not necessary to its decision is obiter: persuasive, but not binding.
  • +1A New South Wales decision is outside the ACT hierarchy, so it is persuasive only.
  • +1The Magistrate must follow the ACT Supreme Court ratio and decide for the defendant.
Only the ACT Supreme Court ratio binds; the other two decisions can only persuade.
Sia tip — Place each decision on the court ladder and label it ratio or obiter before ranking the authorities.
Glossary

Key terms

Obiter dicta
Remarks in a judgment not necessary to the decision, which may persuade but do not bind.
Delegated legislation
Rules made by a body other than Parliament under power conferred by an Act.
Ultra vires
Beyond the power conferred, so that the instrument or act is void.
Purposive approach
Reading a provision in the way that best achieves the purpose of the Act.
Ejusdem generis
A maxim confining general words that follow a specific list to the class of that list.
Extrinsic material
Material outside the Act, such as a second reading speech, used to interpret it.
FAQ

Legislation, Precedent and Statutory Interpretation FAQ

What is the difference between reversing and overruling a decision?

Reversal happens when a superior court corrects the decision in the same case on appeal, without necessarily changing the law. Overruling happens when a court replaces the legal rule laid down in an earlier case, so later courts follow the new rule. Distinguishing leaves the earlier rule intact but avoids it on different facts.

When can a court look at parliamentary speeches?

Section 15AB of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 allows extrinsic material to confirm the ordinary meaning, to resolve a provision that is ambiguous or obscure, or to avoid a manifestly absurd or unreasonable result. Section 15AA, by contrast, always applies and requires the reading that best achieves the statute's purpose.

Does the ACT have an intermediate court?

No. The Week 2 slides note that the ACT, the Northern Territory and Tasmania lack an intermediate court, so ACT cases move from the Magistrates Court, which hears civil and criminal matters, to the Supreme Court, with the High Court above as the final court of appeal.

Why did Wormald v Caftor deny damages for the dog?

The claim relied on a provision compensating loss of capacity to perform domestic services for the plaintiff's household. Katzmann J used the Legislation Act 2001 (ACT) and the Attorney-General's speech to identify the provision's purpose, and held that a household for this purpose consists of human beings, not pets.

Study strategy

Exam move

Treat interpretation as a procedure you can run under time pressure. Write the five rungs on a card: literal meaning, context and maxims, purpose under s 15AA or s 139 of the ACT Legislation Act, extrinsic material under s 15AB, and presumptions such as the principle of legality. Practise on short invented by-laws, deliberately varying whether a list ends in general words, because that single feature decides which maxim fits.

For precedent, take one long judgment summary and mark which sentences are ratio and which are obiter, then explain to yourself why a later Magistrates Court would be bound by one but not the other. Keep a short list of the four delegated instruments and the three parliamentary controls on them, since a tutorial or exam question about a regulation usually turns on whether it exceeds its parent Act.

Learn the four steps for passing a bill only well enough to explain them; marks go to applying interpretation, not reciting procedure. Finally, connect this chapter to the rest of the course: the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act, the Sale of Goods Act and the Insurance Contracts Act all reward reading the definitions section before arguing about the facts, and the habit of citing the right Act and section begins here.

Working through Legislation, Precedent and Statutory Interpretation in BUSN7052? Sia is AskSia’s AI Law tutor — ask any BUSN7052 Legislation, Precedent and Statutory Interpretation question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how BUSN7052 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 48 of your Australian National University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your BUSN7052 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works