The Education University of Hong Kong · FACULTY OF EDUCATION

PES6252 Chap.3 Learning Theories Behind Coaching Practice

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 3 of 11 · PES6252

Learning Theories Behind Coaching Practice

Five words, four incompatible theories

The session opens a long way from sport, with a question about vocabulary: which words do we associate with learning? Transfer, correction, self organisation, computing, participation. Those five do not belong to one account. They belong to four, and a coach who uses them interchangeably is holding four incompatible views of what they are trying to cause.

None of the four is presented as correct. They are presented in historical order, each arriving because the previous one could not explain something, and knowing the order tells you what each was built to fix.

Behaviourism, and the word coaches drop

Learning here is an outcome, the end product of a process, and it counts only when the output can be seen.

Operant conditioning is the version a coach uses daily: reinforcement follows the response and the response becomes more likely. Three operational words follow. Repetition builds the response. Generalisation makes it available across contexts it was not practised in. Discrimination is the capacity to tell one stimulus from a similar one.

The stated consequence is that practice has to be both regular and varied in its settings, and the second half of that sentence is the half that gets dropped, which is the commonest reason a well drilled skill does not appear in a match.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Five everyday words about learning, and the four theories they come from

  • 02

    Behaviourism: stimulus, response, reinforcement, and learning as visible change

  • 03

    Repetition against generalisation, and why varied practice is not optional

  • 04

    Cognitivism: the black box, the transmission model, memory and attention

  • 05

    Constructivism: active engagement, guided discovery, and the stages of development

  • 06

    Social theories: community of practice, newcomers and old timers, informal learning

Worked example · free

Diagnose one failure from four theories, then discriminate

Q [12 marks]. AskSia authored practice. A volleyball coach has drilled the overhead serve for six weeks. In closed practice her players hit the target zone about four times in five; in matches they serve short or into the net, and two have begun avoiding the serve rotation. She increases repetitions and nothing moves. Give each family a diagnosis and say which the evidence supports. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation and are not the University marking scheme.
  • 4State one diagnosis per family, in one sentence each.
  • 4Name the evidence in the case that rules a family out.
  • 4Give the prescription the survivors converge on, and say why convergence matters.
Behaviourist: the response is under stimulus control the match does not supply, so the fix is varied practice rather than more repetition, because generalisation is what transfers a response across contexts. Cognitivist: the skill is intact and the problem is attention and memory under load, so the fix is a cue that survives pressure and rehearsal of the decision rather than the movement. Constructivist: the drill removed the problem the match poses, so the fix is a task containing a real choice. Social: the two who avoid the rotation are responding to their standing in the group, which no technical work reaches. The evidence discriminates twice. Performance is high in one context and low in another, which rules out a skill deficit and therefore rules out more repetition. The avoidance appeared after the failures rather than before, which makes the social reading a consequence rather than a cause. The three survivors converge on one instruction: build the variability and the decision of the match into the practice. Convergence across rival theories is the strongest support a coaching decision can have, and noticing it is worth more than deciding which theory to believe.
Sia tip — Before prescribing more of anything, check whether performance differs across contexts. A skill that works in one place and not another is a transfer problem, and repetition strengthens exactly the context that is already working.
Glossary

Key terms

Operant Conditioning
Learning in which a reward or reinforcement follows a response and makes that response more likely, which is the mechanism behind most coaching praise.
Generalisation
The availability of a learned response in contexts it was not practised in, which the source treats as requiring varied practice rather than more of the same.
Discrimination
The learned capacity to tell one stimulus apart from a similar one, so that a response is produced in the right situation rather than in every situation.
Transmission Model
The cognitivist picture of teaching in which the coach is expert and the athlete novice, and content moves from one to the other.
FAQ

Learning Theories Behind Coaching Practice FAQ

Do I have to choose one learning theory to coach by?

The course does not ask you to, and the worked case in this chapter shows why choosing would cost you something. Four families produce four different accounts of the same observed failure, and using them together works as a differential diagnosis: each one names a different mechanism, and the case evidence rules some of them out.

Coaches are often advised to pick a philosophy and be consistent, but consistency about a mechanism you have not tested is not a virtue. The useful discipline is being able to say which family a given failure belongs to.

Why does the course spend so long on Piaget stages?

Because the age bands are a coaching constraint rather than a psychology detail. Abstract, hypothetical reasoning is a formal operational capacity that arrives from about twelve, so a tactical explanation pitched at a squad of nine year olds is a stage error rather than a communication failure, and repeating it more clearly will not fix it.

The same reasoning underpins the instructional model choices in the next chapter, where models differ sharply in how much abstraction they ask of the learner.

Study strategy

Assessment move

Take one drill you have run or watched and write what each family would say it is for. The exercise takes fifteen minutes and it surfaces the thing this chapter is really testing, which is whether you can hold four accounts at once without merging them into a general belief that people learn by doing.

Working through Learning Theories Behind Coaching Practice in PES6252? Sia is AskSia’s AI Education tutor — ask any PES6252 Learning Theories Behind Coaching Practice question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how PES6252 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 3 of your The Education University of Hong Kong subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your PES6252 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works