University of Auckland · FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT

BUSMGT711 Chap.4 Management Theories and Their Modern Relevance

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
7 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 4 of 10 · BUSMGT711

Management Theories and Their Modern Relevance

Week 4 asks whether management ideas from the early twentieth century still explain how organisations work. The chapter defines what a theory is, follows scientific management from Taylor's search for one best way through time and motion study, lean manufacturing and digital twins, then traces the human relations line from Follett and Barnard through the Hawthorne studies to management by walking around.

It closes with contingency thinking and institutional isomorphism, the ideas you need to judge which theory fits a particular firm, and to write the kind of two-theory comparison the Week 6 example scenario question asks for.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    What a theory explains, predicts and assumes

  • 02

    Webvan and Amazon as contrasting cases of theory in practice

  • 03

    Scientific management: Taylor, the Gilbreths and the one best way

  • 04

    Lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 digital twins

  • 05

    Bureaucracy and institutional isomorphism: regulatory, mimetic, normative

  • 06

    Human relations: Hawthorne, Follett, Barnard and walking around

  • 07

    Contingency thinking and choosing a theory to fit the setting

Worked example · free

Place two modern practices on their theory lineages

Q [4 marks]. A warehouse runs a digital twin that flags machines drifting outside set parameters, and its shift managers spend the first hour of each shift walking the floor talking with staff. Using the two lineages in the chapter figure, identify the theory behind each practice and explain what each inherits. Practice weighting is assigned by AskSia; this is not an official assessment.
Two lineages of management theoryScientific management descends through time and motion study and lean manufacturing to digital twins; the human relations movement runs from Follett and Barnard through the Hawthorne effect and management by walking around to people-centred management; both lineages feed contingency thinking.Scientific managementTaylor, 1911Time and motionLean manufacturingDigital twinsHuman relationsFollett and BarnardHawthorne effectWalking aroundPeople are the showContingency thinking
The left column traces scientific management down to digital twins and the right column traces human relations down to people-centred management; arrows from both bottom boxes meet in contingency thinking, which picks whichever response fits the setting.
  • +1Digital twin: it belongs to the scientific management line that runs through time and motion study and lean manufacturing.
  • +1Inheritance: it applies Taylor's principles with live data, from systematic inquiry and data-based decisions to adherence to set parameters and removing variation that causes waste.
  • +1Walking the floor: it belongs to the human relations line, from Follett and Barnard through the Hawthorne effect to management by walking around.
  • +1Inheritance: it treats attention and listening as levers on performance, a deliberate, people-centred habit that needs observation, recognition and appraisal skills.
The digital twin is a modern form of scientific management and the floor walks are management by walking around from the human relations line; contingency thinking explains why one site can sensibly use both.
Sia tip — Name the principle a practice inherits, not just the theory's founder, so the link to the case is explicit.
Glossary

Key terms

Scientific management
Taylor's approach of finding the one best way to perform work through systematic study, data, rules and the removal of variation.
Hawthorne effect
The finding that attention given to workers raised performance more than changes to physical conditions such as lighting.
Institutional isomorphism
The tendency of organisations in a field to become alike under regulatory, mimetic and normative pressures, described by DiMaggio and Powell.
Contingency thinking
A management stance that matches each response to the specific problem, people and environment instead of applying one universal model.
FAQ

Management Theories and Their Modern Relevance FAQ

Are traditional management theories still relevant today?

Yes, and the course shows how. The four principles of scientific management reappear in lean production and in digital twins that monitor production lines in real time, while human relations ideas live on in agile teams and management by walking around. The useful skill is showing where an old principle still explains a current practice and where it no longer fits.

What is the difference between scientific management and human relations?

Scientific management treats work as something to be measured and standardised, with pay linked to output and variation treated as waste. Human relations starts from people, arguing from the Hawthorne studies that attention, cooperation and social needs shape performance. One looks at the task, the other at the worker, which is why the two make a strong contrasting pair.

How do I choose two theories for a scenario question?

Pick theories that disagree about the case, usually one efficiency-driven and one people-driven, so each paragraph has a clear contrast. Outline each theory's principles, apply them to the scenario with a business or simulation example, and finish with your own reasoned judgement. Balance the space, since each theory carries its own marks ceiling.

Study strategy

Assessment move

Build a one-line timeline from memory: Smith and the division of labour, Taylor's 1911 book, the Gilbreths' motion studies, lean manufacturing and digital twins on one branch; Hawthorne, Follett, Barnard, management by walking around and Tom Peters on the other. Then, for every theory, write three short lines covering the principle, one business example and one modern descendant.

Practise the two-theory question by drawing a random pairing, such as scientific management against human relations or bureaucracy against contingency thinking, and planning a paragraph for each in under five minutes. Because the Week 6 example question asked how two theories align with your own view, rehearse a first-person position sentence for each pairing and decide in advance where you stand.

Use your simulation team as a running case: note one operational decision that followed scientific management logic and one people decision that followed human relations logic, with the rollover where it happened. Finally, test yourself on isomorphism by naming a regulatory, a mimetic and a normative pressure acting on a New Zealand organisation you know.

Keep the strongest examples on your single A4 page of notes, written as triggers rather than sentences, so each one prompts a full paragraph when you are writing against the clock.

Working through Management Theories and Their Modern Relevance in BUSMGT711? Sia is AskSia’s AI Management tutor — ask any BUSMGT711 Management Theories and Their Modern Relevance question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how BUSMGT711 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 34 of your University of Auckland subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your BUSMGT711 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works