ACCT3002 Chap.2 Going Concern Assessment
Going Concern Assessment
Going concern is a forward-looking judgement about whether the entity can continue operating and meet obligations over the relevant period. The course emphasises operating cash flow, trends and ratios rather than profit alone. Liquidity, solvency and interest coverage are signals whose direction and causes need explanation.
Asset sales and new borrowing can preserve cash temporarily without fixing weak operations, so the auditor corroborates management forecasts with contracts, subsequent receipts, debt terms and external evidence.
What this chapter covers
- 01
Operating cash flow
- 02
Liquidity trends
- 03
Solvency evidence
- 04
Industry comparison
- 05
Forecast testing
- 06
Material uncertainty
Worked example · free
Diagnose a cash squeeze hidden by asset sales
- 2Identify falling liquidity, rising leverage and negative operating cash as connected warning signals.
- 1Separate repeatable operating cash from the one-off warehouse proceeds.
- 2Test forecasts, maturities, covenants, facilities, subsequent receipts and asset-sale evidence.
- 1Conclude that heightened work is needed before determining the reporting consequence.
Key terms
- Going concern
- Going concern is the assessment that an entity can continue operating and meet obligations over the relevant forward period.
- Operating cash flow
- Operating cash flow is cash generated or consumed by ordinary activities rather than asset sales or financing.
- Liquidity risk
- Liquidity risk is the possibility that the entity cannot meet short-term obligations as they fall due.
- Material uncertainty
- Material uncertainty is a significant doubt whose nature and disclosure may affect the auditor's reporting.
Going Concern Assessment FAQ
Is profit enough to establish going concern?
No. An entity can report profit while lacking cash to meet obligations, especially when receivables are slow, debt matures soon or operating cash is negative. Analyse cash sources, timing, financing terms and the feasibility of management's plans.
How should I use ratios in a going-concern answer?
State the direction, compare it with prior periods or a relevant benchmark, and explain the cause and cash consequence. A ratio is a signal, not a conclusion. Connect it to maturities, covenants, operating conditions and corroborating evidence.
Why can positive investing cash be a warning sign?
It may arise because the entity sold long-term assets to fund current obligations. That can support liquidity once but may reduce productive capacity. Determine what was sold, whether the sale can recur, and whether operations still generate cash.
How can I turn a ratio table into a coherent assessment?
Select the movements that change the entity's ability to meet obligations rather than narrating every number. Put liquidity, leverage, interest coverage and operating cash into a timeline. For each movement, explain a plausible cause and decide whether it is recurring, temporary or dependent on financing.
Reconcile apparently favourable cash with its source: asset sales and new borrowing may raise the closing balance while ordinary activity deteriorates. Map debt maturities, covenant tests and supplier or payroll commitments against forecast receipts and available facilities.
Challenge the most sensitive forecast assumptions with post-year-end trading, historical forecasting accuracy, signed agreements and external market information. The result should be a supported assessment of uncertainty, not a mechanical verdict from one ratio.
Which evidence best tests management's recovery plans?
Match the evidence to the action management says will close the funding gap. A proposed refinancing needs lender correspondence, term sheets, conditions, approval status and a realistic completion date. Asset disposal needs ownership records, valuation support, marketability and evidence that proceeds are available before obligations fall due.
Cost reductions need board approval, implementation detail and cash-flow timing, not just a target percentage. Sales recovery needs post-year-end orders, margins, collections and capacity evidence, compared with earlier forecasts. Reperform the cash model under adverse but plausible assumptions and inspect covenant calculations.
Finally, consider whether the plan itself creates new risks, such as selling productive assets or relying on restricted cash. Corroboration must establish feasibility, timing and magnitude together.
Which three columns make a useful revision grid?
Use indicator, explanation and corroboration. Put each adverse or favourable trend in the first column, the business and cash mechanism in the second, and evidence that could confirm timing and feasibility in the third. Add a final horizon row for obligations, facilities and covenants.
The grid prevents a ratio list from masquerading as analysis and makes the eventual disclosure or reporting conclusion depend on evidence rather than prediction.
Exam move
Practise reading a four-year table without writing a ratio-by-ratio list. Circle the two or three movements that most affect obligations, identify why each moved and classify every cash source. Add one corroborating procedure beside each management assumption. Close with a conditional conclusion about further work, disclosure and reporting rather than predicting failure as a certainty.
Working through Going Concern Assessment in ACCT3002? Sia is AskSia’s AI Accounting tutor — ask any ACCT3002 Going Concern Assessment question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how ACCT3002 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.