Australian National University · FACULTY OF MARKETING

MKTG3001 Chap.9 Testing Group Differences and Correlation

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 9 of 11 · MKTG3001

Testing Group Differences and Correlation

This chapter moves from describing survey data to testing it.

You learn to frame a null hypothesis (no difference between groups) against an alternative hypothesis (a difference exists), and to reject the null only when p < 0.05. Every hypothesis needs two named variables: the independent variable sorts respondents into groups, and the dependent variable is the Likert-type rating averaged within each group.

Two groups call for an independent-samples t-test; three or more call for a one-way ANOVA, and the count comes from the groups present in the data rather than from how many answer boxes the questionnaire printed.

The chapter closes with Pearson correlation, which links two Likert-type variables through a coefficient r between −1.00 and +1.00: its sign gives direction, its magnitude gives strength, and a value from 0.61 to 0.80 is classed as strong.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Null and alternative hypotheses for group differences

  • 02

    Independent and dependent variables in a hypothesis

  • 03

    Independent-samples t-test for exactly two groups

  • 04

    One-way ANOVA for three or more groups

  • 05

    Choosing a test by the groups in the data

  • 06

    Pearson correlation direction and strength

Worked example · free

Reading correlation direction and the strong range for bike-share ratings

Q [5 marks]. A Canberra bike-share operator surveys members on 5-point Likert-type scales. The correlation between agreement that the app is easy to use and likelihood of renewing membership is r = 0.72. The correlation between agreement with the statement that riders often wait for a free bike and overall satisfaction is r = −0.35. Interpret the direction and strength of each coefficient and state what the operator can and cannot conclude. The marks shown are AskSia practice weighting, not a published university scheme.
The horizontal axis is the Pearson correlation coefficient from −1.00 to +1.00; the shaded band marks the strong range of 0.61 to 0.80, so r = 0.72 sits inside The horizontal axis is the Pearson correlation coefficient from −1.00 to +1.00; the shaded band marks the strong range of 0.61 to 0.80, so r = 0.72 sits inside it while r = −0.35 points in the negative direction and lies nearer zero, meaning weaker.Negative directionPositive directionStrong: 0.61 to 0.80−1.000+1.00r = 0.72r = −0.35Weaker near zero
The horizontal axis is the Pearson correlation coefficient from −1.00 to +1.00; the shaded band marks the strong range of 0.61 to 0.80, so r = 0.72 sits inside it while r = −0.35 points in the negative direction and lies nearer zero, meaning weaker.
  • 1Pearson correlation fits because each pair consists of two Likert-type variables, and every coefficient lies on a scale running from −1.00 to +1.00.
  • 2For app ease and renewal, r = 0.72 is positive, so members who find the app easier also tend to report a higher chance of renewing; 0.72 falls inside the 0.61 to 0.80 band, which makes the association strong.
  • 2For waiting and satisfaction, r = −0.35 is negative, so more frequent waiting accompanies lower satisfaction; its magnitude sits much closer to zero than 0.72 does, so this link is clearly weaker. Neither coefficient shows that one variable predicts the other.
App ease and renewal likelihood share a strong positive association (r = 0.72, inside the 0.61 to 0.80 band). Waiting and satisfaction share a negative, noticeably weaker association (r = −0.35). Both results describe association only and do not support prediction.
Sia tip — Write the sign first and the strength word second for every coefficient, so direction and magnitude never get merged into one vague adjective.
Glossary

Key terms

Null hypothesis
A testable statement, written H₀, proposing that no difference exists between the groups being compared.
Independent variable
A categorical variable that separates respondents into the groups whose means are compared.
Independent-samples t-test
A test that checks whether the mean of a variable differs significantly between exactly two independent groups.
One-way ANOVA
A test that checks whether the mean of a variable differs significantly across three or more independent groups.
Pearson correlation
A coefficient, r, ranging from −1.00 to +1.00, that summarises the direction and strength of the linear relationship between two variables.
FAQ

Testing Group Differences and Correlation FAQ

How do I decide between a t-test and ANOVA for survey data?

Count the groups your coded data actually contains for the grouping question. Two groups point to an independent-samples t-test; three or more point to one-way ANOVA. A question with five printed options that you later merge into two categories therefore needs a t-test, so always check the recoding before naming the method.

What does fail to reject the null hypothesis mean?

It means the p-value was not below 0.05, so the sample did not provide enough evidence of a difference between groups. It is not proof that the groups are identical. In an essay, say there is no statistically significant difference and avoid claiming the groups are the same.

Is a correlation of 0.7 strong in marketing research?

Under the bands taught in this course, a coefficient between 0.61 and 0.80 counts as strong, so 0.7 qualifies. Strength depends on the size of the number, not its sign, so a coefficient of −0.7 describes an equally strong relationship running in the negative direction.

Can I use Pearson correlation with a multiple-choice question?

Only when both variables are Likert-type ratings. A single-response question that lists categories such as brands or store formats has no meaningful numeric order, so a coefficient computed on its codes would be meaningless. For a categorical grouping question paired with a rating, compare group means with a t-test or ANOVA instead.

Why can't I just compare the two group averages?

Sample means almost always differ a little by chance. A gap of 0.4 on a five-point scale might be real or might be noise from who happened to answer. The statistical test converts that gap into a p-value, and only a value below 0.05 lets you report the difference as significant.

Study strategy

Exam move

Revise this chapter as a sequence of decisions rather than a list of definitions. Take any rating question you can invent, pair it with a grouping question, and practise saying aloud which variable is independent, which is dependent, and how many groups the data hold. Then write H₀ and H₁ for that pair from memory.

For correlation, drill the two-part reading: sign for direction, magnitude for strength, and memorise the strong band of 0.61 to 0.80 exactly. Because the exam is closed book and handwritten, rehearse 200 to 250 word answers to appropriateness questions in the style of the reflective questions: a verdict, a justification naming the variable types and group count, and a plain-language conclusion.

Time yourself so each answer fits a realistic share of a two-hour paper.

Working through Testing Group Differences and Correlation in MKTG3001? Sia is AskSia’s AI Marketing tutor — ask any MKTG3001 Testing Group Differences and Correlation question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MKTG3001 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 48 of your Australian National University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MKTG3001 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works