Australian National University · FACULTY OF MARKETING

MKTG3033 Chap.3 Critical Audiences, Target Publics and Legitimacy

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 3 of 10 · MKTG3033

Critical Audiences, Target Publics and Legitimacy

Week 3 turns from the message to the people receiving it. This chapter uses the required article on how the shift from gambling to gaming changed perceptions of legitimacy, and the workshop questions on why non-users were more influenced than users.

It then sets out Mahoney’s principle that organisations depend on their relationships with target publics, works the AI-policy role play for a named public, and shows how personas turn audience research into someone you can write for without stereotyping. Practice items test the label effect and word choice for resistant publics.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Legitimacy as an audience judgement

  • 02

    Gambling versus gaming and the label effect

  • 03

    Users, non-users and audience knowledge

  • 04

    Target publics in Mahoney’s chapter 6

  • 05

    The AI-policy role play for five publics

  • 06

    Personas built from evidence

Worked example · free

Explaining why a climate label shifts some audiences more than others

Q [4 marks]. A campaign changes its wording from “climate change” to “climate crisis”. Using the Week 3 reasoning about audience knowledge, predict which audience the change will move most and explain the legitimacy risk. The four marks shown are a self-marking aid for revision, not a University allocation.
The same activity under two labels, read by two audiencesOne activity is described either as gambling or as gaming. Arrows run to users and non-users; the thicker arrow to non-users marks the group the workshop question says was more influenced.Same activityLabel: gamblingLabel: gamingUsersNon-usersweaker shift abovestronger shift below
The label effect at the heart of Activity 1: the same activity framed as gambling or as gaming reaches users and non-users differently, and the thicker lower arrow marks the non-users the workshop asks you to explain.
  • +1Identify the mechanism: a label supplies meaning, and it supplies more to people with little direct knowledge of an issue.
  • +1Predict: people already engaged with climate issues rely on what they know, so the label changes little for them; less engaged audiences lean on the label more.
  • +1Legitimacy risk: sceptical audiences may read “crisis” as alarmism and question the campaign’s credibility rather than the issue.
  • +1Recommend: pair the stronger label with concrete local evidence, so the urgency appears earned rather than asserted.
The new label will move less-informed audiences most; to protect legitimacy with sceptics, back the label with evidence they can check.
Sia tip — Name the audience’s prior experience before predicting a label’s effect; the same word moves experienced and inexperienced groups differently.
Glossary

Key terms

Cultural representation
The way an activity or group is portrayed in media and public talk, which shapes how people with no direct experience understand it.
Segmentation
Dividing a population into groups with shared characteristics so each can receive messages suited to its needs.
Persona
A realistic profile of one member of a segment, built from research, used to test whether a message will be noticed and believed.
Audience knowledge
What a group already knows or has experienced about an issue, which limits or amplifies the effect of a new frame.
FAQ

Critical Audiences, Target Publics and Legitimacy FAQ

Why did changing the word gambling to gaming matter?

The Week 3 article on framing the game shows that cultural representations shape whether consumers see an activity as legitimate. Gaming sounds like entertainment while gambling carries a moral warning, so the label shifted acceptance, especially among people without direct experience who depend on representations to form a view.

What is a target public according to Mahoney?

A group with a relationship to the organisation whose information needs a strategy must meet. Mahoney’s chapter 6 argues that organisations depend on these relationships, so publics must be segmented with care and each category’s role in the strategy understood.

How should I use personas in a campaign plan?

Build them from research rather than assumption, then use each one to test messages: would this person notice, believe and act? Keep them grounded in how the group actually behaves and in data whose source you have checked, because audience statistics can themselves be reported through a frame.

Is strategic communication just manipulation?

The Week 3 viewing argues it is not. Choosing words that suit an audience is legitimate craft. It becomes manipulation when communicators hide facts the audience needs to judge for itself. In an exam, argue that line explicitly when a scenario involves label choices or emotional appeals.

What were the five publics in the Week 3 role play?

Students, academic staff, employers, parents and the Department of Education. Each group wrote a headline, a key message and a supporting statement about a university policy allowing disclosed use of generative AI in some assessments, then the class compared how wording changed from public to public and why.

Why is the general public a weak target public?

It names no relationship to the organisation and no specific information need, so a strategy cannot choose language, messengers or channels for it. Segmenting into defined publics, each with its own concerns and role, is what allows a message to resonate and lets you measure whether the right people were reached.

Study strategy

Exam move

Learn the gambling and gaming case well enough to explain its mechanism in three sentences, then apply the same reasoning to new label pairs. Practise the five role-play questions on publics you have not yet tried, such as parents or a government department, writing a headline, key message and supporting statement each time.

When you build a persona, note the evidence behind every attribute, so that you can defend it if challenged. Add one habit: whenever you meet an audience statistic in a news story, note who published it and why, because the course’s triple j example shows that audience data is itself framed. Practise one persona a week from a public you have not yet written for, noting the evidence behind each trait.

Working through Critical Audiences, Target Publics and Legitimacy in MKTG3033? Sia is AskSia’s AI Marketing tutor — ask any MKTG3033 Critical Audiences, Target Publics and Legitimacy question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MKTG3033 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 48 of your Australian National University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MKTG3033 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works