MECM90044 Chap.9 Ethics, Responsibility and Power
Ethics, Responsibility and Power
Ethics, Responsibility and Power asks how professional ethics, corporate responsibility and power imbalance change the interpretation of a text, case, institution or public problem. The chapter's practical task is to audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges; that requires an argument, not a list of themes.
Define professional ethics at the scale of the chosen case.
Identify who uses the category, what it makes visible and what it may conceal.
This prevents the definition from floating above the evidence as an interchangeable opening paragraph.
Generative ai and ethics
In MECM90044, generative ai and ethics belongs with professional ethics and corporate responsibility because students use it to audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges.
A defensible use of generative ai and ethics should define the term, connect it to the case evidence and test the conclusion through power imbalance; repeating the phrase without that chain does not demonstrate understanding.
Use corporate responsibility to explain the relationship between the case and the claim.
Quote, describe or compare only the evidence that advances that relationship, and make the inferential step visible instead of assuming the example speaks for itself.
Bring power imbalance in as a second lens or consequence. It may deepen the first reading, expose a conflict or show why another audience would interpret the same material differently.
The comparison should change the conclusion, not simply add another term.
To audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges, build each paragraph around one contested move: claim, specific evidence, explanation and qualification.
A counter-reading is strongest when it identifies exactly which premise or piece of evidence it changes.
Make an evidence table for Ethics, Responsibility and Power with four columns: passage, image, event or institutional fact; the concept it activates; the inference drawn; and a plausible competing reading. Place professional ethics and corporate responsibility in separate rows before combining them.
This keeps interpretation anchored in specific material and shows where disagreement actually enters the argument.
Test the scale of every claim. A detail may support an argument about one text, group or moment without supporting a claim about an entire culture or institution.
Use power imbalance to decide whether the evidence should be widened, narrowed or compared with a counter-case before the paragraph reaches its conclusion.
For timed revision in MECM90044, write a one-sentence thesis for the application — audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges — then list the minimum evidence needed to defend it.
Add one objection that would matter if true and revise the thesis so it survives that objection.
The exercise trains argument selection and qualification rather than a memorised inventory of course terms.
A complete Ethics, Responsibility and Power response should make the task visible before the detail: identify what must be decided, define the relevant terms, connect the evidence to corporate responsibility, and use power imbalance to test the result.
The final sentence should answer the question actually asked rather than merely repeat the topic.
The controlling limit is specific: Ethical language without governance and outcome evidence is insufficient.
Keep that limit beside the worked example, because it separates a careful MECM90044 answer from one that sounds confident but claims more than the task or evidence supports.
For revision, retrieve professional ethics, corporate responsibility and power imbalance without notes, explain their relationship aloud, then complete a changed version of the application: audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges.
Record the first point at which your reasoning fails and repair that move before attempting another case.
What this chapter covers
- 01
professional ethics
- 02
corporate responsibility
- 03
power imbalance
- 04
Applying professional ethics
- 05
Limits of corporate responsibility and power imbalance
Worked example: Ethics, Responsibility and Power
- 1Extract the outcome, actor or operation that the Ethics, Responsibility and Power task actually requires.
- 1State the precondition under which professional ethics is relevant rather than merely familiar.
- 1Use corporate responsibility to reject the nearest alternative, then run a failure-path check with power imbalance.
- 1Choose the response and state when it must be withdrawn or narrowed: Ethical language without governance and outcome evidence is insufficient.
Key terms
- TARES test and the PRIA Code of Ethics
- The TARES test evaluates persuasive communication through Truthfulness, Authenticity, Respect, Equity and Social responsibility; the PRIA Code sets professional ethical duties for Australian public relations practice. In this chapter, use the concept when you audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges.
- Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and image repair strategies
- SCCT matches crisis responses to attributed responsibility and reputational threat, while image-repair strategies are rhetorical options such as denial, reducing offensiveness, corrective action and mortification. In this chapter, use the concept when you audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges.
- Greenwashing (and pinkwashing / bluewashing / whitewashing) in CSR communication
- Greenwashing misleadingly presents environmental responsibility; related 'washing' labels describe unsupported social, humanitarian or reputation-cleaning claims that create a gap between communication and practice. In this chapter, use the concept when you audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges.
Ethics, Responsibility and Power FAQ
What is the main task in Ethics, Responsibility and Power?
Audit whose interests, voice and consequences a communication strategy privileges.
How do professional ethics and corporate responsibility work together?
Use professional ethics to establish the object or condition, then use corporate responsibility to explain how it changes the outcome being analysed.
What must a MECM90044 answer qualify here?
Ethical language without governance and outcome evidence is insufficient.
How should I revise Ethics, Responsibility and Power?
Retrieve professional ethics, corporate responsibility and power imbalance, apply them to a changed case, and correct the first point where the evidence no longer supports the conclusion.
Assessment move
Reconstruct the relationship among professional ethics, corporate responsibility and power imbalance; complete the chapter application without notes; then test the result against this limit: Ethical language without governance and outcome evidence is insufficient.
Working through Ethics, Responsibility and Power in MECM90044? Sia is AskSia’s AI Arts and Humanities tutor — ask any MECM90044 Ethics, Responsibility and Power question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MECM90044 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.
