University of Queensland · S1 2026 · FACULTY OF BUSINESS & ECONOMICS

MKTG3506 · Digital Marketing & Social Media

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
50% final exam · hurdle14 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Built to mirror S1 2026 · updated this semester
Chapter 8 of 10 · MKTG3506

Social Media and Influencers

Social strategy is not 'be everywhere' — it's positioning: pick channels by audience, objective and content fit. This chapter walks the platform landscape and a step-by-step social strategy, then separates real engagement from vanity metrics and covers social listening and share of voice. Its centrepiece is influencer marketing: the influencer pyramid (nano → micro → macro → mega), the reach↔engagement trade-off (smaller influencers reach fewer but engage harder), and the 3 Rs — Reach, Relevance and Resonance — for vetting a partner. The signature prompts ask you to choose between micro and macro influencers by objective, and to justify the choice with the 3 Rs.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 018.1 The platform landscape — position, don't scatter
  • 028.2 The social strategy, step by step
  • 038.3 Engagement rate vs vanity metrics
  • 048.4 Social listening and share of voice
  • 058.5 The influencer tiers and the reach↔engagement trade-off
  • 068.6 Micro vs macro — choosing by objective and vetting with the 3 Rs
Worked example · free

Choosing an influencer tier — micro vs macro, by the 3 Rs

Q [5 marks]. A niche skincare brand has a modest budget and wants trusted conversions. Recommend an influencer tier and justify it with the 3 Rs.
  • +1Name the trade-off. Up the influencer pyramid, reach rises but engagement and trust fall — macro/mega reach many shallowly; nano/micro reach fewer but engage hard.
  • +1Match to the objective. The goal is trusted conversions on a modest budget, so micro-influencers fit — high engagement, niche audiences, lower cost.
  • +1Reach (the first R): enough audience size to matter, but the brand isn't chasing mass awareness — micro's reach is sufficient.
  • +1Relevance (the second R): the influencer's niche and audience must match skincare — a beauty/skincare creator, not a generalist.
  • +1Resonance (the third R): genuine engagement and trust — comments and saves, not just followers. Conclude: micro wins on relevance and resonance for this objective.
A recommendation of micro-influencers for the skincare brand, justified by the reach↔engagement trade-off and each of the 3 Rs (Reach, Relevance, Resonance) tied to the objective and budget.
Sia tip — The mark is in matching the tier to the objective and vetting with the 3 Rs, not just naming a tier. Follower count is a vanity metric — lead with engagement.
Glossary

Key terms

Influencer pyramid
The tiering of influencers by audience size — nano → micro → macro → mega. Reach rises up the pyramid while engagement, trust and relevance to a niche typically fall, which drives the tier choice.
The 3 Rs
The vetting criteria for an influencer partnership: Reach (audience size), Relevance (fit between the influencer's niche and the brand), and Resonance (genuine engagement and trust). All three matter, not just reach.
Engagement rate
A measure of how actively an audience interacts with content — likes, comments, shares, saves relative to reach or followers. It signals real attention, unlike vanity metrics such as raw follower counts.
Vanity metric
A figure that looks impressive but doesn't tie to objectives — e.g. total followers or impressions with no engagement or conversion behind them. Strategy is judged on metrics that map to goals.
Share of voice
A brand's portion of the total conversation about a topic or category, relative to competitors. Tracked through social listening, it gauges relative visibility and momentum.
FAQ

Social Media and Influencers FAQ

When should a brand choose micro over macro influencers?

When the objective is trusted conversion in a niche on a tighter budget. Micro-influencers reach fewer people but engage harder and feel more authentic; macro/mega influencers suit broad awareness pushes where reach outweighs intimacy. Match the tier to the objective.

What are the 3 Rs of influencer selection?

Reach (audience size), Relevance (fit with the brand's niche and audience) and Resonance (genuine engagement and trust). A complete justification scores a partner on all three, not on follower count alone.

Why is follower count a poor way to pick an influencer?

Because it's a vanity metric — it says nothing about whether the audience is relevant or actually engaged. Engagement rate, relevance and resonance predict results far better, which is the whole point of the 3 Rs.

Study strategy

Exam move

Internalise the reach↔engagement trade-off and the 3 Rs — the signature prompt asks you to pick an influencer tier for an objective and defend it. Practise leading with engagement over follower count, and matching the tier (nano/micro/macro/mega) to whether the goal is niche trust or mass awareness. Know that a sound social strategy positions on a few well-chosen platforms rather than chasing every one.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 11 of your University of Queensland subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MKTG3506 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$25/ month
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
Unlock the full MKTG3506 Bible + 11 University of Queensland subjects解锁完整 MKTG3506 Bible + University of Queensland 11 门科目
$25/mo