UTS21895 Chap.3 Stakeholder Theory and Social Norms of Responsibility
Stakeholder Theory and Social Norms of Responsibility
Week 3 supplies the framework most analysis in this subject runs on. Stakeholder theory arrives as a theory of strategic management, offered in 1984 as an alternative to traditional economic theorising, emphasising cooperation over market competition and making the manager responsible for fostering relationships and balancing interests across economic, social and moral dimensions.
The chapter separates descriptive, normative and instrumental work, because each accepts different evidence and switching between them mid-paragraph is the commonest error.
It then covers stakeholder governance as six verbs, three decision-making and three signalling processes, the shift away from shareholder primacy with certification as its visible form, the question of entrenchment against director discretion, and the social norms that carry responsibility through political leaders, managers, employees and the public.
What this chapter covers
- 01
The 1984 origin, and what cooperation replaced in the theory it argued against
- 02
Economic, social and moral dimensions inside one framework
- 03
Descriptive, normative and instrumental work, and the evidence each one needs
- 04
The lane-switching error, and how it appears in a draft
- 05
Purpose as a selection device rather than as inspiration
- 06
Three decision-making and three signalling processes
- 07
Certification, entrenchment, and the discretion of directors
- 08
Collective action, co-creation and two-way communication
- 09
Social norms of responsibility, their three mechanisms and their four carriers
Sorting one governance fact into the right lane
- +1Describe what is evidenced. An establishing process exists and is announced, so one decision-making verb and one signalling verb are present.
- +1Name what is not evidenced. Considering concerns in planning is not a record of a decision that changed, so no applying process is visible.
- +1Supply the normative claim from the literature: governance is more likely to be effective when entrenched in structure rather than left to director discretion, and a quarterly advisory committee without decision rights is the discretionary form.
- +1Write the recommendation to the row that is failing. Publish one case per year in which a community input changed a planning outcome, and name the mechanism that allowed it to.
Key terms
- Stakeholder
- A group that affects, or is affected by, an organisation reaching its goals. In an assessed argument a group only counts once you have shown with a case-specific source why it belongs on the list for this organisation in this period.
- Descriptive work
- Research that reports what managers actually do when they manage stakeholders. Its evidence is observation of practice, and it cannot by itself support a claim about what ought to happen.
- Normative work
- Argument about what managers ought to do, reasoned from moral and philosophical principles. Its evidence is a principle defended from the literature, not a description of current practice.
- Instrumental work
- Research into the relationship between stakeholder management and firm performance. Its evidence is a demonstrated association with outcomes rather than a plausible story about why the practice should pay.
- Stakeholder governance
- The processes through which an organisation-specific purpose shapes decisions and signals. Three decision-making processes, establishing, applying and developing, sit alongside three signalling processes, announcing, demonstrating and sharing.
- Entrenchment
- Fixing stakeholder governance into corporate governance structures rather than leaving it to the discretion of directors. The distinction matters because an entrenched commitment survives a change of leadership and a discretionary one need not.
- Social norms of responsibility
- Shared beliefs about what counts as responsible behaviour, carried by political leaders, corporate managers, employees and the public. They both encourage responsible activity and restrain irresponsible behaviour driven by self-interest.
Stakeholder Theory and Social Norms of Responsibility FAQ
Which stakeholder theory should I use in an essay, since there seem to be three?
There is one theory and three kinds of work done with it. Descriptive work reports how stakeholders are actually managed, normative work argues from principle about how they ought to be, and instrumental work tests whether stakeholder management is associated with firm performance. The practical rule is one lane per paragraph, because the three accept different evidence and a paragraph that moves between them proves nothing.
Does a company having a stakeholder panel show it takes stakeholders seriously?
It shows an establishing process exists and that its existence is announced. Whether anything is applied is a separate question, and the useful evidence is a documented case where a stakeholder input changed a decision that had not yet been made. Consultation that reports back after the fact is one-way engagement, and saying exactly that is a stronger finding than inferring insincerity.
Why does purpose get described as attracting and retaining stakeholders?
Because the mechanism the week describes is selection rather than inspiration: a purpose particular to one organisation lets its leaders gather, sift and keep the parties who back it, and holds conflict down. The analytical consequence is that a highly aligned stakeholder group is weak evidence of doing well by everyone, since it may also mean that those who disagreed left or never joined.
When are social norms actually useful in an argument?
When you have variation to explain. If two comparable firms in the same industry behave differently, norms have something to account for and the four carriers give you a route to name. With a single firm and no comparison, a norms argument usually adds words rather than evidence, and stakeholder governance will do more work.
Assessment move
Build one page of notes around the three lanes and keep it beside you while drafting, because the lane-switching error is invisible while you write and obvious when someone else reads it. For each argument you plan, write the lane, the claim and the evidence type in three words before writing the paragraph.
Learn the six governance verbs as a checklist you can run against any report: three decision-making, three signalling, and the two rows fail independently, so the recommendation has to be addressed to the row that is actually failing. Memorise the entrenchment question, because it is the single sharpest test you can apply to a stated purpose and it takes one search of a governance document to answer.
Treat the social norms material as an explanation of variation rather than as a general theory of pressure, and use it where you have two comparable organisations behaving differently. Practise the concession move: naming what your chosen lane cannot show is what separates a controlled argument from an enthusiastic one.
Working through Stakeholder Theory and Social Norms of Responsibility in UTS21895? Sia is AskSia’s AI Management tutor — ask any UTS21895 Stakeholder Theory and Social Norms of Responsibility question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how UTS21895 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.
