University of Queensland · FACULTY OF ARTS & HUMANITIES

CHIN2600 Chap.12 From Class Concept to Your Own Data Project

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 12 of 12 · CHIN2600

From Class Concept to Your Own Data Project

The final video has to end in at least three suggestions that follow from your own analysis. Work backwards from that requirement and the choice of subject is settled before you collect anything: only a problem generates suggestions, and a topic cannot.

If you cannot name somebody who is worse off because of the thing you are studying, you will reach the solution section with nothing to say.

Naming the party who would act on your recommendations also tells you what evidence you need, so writing that down before the research question tends to make the question write itself.

The task sheet states the direction rule outright: when you collect and analyse language data, begin from a social relationship or an identity and only then go looking for the language features attached to it, rather than beginning from a feature.

Collection runs top down and analysis then runs bottom up. Students who start from a feature they find interesting end up describing the feature, and the published grade descriptions name analysis that is merely descriptive as what separates a pass from a credit.

The two deliverables carry one argument under different rules.

The presentation is live, in English, secure and time limited, with a floor as well as a ceiling and a question session covering every reading. The video is open, uploaded, needs at least four illustrative examples with two in each language, and closes on suggestions. The comparison between the two data sets is a design decision made at the start, not something added at the end.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    12.1 A problem rather than a topic, and the party who would act on it

  • 02

    12.2 The direction rule, and why it is stated in the task sheet

  • 03

    12.3 The two deliverables side by side, with their different conditions

  • 04

    12.4 The calendar, and how little time an early presentation slot leaves

  • 05

    12.5 Building a matched pair of data sets by one collection rule

  • 06

    12.6 What the published grade bands actually reward

Worked example · free

Turning one phenomenon into a matched pair of data sets

Q [13 marks]. You want to argue that learners of Mandarin are heard as abrupt when they disagree, and you have three weeks. Design the collection. The step weighting shown here is our own study device and is not the University's marking scheme.
  • +2State the phenomenon with no language in it. How a speaker softens a disagreement with someone senior to them. This is what makes an English half possible.
  • +3Find two matched sites. A student group chat where a task is being allocated, in each language: both text, both semi public, both carrying a recognised asymmetry.
  • +2Write one collection rule covering both halves. Every disagreeing turn in a fixed window, names removed.
  • +3Analyse the English half first and name what does the softening there, so you do not read the Chinese through a conclusion you have already written.
  • +3Ask what occupies those positions in the Chinese half. The finding you want is not that one language is more polite but that the same job is done by different resources.
A speaker who transfers the resources rather than the job gets read as abrupt. That sentence is a problem, it is supported by both halves of a data set collected under one rule, and it generates suggestions about teaching the job rather than the form, which is what the solution section needs.
Sia tip — State your phenomenon in a sentence containing no language name. If the sentence needs the word Mandarin or the word English to make sense, you have no comparable English half yet, and the video requires two examples from each side analysed on the same terms.
Glossary

Key terms

Secure assessment
An assessment designed to protect academic integrity, in which only approved materials and tools may be used. The in class presentation carries this condition along with identity verification and a time limit.
Open assessment
An assessment in which notes, course materials and other tools including artificial intelligence may be used, with the focus on understanding, judgement and your own thinking. The final video carries this condition.
Matched pair
Two data sets that differ in the dimension under study and in as little else as possible. Without matching, any difference found between a Chinese and an English set is uninterpretable.
Collection rule
The stated procedure by which every item in your data entered it. One rule covering both halves is what makes a comparison defensible and what a marker can actually evaluate.
Illustrative example
A piece of your own data presented and then analysed, rather than described. The video requires at least four, two in each language, and the grade descriptions distinguish described examples from analysed ones.
FAQ

From Class Concept to Your Own Data Project FAQ

What is the difference between a topic and a problem here?

A problem has somebody who is worse off. Sentence final particles is a topic; second language speakers being read as blunt when they leave particles off is a problem. Only the second can end in the three suggestions the final video requires.

Can the second project reuse the first?

Yes, and the task sheet encourages it. The practical benefit is large: the questions you are asked in the assessed session are free review of your own argument, delivered weeks before the second deadline by the person who will mark it.

How early do I really need to start?

The schedule is published in Week 4 and the earliest presentations are in Week 7, so a student with an early slot has roughly three weeks from announcement to delivery. The project is introduced in Week 3 for that reason.

Where can I get feedback on my project?

In scheduled class time. Feedback is not provided by email or outside the scheduled sessions, so questions need to be brought to the weeks the course sets aside for them rather than saved for the fortnight before a deadline.

What actually separates a distinction from a credit?

The published descriptions name it: a credit applies the theory to the data with statements supported by evidence, while a distinction critiques the frameworks and takes the analysis beyond class discussion. Your own data makes that reachable, because nobody in the room has seen it.

Study strategy

Assessment move

Write the suggestions section first, in draft, the week you choose your subject. It will be wrong, and that is the point: an attempt to write three recommendations before you have findings reveals immediately whether the subject can support them. Then collect both halves of your data together, by one rule, and analyse the English half first.

Rehearse the question session aloud with somebody who has not seen your slides, because breadth across every reading is tested there and it is attached to the larger of the two components.

Working through From Class Concept to Your Own Data Project in CHIN2600? Sia is AskSia’s AI Arts and Humanities tutor — ask any CHIN2600 From Class Concept to Your Own Data Project question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how CHIN2600 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 7 of your University of Queensland subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your CHIN2600 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
Unlock the full CHIN2600 Bible + 7 University of Queensland subjects
$0.99 Trial