University of Queensland · FACULTY OF FINANCE

FINM7405 Chap.2 Volatility, Correlation and Tail Risk

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
5 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 2 of 6 · FINM7405

Volatility, Correlation and Tail Risk

Volatility measures return dispersion, but financial risk changes through time and concentrates in the tails. This chapter moves from sample variance to conditional volatility, showing how ARCH reacts to squared shocks and GARCH carries both new information and lagged variance. It then combines asset risks through covariance and explains why crisis correlation can erode diversification.

Skewness, kurtosis, fat tails and Extreme Value Theory extend the analysis beyond symmetric normal dispersion so that a risk estimate addresses the losses most relevant to capital and solvency.

The calculation sequence matters. Variance keeps squared units, volatility returns to the original return scale, and covariance combines asset volatilities with correlation.

A GARCH update adds a constant, a weighted squared innovation and lagged conditional variance. Because the innovation is squared, both a large gain and a large loss raise the forecast. A high persistence sum means the effect of a shock decays slowly.

Portfolio volatility introduces dependence.

Lower correlation can reduce the total below a weighted average of stand-alone volatilities, but that benefit is conditional on the estimate. During crises, assets exposed to the same funding or macro shock can move together. The final layer examines distribution shape: negative skew locates the longer loss tail, while excess kurtosis warns that a normal model assigns too little frequency to extremes.

Volatility, dependence and tail shape are three distinct questions.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Variance and standard deviation

  • 02

    Historical and implied volatility

  • 03

    ARCH and GARCH conditional variance

  • 04

    Correlation and portfolio diversification

  • 05

    Skewness, kurtosis and fat tails

Worked example · free

Updating a GARCH variance forecast

Q [5 marks]. With omega 0.05, alpha 0.08, beta 0.90, prior variance 1.00 and prior shock -3.00, find the next variance and volatility.
This five-point weighting organises the GARCH update and is not a published university assessment scheme.
A calm baseline is interrupted by a crash, after which conditional variance declines gradually.A calm baseline is interrupted by a crash, after which conditional variance declines gradually. GARCH preserves memory instead of resetting after one calm return.D1D2D3D4D5D6D7baselineshockconditional variance decays, not resets
A calm baseline is interrupted by a crash, after which conditional variance declines gradually. GARCH preserves memory instead of resetting after one calm return.
  • +1Square the shock: (-3.00)^2 = 9.00.
  • +1Weight new information: 0.08 x 9.00 = 0.72.
  • +1Carry memory: 0.90 x 1.00 = 0.90.
  • +1Add the floor: 0.05 + 0.72 + 0.90 = 1.67.
  • +1Take the square root: volatility is approximately 1.292%.
The conditional variance is 1.67 and the compatible volatility is approximately 1.292%.
Sia tip — Stay in variance units until the final square root.
Glossary

Key terms

Conditional Variance
A variance forecast that changes with current information and recent shocks.
Volatility Clustering
The tendency for large return movements to follow large movements and calm periods to follow calm periods.
Correlation
A standardised measure of linear co-movement between two returns.
Kurtosis
A distributional property associated with tail weight and the frequency of extreme observations.
FAQ

Volatility, Correlation and Tail Risk FAQ

Why does GARCH remember a shock?

The new squared shock enters through alpha, while beta carries the previous conditional variance into the new forecast. When alpha plus beta is close to one, the effect fades slowly rather than disappearing after one calm day.

How does correlation affect portfolio volatility?

Correlation enters the covariance cross-term. Lower correlation reduces portfolio variance for given weights and volatilities, while correlation near one removes much of the diversification benefit. Stressed correlation should be examined because dependence can rise during crises.

Why is volatility alone incomplete?

Standard deviation treats positive and negative moves symmetrically and says little about tail shape. Negative skew, excess kurtosis and fat-tail analysis matter when the decision focuses on large losses rather than ordinary dispersion.

Study strategy

Exam move

Keep a unit ledger for every calculation. Compute GARCH in variance units, then take a square root only when volatility is requested. Reproduce the calm, shock and decay path so you can explain persistence without relying on a graph. For portfolio risk, write both stand-alone variance terms and the covariance cross-term, then test the result against the weighted average volatility.

Change correlation while holding weights fixed to see exactly where diversification enters. Build a three-column comparison of historical, implied and conditional volatility, focusing on the information each uses and the decision each supports. Pair every number with a limitation: parameter stability for GARCH, correlation stability for diversification, and distribution shape for tail risk.

When an answer mentions a normal model, ask whether negative skew or excess kurtosis makes the left tail more dangerous than the symmetric estimate suggests. Finish by recomputing a two-asset portfolio, interpreting the reduction, and rewriting the conclusion for a stressed correlation state. Build a small diagnostic sheet with raw returns, squared returns, conditional variance and conditional volatility in separate columns.

This makes it harder to mix percent, decimal and variance units. After each GARCH update, compare the new variance with the long-run level and explain whether mean reversion should push the next forecast up or down. For correlation problems, recompute the portfolio under correlations of one, zero and a stressed positive value; these boundary cases reveal impossible answers immediately.

Then ask whether the covariance matrix is internally consistent and whether the weights sum to the intended net or gross exposure. Treat annualisation as an assumption rather than a formatting step, especially when clustering or serial dependence is visible.

For tail interpretation, sketch how negative skew changes loss asymmetry and how excess kurtosis raises the frequency of large moves without necessarily changing ordinary-day variance. Compare a calm-window estimate with a shocked-window estimate and explain the governance consequence for limits. Before finishing, translate the statistic into a decision: position size, capital, hedge urgency or scenario design.

A number without that bridge is measurement, not risk management.

Working through Volatility, Correlation and Tail Risk in FINM7405? Sia is AskSia’s AI Finance tutor — ask any FINM7405 Volatility, Correlation and Tail Risk question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how FINM7405 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 21 of your University of Queensland subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your FINM7405 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works