University of Sydney · S1 2026 · FACULTY OF FINANCE

FINC3017 Investments and Portfolio Management

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
12 Chapters102-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Built to mirror S1 2026 · updated this semester
The Complete Exam Bible · S1 2026

FINC3017 Overview

Investments and Portfolio Management
— one subject, every concept, every calculation, every mark
  • University of Sydney
  • S1 2026
  • 12 chapters
  • Finance

FINC3017 Investments and Portfolio Management is the University of Sydney's third-year capstone on how risky assets are priced and how portfolios are built and judged — from Markowitz mean-variance optimisation and the CAPM, through consumption-based asset pricing and the stochastic discount factor, multi-factor models and market anomalies, to performance evaluation, volatility trading and alternatives, all built on the Bodie-Kane-Marcus text.

It is assessed by a 30% individual assignment (due 13 April 2026), a 30% group Excel assignment (due 25 May 2026), and a closed-book, multiple-choice final exam worth 40% that covers the entire course with a mix of quantitative and conceptual questions.

  • Assessed by Assignment 1 (Individual) 30% · Assignment 2 (Group) 30% · Final exam 40%
  • Key terms Efficient frontier, Capital Market Line (CML) vs Security Market Line (SML), Beta (β), Stochastic discount factor (SDF)
  • How to prepare Treat FINC3017 as a single connected map, not twelve separate topics…
  • Most asked Is the final exam closed-book, and is it a hurdle?
FINC3017 · University of Sydney
An independent, AskSia-authored study guide. AskSia is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by University of Sydney; the course code and name are used for identification only.
Assessment

How FINC3017 is assessed

ComponentWeightFormat
Assignment 1 (Individual)30%Individual; online submission; due 13 April 2026 23:59; apply investment theory to construct/evaluate portfolios, interpret academic research and critique asset-pricing models and strategies; assessed on technical quantitative application AND critical written discussion
Assignment 2 (Group)30%Group; online submission; due 25 May 2026 23:59; same outcomes as Assignment 1 PLUS use Microsoft Excel to solve and analyse investment problems
Final exam40%Closed-book, multiple-choice (per the Lecture 1 slide); held during the S1 2026 final exam period; covers the ENTIRE course; a mix of quantitative and conceptual questions; duration, venue, number of questions and any pass-the-exam hurdle are subject to confirmation — confirm in your unit outline
Contents · every chapter, one map

What FINC3017 covers

The whole subject → one exam-ready map. Each topic links to its free chapter guide.

01

Foundations: Returns, Statistics & Utility

Simple/log returns, moments, OLS with robust standard errors, and expected-utility risk aversion

Foundations: Returns, Statistics & Utility (Week 1) builds the toolkit the whole course runs on.

  • Simple net return R_t = P_t/P_{t-1} − 1 vs gross return 1 + R_t
  • Log return r_t = ln(1 + R_t), additive across time
  • Arithmetic mean vs geometric mean, with r_G ≤ arithmetic
  • Moments: mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis (equity returns: negative skew, excess kurtosis)
  • Variance of the sample mean under i.i.d.: Var(r̄) = Var(r)/T
  • Matrix algebra: transpose, the 2×2 inverse, Cholesky A = LLᵀ
02

Asset Classes, Instruments & Market Mechanics

Real vs financial assets, index weighting, margin and short-sale mechanics, and futures

Asset Classes, Instruments & Market Mechanics (Week 2) maps the investable universe and the plumbing of trading it.

  • Real vs financial assets; debt vs equity (common = residual claim + vote, preferred = fixed dividend, priority) vs derivatives
  • Credit spread = corporate yield − treasury yield
  • Index weighting: price-weighted (DJIA), value/free-float-weighted (S&P 500, ASX 200), equal-weighted (1/N)
  • Bid-ask spread = ask − bid; market, limit and stop orders
  • Long margin = equity/value = (value − loan)/value; margin call when below the maintenance level
  • Margin-call price for a long position
03

Risk, Return & the Two-Asset Portfolio

The Sharpe ratio, annualising by √n, and two-asset μ_p/σ_p with the role of correlation

Risk, Return & the Two-Asset Portfolio (Week 3) is the quantitative heart of early portfolio theory.

  • Equity risk premium = E[r_stock] − rf
  • Sharpe ratio = (r̄_i − rf)/σ_i
  • Annualising: variance scales by n; volatility and Sharpe scale by √n
  • Portfolio weights w_i = N_iP_i/ΣN_jP_j (sum to 1; negative = short)
  • Two-asset mean: μ_p = w₁μ₁ + w₂μ₂
  • Two-asset variance: σ_p² = w₁²σ₁² + w₂²σ₂² + 2w₁w₂σ₁σ₂ρ
04

Modern Portfolio Theory & the Efficient Frontier

Markowitz optimisation, the efficient frontier, the GMV, and the CAL/CML tangency portfolio

Modern Portfolio Theory & the Efficient Frontier (Week 4) generalises the two-asset case to many assets using matrix algebra.

  • Markowitz mean-variance: E[R_p] = w'μ, σ_p² = w'Σw
  • The efficient frontier (upper branch) and the global minimum-variance (GMV) portfolio
  • GMV weights w_GMV = Σ⁻¹¹/(¹'Σ⁻¹¹) and σ²_GMV = 1/C
  • The capital allocation line (CAL): E[R_p] = rf + w(E[R_A] − rf), with slope = Sharpe
  • The tangency (max-Sharpe) portfolio and the two-fund theorem
  • The capital market line (CML) from rf through the tangency portfolio
05

The CAPM & its Empirical Tests

The security market line, beta, and time-series/cross-sectional tests of the CAPM

The CAPM & its Empirical Tests (Week 5) turns portfolio theory into an equilibrium pricing model.

  • CAPM assumptions: homogeneous expectations, price-takers, single period, mean-variance optimisers, frictionless, risk-free borrow/lend
  • Security market line: E[R_i] = rf + β_i(E[R_m] − rf), with β_i = Cov(R_i, R_m)/σ_m²
  • Only systematic risk is priced; idiosyncratic risk is diversified away
  • Equilibrium market risk premium MRP = A·σ_m²
  • Variance decomposition Var(R_i) = β_i²Var(f) + Var(ε_i)
  • Jensen's alpha = 0 under the CAPM; time-series test of α = 0 and the GRS joint test
06

Consumption-Based Asset Pricing, State Prices & the SDF

Arrow-Debreu state prices, the stochastic discount factor, risk-neutral probabilities and the Euler equation

Consumption-Based Asset Pricing, State Prices & the SDF (Week 6) is the signature analytic content of FINC3017.

  • State space: S states, probabilities π_s summing to 1
  • Arrow-Debreu security and the state price ψ_s (0 to 1)
  • Pricing any asset: p = Σψ_s·y_s; risk-free bond B = Σψ_s and 1 + rf = 1/B
  • Stochastic discount factor M_s = ψ_s/π_s, so p = E[M·y] and 1 = E[M(1 + R_i)]
  • Risk-neutral probabilities π̃_s = ψ_s/B and pricing under Q
  • Inferring AD prices from option prices via the butterfly: AD(K) = c(K−1) − 2c(K) + c(K+1)
07

Anomalies, APT & Multi-Factor Models

Size/value/momentum anomalies, APT, and the Fama-French and Carhart factor models

Anomalies, APT & Multi-Factor Models (Week 7) is the empirical answer to the CAPM's failures.

  • The main anomalies: size, value (high book-to-market), momentum, PEAD, low-beta, profitability, investment
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory: E[R_i] = λ₀ + β_i¹λ₁ + … + β_iⁿλₙ (factors unspecified)
  • Fama-French 3-factor: market + SMB (size) + HML (value)
  • Carhart 4-factor: adds momentum (MOM)
  • Fama-French 5-factor: adds RMW (profitability) and CMA (investment)
  • Reading factor loadings: a non-zero alpha means the model is incomplete
08

Active vs Passive, Tracking Error & Allocation

Market-timing tests, tracking error, the information ratio, and portfolio weighting schemes

Active vs Passive, Tracking Error & Allocation (Week 8) judges active management and sets portfolio weights through time.

  • Fama-MacBeth in a multifactor setting: stage-1 betas, stage-2 per-period λ_kt
  • Separating factor exposure (β) from factor pricing (λ)
  • Non-performance metrics: fees (2-and-20), turnover, liquidity, concentration, leverage, tax
  • Tracking error = σ(ε) from r_i − rf = α_i + β_i(r_bench − rf) + ε_t
  • Information ratio IR = α_i/σ(ε)
  • Fundamental Law of Active Management: IR = IC × √breadth
09

Factor Investing, Smart Beta & Betting-Against-Beta

The smart-beta pipeline, alternative weighting, and the betting-against-beta strategy

Factor Investing, Smart Beta & Betting-Against-Beta (Week 9) turns academic factors into investable strategies.

  • Smart beta as rules-based factor tilts that keep passive features (transparency, low cost)
  • The 8-step pipeline: objective → metrics → universe → factor score → construction → constraints → rebalance → monitor
  • Factor score as a standardised Z = (X_i − μ)/σ
  • Alternative weighting: cap, equal (1/N), fundamental (Arnott), risk-parity, minimum-variance, maximum-Sharpe
  • Factor overlay w = θ·w_mc + (1 − θ)w_f
  • Betting-against-beta (Frazzini-Pedersen): lever low-β long + short high-β so net β = 0
10

Performance Evaluation: Skill vs Luck

Time- vs money-weighted return, Sharpe/Treynor/Jensen/information-ratio measures, and attribution

Performance Evaluation: Skill vs Luck (Week 10) is the toolkit for judging a portfolio after the fact.

  • Time-weighted return (TWR) = ∏(1 + R_i) − 1 vs money-weighted return (MWR / IRR)
  • Sharpe = (E[r_p] − rf)/σ_p; M² = rf + Sharpe·σ_M
  • Treynor = (E[r_p] − rf)/β_p; Jensen α = E[r_p] − [rf + β_p(E[r_M] − rf)]
  • Information ratio = α/σ(ε); Sortino = (E[r_p] − target)/downside deviation
  • Choosing the metric: total vs systematic risk, vs model, vs benchmark, downside-only
  • Market-timing tests: Treynor-Mazuy quadratic and Henriksson-Merton
11

Volatility as an Asset, Options & Variance Swaps

The VIX, the volatility risk premium, implied-vol skew, the Greeks and the variance swap

Volatility as an Asset, Options & Variance Swaps (Week 11) treats volatility itself as something you can trade.

  • Volatility as a traded asset: mean-reverting, negative long-run return, negatively correlated with equities
  • P (physical) vs Q (risk-neutral) measure; implied vol is a Q quantity
  • Volatility risk premium VRP = σ^Q − σ^P > 0 on average, earned by the seller
  • VIX / A-VIX as model-free 30-day implied vol; daily move ≈ VIX/√252
  • Black-Scholes pricing and implied volatility; the volatility skew
  • The Greeks: Delta, Vega (primary vol exposure), Theta, Gamma
12

Practical & Current Issues: Alternatives & Machine Learning

Hedge funds, private equity and other alternatives, and supervised vs unsupervised machine learning

Practical & Current Issues: Alternatives & Machine Learning (Week 12) closes the course with two frontier topics.

  • Alternative assets: hedge funds, private equity, real estate/REITs, commodities, infrastructure, crypto
  • Alts characteristics: illiquidity, low correlation, higher fees, complexity
  • Private-equity life-cycle: angel → venture → buyout → growth/mezzanine
  • Supervised ML (logistic regression, ridge, decision trees, SVM) vs unsupervised ML (clustering, PCA)
  • The confusion matrix and Type-I (false positive) vs Type-II (false negative) errors
  • F1 score = TP/(TP + ½FN + ½FP) and the F_β generalisation

The 30/30/40 split is confirmed by both the Lecture 1 slide and the Canvas Assignment page; the exam date, duration, venue and any hurdle are subject to confirmation ("details will be disclosed closer to the date"). Because the final is closed-book MCQ, marks come from holding the right formula and the right which-model / which-metric reasoning in your head — confirm the exam date and any hurdle in your unit outline.

Worked example · free

CAPM required return and Jensen's alpha — did the manager add value?

Q [6 marks]. The risk-free rate is rf = 4% and the expected market return is E[R_m] = 10%. Fund Z realised a return of 9.5% over the period with an estimated beta of β = 0.5. (a) What return did the CAPM require of Fund Z? (b) What is Fund Z's Jensen's alpha, and does it indicate outperformance?
  • 3 marks(a) Apply the Security Market Line: E[R_Z] = rf + β(E[R_m] − rf). Substitute the numbers: E[R_Z] = 4% + 0.5 × (10% − 4%) = 4% + 0.5 × 6% = 4% + 3% = 7%.
  • 2 marks(b) Jensen's alpha is the realised return minus the CAPM-required return: α = R_Z − E[R_Z] = 9.5% − 7% = +2.5%.
  • 1 markInterpret: α = +2.5% > 0, so Fund Z beat the return its systematic risk (β = 0.5) demanded. A low beta paired with a positive alpha is the signature of a defensive or market-neutral strategy that earned return without taking much market risk.
CAPM required 7%; Fund Z's Jensen's alpha is +2.5%, indicating risk-adjusted outperformance given its low beta of 0.5.
Sia tip — In a closed-book MCQ exam, plug into the SML in one line, then subtract — alpha is always realised minus CAPM-required. Watch the sign and the order: a positive alpha means the fund beat its beta-justified return, while a flat or downward-sloping SML (Black-Jensen-Scholes evidence) is exactly why low-beta funds can post positive alphas in practice.
Glossary

Key terms

Efficient frontier
The set of portfolios that give the maximum expected return for each level of risk (the upper branch of the mean-variance opportunity set). Below the global minimum-variance portfolio the lower branch is inefficient. With a risk-free asset, the best portfolio on the frontier is the tangency portfolio.
Capital Market Line (CML) vs Security Market Line (SML)
The CML plots expected return against total risk (σ) and runs from rf through the tangency / market portfolio — it prices efficient portfolios. The SML plots expected return against systematic risk (β) and prices every asset, efficient or not: E[R] = rf + β(E[R_m] − rf).
Beta (β)
An asset's systematic-risk measure, β = Cov(R_i, R_m)/σ_m². Under the CAPM only beta is priced; idiosyncratic risk is diversified away and earns no premium. Beta is the slope of the asset's regression on the market (the characteristic line).
Stochastic discount factor (SDF)
The pricing kernel M = ψ/π that prices every asset through p = E[M·X], equivalently 1 = E[M(1 + R_i)]. M is high in bad states (high marginal utility / low consumption), so assets that pay off in bad times are valuable and carry a lower required return.
Tracking error and information ratio
Tracking error is the standard deviation of a portfolio's return relative to its benchmark, σ(ε). The information ratio IR = α/σ(ε) is active return per unit of tracking error; the fundamental law decomposes it as IR = IC × √breadth (skill times the number of independent bets).
FAQ

FINC3017 FAQ

Is FINC3017 hard?

FINC3017 is a demanding third-year finance elective: it fuses portfolio math (matrix optimisation, CAPM beta, SDF / state pricing, factor regressions, variance-swap strikes) with a wide conceptual sweep (anomalies, smart beta, active-vs-passive, why CAPM fails, why volatility behaves like insurance), and the set text is the whole of Bodie-Kane-Marcus plus a decade of asset-pricing papers.

It is manageable if you keep up week by week, because the closed-book multiple-choice final rewards holding one fused map of every formula and every decision rule in your head, rather than memorising any single derivation.

Is the final exam closed-book, and is it a hurdle?

The Lecture 1 slide states the final is a closed-book, multiple-choice exam worth 40% that covers the entire course with a mix of quantitative and conceptual questions.

No single-component hurdle is stated in the available course materials, and the exam date, duration, venue and number of questions are listed as "details will be disclosed closer to the date" — so confirm the exam date and any pass-the-exam rule in your unit outline before you rely on them.

What do the two assignments cover and when are they due?

Assignment 1 is an individual task worth 30%, due 13 April 2026: you apply investment theory to build and evaluate portfolios, interpret academic research and critique asset-pricing models, and you are marked on both quantitative application and critical written discussion. Assignment 2 is a group task worth 30%, due 25 May 2026: the same outcomes plus you must use Microsoft Excel to solve and analyse investment problems.

How much maths and Excel does the course assume?

A lot. Week 1 sets up returns (simple vs log), matrix algebra (transpose, inverse, Cholesky) for n-asset portfolios, OLS with White standard errors, and expected-utility risk aversion (CARA/CRRA). From there you optimise portfolios with Σ⁻¹, derive the CAPM and SDF, run factor regressions and price variance swaps.

Assignment 2 is explicitly Excel-based (MMULT, MINVERSE, array formulas), so being fluent in matrix functions and regression in Excel is a real advantage.

What is the single most examinable idea across the whole unit?

The chain that links risk to required return: diversification pushes you to the efficient frontier, a risk-free asset gives the CAL/CML and a single tangency portfolio (two-fund theorem), and in equilibrium the CAPM prices each asset on the SML by its beta.

Everything later either tests that chain (consumption-based SDF, multi-factor models that add factors when the CAPM alpha is non-zero) or judges a portfolio against it (Sharpe / Treynor / Jensen / information ratio). Expect MCQs that ask you to pick the right model or the right performance metric for a described situation.

Chapter questions

Questions students ask in each FINC3017 chapter

When do I use log returns instead of simple returns?
Use log returns when you need to add returns across time, because a multi-period log return is just the sum of the single-period log returns. Use simple (arithmetic) returns when you combine assets within a portfolio at one point in time, because a portfolio's simple return is the weighted sum of the assets' simple returns. Mixing the two up is a classic exam trap. Chapter 01 · Foundations: Returns, Statistics & Utility
Why is a short sale's margin call triggered by a price rise rather than a fall?
When you short, you owe shares, so your liability grows as the price climbs. Your equity is the account balance minus the cost to buy the shares back, and a rising price shrinks that equity. The margin-call price is therefore above your entry price, the mirror image of a long position where the call comes from the price falling. Chapter 02 · Asset Classes, Instruments & Market Mechanics
Why does a portfolio's standard deviation fall below the weighted average of the two assets' volatilities?
Because the covariance term is less than the product of the volatilities whenever correlation is below +1. Variance is the weighted sum of the own-variances PLUS a cross term scaled by ρ, so any ρ < 1 makes the portfolio less risky than a naive average would suggest. Only at ρ = +1 do the volatilities add up linearly with no diversification gain. Chapter 03 · Risk, Return & the Two-Asset Portfolio
What is the difference between the CAL and the CML?
The capital allocation line connects the risk-free asset to ANY chosen risky portfolio, while the capital market line is the specific CAL drawn through the tangency (market) portfolio — the one with the highest Sharpe ratio. Under CAPM equilibrium the tangency portfolio is the market portfolio, so the CML is the best possible CAL everyone can access. Chapter 04 · Modern Portfolio Theory & the Efficient Frontier
Why does only beta, not total volatility, determine an asset's required return under the CAPM?
Because a well-diversified investor can eliminate idiosyncratic risk for free, the market refuses to pay a premium for it. Only the systematic component — how an asset co-moves with the market, measured by beta — cannot be diversified away, so the SML rewards beta alone and an asset's own volatility is irrelevant to its equilibrium expected return. Chapter 05 · The CAPM & its Empirical Tests
What is the intuition behind the stochastic discount factor being high in bad states?
In a bad state your consumption is low, so an extra dollar there is worth a lot — marginal utility is high — and the SDF M is exactly that scaled marginal utility. An asset that pays off in bad states is therefore valuable insurance, gets a high price, and earns a low required return; the SDF formalises this 'pay when it hurts most' logic. Chapter 06 · Consumption-Based Asset Pricing, State Prices & the SDF
What is the difference between the APT and a specific model like Fama-French?
The APT is a general framework that says expected returns are linear in some set of systematic factors, but it stays silent on what those factors are. Fama-French (and Carhart, FF5) are concrete implementations that name the factors — market, size, value, momentum, profitability, investment — and supply the data to estimate the premiums, so they are testable special cases of the APT idea. Chapter 07 · Anomalies, APT & Multi-Factor Models
When should I use the information ratio instead of the Sharpe ratio?
Use the information ratio when you are judging an active manager against a specific benchmark, because it measures benchmark-relative alpha per unit of tracking error. Use the Sharpe ratio when you care about total, standalone risk relative to the risk-free rate. The IR is essentially the benchmark-relative version of the Sharpe ratio. Chapter 08 · Active vs Passive, Tracking Error & Allocation
How is smart beta different from both passive indexing and active management?
Smart beta keeps the passive virtues — transparent, rules-based and low-cost — but deliberately departs from cap-weighting to tilt toward factors like value or low volatility, which is an active decision. So it is a middle ground: the systematic, disclosed rules of indexing combined with the factor bets of active management, without a manager's discretion. Chapter 09 · Factor Investing, Smart Beta & Betting-Against-Beta
When do I use Sharpe versus Treynor?
Use the Sharpe ratio when the portfolio is the investor's entire holding, because total risk (σ) is what they bear. Use the Treynor measure when the portfolio is just one sleeve of a larger, well-diversified portfolio, so only its systematic (beta) risk is relevant. Both reward excess return, but they divide by different risk measures, which can rank funds differently. Chapter 10 · Performance Evaluation: Skill vs Luck
Why does volatility behave like insurance?
Volatility tends to spike exactly when markets fall, so a long-volatility position pays off in crashes — like an insurance policy. Investors will pay up for that protection, which is why implied volatility sits above realised volatility on average (the volatility risk premium) and why being long volatility has a negative expected long-run return: you are paying the insurance premium. Chapter 11 · Volatility as an Asset, Options & Variance Swaps
Why do investors add alternatives despite their high fees and illiquidity?
The main draw is diversification: many alternatives have low correlation with public stocks and bonds, so adding them can lower overall portfolio risk and shift the efficient frontier outward. Investors accept the illiquidity, higher fees and valuation complexity as the price for that diversification and for access to return sources unavailable in public markets — but the exam expects you to weigh both sides. Chapter 12 · Practical & Current Issues: Alternatives & Machine Learning
Study strategy

How to study for the exam

Treat FINC3017 as a single connected map, not twelve separate topics, because the closed-book MCQ final can pull a quantitative or conceptual question from any week. (1) Build the spine first: returns and utility (Week 1) → two-asset risk-return (Week 3) → efficient frontier, CAL/CML and the tangency portfolio (Week 4) → the CAPM and the SML (Week 5). If you can move along that chain fluently, half the exam is reflexes.

(2) For every model, store one formula plus one decision rule — e.g. SML for required return, M = ψ/π for the SDF, IR = α/σ(ε) for active skill — so an MCQ triggers the right tool instantly.

(3) Drill the tutorial-confirmed quant patterns: two-asset μ_p / σ_p with short (negative) weights, tangency / GMV weights, CAPM alpha, Arrow-Debreu state prices and butterfly pricing, Euler-equation two-period consumption, betting-against-beta sizing, and the performance-metric showdown (Sharpe vs Treynor vs Jensen vs IR vs Sortino).

(4) Learn the conceptual decision trees: which performance metric when, which factor model when the alpha is non-zero, and name-the-anomaly with its risk-vs-behavioural explanation. (5) Use the two Excel assignments as live rehearsal — matrix optimisation in Assignment 2 cements the exact n-asset algebra the exam abstracts.

(6) Confirm the exam date and format in your unit outline early, since the source flags them as subject to confirmation.

Study FINC3017 with AI

Your AI Finance tutor for FINC3017

Stuck on a hard FINC3017 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Finance tutor — ask any FINC3017 Investments and Portfolio Management question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 202 of your subjects at University of Sydney, plus 1,000+ more Bibles across the AskSia library.
Sia - your FINC3017 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 102-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works