Adelaide University · FACULTY OF ACCOUNTING

ACCT2002 Chap.10 Relevant Information for Managerial Decisions

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
9 Chapters8-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 10 of 13 · ACCT2002

Relevant Information for Managerial Decisions

Relevant-information analysis compares future cash flows and other consequences that differ between alternatives. Historical cost, book value and unavoidable allocated common cost do not become relevant merely because they appear in an accounting report. Opportunity cost does not necessarily appear in the ledger, yet it can be decisive when scarce capacity has another use.

This chapter applies the relevance filter to insource versus outsource, special orders, constrained product mix, bottlenecks, adding or dropping customers or segments and equipment replacement.

The quantitative comparison is only one part of the decision: quality, reliability, workforce capability, strategic control and performance-evaluation incentives must be identified separately rather than forced into an invented dollar value.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Relevant and irrelevant information

  • 02

    Opportunity cost and avoidable cost

  • 03

    Insourcing and outsourcing

  • 04

    Special-order decisions

  • 05

    Product mix under a capacity constraint

  • 06

    Managing bottlenecks

  • 07

    Adding or dropping customers and business units

  • 08

    Equipment replacement and book value

  • 09

    Decision models and performance evaluation

Worked example · free

Rank products by contribution per bottleneck hour

Q [10 marks]. AskSia-authored practice allocation: Product A sells for $120 with $72 variable cost and uses 3 bottleneck hours. Product B sells for $95 with $55 variable cost and uses 2 bottleneck hours. Demand is 500 A and 700 B, but only 1,900 bottleneck hours are available. Find the profit-maximising mix before fixed cost.
  • 2Contribution per unit is $48 for A and $40 for B. Unit contribution alone would rank A first, but that ignores the constraint.
  • 3Contribution per bottleneck hour is $48 ÷ 3 = $16 for A and $40 ÷ 2 = $20 for B, so B ranks first.
  • 3Meet all demand for 700 B using 1,400 hours. The remaining 500 hours produce 166 whole units of A, using 498 hours.
  • 2Total contribution is 700 × $40 + 166 × $48 = $35,968, with 2 unused hours. Fixed costs are then deducted if they are unchanged by the mix.
Produce 700 units of B and 166 units of A for contribution of $35,968. The ranking measure is contribution per unit of the scarce resource, not contribution per product unit.
Sia tip — Name the constraint and its unit before ranking. If the bottleneck changes, the ranking can change even when prices and variable costs do not.
Glossary

Key terms

Relevant information
Expected future information that differs between alternatives.
Sunk cost
A past cost that cannot be changed by the present decision.
Opportunity cost
The benefit sacrificed by choosing one alternative rather than the next best use of a resource.
Avoidable cost
A cost that will not be incurred if a particular alternative is selected.
Bottleneck
A resource whose limited capacity constrains output.
Contribution per constraint unit
Contribution margin divided by the amount of scarce resource consumed.
Book value
Historical asset cost less accumulated depreciation; normally irrelevant to replacement cash flows.
FAQ

Relevant Information for Managerial Decisions FAQ

Why is allocated fixed cost often irrelevant?

If the total common resource and cash spending continue under both alternatives, reallocating the same amount changes reported segment profit but not the organisation's total cash flow.

When is an opportunity cost included?

When a resource used by one alternative could earn a contribution in another feasible use. It is the value of the best forgone use, not an arbitrary surcharge.

Should a special order be accepted whenever price exceeds variable cost?

Not automatically. Include incremental setup, quality, delivery and opportunity costs, and consider customer reactions, capacity and strategic effects.

Why can a manager resist an economically sound replacement?

Performance measures tied to book value or short-run accounting profit can conflict with future cash-flow benefits. The decision model and evaluation model should be aligned.

Study strategy

Exam move

Use a relevance table with one column per alternative and include only future differences. Put sunk and unavoidable items in a separate “excluded and why” box so they do not sneak back into the arithmetic. For constrained mix, rank by contribution per bottleneck unit and then allocate capacity subject to demand. After every numerical answer, list two qualitative factors and identify who owns the information.

Practise defending why book value is excluded without saying the asset has no economic significance.

Working through Relevant Information for Managerial Decisions in ACCT2002? Sia is AskSia’s AI Accounting tutor — ask any ACCT2002 Relevant Information for Managerial Decisions question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how ACCT2002 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 2 of your Adelaide University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your ACCT2002 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 8-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
Unlock the full ACCT2002 Bible + 2 Adelaide University subjects
$0.99 Trial