The Education University of Hong Kong · FACULTY OF EDUCATION

FEX2162 Chap.5 Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
8 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 5 of 10 · FEX2162

Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning

Three parts of whole-person development

Session three describes whole-person development in a school through three things: a wide range of student activities, positive values and attitudes, and catering for different learning needs. The last is the subject of the previous chapter.

This one takes the first two through a single invented classroom case, because values education is easier to reflect on when you can watch it happen than when you try to define it.

Positive values as a process

The session's description of values education is a sequence: help pupils at different stages recognise the values involved in a difficulty, analyse it objectively, make a reasonable judgement and act on it, so that they can face the challenges of later life.

That sequence gives you a way to describe a moment in your own teaching. The question is not whether you handled it perfectly, but what reasoning you offered pupils and what it made possible.

Kohlberg's stages

The session sets out Kohlberg's stages of moral development in three levels. At the pre-conventional level, judgement centres on avoiding punishment and then on satisfying one's own needs.

At the conventional level, pupils seek approval and then follow rules as fixed. At the post-conventional level, judgement rests on understanding rules as social agreements and then on universal ethical principles applied consistently. Used carefully, the stages let you say which kind of reason a response to an incident appeals to.

Structures, not only moments

An incident is half the story.

The session lists who supports development during the placement: the Principal, the academic affairs team, the discipline and guidance team, the co-curricular activities team, subject and class teachers and the school social worker. It asks you to photograph a teacher, or yourself, taking part in an activity with pupils and to caption it, and to draw a mind map of how the school supports development.

Those tasks produce exhibits for the second portfolio task and for the sharing sessions.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Activities, values and diverse needs

  • 02

    Values education as recognise, analyse, judge and act

  • 03

    One invented incident, three possible responses

  • 04

    Kohlberg's pre-conventional, conventional and post-conventional levels

  • 05

    Offering a reason one step up

  • 06

    Who supports development in a school

  • 07

    Photographs with captions as reflection

  • 08

    Where an incident fits in the portfolio

Worked example · free

Name the reasoning behind a response

Q [5 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. During a group task in Primary 6, one group finishes early by copying another group's answers. The student-teacher says: 'If everyone copied, nobody would learn anything from group work, so what would be fair here?' Identify the level of reasoning this response appeals to and explain how you would describe it in a reflection. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation, not a University marking scheme.
The stair describes reasoning, not pupils.The stair describes reasoning, not pupils. A useful response to an incident offers a reason one step above the one the class is using, rather than a lecture pitched at the top.Six stages in three levels, each resting on the one belowPunishmentand obedience1Instrumentalexchange2Seekingapproval3Law andorder4Socialcontract5Universalprinciple6Pre-conventionalConventionalPost-conventional
The stair describes reasoning, not pupils. A useful response to an incident offers a reason one step above the one the class is using, rather than a lecture pitched at the top.
  • 2Identify the kind of reason offered.
  • 1Place it against Kohlberg's levels.
  • 2Write the reflective sentence.
The response does not appeal to punishment or to a rule. It asks pupils to consider what would happen if everyone acted the same way and what a fair arrangement would be, which is reasoning about agreements that serve the whole group. That points towards the post-conventional level, even if pupils answer from lower on the scale. In a reflection I would describe the incident without identifying the group, state that I chose a fairness question rather than a sanction because I wanted pupils to see why the practice matters, and note what the class said in reply as evidence of where their reasoning sat.
Sia tip — In any values incident, write down the exact reason you gave pupils; the reflection is about that reason, not about the incident.
Glossary

Key terms

Moral Development
The growth of the reasoning people use to judge right and wrong, described by Kohlberg as a sequence of stages.
Pre-conventional Level
Kohlberg's first level, in which judgement rests on avoiding punishment and then on satisfying one's own needs.
Conventional Level
Kohlberg's middle level, in which judgement rests on seeking others' approval and then on following established rules.
Post-conventional Level
Kohlberg's highest level, in which rules are understood as agreements and judgement rests on consistent ethical principles.
FAQ

Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning FAQ

Is a behaviour incident suitable evidence for the portfolio?

It can be, if you describe it without identifying anyone and focus on the reasoning you offered and what pupils did with it. A values moment is evidence of the caring cultivator role and of support for moral development, not a story to be told for its own sake.

Who in a school supports whole-person development?

Session three lists the Principal, the academic affairs team, the discipline and guidance team, the co-curricular activities team, subject and class teachers, and the school social worker. Observe which of them are involved in an activity you can document, rather than listing them all.

What kinds of student activity count?

The session mentions religious, academic, sports, music, uniformed and interest groups. Any activity counts if you can show how it serves development in the areas the task names, such as values, multicultural awareness or an entrepreneurial spirit.

Study strategy

Assessment move

Keep a short incident note for any values moment in your lessons: what happened, the reason you gave, and what pupils said back. After two weeks, choose the note where you can best explain your reasoning with Kohlberg's levels and draft it as a paragraph for the second task or for your sharing.

Working through Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning in FEX2162? Sia is AskSia’s AI Education tutor — ask any FEX2162 Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how FEX2162 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 16 of your The Education University of Hong Kong subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your FEX2162 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works