MDUM8010 Dissertation
MDUM8010 Overview
- The University of Hong Kong
- 2026-27, both semesters
- Postgraduate research course
- 15 credit research option
- Assessed by coursework
What this course is
MDUM8010 Dissertation is the individual research option that closes the Master of Digital Urban Management, run by the Department of Urban Planning and Design at The University of Hong Kong.
- Assessed by Work progress and the proposal, then a final dissertation of at most 15,000 words read by two markers.
- The skill being tested Turning a real urban problem into a bounded question and answering it with your own analysis.
- Hardest step Getting ethics approval in time, since no data may be collected or analysed before it.
- Where to confirm Dates marked tentative, the presentation schedule and any timetable changes are announced on Moodle.
How MDUM8010 is assessed
| Component | Weight | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Work Progress / Proposal | 20% | Proposal, progress reports, presentations and progress meetings with the supervisor; determined by the supervisor |
| Final Dissertation | 80% | At most 15,000 words, graded separately by the supervisor and another teacher, with a third marker where marks diverge |
The course outline lists these two components and they total 100%. Under the final dissertation it prints six aspects with the values research question 10, literature review 15, analytical framework and methods 15, analysis, findings and discussions 20, conclusions and recommendations 20, and communication and presentation 10. Those values add to 90 rather than 80, so read them as the relative emphasis of each aspect and ask your supervisor how they are scaled.
Two further conditions sit outside the table. Failing to submit the relevant forms and required deliverables by the deadlines without valid reasons leads to a fail grade in the course, and a dissertation that does not meet the format requirements may be returned for rectification, downgraded, or rejected with an F grade. All marks are presented, moderated and endorsed at the Internal Examiners' Meeting.
Assessment structure
Segment widths reproduce the published percentage weights and total 100%.
Current MDUM8010 dates
| Date | Item | Control |
|---|---|---|
| 8 September 2026 | Introductory briefing on dissertation and capstone | The outline labels this date a Wednesday; it falls on a Tuesday, which is how the capstone outline lists it. |
| 15 September to 6 October 2026 | Four preparatory research training lectures | Shared with the capstone route; confirm times and rooms on Moodle. |
| 9 October 2026 | Tentative topic and preliminary proposal, Form A1 | About 1,200 to 1,500 words, four to five pages. |
| 14 and 15 January 2027 | Proposal presentation | Marked tentative in the timetable. |
| 18 January 2027 | Draft dissertation proposal on Moodle, Form A2 | Submitted through Moodle. |
| 4 February 2027 | Title, revised proposal and draft ethics application, Form A3 | To the departmental general office. |
| 2 March 2027 | First progress report and final ethics application, Form A5 | To the departmental general office. |
| 9 March 2027 | Change of dissertation title if necessary, Form A4 | Conditional. |
| 14 April 2027 | Second progress report, Form A6 | To the departmental general office. |
| 26 April 2027 | Extension of time if necessary, Form A7 | Late applications without valid reasons will not be entertained. |
| Mid May 2027 | Dissertation presentation | Marked to be confirmed in the timetable. |
| 28 May 2027 | Completed draft dissertation for supervisor comments, Form A8 | To the departmental general office. |
| 14 June 2027, 12 noon | Final dissertation, Form A9 | To the departmental general office. |
Dates are as published in the course outline timetable and the dissertation briefing for the 2026-27 offering. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.
What MDUM8010 covers
Nine chapters follow the dissertation year: three on choosing the route and framing a question, four on argument, structure, ethics approval and the form timetable, and two on how the work is marked and the format and referencing rules it must meet.
Choosing Between Dissertation and Capstone
dissertation and capstone compared · how the grade is split on each route · the capstone's individual paper · the specialism conditionOne research option, two very different jobs
The Master of Digital Urban Management at HKU closes with a single fifteen credit research option. Students pick either an individual dissertation or a group capstone project.
- Why the programme offers a choice of research route
- The shared briefing and training lectures
- Individual dissertation compared with group capstone
- How the grade is split on each route
- The individual paper inside the capstone
- The specialism condition on dissertation topics
What the Dissertation Must Demonstrate
the seven course outcomes and where each is evidenced · what a dissertation is and is not · learner led supervision · the 375 hour study loadA course built to measure outcomes
The outline gives the dissertation an unusual purpose statement: the course exists to measure how far each student has achieved the programme learning outcomes.
- The purpose statement in the course outline
- The seven course learning outcomes
- Where each outcome is evidenced in the finished work
- The programme outcomes most relevant to a topic
- A dissertation compared with an essay, a review and a report
- What learner led supervision means
From Practical Problem to Research Question
the problem chain from practical problem to research answer · six characteristics of a good problem · the BEST words · narrowing example topicsTwo kinds of problem
The briefing borrows its account of research from The Craft of Research by Booth and colleagues. A practical problem is a condition in the world that someone wants changed.
- Practical problems and conceptual problems
- The four step problem chain
- Why indifference is the worst response to research
- Six characteristics of a good research problem
- The BEST words for wording a question
- Screening a first question before the proposal
Building an Argument with Claims and Warrants
claim, reason, evidence and warrant · acknowledgment and response · drafting a paragraph that survives two markers · placing limitationsWriting for readers who question everything
The briefing describes research writing as an objective process built from claims, reasons and warrants, following Booth and colleagues.
- Research writing as an objective process
- Claim, reason and evidence
- The warrant that connects a reason to a claim
- Acknowledgment and response to objections
- Reason and evidence kept apart
- A drafting order for one paragraph
Structuring the Dissertation: The Hourglass Model
the hourglass section by section · problem, theory, analysis, conclusion · literature review against analytical framework · the sample contents pageTwo models of the same structure
The briefing offers two ways to see how a dissertation is organised. The hourglass model describes the shape of the write up: general at the opening, specific through methods and results, general again at the close.
- The hourglass shape of a research write up
- What the opening must do
- Methods written so a study could be recreated
- Results stated objectively
- The discussion as the return to the gap
- Problem, theory, analysis and conclusion
Research Ethics Approval at HKU
the Policy on Research Integrity · which committee reviews what · the application form and the supervisor's role · the two ethics deadlines and the rule on collectionWhy a dissertation student needs approval
Under the University's Policy on Research Integrity, whoever leads a study that asks people to agree to take part, or that uses vertebrate animals, must send the protocol to the relevant ethics committee for clearance first.
- The Policy on Research Integrity and who it covers
- Human participants and live animals as triggers
- Routing to the committee, the clinical board or the animal committee
- Downloading the current application form
- The supervisor's role in the application
- The draft and final application deadlines
The Proposal and the Form Timetable
the preliminary proposal and supervisor matching · forms A1 to A9 in date order · progress reports · change of title and extension of timeA course run on numbered forms
Every stage of the dissertation is recorded on a numbered form submitted with its deliverable, from the tentative topic in October 2026 to the final dissertation in June 2027. The outline attaches a serious consequence to the sequence: failing to submit the relevant forms and required deliverables by the deadlines, without valid reasons, leads to a fail grade in the course.
The preliminary proposal
At the end of the preparatory training, students opting for the dissertation submit a tentative topic with a preliminary proposal of four to five pages, in Times New Roman at twelve point, double spaced, about 1,200 to 1,500 words.
- Why the course is managed through numbered forms
- The consequence of a missed form or deliverable
- What the preliminary proposal must contain
- How supervisors are matched to proposals
- The proposal presentation and the draft proposal
- Title, revised proposal and the draft ethics application
How the Dissertation Is Marked
work progress and final dissertation · six printed criteria and why they add to ninety · grade descriptors A to F · double marking and the third markerTwo components of coursework
Student performance is assessed entirely by coursework. Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent and include the proposal, progress reports, presentations and progress meetings with the supervisor.
- Coursework only: the two components
- What the work progress component records
- The six criteria of the final dissertation
- Why the printed criterion values add to ninety
- The grade descriptors from A to F
- The step from B to A
Dissertation Format and Harvard Referencing
A4 layout, margins and the word limit · front materials and the signed declaration · generative AI and plagiarism · Harvard citations and reference patternsWhy format is enforced
A dissertation is an academic output and must comply with the University's and the department's regulations and conventions.
- What happens to a dissertation that breaks the format rules
- Paper, margins and the word limit
- Type size, spacing, orientation and alignment
- Pagination in Roman and Arabic numerals
- Front materials in order
- The abstract and the signed declaration
The programme combines six compulsory courses and three electives with one fifteen credit research component, and students take that component either as this dissertation or as the group capstone project.
The course outline describes its purpose directly: it measures how far each student has achieved the programme learning outcomes, through an individual project that integrates what they have learned and applies it to an urban issue.
How the year runs
The course spans both semesters of 2026-27. It opens with an introductory briefing shared with the capstone route and four preparatory research training lectures on proposal preparation, research design, methodology and methods, and preventing plagiarism.
Attendance at the briefing and the dissertation lecture is compulsory. Students then submit a tentative topic with a preliminary proposal of about 1,200 to 1,500 words, and the dissertation coordinator assigns supervisors by matching proposals with expertise.
From there the course is learner led: a full proposal and its presentation, ethics approval, two progress reports, a dissertation presentation, a completed draft for comments and the final dissertation, each recorded on a numbered form.
What is assessed
Assessment is by coursework.
Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent and are determined by the supervisor on the basis of consistency, steadfastness, discipline and project management. The final dissertation carries eighty per cent and is graded separately by the supervisor and another teacher, with a third marker when their marks differ by more than ten or fall into different grade categories.
The outline lists six aspects of the final dissertation: the research question, literature review, analytical framework and methods, analysis with findings and discussion, conclusions and recommendations, and communication.
What a dissertation is expected to be
The briefing is clear that an essay, a review or a report, however long, does not amount to a dissertation.
The work is a process of finding an actual urban problem, framing a research question and investigating it systematically, and a product that sets out the findings and why they matter, with practical implications for digital urban management. Students with a specialism in urban policy and management or in urban technology and analytics must choose a topic related to it.
Research involving human participants needs ethics approval from the appropriate University committee before any data is collected or analysed.
What this guide covers
Nine chapters follow the order in which the year raises its decisions. The first three help you choose the route, understand what the dissertation must demonstrate and turn a practical problem into a bounded research question.
The next four cover building an argument from claims, reasons, evidence and warrants, structuring the dissertation with the hourglass model, ethics approval at HKU, and the full form timetable. The last two cover the marking criteria and grade descriptors, and the format and Harvard referencing rules the final document has to meet.
Worked example · free
Test a first topic against the course before the preliminary proposal
- 2Say why the topic cannot yet be assessed.
- 3Narrow it to a practical problem and a bounded question.
- 3List the five parts the preliminary proposal must contain.
Key terms
- Dissertation Coordinator
- The member of the course team who assesses preliminary proposals and assigns supervisors by matching proposals with expertise.
- Supervisor
- The teacher assigned to mentor and monitor an individual dissertation, who also determines the work progress mark.
- Preparatory Lectures
- Four research training lectures for all programme students on proposals, research design, methods and preventing plagiarism.
- Tentative Topic
- The first dissertation submission, made with the preliminary proposal on Form A1 in October.
- Progress Meeting
- A scheduled consultation with the supervisor, counted in the work progress component alongside reports and presentations.
- Internal Examiners' Meeting
- The meeting at which all dissertation marks are presented, moderated and endorsed.
- Digital Urban Management
- The field of the programme: managing cities with digital tools, data and technologies for sustainable urban environments.
- Turnitin
- The similarity checking service to which this course requires deliverables to be submitted.
- Form A9
- The form that accompanies submission of the final dissertation to the departmental general office.
MDUM8010 FAQ
How is the Dissertation course assessed at HKU?
Entirely by coursework in two components. Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent, covering the proposal, progress reports, presentations and meetings, and are determined by the supervisor. The final dissertation carries eighty per cent and is read separately by the supervisor and another teacher, with a third marker brought in when their marks diverge by more than ten or cross a grade category.
Should I choose the dissertation or the capstone project?
Choose by the kind of work you want to be judged on. The dissertation is individual, original research on a topic you choose, under an allocated supervisor, with eighty per cent on one document. The capstone is a group project that designs a digital solution, with an inception report, a group seminar with report and poster, and an individual paper, and peer assessment adjusts the group marks.
What goes into the preliminary dissertation proposal?
A background that clearly articulates the research gap, the context and data sources, the methodology, the expected results and the potential of the proposed work. The outline sets it at four to five pages in Times New Roman at twelve point, double spaced, roughly 1,200 to 1,500 words, submitted with the tentative topic on Form A1.
How is my dissertation supervisor chosen?
The dissertation coordinator assesses the preliminary proposals and assigns supervisors by matching each proposal with staff expertise. A precise proposal that names its question and data therefore helps you get a supervisor whose research interests fit the project.
Does a dissertation using surveys or interviews need ethics approval?
Yes. A study that needs people to agree to take part must be cleared by the relevant ethics committee under the University's Policy on Research Integrity, which for non-clinical departments means the Human Research Ethics Committee. No data may be collected or analysed until approval is granted.
What are the main dissertation deadlines in 2026-27?
The tentative topic and preliminary proposal are due on 9 October 2026, the draft proposal on 18 January 2027, the title with the revised proposal on 4 February, progress reports on 2 March and 14 April, the completed draft on 28 May, and the final dissertation at 12 noon on 14 June 2027.
How long can the dissertation be and how must it be formatted?
The main body must be under 15,000 words, excluding figures, tables and appendices. It is printed on one side of A4 with 25 mm margins, typed between 10 and 12 point, double spaced in portrait, with Roman numerals before chapter one and Arabic numerals from it, and an English abstract of at most 500 words.
Which referencing style and rules on AI apply?
The Harvard system, with author, year and page in the text and an alphabetical reference list. Deliverables go through Turnitin. Any use of generative AI must be declared with the tool, version, stage, purpose and how the output was reworked, and work must be in your own English rather than translated.
Questions students ask in each MDUM8010 chapter
- When do I have to decide between the dissertation and the capstone?
- Early. Each route has its own first submission: a tentative dissertation topic with a preliminary proposal in October for the dissertation, and a one to two page problem statement in November for the capstone. From those points the two routes follow separate sequences of forms and supervision, so settle the choice before either document is written and raise any doubt with the coordinator. Chapter 01 · Choosing Between Dissertation and Capstone
- What exactly is a dissertation supposed to prove about me?
- That you have reached the programme's learning outcomes. The outline states that the course measures the extent to which those outcomes have been achieved, through an individual project that integrates your understanding of digital urban management and applies it to an urban issue. In practice the markers look for depth in one area, rigorous independent research, critical use of literature, an original contribution, clear scholarly writing, use of feedback and an oral defence. Chapter 02 · What the Dissertation Must Demonstrate
- What is the difference between a research topic and a research question?
- A topic names an area, such as smart mobility in Hong Kong. A question commits to something that can be answered with evidence, with a boundary of place, group and period. The briefing's problem chain shows why the difference matters: a practical problem motivates a question, the question defines a conceptual problem, and only answering that leads to something that helps. Chapter 03 · From Practical Problem to Research Question
- What is a warrant in a research argument?
- It is the general principle that connects your reason to your claim. The briefing, following Booth and colleagues, sets it out as the principle that lets a particular reason support a particular claim. It is often left unstated because it seems obvious to the writer, but it is usually where a critical reader will push hardest. Chapter 04 · Building an Argument with Claims and Warrants
- What chapters should an MDUM dissertation have?
- The outline's sample contents page runs introduction, theoretical framework, methodology, a chapter on the case and conclusion, preceded by abstract, declaration, acknowledgements and lists of figures and tables, and followed by appendices and a bibliography. Your chapter titles can differ, but the sequence of problem, theory, analysis and conclusion should be visible from the contents page alone. Chapter 05 · Structuring the Dissertation: The Hourglass Model
- Do I need ethics approval for a survey in my dissertation?
- A survey involves the consent of human participants, and the University's Policy on Research Integrity requires the principal investigator of such a project, including a taught postgraduate student, to refer the protocol to the appropriate ethics committee. For non-clinical departments that is the Human Research Ethics Committee, using the application form for taught postgraduate and undergraduate students. Chapter 06 · Research Ethics Approval at HKU
- What happens if I miss one of the dissertation forms?
- The outline states that failure to submit the relevant forms and required deliverables in accordance with the deadlines, and without valid reasons, will lead to a fail grade in the course. The forms are therefore part of the assessment structure, and a missed form cannot be made up by the quality of the final dissertation. Chapter 07 · The Proposal and the Form Timetable
- How is the MDUM dissertation course assessed?
- Entirely by coursework. Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent, covering the proposal, progress reports, presentations and progress meetings, and are determined by the supervisor. The final dissertation carries eighty per cent and is marked on six aspects: research question, literature review, analytical framework and methods, analysis with findings and discussion, conclusions and recommendations, and communication and presentation. Chapter 08 · How the Dissertation Is Marked
- What is the word limit for the MDUM dissertation, and what counts?
- The main body must be under 15,000 words. The outline excludes figures, tables and appendices from the count, and the abstract that precedes the main text has its own limit of 500 words. Supporting material can go in appendices, but any argument the markers need to assess should stay in the main text. Chapter 09 · Dissertation Format and Harvard Referencing
How to prepare for the assessments
Start a one page project record on the day you pick a topic: the research question in its current wording, the gap it fills, the data source and the next form with its date. Update it after every supervisor meeting. Draft the ethics application alongside the full proposal rather than after it, because approval is the step most likely to delay the analysis.
Then write in the order the markers read: a question that stays fixed, a methods chapter someone could repeat, findings stated plainly, and a discussion that returns to the gap. Leave the final month for revision against the six criteria, not for first drafting.
Your AI Management tutor for MDUM8010
Stuck on a hard MDUM8010 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Management tutor — ask any MDUM8010 Dissertation question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.