The University of Hong Kong · S2 2026 · FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT

MDUM8010 Dissertation

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
9 Chapters41-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Built to mirror S2 2026 · updated this semester
The Complete Study & Assessment Guide · S1 and S2 2026-27

MDUM8010 Overview

Dissertation
— Start from a real urban problem, end with an answer someone can use.
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • 2026-27, both semesters
  • Postgraduate research course
  • 15 credit research option
  • Assessed by coursework

What this course is

MDUM8010 Dissertation is the individual research option that closes the Master of Digital Urban Management, run by the Department of Urban Planning and Design at The University of Hong Kong.

  • Assessed by Work progress and the proposal, then a final dissertation of at most 15,000 words read by two markers.
  • The skill being tested Turning a real urban problem into a bounded question and answering it with your own analysis.
  • Hardest step Getting ethics approval in time, since no data may be collected or analysed before it.
  • Where to confirm Dates marked tentative, the presentation schedule and any timetable changes are announced on Moodle.
MDUM8010 · The University of Hong Kong
An independent, AskSia-authored study guide. AskSia is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by The University of Hong Kong; the course code and name are used for identification only.
Assessment

How MDUM8010 is assessed

ComponentWeightFormat
Work Progress / Proposal20%Proposal, progress reports, presentations and progress meetings with the supervisor; determined by the supervisor
Final Dissertation80%At most 15,000 words, graded separately by the supervisor and another teacher, with a third marker where marks diverge

The course outline lists these two components and they total 100%. Under the final dissertation it prints six aspects with the values research question 10, literature review 15, analytical framework and methods 15, analysis, findings and discussions 20, conclusions and recommendations 20, and communication and presentation 10. Those values add to 90 rather than 80, so read them as the relative emphasis of each aspect and ask your supervisor how they are scaled.

Two further conditions sit outside the table. Failing to submit the relevant forms and required deliverables by the deadlines without valid reasons leads to a fail grade in the course, and a dissertation that does not meet the format requirements may be returned for rectification, downgraded, or rejected with an F grade. All marks are presented, moderated and endorsed at the Internal Examiners' Meeting.

Assessment structure

20%80%Work Progress / ProposalFinal DissertationMissing a required form or deliverable without valid reasons leads to a fail grade

Segment widths reproduce the published percentage weights and total 100%.

Current dates · verify in LMS

Current MDUM8010 dates

DateItemControl
8 September 2026Introductory briefing on dissertation and capstoneThe outline labels this date a Wednesday; it falls on a Tuesday, which is how the capstone outline lists it.
15 September to 6 October 2026Four preparatory research training lecturesShared with the capstone route; confirm times and rooms on Moodle.
9 October 2026Tentative topic and preliminary proposal, Form A1About 1,200 to 1,500 words, four to five pages.
14 and 15 January 2027Proposal presentationMarked tentative in the timetable.
18 January 2027Draft dissertation proposal on Moodle, Form A2Submitted through Moodle.
4 February 2027Title, revised proposal and draft ethics application, Form A3To the departmental general office.
2 March 2027First progress report and final ethics application, Form A5To the departmental general office.
9 March 2027Change of dissertation title if necessary, Form A4Conditional.
14 April 2027Second progress report, Form A6To the departmental general office.
26 April 2027Extension of time if necessary, Form A7Late applications without valid reasons will not be entertained.
Mid May 2027Dissertation presentationMarked to be confirmed in the timetable.
28 May 2027Completed draft dissertation for supervisor comments, Form A8To the departmental general office.
14 June 2027, 12 noonFinal dissertation, Form A9To the departmental general office.

Dates are as published in the course outline timetable and the dissertation briefing for the 2026-27 offering. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.

Contents · every chapter, one map

What MDUM8010 covers

Nine chapters follow the dissertation year: three on choosing the route and framing a question, four on argument, structure, ethics approval and the form timetable, and two on how the work is marked and the format and referencing rules it must meet.

01

Choosing Between Dissertation and Capstone

dissertation and capstone compared · how the grade is split on each route · the capstone's individual paper · the specialism condition

One research option, two very different jobs

The Master of Digital Urban Management at HKU closes with a single fifteen credit research option. Students pick either an individual dissertation or a group capstone project.

  • Why the programme offers a choice of research route
  • The shared briefing and training lectures
  • Individual dissertation compared with group capstone
  • How the grade is split on each route
  • The individual paper inside the capstone
  • The specialism condition on dissertation topics
02

What the Dissertation Must Demonstrate

the seven course outcomes and where each is evidenced · what a dissertation is and is not · learner led supervision · the 375 hour study load

A course built to measure outcomes

The outline gives the dissertation an unusual purpose statement: the course exists to measure how far each student has achieved the programme learning outcomes.

  • The purpose statement in the course outline
  • The seven course learning outcomes
  • Where each outcome is evidenced in the finished work
  • The programme outcomes most relevant to a topic
  • A dissertation compared with an essay, a review and a report
  • What learner led supervision means
03

From Practical Problem to Research Question

the problem chain from practical problem to research answer · six characteristics of a good problem · the BEST words · narrowing example topics

Two kinds of problem

The briefing borrows its account of research from The Craft of Research by Booth and colleagues. A practical problem is a condition in the world that someone wants changed.

  • Practical problems and conceptual problems
  • The four step problem chain
  • Why indifference is the worst response to research
  • Six characteristics of a good research problem
  • The BEST words for wording a question
  • Screening a first question before the proposal
04

Building an Argument with Claims and Warrants

claim, reason, evidence and warrant · acknowledgment and response · drafting a paragraph that survives two markers · placing limitations

Writing for readers who question everything

The briefing describes research writing as an objective process built from claims, reasons and warrants, following Booth and colleagues.

  • Research writing as an objective process
  • Claim, reason and evidence
  • The warrant that connects a reason to a claim
  • Acknowledgment and response to objections
  • Reason and evidence kept apart
  • A drafting order for one paragraph
05

Structuring the Dissertation: The Hourglass Model

the hourglass section by section · problem, theory, analysis, conclusion · literature review against analytical framework · the sample contents page

Two models of the same structure

The briefing offers two ways to see how a dissertation is organised. The hourglass model describes the shape of the write up: general at the opening, specific through methods and results, general again at the close.

  • The hourglass shape of a research write up
  • What the opening must do
  • Methods written so a study could be recreated
  • Results stated objectively
  • The discussion as the return to the gap
  • Problem, theory, analysis and conclusion
06

Research Ethics Approval at HKU

the Policy on Research Integrity · which committee reviews what · the application form and the supervisor's role · the two ethics deadlines and the rule on collection

Why a dissertation student needs approval

Under the University's Policy on Research Integrity, whoever leads a study that asks people to agree to take part, or that uses vertebrate animals, must send the protocol to the relevant ethics committee for clearance first.

  • The Policy on Research Integrity and who it covers
  • Human participants and live animals as triggers
  • Routing to the committee, the clinical board or the animal committee
  • Downloading the current application form
  • The supervisor's role in the application
  • The draft and final application deadlines
07

The Proposal and the Form Timetable

the preliminary proposal and supervisor matching · forms A1 to A9 in date order · progress reports · change of title and extension of time

A course run on numbered forms

Every stage of the dissertation is recorded on a numbered form submitted with its deliverable, from the tentative topic in October 2026 to the final dissertation in June 2027. The outline attaches a serious consequence to the sequence: failing to submit the relevant forms and required deliverables by the deadlines, without valid reasons, leads to a fail grade in the course.

The preliminary proposal

At the end of the preparatory training, students opting for the dissertation submit a tentative topic with a preliminary proposal of four to five pages, in Times New Roman at twelve point, double spaced, about 1,200 to 1,500 words.

  • Why the course is managed through numbered forms
  • The consequence of a missed form or deliverable
  • What the preliminary proposal must contain
  • How supervisors are matched to proposals
  • The proposal presentation and the draft proposal
  • Title, revised proposal and the draft ethics application
08

How the Dissertation Is Marked

work progress and final dissertation · six printed criteria and why they add to ninety · grade descriptors A to F · double marking and the third marker

Two components of coursework

Student performance is assessed entirely by coursework. Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent and include the proposal, progress reports, presentations and progress meetings with the supervisor.

  • Coursework only: the two components
  • What the work progress component records
  • The six criteria of the final dissertation
  • Why the printed criterion values add to ninety
  • The grade descriptors from A to F
  • The step from B to A
09

Dissertation Format and Harvard Referencing

A4 layout, margins and the word limit · front materials and the signed declaration · generative AI and plagiarism · Harvard citations and reference patterns

Why format is enforced

A dissertation is an academic output and must comply with the University's and the department's regulations and conventions.

  • What happens to a dissertation that breaks the format rules
  • Paper, margins and the word limit
  • Type size, spacing, orientation and alignment
  • Pagination in Roman and Arabic numerals
  • Front materials in order
  • The abstract and the signed declaration

The programme combines six compulsory courses and three electives with one fifteen credit research component, and students take that component either as this dissertation or as the group capstone project.

The course outline describes its purpose directly: it measures how far each student has achieved the programme learning outcomes, through an individual project that integrates what they have learned and applies it to an urban issue.

How the year runs

The course spans both semesters of 2026-27. It opens with an introductory briefing shared with the capstone route and four preparatory research training lectures on proposal preparation, research design, methodology and methods, and preventing plagiarism.

Attendance at the briefing and the dissertation lecture is compulsory. Students then submit a tentative topic with a preliminary proposal of about 1,200 to 1,500 words, and the dissertation coordinator assigns supervisors by matching proposals with expertise.

From there the course is learner led: a full proposal and its presentation, ethics approval, two progress reports, a dissertation presentation, a completed draft for comments and the final dissertation, each recorded on a numbered form.

What is assessed

Assessment is by coursework.

Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent and are determined by the supervisor on the basis of consistency, steadfastness, discipline and project management. The final dissertation carries eighty per cent and is graded separately by the supervisor and another teacher, with a third marker when their marks differ by more than ten or fall into different grade categories.

The outline lists six aspects of the final dissertation: the research question, literature review, analytical framework and methods, analysis with findings and discussion, conclusions and recommendations, and communication.

What a dissertation is expected to be

The briefing is clear that an essay, a review or a report, however long, does not amount to a dissertation.

The work is a process of finding an actual urban problem, framing a research question and investigating it systematically, and a product that sets out the findings and why they matter, with practical implications for digital urban management. Students with a specialism in urban policy and management or in urban technology and analytics must choose a topic related to it.

Research involving human participants needs ethics approval from the appropriate University committee before any data is collected or analysed.

What this guide covers

Nine chapters follow the order in which the year raises its decisions. The first three help you choose the route, understand what the dissertation must demonstrate and turn a practical problem into a bounded research question.

The next four cover building an argument from claims, reasons, evidence and warrants, structuring the dissertation with the hourglass model, ethics approval at HKU, and the full form timetable. The last two cover the marking criteria and grade descriptors, and the format and Harvard referencing rules the final document has to meet.

Worked example · free

Test a first topic against the course before the preliminary proposal

Q [8 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A student without a specialism writes the tentative topic 'Smart city technologies in Hong Kong' and has two weeks before the preliminary proposal is due. Turn it into a topic the course can assess, and list what the proposal must then contain. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation and are not the University's marking scheme.
Two ethics deadlines in the course timetable.Two ethics deadlines in the course timetable. The draft application goes in with the revised proposal and the final application with the first progress report; collection starts only once approval is granted.Ethics sits between the proposal and the data18 JanDraft proposal4 FebDraft ethics form2 MarFinal ethics form28 MayDraft dissertationcollect only after approvalno data collected or analysed here
Two ethics deadlines in the course timetable. The draft application goes in with the revised proposal and the final application with the first progress report; collection starts only once approval is granted.
  • 2Say why the topic cannot yet be assessed.
  • 3Narrow it to a practical problem and a bounded question.
  • 3List the five parts the preliminary proposal must contain.
The topic names an area and asks nothing, so none of the course outcomes, such as independent research or an original contribution, could be shown by it. Narrowing starts from a practical problem: on-street parking sensors have been installed, yet drivers still circle in older districts. The question becomes whether streets with live occupancy information show shorter search times than comparable streets without it, over a stated period. That question has a boundary, can be answered with data, breaks into steps and fits the time available. The preliminary proposal must then set out the background with a clearly articulated research gap, the context and data sources, the methodology, the expected results and the potential of the work, in about 1,200 to 1,500 words, because the coordinator will use it to match a supervisor.
Sia tip — Write your proposal's data source as a named dataset with a publisher and a period. If you cannot, the question is not yet researchable.
Glossary

Key terms

Dissertation Coordinator
The member of the course team who assesses preliminary proposals and assigns supervisors by matching proposals with expertise.
Supervisor
The teacher assigned to mentor and monitor an individual dissertation, who also determines the work progress mark.
Preparatory Lectures
Four research training lectures for all programme students on proposals, research design, methods and preventing plagiarism.
Tentative Topic
The first dissertation submission, made with the preliminary proposal on Form A1 in October.
Progress Meeting
A scheduled consultation with the supervisor, counted in the work progress component alongside reports and presentations.
Internal Examiners' Meeting
The meeting at which all dissertation marks are presented, moderated and endorsed.
Digital Urban Management
The field of the programme: managing cities with digital tools, data and technologies for sustainable urban environments.
Turnitin
The similarity checking service to which this course requires deliverables to be submitted.
Form A9
The form that accompanies submission of the final dissertation to the departmental general office.
FAQ

MDUM8010 FAQ

How is the Dissertation course assessed at HKU?

Entirely by coursework in two components. Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent, covering the proposal, progress reports, presentations and meetings, and are determined by the supervisor. The final dissertation carries eighty per cent and is read separately by the supervisor and another teacher, with a third marker brought in when their marks diverge by more than ten or cross a grade category.

Should I choose the dissertation or the capstone project?

Choose by the kind of work you want to be judged on. The dissertation is individual, original research on a topic you choose, under an allocated supervisor, with eighty per cent on one document. The capstone is a group project that designs a digital solution, with an inception report, a group seminar with report and poster, and an individual paper, and peer assessment adjusts the group marks.

What goes into the preliminary dissertation proposal?

A background that clearly articulates the research gap, the context and data sources, the methodology, the expected results and the potential of the proposed work. The outline sets it at four to five pages in Times New Roman at twelve point, double spaced, roughly 1,200 to 1,500 words, submitted with the tentative topic on Form A1.

How is my dissertation supervisor chosen?

The dissertation coordinator assesses the preliminary proposals and assigns supervisors by matching each proposal with staff expertise. A precise proposal that names its question and data therefore helps you get a supervisor whose research interests fit the project.

Does a dissertation using surveys or interviews need ethics approval?

Yes. A study that needs people to agree to take part must be cleared by the relevant ethics committee under the University's Policy on Research Integrity, which for non-clinical departments means the Human Research Ethics Committee. No data may be collected or analysed until approval is granted.

What are the main dissertation deadlines in 2026-27?

The tentative topic and preliminary proposal are due on 9 October 2026, the draft proposal on 18 January 2027, the title with the revised proposal on 4 February, progress reports on 2 March and 14 April, the completed draft on 28 May, and the final dissertation at 12 noon on 14 June 2027.

How long can the dissertation be and how must it be formatted?

The main body must be under 15,000 words, excluding figures, tables and appendices. It is printed on one side of A4 with 25 mm margins, typed between 10 and 12 point, double spaced in portrait, with Roman numerals before chapter one and Arabic numerals from it, and an English abstract of at most 500 words.

Which referencing style and rules on AI apply?

The Harvard system, with author, year and page in the text and an alphabetical reference list. Deliverables go through Turnitin. Any use of generative AI must be declared with the tool, version, stage, purpose and how the output was reworked, and work must be in your own English rather than translated.

Chapter questions

Questions students ask in each MDUM8010 chapter

When do I have to decide between the dissertation and the capstone?
Early. Each route has its own first submission: a tentative dissertation topic with a preliminary proposal in October for the dissertation, and a one to two page problem statement in November for the capstone. From those points the two routes follow separate sequences of forms and supervision, so settle the choice before either document is written and raise any doubt with the coordinator. Chapter 01 · Choosing Between Dissertation and Capstone
What exactly is a dissertation supposed to prove about me?
That you have reached the programme's learning outcomes. The outline states that the course measures the extent to which those outcomes have been achieved, through an individual project that integrates your understanding of digital urban management and applies it to an urban issue. In practice the markers look for depth in one area, rigorous independent research, critical use of literature, an original contribution, clear scholarly writing, use of feedback and an oral defence. Chapter 02 · What the Dissertation Must Demonstrate
What is the difference between a research topic and a research question?
A topic names an area, such as smart mobility in Hong Kong. A question commits to something that can be answered with evidence, with a boundary of place, group and period. The briefing's problem chain shows why the difference matters: a practical problem motivates a question, the question defines a conceptual problem, and only answering that leads to something that helps. Chapter 03 · From Practical Problem to Research Question
What is a warrant in a research argument?
It is the general principle that connects your reason to your claim. The briefing, following Booth and colleagues, sets it out as the principle that lets a particular reason support a particular claim. It is often left unstated because it seems obvious to the writer, but it is usually where a critical reader will push hardest. Chapter 04 · Building an Argument with Claims and Warrants
What chapters should an MDUM dissertation have?
The outline's sample contents page runs introduction, theoretical framework, methodology, a chapter on the case and conclusion, preceded by abstract, declaration, acknowledgements and lists of figures and tables, and followed by appendices and a bibliography. Your chapter titles can differ, but the sequence of problem, theory, analysis and conclusion should be visible from the contents page alone. Chapter 05 · Structuring the Dissertation: The Hourglass Model
Do I need ethics approval for a survey in my dissertation?
A survey involves the consent of human participants, and the University's Policy on Research Integrity requires the principal investigator of such a project, including a taught postgraduate student, to refer the protocol to the appropriate ethics committee. For non-clinical departments that is the Human Research Ethics Committee, using the application form for taught postgraduate and undergraduate students. Chapter 06 · Research Ethics Approval at HKU
What happens if I miss one of the dissertation forms?
The outline states that failure to submit the relevant forms and required deliverables in accordance with the deadlines, and without valid reasons, will lead to a fail grade in the course. The forms are therefore part of the assessment structure, and a missed form cannot be made up by the quality of the final dissertation. Chapter 07 · The Proposal and the Form Timetable
How is the MDUM dissertation course assessed?
Entirely by coursework. Work progress and the proposal carry twenty per cent, covering the proposal, progress reports, presentations and progress meetings, and are determined by the supervisor. The final dissertation carries eighty per cent and is marked on six aspects: research question, literature review, analytical framework and methods, analysis with findings and discussion, conclusions and recommendations, and communication and presentation. Chapter 08 · How the Dissertation Is Marked
What is the word limit for the MDUM dissertation, and what counts?
The main body must be under 15,000 words. The outline excludes figures, tables and appendices from the count, and the abstract that precedes the main text has its own limit of 500 words. Supporting material can go in appendices, but any argument the markers need to assess should stay in the main text. Chapter 09 · Dissertation Format and Harvard Referencing
Study strategy

How to prepare for the assessments

Start a one page project record on the day you pick a topic: the research question in its current wording, the gap it fills, the data source and the next form with its date. Update it after every supervisor meeting. Draft the ethics application alongside the full proposal rather than after it, because approval is the step most likely to delay the analysis.

Then write in the order the markers read: a question that stays fixed, a methods chapter someone could repeat, findings stated plainly, and a discussion that returns to the gap. Leave the final month for revision against the six criteria, not for first drafting.

Study MDUM8010 with AI

Your AI Management tutor for MDUM8010

Stuck on a hard MDUM8010 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Management tutor — ask any MDUM8010 Dissertation question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 26 of your The University of Hong Kong subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MDUM8010 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 41-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works