National University of Singapore · FACULTY OF PHARMACOLOGY

MDG5204 Chap.7 Dose-Response, Agonism and Antagonism

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 7 of 11 · MDG5204

Dose-Response, Agonism and Antagonism

Binding follows the law of mass action

The course treats drug-receptor binding as a reversible reaction whose rate depends on the concentrations of drug and receptor. At equilibrium, the equilibrium dissociation constant, KD, is the concentration that occupies half the receptors, and affinity is inversely related to it.

Binding alone is not enough: to produce a response, a drug must both occupy the receptor and activate it.

That second ability is efficacy, and it is distinct from clinical efficacy, which describes how well a treatment achieves its therapeutic goal.

Kinds of agonist and antagonist

A full agonist produces the maximal response the system can give; a partial agonist cannot, however high its concentration, because its intrinsic activity is lower despite high affinity; an inverse agonist reduces constitutive receptor activity below baseline; and a biased agonist favours one signalling pathway over another at the same receptor.

An antagonist has zero efficacy and works only by preventing an agonist from acting.

The course sorts antagonism into four types: receptor antagonism at the binding site, chemical antagonism in solution, physiological antagonism through opposing mechanisms, and pharmacokinetic antagonism through reduced absorption or increased elimination.

Reading concentration-response curves

Plotted against log concentration, a graded response curve rises from a threshold to a maximum.

EC50, the concentration giving half the maximal response, measures potency; Emax, the maximal response, measures efficacy. The Emax model describes the curve mathematically and shows that the effect changes fastest around the EC50 and saturates near the top.

A competitive antagonist shifts the curve to the right without lowering the maximum, while a non-competitive antagonist lowers the maximum. Allosteric modulators act away from the agonist site and can change potency, efficacy or both.

From individuals to populations

For all-or-none responses the course uses quantal curves, plotting the percentage of a population that responds at each dose.

ED50, TD50 and LD50 are the doses that produce the effect, toxicity or death in half the population, and the therapeutic index is TD50 divided by ED50.

The chapter ends with why responses change over time and between people: hysteresis, desensitisation, tolerance, down-regulation, spare receptors, and pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, disease and environmental variation.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Law of mass action, KD and affinity

  • 02

    Occupancy against activation: efficacy and intrinsic activity

  • 03

    Full, partial, inverse and biased agonists

  • 04

    EC50 and Emax on graded concentration-response curves

  • 05

    Receptor, chemical, physiological and pharmacokinetic antagonism

  • 06

    Quantal curves, ED50, TD50, LD50 and the therapeutic index

Worked example · free

Telling competitive from non-competitive antagonism on a graph

Q [6 marks]. An agonist's concentration-response curve is measured alone and then with antagonist X and, separately, with antagonist Y. With X, EC50 rises from 1 to 10 nM and the maximum stays at 100%. With Y, EC50 is unchanged and the maximum falls to 60%. Classify each antagonist and name one clinical example of each type from the course. The step weighting shown here is an AskSia study allocation and is not a University marking scheme.
Figure 7.2.Figure 7.2. A competitive antagonist shifts the agonist curve to the right with the maximum intact; a non-competitive antagonist lowers the maximum. competitive non-competitive shifts right, same maximum maximum falls
Figure 7.2. A competitive antagonist shifts the agonist curve to the right with the maximum intact; a non-competitive antagonist lowers the maximum.
  • 2Classify X from its effect on EC50 and Emax.
  • 2Classify Y from its effect on EC50 and Emax.
  • 2Give one course example of each.
X shifts the curve tenfold to the right while the maximum is preserved, which means more agonist can overcome it: X is a competitive, surmountable antagonist, reducing agonist potency but not maximal effect. Y leaves the concentration for half-maximal response unchanged but lowers the maximum to 60%, which no amount of agonist restores: Y is non-competitive and insurmountable. The course's examples are propranolol for competitive antagonism of catecholamines at beta-adrenoceptors, and phenoxybenzamine, used in phaeochromocytoma, for non-competitive antagonism.
Sia tip — Look at the top of the curve first. If the maximum is intact, the antagonism is surmountable, whatever else has happened.
Glossary

Key terms

Affinity
The ability of a drug to bind its target, quantified by the equilibrium dissociation constant.
Efficacy
The ability of a bound drug to produce a response from its target.
Potency
The amount of drug needed for a given effect, usually measured as the EC50.
Inverse Agonist
A ligand that suppresses constitutive receptor activity and lowers the basal response.
Allosteric Modulator
A ligand binding away from the agonist site that changes the agonist's potency or efficacy.
Quantal Response
An all-or-none response whose frequency in a population varies with dose.
Down-Regulation
A loss of receptors from the cell surface after prolonged agonist exposure.
FAQ

Dose-Response, Agonism and Antagonism FAQ

Can a drug have high affinity but low efficacy?

Yes. A partial agonist binds strongly, with high affinity, but activates the receptor only weakly, so it cannot reach the full response of the system. An antagonist is the extreme case: it can bind with high affinity while having no efficacy at all.

Why is a large therapeutic index reassuring?

It means the dose that is toxic to half a population is many times the dose that is effective in half, so ordinary variation between patients is unlikely to push someone into toxicity. Drugs with a small index, such as warfarin, leave little room and are usually monitored.

What does hysteresis tell you about a drug?

It shows that the effect lags behind the plasma concentration. An anticlockwise loop points to delayed access to the site of action or slow receptor kinetics, so the timing of a blood level does not directly tell you the size of the effect at that moment.

Why do some drugs lose their effect with repeated use?

Repeated or continuous agonist exposure can desensitise receptors temporarily, most rapidly as tachyphylaxis, reduce receptor numbers by internalisation, which is down-regulation, or produce tolerance, in which larger doses are needed for the same effect after prolonged use.

Study strategy

Exam move

Sketch three curves from memory, a potent full agonist, a less potent full agonist and a partial agonist, then add a competitive and a non-competitive antagonist to copies of the first. Being able to draw the shift is faster in an examination than describing it.

Working through Dose-Response, Agonism and Antagonism in MDG5204? Sia is AskSia’s AI Pharmacology tutor — ask any MDG5204 Dose-Response, Agonism and Antagonism question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MDG5204 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 21 of your National University of Singapore subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MDG5204 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works