HKU · MEDD6128 · Curriculum Conceptions and Design

HKU MEDD6128: Curriculum Conceptions and Design — course overview with AskSia

MEDD6128 Curriculum Conceptions and Design is a 6-credit specialist course in the Curriculum and Pedagogy specialism of HKU's Master of Education, and is also offered to students of other specialisms as an elective with limited quota (listed for 2026-27).

6 credit points Taught postgraduate (MEd specialist course) Faculty of Education

Sia generates MEDD6128 practice questions, walks through interdisciplinary perspectives and curriculum conceptions step by step, and quizzes you on the material the presentation that weights most heavily.

Which thesis is stronger?

Sharpen your argument

Pick one · the reasoning is revealed after you answer

A school's new science curriculum lists only content to be covered, with a single end-of-year test. A curriculum leader asks what is wrong with it as a design. Which critique applies the course best?

Why this one wins

The course asks first which conception a design embodies; a pure content list is a subject-centred conception adopted by default.

It then asks what the conception implies for design, including assessment as an integral part rather than an afterthought.
Declaring another conception 'always superior' is the opposite of the critical evaluation CLO 2 asks for.
More content does not address the design question at all.
your whole grade↘
Where your grade comes from Presentations 100%

One presentation decides 100% of your grade. Continuous; 100% coursework. This whole page is built around that.

Overview

What MEDD6128 is, and where it sits

MEDD6128 Curriculum Conceptions and Design is a 6-credit specialist course in the Curriculum and Pedagogy specialism of HKU's Master of Education, and is also offered to students of other specialisms as an elective with limited quota (listed for 2026-27).

The syllabus describes it as an introduction to the field of curriculum studies: its main theoretical perspectives and its enduring and changing issues. Students meet the main conceptions of curriculum and the ways they are categorised, examine the basic tenets of each conception critically, and work out what they imply for curriculum design and analysis at systemic and school levels. The course description sheet adds the topic list: theory and practice, interdisciplinary perspectives and global trends, conceptions and ideologies, curriculum design, assessment as part of design, and technology-enhanced design.

Assessment is 100% coursework through two short essays, an oral presentation and a written paper. The theories learnt here are expected to be applied in the other Curriculum and Pedagogy courses.

What to focus on. The whole course turns on one move: naming which conception of curriculum a document or a school is working from, then showing what that conception forces at the level of design. Do that in every essay and the presentation and you are writing at the level the CLOs describe.

Always treat your own course outline and the exam timetable as authoritative.

Difficulty & time commitment

Is MEDD6128 hard, and how much time does it take?

MEDD6128 is manageable if you keep a weekly rhythm and treat the back half as the main event. The pattern is consistent: it starts gently and steepens, and the heaviest assessment is the part that separates grades.

Difficulty
2.1 / 5
Light. Gentle early, demanding back half. Hard to fail with steady work; a top grade takes consistent practice.
Coursework
100%
Coursework carries most of the grade. The heaviest single component is the presentation at 100%.
Curriculum studies: theory, practice and interdisciplinary perspectivessteady
Conceptions and ideologies of curriculum; short essayssteep
Curriculum design and assessment as part of designsteady
Technology-enhanced design; presentation and written papersteep

The difficulty curve and the assessment weighting point the same way: the back half is harder and worth more. Front-loading effort there is the highest-return decision in the course.

Is this course for you

Who tends to do well, and who tends to struggle

You will likely do well if

  • You can tell a subject-centred document from a learner-centred one on the first page.
  • You bring a curriculum you have taught or written to use as your running case.
  • You read beyond the set list; the sheet says this is expected.

You may struggle if

  • You want a lesson-planning course; this is about conceptions and their design consequences.
  • You write descriptively about a curriculum without naming the ideology behind it.
  • You leave the written paper until the presentation is done.
do this ↘
What top students do differently
  • For each conception, keep a one-page card: tenets, categorisation, design implications, a Hong Kong example.
  • Analyse the Hong Kong school curriculum documents on the reading list with the conceptions before writing the paper.
  • Use the presentation as a draft of the written paper's argument and act on the feedback.

Syllabus

The 10 topics, topic by topic

Topics from the public source. Their order is a content map, not an official weekly timetable or published exam weighting.

1

T1 · Introduction to curriculum studies: theory and practice

Description sheet topic 1; CLO 1

The field, its enduring issues and how theory meets classroom practice.

Study topic — official weight not published
2

T2 · Interdisciplinary perspectives and global trends

Description sheet topic 2

Perspectives shaping curriculum decisions at different levels of the system; global trends and influences.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on interdisciplinary perspectives →
3

T3 · Curriculum conceptions and ideologies

Description sheet topic 3; CLOs 1-3

The main conceptions, how they are categorised, and what each implies for design.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on curriculum conceptions →
4

T4 · Curriculum design

Description sheet topic 4; CLO 4

Design methods and their fit with real contexts.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on curriculum design →
5

T5 · Assessment as an integral part of curriculum design

Description sheet topic 5

Building assessment into design rather than after it.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on assessment as an integral part of curriculum design →
6

T6 · Technology-enhanced design and curriculum in the New Normal

Description sheet topic 6; CLO 5

Design for blended and online settings; novel, undefined situations.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on technology-enhanced design →
7

T7 · Strengths, limits and conflicts among conceptions

CLO 2

Evaluating each conception critically and the tensions between them.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on strengths →
8

T8 · Applying conceptions to real contexts

CLO 4

Choosing design methods to suit the needs of an actual school or system.

Study topic — official weight not published
9

T9 · Applying conceptions to novel, undefined situations

CLO 5

Using the conceptions where no template exists.

Study topic — official weight not published
10

T10 · Short essays, oral presentation and written paper

Assessment

The four assessed pieces of the course.

Study topic — official weight not published

How it's assessed

Assessment structure

ComponentWeightFormat & timing
Coursework (short essay 1, short essay 2, oral presentation, written paper)100%Two short essays, an oral presentation and a written paper, as listed on the course description sheet; individual weights are not published. Across the course. Continuous; 100% coursework.
Coursework (short essay 1, short essay 2, oral presentation, written paper)100%
Two short essays, an oral presentation and a written paper, as listed on the course description sheet; individual weights are not published.
  • 100% coursework: short essay 1, short essay 2, oral presentation and written paper (weights not published). MEd regulations allow re-assessment, re-submission or repetition of a failed course.
  • No examination. The written paper and the essays are assessed against the five course learning outcomes, from understanding and evaluating the conceptions of curriculum to applying them in real and novel contexts.
read this! If you read nothing else

This is a coursework course. Coursework carries 100% of the grade and the coursework (short essay 1, short essay 2, oral presentation, written paper) is the single heaviest piece at 100%, so steady work across the semester decides your result more than any one sitting. Continuous; 100% coursework.

Final exam timing: No examination. Confirm the exact date and venue on your exam timetable.

How to actually pass it

A weekly rhythm, two checklists, and the traps to avoid

The course rewards consistency over cramming, and practice over re-reading. Here is the loop that works, then what to have nailed before each exam.

The weekly loop

Class
Log which conception each example belongs to and why.
Same week
One reading from the list; note its stance on curriculum.
Fortnightly
Draft a section of the next essay or the paper.

The mistakes that cost marks

Formula & concept sheet

The vocabulary and formulas you must own

Curriculum conception
A coherent view of what a curriculum is for and what should be in it.
Curriculum ideology
The values behind a conception, for example academic, social-efficiency or learner-centred.
Systemic level
Curriculum decisions taken for a whole education system, such as by a curriculum council.
School level
Curriculum decisions taken within a school, including school-based curriculum.
Curriculum design
The structured planning of aims, content, learning experiences and assessment.
Assessment for learning
Assessment built into the design to inform teaching while it happens.
Concept-based curriculum
Design organised around transferable concepts rather than isolated content.
Technology-enhanced design
Curriculum design that plans for blended and online learning from the start.

Where it fits

Prerequisites, related courses & why it matters

No prerequisites; 6 credits; one of the four Curriculum and Pedagogy specialist courses, also open as an elective with limited quota in 2026-27.

Why it matters beyond the grade. Curriculum leaders, panel heads and curriculum officers are asked to justify designs; this course supplies the conceptual vocabulary those justifications need.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is MEDD6128 hard?

Light on the six-factor rubric: no exam and no numbers, but four pieces of assessed work and a long recommended reading list that the description sheet expects you to go beyond.

What is the assessment?

100% coursework through short essay 1, short essay 2, an oral presentation and a written paper; the description sheet does not publish their weights.

Can I take it if I am not in Curriculum and Pedagogy?

Yes. It is on the Faculty's 2026-27 list of specialist courses offered as electives, with limited quota.

Is there a textbook?

No single required text. The description sheet lists general references (Glatthorn, Marsh, Schiro, Yeung, Morris and others), tool books, journals and policy sources, all available through the course reading list on Moodle.

Who teaches it?

The public description sheet and regulations do not name the teaching staff.

What are the learning outcomes?

Five CLOs: understand the conceptions of curriculum and how they are categorised; evaluate their strengths, limits and conflicts; understand their implications for design and analysis; apply them to real contexts; apply them to novel, undefined situations.

Study MEDD6128 with Sia

Practise explaining the course concepts and check your reasoning. Confirm assessed-work requirements in your current outline.

Start studying with Sia