HKU · MEDD8937 · Curriculum Implementation and Leadership

HKU MEDD8937: Curriculum Implementation and Leadership — course overview with AskSia

MEDD8937 Curriculum Implementation and Leadership is a 6-credit specialist course in the Curriculum and Pedagogy specialism of HKU's Master of Education, listed for 2026-27 and also open to other specialisms as an elective with limited quota.

6 credit points Taught postgraduate (MEd specialist course) Faculty of Education

Sia generates MEDD8937 practice questions, walks through curriculum implementation as a process and concerns-based adoption model step by step, and quizzes you on the material the presentation that weights most heavily.

Which thesis is stronger?

Sharpen your argument

Pick one · the reasoning is revealed after you answer

A district rolls out a new inquiry-based science curriculum with a two-day workshop and new textbooks. A year later most lessons look as they did before. Which diagnosis best applies the course?

Why this one wins

The course treats implementation as a process, not an event; a workshop and materials are inputs, not implementation.

The Concerns-Based Adoption Model predicts that without sustained support, teachers' concerns stay personal and use stays mechanical.
Coaching, mentoring and professional learning communities are the support measures the syllabus lists for exactly this gap.
Blaming materials, mandating compliance or abandoning the design each skip the factors-of-implementation analysis.
your whole grade↘
Where your grade comes from Presentations 100%

One presentation decides 100% of your grade. Continuous; 100% coursework. This whole page is built around that.

Overview

What MEDD8937 is, and where it sits

MEDD8937 Curriculum Implementation and Leadership is a 6-credit specialist course in the Curriculum and Pedagogy specialism of HKU's Master of Education, listed for 2026-27 and also open to other specialisms as an elective with limited quota.

The course description sheet frames it around curriculum implementation as a process: the stages, the factors that influence implementation, the application of evaluation, and the issues and challenges seen from multiple perspectives, plus the roles curriculum leaders play in leading renewals in school and government settings. Its eight content topics run from implementation as a process and the Concerns-Based Adoption Model, through educative curriculum materials, coaching and mentoring and professional learning communities, to organisational change for renewal and the roles of curriculum leaders.

The three objectives all speak to future curriculum developers and officers: formulating, implementing and evaluating implementation strategies; designing teacher professional support measures; and transforming organisational and curricular practices. Assessment is 100% coursework through an oral presentation, a written evaluation and a reflective essay.

What to focus on. Where the sister course asks what a curriculum is for, this one asks why a good curriculum fails on the ground. Every task benefits from a real renewal you have lived through: the written evaluation and the reflective essay reward candour about what stalled and why.

Always treat your own course outline and the exam timetable as authoritative.

Difficulty & time commitment

Is MEDD8937 hard, and how much time does it take?

MEDD8937 is manageable if you keep a weekly rhythm and treat the back half as the main event. The pattern is consistent: it starts gently and steepens, and the heaviest assessment is the part that separates grades.

Difficulty
2.2 / 5
Light. Gentle early, demanding back half. Hard to fail with steady work; a top grade takes consistent practice.
Coursework
100%
Coursework carries most of the grade. The heaviest single component is the presentation at 100%.
Implementation as a process; Concerns-Based Adoption Modelsteady
Factors of implementation; educative curriculum materialssteady
Coaching, mentoring and professional learning communitiessteep
Organisational change, roles of curriculum leaders; final taskssteep

The difficulty curve and the assessment weighting point the same way: the back half is harder and worth more. Front-loading effort there is the highest-return decision in the course.

Is this course for you

Who tends to do well, and who tends to struggle

You will likely do well if

  • You have watched a curriculum reform land in a school and can describe what happened week by week.
  • You can separate a teacher's concern about a change from resistance to it.
  • You can write a critical evaluation of something you were part of.

You may struggle if

  • You expect a curriculum-design course; design is the sister course, this one is about what happens after design.
  • You describe a reform's outcome without analysing the factors that produced it.
  • You treat the reflective essay as a diary rather than an argument about practice.
do this ↘
What top students do differently
  • Choose one real renewal in week one and use it in the presentation, the evaluation and the essay.
  • Map that renewal onto the Concerns-Based Adoption Model stages before you write anything else.
  • For each support measure (materials, coaching, PLCs), state one condition under which it sustains the change and one under which it fades.

Syllabus

The 10 topics, topic by topic

Topics from the public source. Their order is a content map, not an official weekly timetable or published exam weighting.

1

T1 · Curriculum implementation as a process

Description sheet topic 1; CLO 1

Stages of implementation and why adoption is not the same as use.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on curriculum implementation as a process →
2

T2 · Concerns-Based Adoption Model

Description sheet topic 2

Reading teachers' concerns and levels of use as the implementation unfolds.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on concerns-based adoption model →
3

T3 · Factors of curriculum implementation

Description sheet topic 3; CLO 1

The conditions that help or block implementation across sites.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on factors of curriculum implementation →
4

T4 · Educative curriculum materials

Description sheet topic 4

Materials designed to teach the teacher as well as the student.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on educative curriculum materials →
5

T5 · Coaching and mentoring

Description sheet topic 5; CLO 2

One-to-one support measures for effective implementation.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on coaching →
6

T6 · Professional learning communities

Description sheet topic 6; CLO 2

Collective support structures and sustainability of the change.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on professional learning communities →
7

T7 · Organisational changes for curriculum renewals

Description sheet topic 7; CLO 3

Transforming organisational and curricular practices so a new curriculum can take.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on organisational changes for curriculum renewals →
8

T8 · Roles of curriculum leaders

Description sheet topic 8

What a leader does in school and government settings to lead renewal.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on roles of curriculum leaders →
9

T9 · Formulating and evaluating implementation strategies

Course objective 1; CLO 1

Strategies that are theoretically rigorous and contextually appropriate, given the influencing factors.

Study topic — official weight not publishedQuiz me on formulating →
10

T10 · Oral presentation, written evaluation and reflective essay

Assessment

The three assessed pieces of the course.

Study topic — official weight not published

How it's assessed

Assessment structure

ComponentWeightFormat & timing
Coursework (oral presentation, written evaluation, reflective essay)100%An oral presentation, a written evaluation and a reflective essay, as listed on the course description sheet; individual weights are not published. Across the course. Continuous; 100% coursework.
Coursework (oral presentation, written evaluation, reflective essay)100%
An oral presentation, a written evaluation and a reflective essay, as listed on the course description sheet; individual weights are not published.
  • 100% coursework: oral presentation, written evaluation and reflective essay (weights not published). MEd regulations allow re-assessment, re-submission or repetition of a failed course.
  • No examination. The tasks map to three CLOs: formulate, implement and evaluate implementation strategies; formulate and evaluate support measures, including consistency across sites and sustainability; develop strategies to transform organisational and curricular practices.
read this! If you read nothing else

This is a coursework course. Coursework carries 100% of the grade and the coursework (oral presentation, written evaluation, reflective essay) is the single heaviest piece at 100%, so steady work across the semester decides your result more than any one sitting. Continuous; 100% coursework.

Final exam timing: No examination. Confirm the exact date and venue on your exam timetable.

How to actually pass it

A weekly rhythm, two checklists, and the traps to avoid

The course rewards consistency over cramming, and practice over re-reading. Here is the loop that works, then what to have nailed before each exam.

The weekly loop

Class
Note which factor of implementation each case illustrates.
Same week
One handbook chapter; record its model and its evidence base.
Fortnightly
Add to the written evaluation of your chosen renewal.

The mistakes that cost marks

Formula & concept sheet

The vocabulary and formulas you must own

Curriculum implementation
The process by which a designed curriculum comes to be used in classrooms.
Concerns-Based Adoption Model
A framework describing teachers' stages of concern and levels of use during a change.
Educative curriculum materials
Materials written to develop teachers' knowledge as they use them.
Professional learning community
A group of teachers who inquire into their practice together to sustain a change.
Coaching
Sustained one-to-one support for a teacher implementing a new practice.
Implementation consistency
The degree to which a curriculum is enacted the same way across sites.
Sustainability
Whether an implemented change and its effects last beyond the initial push.
Curriculum leader
A person who leads renewal in a school or government setting.

Where it fits

Prerequisites, related courses & why it matters

No prerequisites; 6 credits; one of the four Curriculum and Pedagogy specialist courses listed for 2026-27, also open as an elective with limited quota.

Why it matters beyond the grade. Curriculum officers, panel chairs and school leaders are judged on whether reforms take; this course is about the support measures and organisational moves that decide that.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is MEDD8937 hard?

Light on the six-factor rubric: 100% coursework in three tasks with no numbers, but the written evaluation and reflective essay are judged on analytical honesty about an implementation.

What is the assessment?

An oral presentation, a written evaluation and a reflective essay; the course description sheet does not publish the weights.

Is it new?

It appears on the Faculty's 2026-27 list of Curriculum and Pedagogy specialist courses and is not in the 2025-26 Regulations and Syllabuses PDF.

What are the readings?

The description sheet lists the Second International Handbook of Educational Change (Hargreaves, Lieberman, Fullan and Hopkins, 2010), Jackson's Handbook of Research on Curriculum (1992) and Posner's Analysing the Curriculum (3rd ed., 2004).

Who is it for?

The objectives name future curriculum developers and officers; the content covers school and government settings.

Who teaches it?

The public description sheet does not name the teaching staff.

Study MEDD8937 with Sia

Practise explaining the course concepts and check your reasoning. Confirm assessed-work requirements in your current outline.

Start studying with Sia