Australian National University · FACULTY OF FINANCE

FINM7008 Chap.6 Two Risky Assets and the Optimal Risky Portfolio

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
7 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 6 of 12 · FINM7008

Two Risky Assets and the Optimal Risky Portfolio

Correlation decides the shape

With two risky funds, the portfolio mean is a weighted average but the variance includes a covariance term.

Perfect positive correlation gives a straight line, perfect negative correlation a broken line through zero risk, and anything in between a curve that bulges left.

Tangency and the complete portfolio

The chapter finds the minimum-variance mix, the tangency portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio, and the investor's complete portfolio of bills and both funds.

The lecture's timed question

The Week 3 lecture sets an assessment-style problem in which a second, perfectly negatively correlated asset is added to a one-asset portfolio while risk is held fixed.

Questions like it test whether you keep the absolute value in the standard deviation and read the constraint correctly, and the chapter practises one with new numbers.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Portfolio mean and variance

  • 02

    Correlation between minus one and one

  • 03

    Perfect positive correlation

  • 04

    Perfect negative correlation and zero risk

  • 05

    The minimum-variance portfolio

  • 06

    Tangency weights in excess returns

  • 07

    From P to the complete portfolio

Worked example · free

The minimum-variance mix of a bond fund and a stock fund

Q [3 marks]. A bond fund has a standard deviation of 10% and a stock fund 24%, with a correlation of 0.2. The funds' expected returns are 6% and 14%. Find the minimum-variance mix, its expected return and its risk. The practice weighting is assigned by AskSia and is not an official assessment.
Every mix of a bond fund at 6% with a 10% standard deviation and a stock fund at 14% with 24%: a straight line if correlation is 1, a broken line touching zero Every mix of a bond fund at 6% with a 10% standard deviation and a stock fund at 14% with 24%: a straight line if correlation is 1, a broken line touching zero risk at 8.35% if it is minus 1, and the blue curve bending left if it is 0.2.standard deviationexpected return10%24%8.35%bond fundstock fundρ = 0.2ρ = −1ρ = 1
Every mix of a bond fund at 6% with a 10% standard deviation and a stock fund at 14% with 24%: a straight line if correlation is 1, a broken line touching zero risk at 8.35% if it is minus 1, and the blue curve bending left if it is 0.2.
  • 1Covariance: 0.2 × 0.24 × 0.10 = 0.0048.
  • 1Bond weight: (0.0576 − 0.0048) / (0.0576 + 0.01 − 2 × 0.0048) = 0.0528 / 0.058 = 0.910.
  • 1Mean 0.910 × 6% + 0.090 × 14% = 6.72%; risk 9.76%, below the bond fund's own 10%.
About 91% in bonds and 9% in stocks gives the lowest attainable risk, 9.76%, with a 6.72% expected return. Adding a little of the riskier fund lowers risk because the funds are only weakly correlated.
Sia tip — The minimum-variance weight uses variances and the covariance only; expected returns enter afterwards, when you compute the mix's mean.
Glossary

Key terms

Correlation Coefficient
A number between minus one and one measuring how closely two returns move together.
Covariance
The expected product of two returns' deviations from their means, equal to correlation times both standard deviations.
Tangency Portfolio
The risky portfolio whose capital allocation line from the risk-free rate is steepest.
Opportunity Set
All the mean and standard deviation pairs attainable by mixing the available assets.
Perfect Hedge
A mix of perfectly negatively correlated assets weighted so that portfolio risk is zero.
Minimum-Variance Portfolio
The mix of the two funds with the lowest possible standard deviation.
FAQ

Two Risky Assets and the Optimal Risky Portfolio FAQ

Why does a lower correlation reduce portfolio risk?

Portfolio variance includes twice the weights times the covariance, and the covariance equals correlation times the two standard deviations. A lower correlation shrinks that term, so the same holdings produce less variation in the combined return.

Does the optimal risky portfolio depend on risk aversion?

No. Investors with the same inputs hold the same tangency portfolio, because it maximises the Sharpe ratio whatever their preferences. Risk aversion only decides how much of their wealth goes into it and how much stays in bills.

Why use excess returns in the tangency formula?

The tangency portfolio maximises the slope of a line from the risk-free rate, and that slope is the excess return per unit of risk. Writing the weights in excess returns over the risk-free rate builds the slope directly into the formula.

Can an asset with a lower return and higher risk be worth holding?

Yes, if its correlation with the rest of the portfolio is low enough. A small position can then reduce total risk. With a correlation of one it would be dominated, and nobody would hold it at that price.

What does a correlation of minus one allow?

It allows the two assets' risks to offset completely. Weighting each asset by the other's standard deviation produces a portfolio with zero standard deviation, which in equilibrium must earn the risk-free rate, since a riskless portfolio cannot offer more than a riskless bill.

How do I find the complete portfolio from the tangency portfolio?

Compute y* from the tangency portfolio's risk premium and variance and the investor's A, then multiply each fund's weight inside the tangency portfolio by y*. Whatever is left, one minus y*, goes into bills.

Why does the top-down process build the risky portfolio first?

Because the best risky portfolio does not depend on the investor. Once it is found from the opportunity set and the risk-free rate, each investor's risk aversion only sets how much to hold, so the same technical step serves everyone.

Study strategy

Exam move

Draw the three correlation cases from memory, then work one tangency problem fully: covariance, weights, mean, standard deviation and Sharpe ratio. Finish by scaling P into a complete portfolio for a given A. Keep a one-line check for each answer: the weights sum to one and the tangency Sharpe ratio beats both funds on their own.

Rehearse the timed two-asset question with a stopwatch, since the lecture sets thirty minutes for its own version and the method has several steps.

Working through Two Risky Assets and the Optimal Risky Portfolio in FINM7008? Sia is AskSia’s AI Finance tutor — ask any FINM7008 Two Risky Assets and the Optimal Risky Portfolio question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how FINM7008 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 46 of your Australian National University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your FINM7008 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works