Australian National University · FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT

MGMT1003 Chap.7 Group Norms, Conformity and Social Loafing

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
7 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 7 of 12 · MGMT1003

Group Norms, Conformity and Social Loafing

The unwritten rules

Week 4 moves from the individual to the group. Norms are shared standards that are rarely written down and are enforced by disapproval.

Asch's line experiment shows how readily people go along with a wrong majority, and the distinction between descriptive and injunctive norms explains two different sources of that pressure.

Perception and size

People act on the norm they believe in, so pluralistic ignorance can make a whole group follow a rule few of them hold.

Adding members raises total output but lowers each member's effort, which is why the lecture recommends teams of three to six.

How this chapter is examined

Classification items on descriptive and injunctive norms are common, as are items on what Asch's figures mean and why people loaf. Applied questions usually describe a meeting where everyone agrees too quickly or a group project where effort collapses.

Name the mechanism, conformity, a misread norm or one of the two causes of loafing, and propose a structural fix such as private input, smaller teams or visible roles.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Why teams outperform individuals

  • 02

    Groups, norms and how norms are enforced

  • 03

    Asch's line experiment and conformity

  • 04

    Descriptive versus injunctive norms

  • 05

    Pluralistic ignorance and perceived norms

  • 06

    Ringelmann and social loafing

  • 07

    Ideal team size and the two-pizza rule

Worked example · free

Read Asch's conformity results on the right base

Q [3 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A classmate says Asch showed that 75% of people conform to a wrong majority most of the time. Using the experiment's results for participants and for responses, correct the claim. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation, not an official University marking scheme.
Asch’s conformity results on two bases.Asch’s conformity results on two bases. The upper bar counts participants, of whom 75% went along with the wrong majority at least once; the lower bar counts all responses, of which 37% conformed to the incorrect majority.Participants75%conformed at least once25%never conformedResponses37%conformed63%stayed correct
Asch’s conformity results on two bases. The upper bar counts participants, of whom 75% went along with the wrong majority at least once; the lower bar counts all responses, of which 37% conformed to the incorrect majority.
  • 1The 75% figure counts participants who conformed at least once, not most of the time.
  • 1Counting responses, 37% conformed to the incorrect majority, so most answers stayed correct.
  • 1A quarter of participants never conformed; the accurate summary is that conformity was common across people but not the majority of answers.
Three quarters of participants conformed at least once, but only 37% of responses conformed, and 25% of participants never did. The claim confuses the two bases.
Sia tip — Always say what a percentage counts: people who ever conformed and responses that conformed are different denominators.
Glossary

Key terms

Social Norms
Shared, usually unwritten standards of what group members do and approve of, enforced by disapproval or exclusion.
Descriptive Norm
What most others in a group commonly do, most influential in new or uncertain situations.
Conformity
Going along with a group's judgement or behaviour, even against one's own view, to avoid rejection.
Two-Pizza Rule
Amazon's policy that a team should be small enough to be fed by two pizzas, keeping every contribution visible.
Injunctive Norm
A shared view of what group members approve or disapprove of, which carries social penalties for breaking it.
FAQ

Group Norms, Conformity and Social Loafing FAQ

What did Asch's line experiment show?

That people often go along with a unanimous wrong answer they can see is wrong. In the lecture's figures, 37% of responses conformed, 75% of participants conformed at least once and 25% never did. The pressure comes from fear of being disliked or rejected, even when the stakes are trivial.

How do you tell a descriptive norm from an injunctive one?

Ask what the statement reports. If it describes what people do, it is descriptive; if it describes what people think should happen, it is injunctive. Descriptive norms guide behaviour in uncertain situations, while injunctive norms carry the threat of social sanction.

Why do people loaf in groups?

The lecture gives two structural causes. Members who believe others are not doing their fair share cut their own effort to restore equity, and members who think their individual input cannot be identified feel less responsible. Both are fixed by making contributions visible and assigning clear responsibility.

What is pluralistic ignorance, with an example?

It is a shared misreading of a group's own norm. A new employee might assume colleagues are expected to answer emails late at night and do the same, when most people in the team do not. Correcting it means finding out what people believe the norm is and stating the real one openly.

Study strategy

Exam move

Learn the Asch figures with their bases, the one-line test for the two norm types and the two causes of social loafing. Then practise one applied answer that diagnoses a group problem with a named norm concept and fixes it with a structural change such as size or visible roles.

To finish, recall a group assignment that went badly and decide whether equity, hidden contributions or group size was the main cause, then write the fix you would apply next time.

Working through Group Norms, Conformity and Social Loafing in MGMT1003? Sia is AskSia’s AI Management tutor — ask any MGMT1003 Group Norms, Conformity and Social Loafing question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MGMT1003 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 46 of your Australian National University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MGMT1003 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works