Australian National University · FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT

MGMT1003 Chap.5 The Big Five, HEXACO and Job Performance

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
7 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 5 of 12 · MGMT1003

The Big Five, HEXACO and Job Performance

Measuring personality

The Big Five emerged from the lexical hypothesis rather than a theory, and every person sits on all five continuous factors. HEXACO replaces it with six factors, adding honesty-humility.

The chapter shows how to score the ten-item inventory used in the lecture and tutorial.

What personality predicts

Hurtz and Donovan's meta-analysis found conscientiousness and emotional stability significantly related to performance, while other factors predict specific outcomes.

Type instruments, faking and legal risk limit how personality tests should be used at work.

How this chapter is examined

Numbers and directions are favourite quiz material: the two significant correlations, which items are reversed, and which trait predicts which outcome. Applied items tend to ask whether a firm should hire on a personality test.

A strong answer cites the modest validity, the faking problem and the legal risk of clinical instruments, then recommends combining a stated trait with better predictors.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    The lexical hypothesis and the origins of the Big Five

  • 02

    Five factors as degrees, not types

  • 03

    HEXACO and honesty-humility

  • 04

    Scoring the ten-item personality inventory

  • 05

    Hurtz and Donovan's correlations with performance

  • 06

    Traits that predict specific outcomes

  • 07

    Critiques of type instruments, faking and legal risk

Worked example · free

Read which Big Five traits predict job performance

Q [3 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A recruiter wants to rank graduates on extraversion because 'outgoing people perform better'. Using the meta-analysis results on correlation with job performance, evaluate the claim and suggest a better use of extraversion. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation, not an official University marking scheme.
Two significant traits, three null results.Two significant traits, three null results. The dots mark each factor’s correlation with job performance in the meta-analysis; conscientiousness reaches .22 and emotional stability .14, while the remaining three sit at zero because no significant link was found.Conscientiousnessr = .22Emotional stabilityr = .14Agreeablenessn.s.Extraversionn.s.Opennessn.s.correlation with job performance
Two significant traits, three null results. The dots mark each factor’s correlation with job performance in the meta-analysis; conscientiousness reaches .22 and emotional stability .14, while the remaining three sit at zero because no significant link was found.
  • 1In Hurtz and Donovan's meta-analysis, extraversion was not significantly correlated with overall job performance; conscientiousness (r = .22) and emotional stability (r = .14) were.
  • 1So ranking all graduates on extraversion rests on a trait with no overall link to performance.
  • 1Extraversion does predict specific criteria, such as sales performance and leadership, so it is defensible only for roles where that criterion is stated in advance.
The claim fails for overall performance, where extraversion was not significant. Use extraversion only for roles such as sales where its specific criterion applies, and combine any score with structured interviews and work samples.
Sia tip — Name the criterion before the trait: overall performance points to conscientiousness, a sales role can justify extraversion.
Glossary

Key terms

Lexical Hypothesis
The idea that important differences between people are encoded as words in a language, the origin of the Big Five.
Conscientiousness
The degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent and achievement-oriented; the strongest personality predictor of performance.
Honesty-Humility
The HEXACO factor contrasting fairness and modesty with pretentiousness and dishonesty.
Meta-Analysis
A study that pools effect sizes already reported by many studies rather than running a new experiment.
Reverse Scoring
Converting a rating on a negatively worded item so that high always means more of the trait, on a 1 to 7 scale as 8 minus the rating.
Five-Factor Model
Another name for the Big Five: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness, each measured as a continuous score.
FAQ

The Big Five, HEXACO and Job Performance FAQ

How do you score the ten-item personality inventory?

Rate the ten items from 1 to 7, reverse-score five items (numbers 2, 6, 8, 9 and 10) by taking each rating away from 8, then average each trait's pair: extraversion from items 1 and 6, agreeableness from 2 and 7, conscientiousness from 3 and 8, neuroticism from 4 and 9, and openness from 5 and 10.

Is the Myers-Briggs indicator useful for hiring?

The lecture says no. Many people get a different type on retest, the scales are continuous so splitting at the midpoint creates false opposites, and there is little evidence that type predicts job performance. Even the company that publishes it warns against using it for hiring.

Why should a personality score never be a single hiring hurdle?

Because applicants fake, most on conscientiousness and emotional stability, and because correlations around .22 describe tendencies across many people rather than predictions about one candidate. The lecture recommends pairing any score with stronger predictors: samples of real work, structured interviews and cognitive tests.

Which Big Five trait predicts which outcome at work?

Beyond overall performance, extraversion goes with sales success and leadership, openness with training and adjusting to an overseas posting, agreeableness with customer service and teamwork, and emotional stability with management and safety-critical roles. Conscientiousness supports performance across most jobs and predicts persistence.

Study strategy

Exam move

Practise scoring the inventory on two made-up response sets until the reversal is automatic. Memorise the five factors with one descriptor each, HEXACO's extra factor, and the two significant correlations with their values. For critiques, learn three problems with type instruments and three defences against faking.

Finish by explaining, in two sentences, why a correlation of .22 justifies using conscientiousness as one input but not as the only hiring hurdle.

Working through The Big Five, HEXACO and Job Performance in MGMT1003? Sia is AskSia’s AI Management tutor — ask any MGMT1003 The Big Five, HEXACO and Job Performance question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MGMT1003 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 46 of your Australian National University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MGMT1003 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works