The University of Melbourne · FACULTY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

SWEN90016 Chap.3 Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
5 Chapters2-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 3 of 6 · SWEN90016

Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning

Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning

Week 4 combines project planning, stakeholder management, communication management and executive roles.

This chapter therefore separates Stakeholder Interest, Influence and Power and Communication Action before combining them in an answer.

The practical objective is to select communication content, channel, cadence and owner for stakeholders with different decision rights.

Begin the communication plan analysis by separating supplied facts from inferences and naming the exact decision the response must support.

Before submitting a communication plan, compare its prose, equations, tables and diagrams. Direction, denominator, date, sign and unit must agree with the Influence and Power working.

If this subject keeps an operational rule for Stakeholder Interest on its live site, confirm that rule there without inventing certainty.

An error note for communication plan records the trigger, mistaken inference, corrected reasoning and future check. Distinguish failure to define Stakeholder Interest, trace Influence and Power, or let Communication Action affect the conclusion.

That chapter-specific distinction turns feedback into a reusable repair method.

A strong explanation of communication plan remains intelligible after surface details change. It does not rely on recognising a copied Stakeholder Interest example.

It identifies Influence and Power, completes the required operation, interprets the outcome and leaves Communication Action open to inspection and challenge.

Stakeholder Interest establishes the object and scope of this problem. Before drawing a conclusion about Stakeholder Interest, name the actor, period, series, artefact or cultural object that the case actually supplies.

That choice keeps Stakeholder Interest tied to evidence instead of turning it into a floating definition.

Influence and Power carries the central reasoning in this chapter. Explain what changes through Influence and Power, which relationship produces that change, and what evidence would distinguish it from a plausible alternative.

A label for Influence and Power earns its place only when it performs that analytical job.

Communication Action is the chapter control. Use Communication Action to test the relevant sign, timing convention, category, assumption, stakeholder effect or interpretive limit.

A Communication Action check must be capable of changing the answer, not merely redescribing the preferred conclusion.

The practical task is to select communication content, channel, cadence and owner for stakeholders with different decision rights. Start the communication plan working from supplied facts, keep its assumptions separate, and show each consequential transformation.

Finish at the evidential scale of communication plan and name the condition that would require revision.

A reliable communication plan response uses a ledger of fact, rule or model, working, interpretation and verification. Its entries show whether an error concerns Stakeholder Interest, Influence and Power, sequence, evidence or overstatement.

Repair the first failed entry, then propagate only its consequences.

Transfer practice for communication plan

Worked retrieval check. Without looking back, define Stakeholder Interest, explain how Influence and Power changes the working, and state when Communication Action would narrow the conclusion.

Then compare your Stakeholder Interest reconstruction with the chapter map and correct the first missing link to Influence and Power.

Changed-case prompt. Increase the user group’s formal approval power.

Response. Escalation and decision paths change; the plan should not leave approval with the sponsor by habit when governance has shifted.

This exercise isolates transfer in Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning.

A useful answer identifies the changed fact, preserves every premise that still holds, retraces Influence and Power, and lets Communication Action determine whether the communication plan survives. Record why that result changed so the Communication Action check can be reused on a later case.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Stakeholder Interest

  • 02

    Influence and Power

  • 03

    Communication Action

  • 04

    Select communication content, channel, cadence and owner for stakeholders with different decision rights

  • 05

    Frequent communication can still fail when it carries the wrong evidence, reaches the wrong role or leaves a decision unowned.

Worked example · free

Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning case

Q [7 marks]. A clinical user has high operational knowledge but limited formal authority, while a sponsor controls funding. Design communication actions for each. The mark allocation shown here organises independent practice and is not a published University assessment scheme.
  • 2Define Stakeholder Interest for the case.
  • 3Apply Influence and Power with visible working.
  • 2Use Communication Action to qualify the result.
The user receives iterative demonstrations and feedback loops tied to workflow evidence. The sponsor receives concise progress, risk and decision requests. The plan names who synthesises conflicts and who owns acceptance decisions.
Sia tip — Write the decision each stakeholder must make before choosing the channel or cadence.
Glossary

Key terms

Stakeholder Interest
Stakeholder Interest names the chapter’s starting object or classification and fixes its relevant scale.
Influence and Power
Influence and Power is the relationship or operation used to move from evidence to an interpretable result.
Communication Action
Communication Action is the diagnostic that checks whether the preferred result survives a changed condition.
FAQ

Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning FAQ

What belongs in a communication plan?

Identify stakeholder purpose, required information, format, timing, sender, feedback route and escalation trigger so communication is connected to a real project decision. Recheck the conclusion against the chapter boundary and the facts supplied in the new case.

Study strategy

Exam move

Retrieve Stakeholder Interest, Influence and Power and Communication Action; complete the changed case; then repair the first move that crosses this boundary: Frequent communication can still fail when it carries the wrong evidence, reaches the wrong role or leaves a decision unowned.

Working through Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning in SWEN90016? Sia is AskSia’s AI Computer Science tutor — ask any SWEN90016 Stakeholders, Roles and Communication Planning question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how SWEN90016 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 51 of your The University of Melbourne subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your SWEN90016 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 2-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
Unlock the full SWEN90016 Bible + 51 The University of Melbourne subjects
$0.99 Trial