University of Sydney · FACULTY OF ACCOUNTING

ACCT3031 Chap.9 Stakeholders, CSR, Sustainability and Ethics

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
8 Chapters6-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 9 of 9 · ACCT3031

Stakeholders, CSR, Sustainability and Ethics

The final chapter widens governance to the people and systems a company affects.

It traces definitions of corporate social responsibility from Bowen and Carroll to Friedman, contrasts overlapping and nested models of sustainability, shows how to test SDG and CSR claims for evidence, names the forms of greenwashing, uses Shell in the Niger Delta and multinational tax planning as cases, and introduces the normative ethical approaches boards use to justify decisions.

It closes the unit by asking how stakeholders can tell a responsible corporation from one that is simply good at reporting responsibility.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Definitions of CSR

  • 02

    Sustainability and the two models

  • 03

    SDG alignment and contribution

  • 04

    Policy, activity and outcome

  • 05

    Greenwashing and legitimacy theory

  • 06

    Shell in the Niger Delta

  • 07

    Tax avoidance and evasion

  • 08

    Normative ethics

Worked example · free

Classify three arguments about a plant closure by ethical approach

Q [3 marks]. A board debating whether to close a profitable but polluting plant hears three arguments: closing it will prevent more harm than it causes; the company has a duty not to pollute whatever the result; a responsible company would act honestly and fairly towards the workers. Classify each argument as a consequential, non-consequential or virtue approach within normative ethics. The mark allocation shown here is not an official university assessment scheme.
The unit focuses on one branch of ethics.The unit focuses on one branch of ethics. Descriptive ethics studies how people behave and conceptual ethics what terms mean, while normative ethics asks what ought to be done and divides into consequential, non-consequential and virtue approaches.EthicsDescriptivehow people actConceptualwhat terms meanNormativewhat ought to beConsequentialNon-consequentialVirtue
The unit focuses on one branch of ethics. Descriptive ethics studies how people behave and conceptual ethics what terms mean, while normative ethics asks what ought to be done and divides into consequential, non-consequential and virtue approaches.
  • +1The first judges the action by its results, so it is a consequential approach.
  • +1The second holds the duty regardless of outcome, so it is a non-consequential approach.
  • +1The third focuses on whether the action and the way it is carried out are justifiable, so it reflects a virtue approach.
The arguments are consequential, non-consequential and virtue-based in turn. Naming them shows the board why reasonable people disagree: they weigh outcomes, duties and character differently. A sound decision states which approach it relies on and explains how it answers the others.
Sia tip — Ask whether the argument rests on results, on a duty that holds regardless of results, or on the character of the action.
Glossary

Key terms

Corporate social responsibility
The responsibilities a corporation is expected to accept towards society and stakeholders beyond financial returns to shareholders.
Sustainable development
Development that meets today's needs without undermining the capacity of future generations to provide for theirs.
SDG washing
Superficial use of the Sustainable Development Goals to imply sustainability without meaningful action.
Legitimacy theory
A theory that corporations depend on continuing social acceptance and act to close gaps between conduct and expectations.
Treaty shopping
Routing income through a jurisdiction to gain favourable treatment under a double taxation agreement.
Normative ethics
The branch of ethics concerned with what people or organisations should do.
FAQ

Stakeholders, CSR, Sustainability and Ethics FAQ

What is the difference between CSR and sustainability?

Sustainability asks whether environmental, social and economic systems can be maintained over time, as in the Brundtland definition. CSR asks what responsibilities a corporation has for its impacts on society and stakeholders. The two increasingly overlap, but sustainability is the wider idea, and the nested model shows the economy depending on society and the environment.

How can you tell whether a sustainability claim is greenwashing?

Ask five questions: what is claimed, what evidence supports it, what boundary it covers, what is missing and whether it can be challenged. Watch for vague claims, ratios that hide totals, changed boundaries, distant targets without milestones and symbolic governance. The test is whether the claim matches the underlying practice, as ASIC's penalty cases show.

Why does ethics matter if a decision is legal?

A decision can be lawful yet still raise questions of fairness, honesty or responsibility to those affected. Ethical reasoning gives the board a structured way to weigh consequences, duties and character and to justify its choice to stakeholders. The module stresses that ethics offers reasoning rather than automatic answers.

What is the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion?

Tax evasion is unlawful, while avoidance and planning can comply with the law technically yet reduce tax substantially. The OECD's work on base erosion and profit shifting shows how multinationals use transfer pricing, deductions in high-tax countries, mismatches and treaty shopping, which turns tax into a question of responsibility to the societies a company relies on.

Why are the SDGs not a reporting checklist?

The Sustainable Development Goals were adopted by UN member states in 2015 as a global agenda, not as a corporate reporting template. Mapping activities to Goals shows alignment only. Contribution needs evidence of what the company did, what changed, how significant the change was and how it was measured, alongside any adverse impacts.

Study strategy

Assessment move

Build a short table of CSR definitions and their primary duty, then practise the five-question test on a real sustainability report. For ethics, learn the three normative approaches with one board example each, and practise a paragraph that states which approach supports your recommendation and how another would challenge it.

Use the Shell case to practise starting from the impact rather than the report, and compare the company's account with what affected communities experienced.

Working through Stakeholders, CSR, Sustainability and Ethics in ACCT3031? Sia is AskSia’s AI Accounting tutor — ask any ACCT3031 Stakeholders, CSR, Sustainability and Ethics question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how ACCT3031 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 202 of your University of Sydney subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your ACCT3031 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 6-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works