City University of Hong Kong · FACULTY OF LAW

LW4641 Chap.6 Restricted Acts and Infringement

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
7 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 6 of 11 · LW4641

Restricted Acts and Infringement

Three stages, always in order

The lecture's summary of the infringement analysis gives the structure for every problem question: first subsistence, then infringement, then defences. Primary infringement means doing a restricted act without licence. Secondary infringement concerns infringing copies, requires knowledge and is limited to particular kinds of dealing.

Defences come last: the general defences, the statutory permitted acts with their fair dealing analysis, and for secondary infringement the questions of reason to know and safe harbour.

The restricted acts

Section 22 lists the acts only the owner may do or authorise, and the following sections define them: copying under s23, issuing copies to the public under s24, rental under s25, public performance, playing or showing under s27, communication to the public under s28A, and adaptation under s29.

Sections 26 and 28 have been repealed. An act infringes whether it takes the entire work or only a substantial part of it.

The communication right

The Copyright (Amendment) Ordinance 2022, in force from 1 May 2023, made communication to the public a technology neutral right with matching criminal sanctions, added new exceptions and created a safe harbour for online service providers.

Communication covers broadcasting, cable services and making a work available so that people can access it at a time and place they choose.

The person who communicates is the one who determined the content; merely gaining access, receiving a transmission or providing facilities is not enough.

Secondary infringement

The Lecture 5 reading list sets ss30 to 35. The provisions reach importing or exporting an infringing copy, possessing or dealing with one in business, providing the means to make infringing copies, and permitting premises or supplying apparatus for an infringing performance.

The common thread is that the defendant knew or had reason to believe the copy was infringing. The course materials illustrate platform liability with two Chinese decisions on AI image services, one finding direct and one only indirect liability.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Subsistence, infringement and defences in order

  • 02

    The restricted acts in ss22 to 29

  • 03

    Whole or substantial part

  • 04

    The s28A communication right and the 2022 reforms

  • 05

    Who determines the content of a communication

  • 06

    Secondary infringement in ss30 to 34

  • 07

    Knowledge and reason to believe

Worked example · free

Sort defendants into primary and secondary liability

Q [9 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A Hong Kong gym plays a pirated fitness video on its screens during classes. The video was burned onto discs by a supplier who sells them to gyms across the city. Identify the infringements for each party. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation and are not the University's marking scheme.
The restricted acts.The restricted acts. Doing any of them, or authorising another to do them, without the owner's licence is primary infringement.Section 22: the acts only the owner may do or authoriseCopyrightownerCopyings23Issuing copiess24Rentals25Public performances27Communications28AAdaptations29
The restricted acts. Doing any of them, or authorising another to do them, without the owner's licence is primary infringement.
  • 2Confirm subsistence and ownership of the video.
  • 4Classify the gym's conduct and the supplier's conduct under the right sections.
  • 3State the knowledge element for each secondary claim.
The video is a film and its producer owns the copyright. The supplier who burned the discs copied the film, which is primary infringement under s23 needing no proof of knowledge, and selling the discs to gyms is also secondary infringement under s31. The gym showed the film to its members, a public showing restricted under s27, so it infringes directly, and if it kept the discs in the course of its business it also deals with infringing copies. For each secondary claim the owner must show that the defendant knew or had reason to believe the discs were infringing copies, which the supplier's trade in cheap copies will usually establish.
Sia tip — Write the section number beside each defendant's act before discussing knowledge; knowledge matters only for the secondary sections, so a copier's ignorance is no answer.
Glossary

Key terms

Primary Infringement
Doing, or authorising, one of the restricted acts without the owner's licence; no knowledge is required.
Communication Right
The technology neutral exclusive right in s28A to communicate a work to the public, including by making it available online.
Making Available
Putting a work where members of the public can access it from a place and at a time they individually choose, as on the internet.
Infringing Copy
A copy whose making infringed copyright, or would have done if made in Hong Kong; secondary infringement turns on dealing with one.
Safe Harbour
The regime introduced in 2023 that limits the liability of online service providers for material on their services, set out in Division IIIA of the Ordinance.
Reason To Believe
The objective knowledge standard in secondary infringement, satisfied where the facts known would lead a reasonable person to suspect the copy was infringing.
FAQ

Restricted Acts and Infringement FAQ

What is the difference between primary and secondary infringement?

Primary infringement is doing a restricted act without licence, such as copying a work or putting it before the public electronically, and knowledge is irrelevant. Secondary infringement covers dealing with infringing copies or facilitating infringement, such as importing, selling or supplying apparatus, and it requires proof that the defendant knew or had reason to believe.

Does linking to a film online count as communicating it to the public?

Not automatically. Under s28A the person who communicates is the one who determined the content of the communication, and merely providing facilities is not communication. A site that only lists links needs further analysis of what it controls, of authorisation, and of the safe harbour for service providers.

What changed in Hong Kong copyright law on 1 May 2023?

The Copyright (Amendment) Ordinance 2022 took effect, introducing a technology neutral exclusive communication right with corresponding criminal sanctions, several new and expanded exceptions, and a safe harbour regime for online service providers. Older materials citing s28 for broadcasting are out of date, since that section is repealed.

Study strategy

Exam move

Draw the three-stage analysis on one index card and put the section numbers for each restricted act and each secondary infringement underneath. Then take the facts of any practice problem and label every party with a section before writing a word. The card becomes the first tab in your printed exam notes.

Working through Restricted Acts and Infringement in LW4641? Sia is AskSia’s AI Law tutor — ask any LW4641 Restricted Acts and Infringement question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how LW4641 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 16 of your City University of Hong Kong subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your LW4641 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works