LW4641 Intellectual Property: Theory, Copyright, and Design
LW4641 Overview
- City University of Hong Kong
- Semester A, 2026/27
- Level 4 law course
- Law
- Open-book final exam
What this course is asking you to do
This course gives a working knowledge of intellectual property as a whole and of copyright and design law in particular.
- Assessed by A two-hour open-book final exam worth seventy per cent, plus a group presentation, a group research report and class participation.
- The skill being tested Running a problem through subsistence, infringement and defences in order, and arguing a policy position against its strongest objection.
- Hardest step Spotting the design overlap in a problem about a manufactured product, where ss86 and 87 decide whether copyright is still running.
- Where to confirm The exam date is to be announced; check Canvas for it and for any change to the arrangements.
How LW4641 is assessed
| Component | Weight | Format |
|---|---|---|
| General Participation: contributions to class discussions | 5% | Raising questions on behalf of your group after other groups' presentations |
| Group Presentation | 15% | Up to 40 minutes on a copyright topic, followed by questions, from Lecture 3 |
| Group research report | 10% | Around 10 to 15 pages with footnotes, due within two weeks after the presentation |
| Final Exam | 70% | Two hours, open book, printed materials only, no internet: one issue spotter and one of three policy questions |
The first lecture for this offering lists three assessment lines totalling 100%. Participation and the group presentation appear together as one 20% line, made up of 5% for contributions to class discussions and 15% for the presentation, and this guide shows the two parts separately. The group research report is worth 10% and the final exam 70%. The exam is two hours and open book, with printed materials allowed and no internet access; it contains one case-based question worth 70% of the paper and one of three theoretical policy questions worth 30%. Its date is listed as to be announced. A formative essay is also offered but does not count towards the final grade. Confirm the current arrangements, including the exam date, on Canvas.
Assessment structure
Segment widths reproduce the published percentage weights and total 100%.
Current LW4641 dates
| Date | Item | Control |
|---|---|---|
| 15 September 2026 | First group presentations (Lecture 3) | Stated in the class schedule for this offering; presentations continue weekly according to group sign-up. |
| 13 November 2026 | Optional formative essay deadline | End of the reading week, stated for this offering. The essay is graded with feedback but does not count towards the final grade. |
| 17 November 2026 | Last group presentations (Lecture 11) | Stated in the class schedule for this offering. Each group report is due within two weeks after its presentation. |
| 24 November 2026 | Concluding appraisal and exam tips (Lecture 12) | Stated in the class schedule; the exam date itself is listed as to be announced. |
Dates are as published in the class schedule and assessment section published in the first lecture for this offering. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.
What LW4641 covers
Eleven chapters follow the published lecture sequence from the justifications for intellectual property through subsistence, infringement, permitted acts, moral rights, performers' rights and remedies to the overlap with design and registered designs.
Why Intellectual Property Is Granted
content against vehicle · the four traditional rights compared · utilitarian, labour and personality theories · first-order and midlevel principlesContent, not the vehicle
The course begins with a distinction that settles later arguments before they start.
- Intellectual property rights against property rights
- Copyright, trade marks, patents and trade secrets compared
- The utilitarian incentive argument and its evidence problem
- Locke's labour theory and the proviso
- Personality theory and the link to moral rights
- First-order foundations and midlevel principles
Copyright Origins, Hong Kong Law and the Treaties
the Stationers' monopoly and the Statute of Anne · authors' rights and economic models · Cap 528 and the Basic Law · Berne, Rome, TRIPS and the WIPO treatiesFrom printers' privilege to author's right
Copyright began as a privilege tied to censorship.
- The Stationers' Company and the Statute of Anne
- Technology as the driver of new rights
- Authors' rights and the economic model
- The 1956 Act, Cap 528 and 27 June 1997
- Articles 139 and 140 of the Basic Law
- Berne, Rome, TRIPS and the WIPO treaties
Protected Works and the Closed List
descriptions of protected work · means against includes · the photo-shoot scene and television formats · open list comparisons and who should decideSubsistence starts with a category
Before asking whether anything was copied, a claimant must show that copyright subsists, and in Hong Kong that begins with fitting the material into one of the descriptions of work the Ordinance names.
- Why subsistence starts with a category
- Nine descriptions of work in Hong Kong
- Means against includes in the definitions
- The photo-shoot scene and each failed category
- Television formats and film props
- Open lists, perfume and chemical schemes
Originality and the Idea and Expression Divide
skill and labour, sweat of the brow and intellectual creation · merger and stock scenes · the plot and character cases · software and musicOriginality as the reading list builds it
The Lecture 2 reading list assembles the originality standard from cases rather than from a statutory definition.
- Skill, labour and judgment in the reading list
- Sweat of the brow and the Hong Kong authority
- The EU intellectual creation test as comparator
- TRIPS Article 9(2) and the public domain
- Merger and scenes a faire
- Nichols, Baigent, Shazam and Brown
Authorship and AI Generated Content
prompts alone · expressive inputs that stay perceptible · selection and arrangement · computer-generated works under s11(3) and s198The question the course puts to AI
One stated aim of this course is to understand how artificial intelligence has challenged, and may reshape, copyright's central doctrines. Authorship is where the pressure is greatest.
- No accepted non-human author
- Prompts alone and the black box problem
- Expressive inputs that remain perceptible
- Selection, modification and arrangement
- Burrow-Giles, Suryast and Rose Enigma
- Li v Liu in the Beijing Internet Court
Restricted Acts and Infringement
the three-part analysis · the restricted acts in ss22 to 29 · the s28A communication right · secondary infringement in ss30 to 34 and knowledgeThree stages, always in order
The lecture's summary of the infringement analysis gives the structure for every problem question: first subsistence, then infringement, then defences. Primary infringement means doing a restricted act without licence.
- Subsistence, infringement and defences in order
- The restricted acts in ss22 to 29
- Whole or substantial part
- The s28A communication right and the 2022 reforms
- Who determines the content of a communication
- Secondary infringement in ss30 to 34
Fair Dealing and the Permitted Acts
the list of exceptions and the four factors · research and private study · criticism, quotation and current events · parody and incidental inclusion · contract override and miningDefences, not rights
Division III of the Copyright Ordinance lists acts that may be done even though copyright subsists. Section 37(1) adds that the provisions concern infringement alone and leave every other right or duty untouched.
- Section 37(1) and the nature of the permitted acts
- The four fairness factors
- Research and private study under s38
- Criticism, review and quotation under s39
- Reporting current events and Hyde Park v Yelland
- Parody and incidental inclusion
Moral Rights of Authors and Directors
the right to be identified and assertion · false attribution · derogatory treatment and prejudice · duration, waiver and transmissionPersonal rights that survive a sale
Moral rights belong to the individual creators of copyright works and cannot be transferred, assigned or sold. An owner who has bought the copyright can therefore still infringe them.
- Moral rights belong to individual creators
- The right to be identified and assertion under s90
- What counts as sufficient identification
- False attribution and the reasonable reader
- Treatment, distortion and prejudice
- Duration, waiver and transmission on death
Performers' Rights, Remedies and Enforcement
qualifying performances and the performer's consent · economic and moral rights of performers · civil and interim relief · the s118 offencesWhy performers need their own rights
Performers contribute to works, but a live performance is transitory, and for a long time their interests were treated as subordinate to those of copyright owners.
- What counts as a qualifying performance
- Consent rights over first fixation
- Economic rights in fixations made with consent
- Performers' moral rights
- Duration under s214
- Civil remedies and interim orders
Where Copyright Meets Design
direct and indirect copyright in designs · engravings, sculptures and artistic craftsmanship · corresponding designs under s86 · the s87 termsTwo regimes, one shape
Design covers product, industrial, fashion, packaging and many other fields, and it is costly and valuable work.
- Design practice and the two Hong Kong ordinances
- Artistic works irrespective of artistic quality
- Engravings, sculptures and artistic craftsmanship
- Design drawings as indirect protection
- Corresponding designs under s86
- The twenty-five and fifteen year rules in s87
Registered Designs and Registrability
the Hong Kong Designs Registry · the four requirements · shape, article, industrial process and eye appeal · function and must match · co-ownershipHong Kong's registry and its roots
Registered designs began in the United Kingdom in 1839, when a registered monopoly of up to three years was offered to improve the look of manufactured goods.
- From the 1839 register to Cap 522
- The four requirements for registration
- Shape, configuration, pattern and ornament
- What counts as an article, and spare parts
- Eye appeal through the customer's eye
- Features dictated solely by function
It is taught as both theory and practice: the theories that justify the doctrines, the statute and case law in Hong Kong, the ability to give a professional opinion on how copyright and design rights operate in real life, and an understanding of how artificial intelligence is challenging, and may reshape, the central doctrines of copyright.
The final paper tests all of this with one problem question and one policy question, so every chapter here ends in something you can apply.
Why Intellectual Property Is Granted
The opening chapter separates the content from the vehicle, sets copyright beside trade marks, patents and trade secrets, and works through the three justifications taught in the first lecture: the utilitarian incentive argument and its evidence problem, Locke's labour theory with its proviso, and personality theory.
It closes with the argument that efficiency is a midlevel principle and that midlevel principles shape doctrine in practice.
Copyright Origins, Hong Kong Law and the Treaties
Copyright began as a printers' privilege and became an author's right with the Statute of Anne.
The chapter explains why continental and American copyright diverged, how the UK Act of 1956 governed Hong Kong until the Copyright Ordinance took effect on 27 June 1997, why the Basic Law lets Hong Kong set its own policy, and what the Berne, Rome, TRIPS and WIPO instruments each added.
Protected Works and the Closed List
Hong Kong protects only the descriptions of work its Ordinance names.
The chapter shows how much room the drafting leaves through the difference between means and includes, why an elaborately staged photo shoot was not protected as any kind of work, and why some commentators prefer to leave new categories to the legislature rather than the courts.
Originality and the Idea and Expression Divide
Authorial works must be original, and the reading list builds the standard from cases on betting coupons, invented words and redrawn designs.
The second half of the chapter explains why ideas stay free, how merger and stock scenes limit protection, and how courts in the United States and the United Kingdom compared plots, themes and characters.
Authorship and AI Generated Content
No court has accepted a work made entirely without a human author, so the question is how much human control is enough.
The chapter follows the three positions used in United States registration practice, contrasts a Beijing decision, and explains Hong Kong's own computer-generated works rule, which names the person who made the arrangements for the work's creation.
Restricted Acts and Infringement
Every problem question follows the same three stages: subsistence, infringement and defences.
This chapter lays out the restricted acts from copying to adaptation, the technology neutral communication right introduced by the 2022 reforms, and the secondary infringements that catch importers, sellers and those who supply premises or apparatus, all of which turn on knowledge.
Fair Dealing and the Permitted Acts
A permitted act is a defence to infringement, not a right of the user.
The chapter works through research and private study, criticism and review, quotation, news reporting, parody and incidental inclusion, with the conditions each one carries and the four factors that decide fairness, and then turns to contract override and proposals for a text and data mining exception.
Moral Rights of Authors and Directors
Three personal rights protect the creator's name and the integrity of the work: identification, which must be asserted, the right against false attribution, and the right to object to derogatory treatment, which needs prejudice to honour or reputation.
The chapter also covers duration, written waiver and what happens on death.
Performers' Rights, Remedies and Enforcement
Performers hold consent rights over the first recording of a live performance, economic rights over a recording made with consent, and moral rights of their own.
The chapter then sets out the civil remedies, the interim orders developed by Hong Kong courts, and the criminal offences for dealing in infringing copies.
Where Copyright Meets Design
A manufactured product can be protected by copyright directly, as a sculpture, engraving or work of artistic craftsmanship, or indirectly through the drawings behind it.
The Ordinance then trims that protection once the design is exploited industrially, to twenty-five years if registered and fifteen if not.
Registered Designs and Registrability
Hong Kong has run its own Designs Registry since 1997. The last chapter takes the statutory definition apart as an ordered test, covering shape and pattern, the meaning of article and the spare parts problem, eye appeal, and the two exclusions for functional and must-match features.
How to use this guide
Read the front matter first, then work one chapter at a time and write your own answer to each practice item before reading ours.
The practice chapter works a full problem question and plans a policy answer, and the closing chapter is a revision pass for the morning of the exam.
Evidence and assessment control
Assessment components and weights follow the first lecture for Semester A, 2026/27, the published offering this guide describes.
Teaching explanations, worked examples and practice items are independently authored and are not University assessment material; any marks shown on them are an AskSia study allocation. The exam date is listed as to be announced, so check Canvas for it and for any update to the assessment arrangements.
Worked example · free
Sort a manufactured product through copyright and design
- 2Identify the work and its first owner.
- 4Apply s86 and s87 and work out whether copyright in making the lamp is still running.
- 3Classify the rival's conduct and state what the studio must prove.
Key terms
- Closed List
- A system that protects only the descriptions of work named in the statute, so material fitting none of them is unprotected however creative it is. Hong Kong follows this model.
- Corresponding Design
- A design which, applied to an article, would produce a copy of an artistic work. Once such a design is exploited industrially, s87 shortens the copyright in making those articles.
- Restricted Act
- An act only the copyright owner may do or authorise, such as copying, issuing copies, communicating the work to the public or making an adaptation.
- Secondary Infringement
- Liability for importing, dealing in or facilitating infringing copies, which requires that the defendant knew or had reason to believe the copies were infringing.
- Fair Dealing
- The requirement, applied within each listed permitted purpose, that a use be fair in all the circumstances, judged by purpose, the nature of the work, the amount taken and the effect on the market.
- Sufficient Acknowledgement
- An indication that tells a reasonably alert member of the audience who the author is; required for criticism, review, quotation and most news reporting.
- Derogatory Treatment
- An addition to, deletion from, alteration to or adaptation of a work that distorts or mutilates it or otherwise prejudices the author's honour or reputation.
- Qualifying Performance
- A performance given by an individual domiciled or resident in, or with a right of abode in, Hong Kong or elsewhere, which attracts performers' rights.
- Eye Appeal
- The quality a registrable design must have: features that attract the prospective customer and are assessed by eye, taking the design as a whole.
LW4641 FAQ
Is the final exam open book?
Yes. The first lecture describes a two-hour open-book exam in which you may bring any printed materials you like but will have no internet access. Because the materials are allowed in the room, the marks go to candidates who can locate the right section and case quickly and spend their time applying them to the facts.
How is the course assessed?
Seventy per cent is the final exam and thirty per cent is group work and participation: five for contributions to class discussions, fifteen for the group presentation and ten for the group research report. Participation and presentation are listed together as one twenty per cent line, and the exam date is listed as to be announced, so check Canvas.
What does the exam paper look like?
It has one case-based issue spotter worth seventy per cent of the paper and one theoretical policy question, chosen from three, worth thirty. Both reward understanding of the general theories and principles together with the ability to apply them to real situations with sound arguments, so prepare a problem method and a policy plan rather than a summary.
Can I use generative AI for the group research report?
No. The course states that generative AI is not allowed for the report and that any use must be acknowledged at the beginning, or it will be treated as academic dishonesty. More generally, use in any assignment or exam is described as prohibited by the University, although everyday use for learning is encouraged.
What should the group research report contain?
An introduction and background to the presentation topic, an outline of its substance, and the group's own critical and argumentative opinion. It extends the presentation slides, runs to around ten to fifteen pages and no more than fifteen, uses OSCOLA or Bluebook footnotes, and is due within two weeks after the presentation.
Is the formative essay worth doing if it does not count?
It is the only graded rehearsal of the policy question you will get. The question is released once copyright has been covered and is modelled on the policy-type exam question; you write five to six hundred words, email it by the end of the reading week, and receive a grade and suggestions without any effect on your final result.
Which Hong Kong statutes does the course rely on?
Mainly the Copyright Ordinance, Cap 528, for subsistence, infringement, permitted acts, moral rights, performers' rights and remedies, and the Registered Designs Ordinance, Cap 522, for registered designs. The Layout-design (Topography) of Integrated Circuits Ordinance, Cap 445, is also named in the design lectures.
Questions students ask in each LW4641 chapter
- Why is intellectual property called an artificial right?
- Because it exists only because the law creates it for policy reasons, rather than arising from possession of a physical thing. The lecture links this to its limits: the rights are territorial, time-limited and shaped by public policy, which is why a policy question can ask whether a right should exist at all. Chapter 01 · Why Intellectual Property Is Granted
- When did Hong Kong's current copyright law come into force?
- The Copyright Ordinance, Cap 528, came into effect on 27 June 1997 and is based mainly on the UK's Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1988. Before that date the UK Copyright Act 1956 extended to Hong Kong, and it still governs questions such as who first owned a work created earlier. Chapter 02 · Copyright Origins, Hong Kong Law and the Treaties
- Why does Hong Kong use a closed list of protected works?
- Because the Copyright Ordinance names the descriptions of work that can be protected and anything outside them is excluded. The course materials defend this on grounds of certainty and democratic legitimacy, while noting that the mix of means and includes in the definitions still leaves room for argument at the edges. Chapter 03 · Protected Works and the Closed List
- What is the originality standard in Hong Kong?
- The reading list builds it from the UK skill and labour cases, with Tai Shing Dairy v Maersk listed for Hong Kong under sweat of the brow. A work must come from the author and reflect enough independent skill or judgment; effort spent only in copying, as Interlego shows, is not enough. Chapter 04 · Originality and the Idea and Expression Divide
- Is an image made with an AI tool protected by copyright in Hong Kong?
- It may be. Section 11(3) of the Copyright Ordinance treats the person who made the arrangements for a computer-generated work as its author, and the government consultation took the view that AI output falls within that rule. The work still has to be original, which is where critics say the provision struggles. Chapter 05 · Authorship and AI Generated Content
- What is the difference between primary and secondary infringement?
- Primary infringement is doing a restricted act without licence, such as copying a work or putting it before the public electronically, and knowledge is irrelevant. Secondary infringement covers dealing with infringing copies or facilitating infringement, such as importing, selling or supplying apparatus, and it requires proof that the defendant knew or had reason to believe. Chapter 06 · Restricted Acts and Infringement
- Does Hong Kong have fair use like the United States?
- No. Hong Kong uses fair dealing, which only applies to purposes the Ordinance lists, such as research and private study, criticism and review, quotation, news reporting and parody. Within those purposes fairness is judged on all the circumstances and four factors, while United States cases on transformative use are set for reference only. Chapter 07 · Fair Dealing and the Permitted Acts
- Can I sell my moral rights with my copyright?
- No. Moral rights cannot be assigned, so they stay with you after a sale of copyright. They can, however, be waived by a signed written instrument, and a waiver in favour of the copyright owner is presumed to extend to its licensees and successors unless a contrary intention is expressed. Chapter 08 · Moral Rights of Authors and Directors
- Do performers in Hong Kong own copyright in their performances?
- Not copyright as such. Part 3 of the Copyright Ordinance gives performers related rights: consent over the first recording and live communication of their performances, economic rights over authorised recordings, and moral rights to be identified and to object to derogatory treatment of their performances. Chapter 09 · Performers' Rights, Remedies and Enforcement
- Can a product design be protected by copyright in Hong Kong?
- Yes, in two ways. The product itself may be an artistic work, such as a sculpture, an engraving or a work of artistic craftsmanship, and the drawings it was made from are graphic works protected irrespective of artistic quality. Once the design is exploited industrially, however, s87 shortens the copyright in making such articles. Chapter 10 · Where Copyright Meets Design
- What can be registered as a design in Hong Kong?
- Shape, configuration, pattern or ornament put onto an article industrially, which in the finished product attracts the eye and is assessed by it. Methods of construction, features dictated solely by function and features that must match another article are excluded, and the design must also be new, owned by the applicant and free of conflict with earlier rights. Chapter 11 · Registered Designs and Registrability
How to study for the exam
Build an index to your printed notes arranged by the three stages of an infringement answer, then test it: take any practice problem, set a timer, and see how quickly you can put your finger on the section and the case each issue needs. In an open-book exam that speed is worth more than another reading of the lecture slides, because it is time you can spend on application.
Your AI Law tutor for LW4641
Stuck on a hard LW4641 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Law tutor — ask any LW4641 Intellectual Property: Theory, Copyright, and Design question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.