FEX2162 FE and Professional Learning Portfolio I
FEX2162 Overview
- The Education University of Hong Kong
- Semester 2, 2025/26
- BEd Year 3 field experience
- Education
- Portfolio and post-placement sharing
What this course asks of you
FE and Professional Learning Portfolio I travels with your first block practice, the eight-week teaching placement in Year 3, Semester 2 of the five-year full-time BEd programmes.
- Assessed by An evidence-based e-Portfolio of four reflective tasks with presentation and organisation, plus participation in two post-placement sharing sessions.
- The skill being tested Turning what you observe in a school into claims backed by exhibits, and evaluating your own teaching honestly.
- Hardest step Writing a lesson problem statement precise enough, with contextual factors, to carry the double-weighted reflection.
- Where to confirm Deadlines, the generative AI rule and the sharing slide due date are controlled by the course Moodle page and your tutor.
How FEX2162 is assessed
| Component | Weight | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment Task 1 School Development | 15% | Evidence-based reflection on the school's philosophy, goals, policies and practices and teachers' roles; about 400 words |
| Assessment Task 2 Student Development | 15% | Evidence-based reflection on pupils' diverse characteristics and needs and support for all-round development; about 400 words |
| Assessment Task 3 About your Teaching | 30% | Video and evidence-based problem-solving reflection on a supervised lesson; carries double weighting; about 700 words |
| Assessment Task 4 Reflection for Professional Development | 15% | Evidence-based reflection on the three teacher roles with a plan for the next block practice; about 500 words |
| Presentation and organisation | 15% | Language and evidence, coherence, format and orderliness across the portfolio |
| Participation in the post-placement sessions | 10% | Attendance, sharing and presentation materials submitted for both sessions |
The outline lists the e-Portfolio at 90% and participation in the post-placement sharing at 10%; the assessment form splits the 90% into the four tasks and presentation and organisation, giving the six rows above, which total 100%. The outline states that a pass in both the portfolio and the participation is needed to pass the course, and the form grades a fail in any task or in presentation and organisation as an overall F. Session one adds an attendance condition: at least 80% attendance is needed to complete the course. Suggested word counts differ slightly between documents, but only the 2,000-word English total with a 10% allowance is fixed. Confirm deadlines and current arrangements on the course Moodle page.
Assessment structure
Segment widths reproduce the published percentage weights. The first five segments make up the 90% e-Portfolio; the last is participation in the post-placement sharing. Together they total 100%.
Current FEX2162 dates
| Date | Item | Control |
|---|---|---|
| 27 February 2026 | Create the FE e-Portfolio link | Shown on the course site submission point for the 2025/26 offering, due 11:59. |
| 5 and 6 May 2026 | Post-placement sharing sessions | Listed in the first session's schedule for the 2025/26 offering. |
| 8 May 2026 | Presentation slides | The course site submission point shows 8 May; a session five slide instead asks for upload by 6 February 2026. Confirm with your tutor. |
| 15 May 2026 | Submit the FE e-Portfolio | Shown on the course site submission point and in the first session's schedule, due 11:59. |
Dates are as published in the course site submission points and the first session's schedule for the 2025/26 offering. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.
What FEX2162 covers
Ten chapters follow the four portfolio tasks and the pre-placement sessions, from the purpose of the portfolio and your placement school through your pupils, a supervised lesson and lesson planning to technology, graphic organisers and your roles as a teacher.
Portfolio Purpose, FEILOs and the Four Domains
the four course outcomes and the task each one drives · ten FEILOs in four domains · how the tasks map onto them · reflection for, in and on action · evidence as non-text exhibitsA course built around one placement
This course sits beside your first block practice in Year 3 and gives it a structure.
- What the course is for across the placement
- The four course outcomes and their verbs
- Ten FEILOs grouped in four domains
- Which task reaches which outcome
- The outcome evidenced only through sharing
- Reflection for, in and on action
Reading Your School: Philosophy, Policy and Practice
Assessment Task 1 · a mission as the attributes a school wants its pupils to develop · the sponsoring body · stakeholders who carry the goals · profiling the school from its website · the interrelationships descriptorWhat the first task asks
The first portfolio task is an evidence-based reflection on your placement school's philosophy and goals, the policies and practices through which it pursues them, and the roles and responsibilities that follow for teachers.
- A mission as the attributes a school wants to develop
- Why the School Sponsoring Body comes first
- Policies and practices that support staff
- Stakeholders from Principal to parents
- Interview notes and observation as evidence
- Profiling the school from its website
School Development Planning and Self-Evaluation
the school self-evaluation cycle of planning, implementation and evaluation · the three-year development plan · annual plans and school reports · performance indicator areas · placing an observation in your entryWhy a planning cycle belongs in a placement course
A mission says what a school wants; its development plan says what it has decided to work on, in what order and how it will know.
- Why a development plan is the best evidence for Task 1
- The self-evaluation cycle in four moves
- Major concerns, targets, timeline and strategies
- Annual plans and school reports
- Performance indicator areas for describing a school
- Which year's focus is live during your placement
Student Characteristics and Diverse Learning Needs
Assessment Task 2 · the characteristics the guide lists · from characteristic to need to support · multiple intelligences as a lens · special educational needs, learner diversity and inclusion · the and against and/or in the descriptorThree claims, in order
The second task asks you to reflect, with evidence, on how your pupils differ as learners, what they need as a result, and how they can be supported to develop in the round.
- Characteristic, need and support as three claims
- The six aspects the guide lists
- Describing one class on two levels
- Watching an experienced teacher cater for the class
- Multiple intelligences as a lens, not a label
- Special needs, learner diversity and inclusion
Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning
what schools mean by whole-person development · positive values education · Kohlberg's three levels and six stages · student activities · who supports development in a school · the caring cultivator roleThree parts of whole-person development
Session three describes whole-person development in a school through three things: a wide range of student activities, positive values and attitudes, and catering for different learning needs.
- Activities, values and diverse needs
- Values education as recognise, analyse, judge and act
- One invented incident, three possible responses
- Kohlberg's pre-conventional, conventional and post-conventional levels
- Offering a reason one step up
- Who supports development in a school
The Five-Stage Problem-Solving Approach
Assessment Task 3 and its double weighting · the five stages as guiding questions · planning, teaching and assessment tags · the problem statement bands · evidence from video, pupil work and supervision formsThe heaviest task
The third task takes one lesson that a supervisor observed and asks you to use a problem-solving approach, drawing on video and other evidence, to judge how well your planning, teaching, assessment and follow-up worked, including how you catered for pupils' diverse needs.
- Why the lesson reflection carries double weight
- Identify a problem and its causes
- Consider possible solutions and their sources
- Choose a feasible solution with a rationale
- Plan, implement and observe the effect
- Review the process and look ahead
Lesson Plans, Learning Objectives and Goal Setting
key parts of a lesson plan · objectives in knowledge, skills and attitudes · condition, behaviour and criterion · signposting language for the first lesson · goals against objectives · SMART goals for the placementPlans are evidence
Two pre-placement sessions are spent on planning, and the task guide requires every full-time BEd student to put every lesson plan into the e-Portfolio in a simple form, with at least two detailed plans prepared for supervised lessons.
- Why lesson plans are portfolio evidence
- Key parts of a lesson plan
- Objectives in knowledge, skills and attitudes
- Condition, behaviour and criterion
- Anticipated difficulties and the three-stage lesson
- Signposting and the first-lesson script
Educational Technology, TPACK and Gamification
digital technology in the Task 3 descriptor · what counts as evidence of integration · the TPACK framework · gamification definitions and elements · tools on the session pages · checking the generative AI ruleTechnology as a criterion
The Task 3 descriptor includes a line on integrating digital technologies, with AI and digital educational tools named as examples, into learning and teaching.
- Digital technology in the lesson descriptor
- Evidence of integration worth collecting
- TPACK and its seven knowledge areas
- Writing from the centre of the framework
- Gamification defined twice
- Game elements and their risks
Graphic Organisers for Thinking and Reflection
what a graphic organiser is · cyclical, conceptual, sequential and hierarchical families · why organisers help thinking · a recommended sequence for introducing one · small-group use · organisers as portfolio evidenceA thinking tool inside a course about schools
Session two interrupts its material on school philosophy to ask you to draw the relationship between a school's mission, curriculum goals and implementation strategies as a graphic organiser and to share it in three minutes.
- Why session two asks you to draw the mission
- A definition of the graphic organiser
- Three reasons organisers support thinking
- Cyclical, conceptual, sequential and hierarchical families
- Four ways organisers build thinking skills
- A sequence for introducing an organiser
Teacher Roles, Professional Conduct and Reflection
Assessment Task 4 · the three T-standard+ roles and their student outcomes · the eight codes of professional conduct · presentation and organisation · participation in the sharing sessions · the 4R model and experiential learning · stress on placementThe fourth task
The fourth task asks you to reflect, with evidence, on three roles a teacher is expected to play and to plan how you will grow into them before the next block practice.
- Claiming a role against evidencing it
- The three roles and their student outcomes
- The eight codes of professional conduct
- Goals for the next block practice with a timeline
- Presentation and organisation across the portfolio
- Participation bands and the sharing requirement
Its job, in the words of the outline, is to support your preparation for, learning from and reflection on that teaching practice. You meet in a small group with a Professional FE Tutor for five sessions before the placement and two after it, with online contact and draft comments in between. What you submit is an evidence-based e-Portfolio of four reflective tasks, and you also present in the post-placement sharing sessions.
The grade depends on what you notice, collect and explain while you are in the school.
What it takes to pass
Every part of the assessment has to be passed. The outline requires a pass in both the e-Portfolio and the participation in the post-placement sessions, and the assessment form grades a fail in any task, or in presentation and organisation, as an overall F.
Attendance matters too: session one states that at least 80% attendance is needed to complete the course.
The course Moodle page carries the current rules and dates.
Portfolio Purpose, FEILOs and the Four Domains
The first chapter sets out the four course outcomes, each matched to one written task, and the ten Field Experience Intended Learning Outcomes that every field experience course shares, grouped into school development, student development, teaching and learning, and professional relationships and development.
It shows which task reaches which outcome and introduces the habit the whole course depends on: collecting evidence as you go and placing it as non-text, where it does not count towards the word limit.
Reading Your School: Philosophy, Policy and Practice
The first task asks how your placement school's philosophy and goals are carried through policies and practices into teachers' roles.
The chapter treats the mission as a statement of the attributes the school wants its pupils to develop, starts from the sponsoring body, follows the goals to the people who carry them and shows how to turn a website profile into an argument about interrelationships.
School Development Planning and Self-Evaluation
This chapter explains the school self-evaluation cycle taught in session two, from the three-year development plan through annual plans to school reports, so you can connect observations to concerns the school itself has named and describe gaps fairly.
Student Characteristics and Diverse Learning Needs
The second task asks about one class you teach.
The chapter keeps characteristic, need and support as three separate claims, uses frameworks such as multiple intelligences as lenses rather than labels, distinguishes special educational needs from learner diversity and inclusion, and reads the descriptor's wording on the four attributes of all-round development.
Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning
Through an invented classroom incident, this chapter shows how to reflect on values education using Kohlberg's stages of moral development, and how to evidence the structures a school uses to support pupils' all-round growth.
The Five-Stage Problem-Solving Approach
The lesson reflection carries thirty per cent, double the weighting of the other tasks.
The chapter works one supervised lesson through the five stages, from identifying a problem and its causes to reviewing the whole process, and explains why the problem statement and its contextual factors largely set the band.
Lesson Plans, Learning Objectives and Goal Setting
Plans are uploaded to the portfolio and quoted in the lesson reflection.
The chapter covers the key parts of a plan, objectives with a condition, behaviour and criterion, signposting for the first lesson, and SMART goals for your own development.
Educational Technology, TPACK and Gamification
The lesson descriptor grades how effectively you integrated digital technologies.
This chapter uses the TPACK framework and the session's material on gamification to show what a reflection about technology needs to say.
Graphic Organisers for Thinking and Reflection
Organisers appear in session two as a way of seeing relationships.
The chapter explains their families and uses, and how an organiser in the portfolio can carry structure without using words.
Teacher Roles, Professional Conduct and Reflection
The fourth task asks you to evaluate yourself against three professional roles and the codes of professional conduct and to plan for the next placement.
The chapter also covers presentation and organisation, the participation requirement and the reflection models used in the sharing sessions.
Worked example · free
Plan the evidence for a double-weighted lesson reflection
- 2List the evidence to collect before the lesson.
- 3List the evidence to collect during and straight after it.
- 3State how you will choose which lesson to write up.
Key terms
- e-Portfolio
- The online collection of reflective tasks, lesson plans and evidence that makes up ninety per cent of the assessment.
- Block Practice
- The eight-week teaching placement in a school around which the whole course is organised.
- FEILO
- One of ten Field Experience Intended Learning Outcomes shared by all field experience courses and grouped into four domains.
- Professional FE Tutor
- The tutor who leads your group, comments on drafts during the placement and supports your professional development.
- Evidence-based Reflection
- Reflection in which each claim about the school, pupils or your teaching is supported by an exhibit a reader can check.
- Problem-solving Approach
- The five-stage method used in the lesson reflection, from identifying a problem and its causes to reviewing the whole process.
- T-standard+
- The professional standards framework that sets out three key roles for teachers in Hong Kong.
- Post-placement Sharing
- The two sessions after block practice in which each student presents and discusses their placement learning.
- Supporting Teacher
- The school teacher who works with you during the placement and whose comments often serve as evidence.
FEX2162 FAQ
How is the course assessed?
The outline gives the e-Portfolio ninety per cent and participation in the post-placement sharing ten. The assessment form splits the portfolio into four tasks weighted fifteen, fifteen, thirty and fifteen, plus fifteen for presentation and organisation across the whole collection.
What are the pass conditions for this course?
The outline requires a pass in both the e-Portfolio and the participation in the post-placement sessions, and the assessment form grades a fail in any task, or in presentation and organisation, as an overall F. Session one states that at least 80% attendance is needed to complete the course, and session five warns that not completing the sharing means failing it. Check the current rules on the course Moodle page.
What is the word limit for the portfolio?
The four tasks together may use 2,000 words in English or 3,200 in Chinese, with a ten per cent allowance above that; words beyond it are not assessed. The suggested split is 400, 400, 700 and 500, but you may move words between tasks, and non-text evidence does not count.
Which task matters most?
The lesson reflection. It is weighted at thirty per cent, double the other tasks, and reaches six of the ten FEILOs. Its first stage, a problem statement with relevant contextual factors, largely decides which band the rest of the reflection can reach.
How should I handle pupils' privacy in my evidence?
Describe groups and patterns rather than individuals, remove names and faces from photographs and pupil work, and seek consent before filming using the University's form. Respecting privacy is also one of the eight codes of professional conduct the fourth task asks you to consider.
What happens in the post-placement sessions?
The outline describes sharing about your school, pupils and teaching, observations of good teacher models, an ethical decision-making case, self-evaluation, an optional topic of your choice and planning for the next placement. Session five sets a six-minute sharing with slides of up to ten pages.
Can I use generative AI tools for the portfolio?
Ask your tutor. The outline copy in the course materials prints both its not-permitted and permitted options without marking which one applies, and says instructors will give specific instructions, including acknowledgement requirements, if use is permitted.
Questions students ask in each FEX2162 chapter
- Do I have to evidence all ten FEILOs?
- The four tasks and the sharing sessions are designed so that together they give you the chance to show all ten. Each task targets particular outcomes, which the task guide prints beside it, so aim each entry at those outcomes rather than trying to touch all ten everywhere. Chapter 01 · Portfolio Purpose, FEILOs and the Four Domains
- How long should the school reflection be?
- The outline suggests about 400 words in English, while the task guide sets a floor of 125 words. Only the 2,000-word total across all four tasks is fixed, so a long first task is paid for by a later one, usually the lesson reflection that carries the most weight. Chapter 02 · Reading Your School: Philosophy, Policy and Practice
- Where can I find my school's development plan?
- The school report is written for stakeholders to read, so ask your supporting teacher or check the school website for the current development plan and the latest report. Read the report first, since it tells you which concerns the school still considers unfinished. Chapter 03 · School Development Planning and Self-Evaluation
- How many of the four development areas must I cover?
- The guiding question asks about some of them, so covering one area well is legitimate. The top band's wording, however, joins moral virtues, positive values, multicultural awareness and entrepreneurial spirit with and, so an entry aiming at the top band should relate each to your class. Chapter 04 · Student Characteristics and Diverse Learning Needs
- Is a behaviour incident suitable evidence for the portfolio?
- It can be, if you describe it without identifying anyone and focus on the reasoning you offered and what pupils did with it. A values moment is evidence of the caring cultivator role and of support for moral development, not a story to be told for its own sake. Chapter 05 · Whole-Person Development and Moral Reasoning
- How much is the lesson reflection worth?
- The assessment form weights it at thirty per cent and states that it carries double the weighting of the other written tasks. It also reaches six of the ten FEILOs, so it deserves evidence collected from your first supervised lesson rather than reconstructed at the end. Chapter 06 · The Five-Stage Problem-Solving Approach
- How many lesson plans go into the portfolio?
- The task guide requires full-time BEd students to put every lesson plan into the e-Portfolio in a simple form, plus at least two detailed plans prepared for the supervised lessons. Name them using the file system the guide sets out so they can be found alongside related worksheets and pupil work. Chapter 07 · Lesson Plans, Learning Objectives and Goal Setting
- Do I need to use AI tools in my lessons?
- The descriptor names AI and digital educational tools only as examples of digital technologies, and grades how effectively technology was integrated. One tool used for a clear reason that you can evidence is enough to address the criterion; the number of tools is not what is measured. Chapter 08 · Educational Technology, TPACK and Gamification
- Do graphic organisers count towards the portfolio word limit?
- Evidence included as non-text, such as figures or text boxes, does not count towards the limit, so a clear organiser can carry the structure of an argument while your sentences carry interpretation. Label it and refer to it in a clause. Chapter 09 · Graphic Organisers for Thinking and Reflection
- Do I need to address all eight codes of professional conduct?
- No. The guide says you may use the three roles and the eight codes to frame the reflection. One code you genuinely tested, such as respecting privacy when photographing pupil work, evidenced properly, says more than a list touching all eight. Chapter 10 · Teacher Roles, Professional Conduct and Reflection
How to prepare for the assessments
Treat the placement as the study period. Start an evidence log on the first day, write a stage-one note after every supervised lesson, and send each task draft to your tutor while you are still in the school, when advice can change what you collect. Leave the final week for format, word counts and linking every claim to its exhibit.
Your AI Education tutor for FEX2162
Stuck on a hard FEX2162 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Education tutor — ask any FEX2162 FE and Professional Learning Portfolio I question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.