The University of Hong Kong · S1 2026 · FACULTY OF LAW

LLAW6093B Regulation of Financial Markets

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
10 Chapters55-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Built to mirror S1 2026 · updated this semester
The Complete Exam Bible · S1 2026-27

LLAW6093B Overview

Regulation of Financial Markets
— Find the market failure, name the objective, then choose the regulatory tool and its side effect.
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • First Semester, 2026-27
  • Postgraduate law course
  • Law
  • Take-home examination
  • Eleven three-hour seminars

What this course is actually asking you to do

This is a postgraduate course in the Faculty of Law, written for both JD and LLM students and designed so that no background in finance is assumed. The outline is explicit that it is not vocational training in substantive rules.

  • Assessed by Participation and group presentations assessed pass/fail for thirty per cent, and a take-home examination for seventy.
  • The skill being tested Matching a named market failure to the regulatory tool that addresses it, and defending that choice against the strongest objection.
  • Hardest step Choosing which issues a crowded problem question really raises, and taking them in the order a regulator would decide them.
  • Where to confirm Submission settings, the presentation calendar and any syllabus changes are controlled by the course Moodle page.
LLAW6093B · The University of Hong Kong
An independent, AskSia-authored study guide. AskSia is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by The University of Hong Kong; the course code and name are used for identification only.
Assessment

How LLAW6093B is assessed

ComponentWeightFormat
Class participation and group presentations30%Pass/Fail; typically 20% for the oral group presentation and 10% for class participation
Take-home examination70%Full grading scale; two equally weighted questions within 6,000 words in total

The course outline lists two components totalling 100%. The 30% for class participation and group presentations is assessed pass/fail; the outline says it is typically allocated as 20% for the oral presentation and 10% for participation, and that the feedback bands for it are not converted into arithmetic marks. How a pass/fail result enters the final mark is not spelled out, so ask in class. Attendance is a separate condition: seminars are compulsory, and failing to attend 70% of compulsory classes without a satisfactory explanation may lead to consequences including non-admission to the final examination, which carries 70% of the grade and without which you are likely to fail. Late take-home scripts lose five points out of 100 at once and five more per day, and none is accepted after 1:00 p.m. on 23 December 2026. Confirm the current rules on the course Moodle page.

Assessment structure

30% pass/fail70% take-home examinationParticipation and presentationTwo questions, 6,000 words, full grading scale

Segment widths reproduce the published percentage weights and total 100%.

Current dates · verify in LMS

Current LLAW6093B dates

DateItemControl
8 September 2026First classStated in the key dates of the course outline.
22 September 2026Add/drop deadline; group presentation enrolment closesStated in the course outline.
29 September 2026Group presentations beginStated in the course outline and the syllabus.
13 October 2026Reading week, no classStated in the course outline.
24 November 2026Last substantive class; take-home examination released at 1:00 p.m.Released on Moodle, as stated in the course outline.
17 December 2026Take-home examination due at 1:00 p.m.Described in the outline as an absolute deadline.
23 December 2026No late take-home script accepted after 1:00 p.m.Late penalties apply from the original deadline.

Dates are as published in the published course outline for this offering. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.

Contents · every chapter, one map

What LLAW6093B covers

Ten chapters follow the three parts of the published syllabus, from the role of law in financial markets and the case for regulation, through rule design and regulatory styles, to regulated activities, international coordination and the crisis reforms.

01

Financial Markets, Law and Regulation

the five functions of a financial system · banks, markets, facilitators and asset managers · liquidity promises · function over form

Start with what the system is for

Before any rule can be judged, you need a picture of the thing being regulated.

  • Why regulation starts from the functions of finance
  • Payments, savings, project selection, monitoring and risk
  • Banks and the promise of cash on demand
  • Markets, prices and the information they carry
  • Rating agencies, analysts, exchanges and clearing
  • Asset managers and who bears the risk
02

The Legal Construction of Finance

financial assets as legally vindicated contracts · uncertainty and liquidity · the hierarchy of money · law elastic at the apex

A reading chosen to unsettle a premise

The first seminar's required reading is presented on the course page as a challenge rather than a summary. The usual account treats markets as natural and regulation as a later correction.

  • Why the course opens with a legal theory of finance
  • Financial assets as enforceable promises
  • Uncertainty and the price of liquidity
  • Collateral calls and the insurer rescue
  • The hierarchy of money and the lender of last resort
  • Elastic commitments at the apex, binding ones at the periphery
03

Market Failures and the Goals of Regulation

efficiency as the benchmark · five market failures · regulatory goals anchored in failures · resolving conflicts between goals

A cautious default, and a three-stage test

The reading behind this chapter begins by refusing to assume that regulation helps. Where markets work, prices allocate resources without a central plan, and intervention can do harm.

  • The default against intervention
  • Productive, allocative and dynamic efficiency
  • Information gaps and credence goods
  • Spillovers, runs and the limits of bargaining
  • Public goods and market power
  • Behavioural errors and paternalism
04

Rule Design and the Precision of Rules

transparency, accessibility and congruence · bright lines, standards and tables · the precision calculus · a bank chartering case

A technical-looking question with real stakes

The second seminar's rule-design reading asks how precise a rule should be.

  • Why precision is a policy choice
  • Transparency, accessibility and congruence
  • A retirement age, a fitness test and a medical table
  • Compliance, misfits, drafting and application costs
  • Presumptions for internal, sanctioning and licensing rules
  • Bank chartering under an open standard
05

Regulatory Styles and Supervisory Strategies

risk-based supervision · reliance on management · principles and outcomes · treating customers fairly · credible deterrence

From one rule to a whole regime

The second rule-design reading steps back from individual rules to the overall stance of a regulatory system.

  • Regulation and supervision as one activity
  • Three UK architectures and why each ended
  • Impact, probability and what goes unexamined
  • Relying on management and the four conditions
  • Principles, outcomes and treating customers fairly
  • Credible deterrence and senior manager accountability
06

Behavioural Biases and Nudges

inertia, framing, loss aversion and social influence · disclosure designed for comprehension · defaults and active choice

Why behaviour belongs in a regulation course

The second seminar opens with material on behavioural biases, and the extra reading explains what the findings mean for regulators. Standard models assume people weigh costs and benefits sensibly.

  • Behavioural findings that matter for regulation
  • Inertia, procrastination and defaults
  • Framing, salience and hidden costs
  • Loss aversion and social influence
  • Designing and testing disclosure
  • Choosing a default or requiring a choice
07

New Governance Techniques and the Crisis

regulatory paradoxes · principles, meta-regulation, enrolment and risk-based regulation under stress · three dimensions of failure

A puzzle about praised techniques

The extra reading for the second seminar asks why regulatory techniques that had been praised for twenty years failed in the crisis.

  • Why praised techniques failed
  • Regulatory paradox and endogenous risk
  • Principles as rhetoric and as practice
  • Regulating a representation of risk
  • Rating agencies, accounting and enrolment
  • Risk-based supervision under strain
08

Regulated Activities and Regulatory Strategies

drawing the regulatory perimeter · seven strategies from entry to resolution · timing and addressee · side effects of each tool

The perimeter question

The second part of the syllabus begins by asking how activities come to be designated as regulated, with crypto-assets as the seminar case, and the third part covers conduct of business regulation and prudential regulation.

  • Designating regulated activities
  • Function, failure, goal and strategy
  • Ex ante and ex post strategies
  • User, firm and sector obligations
  • Entry controls and conduct of business rules
  • Disclosure, prudence and governance
09

Financial Globalization and International Regulation

the scale of cross-border finance · the trilemma · how failure crosses borders · standards, assessment and backstops

A course aim about global governance

One of the course outcomes is to assess what global regulatory governance means for market integrity and financial stability, and the fifth seminar takes it up through the trilemma and the role of domestic authorities when international banks fail.

  • The scale of cross-border finance
  • Drivers of integration and cross-listing
  • Globalisation before 1914 and after 1973
  • The trilemma and the regimes that chose
  • How one failure crossed borders
  • Standards, assessments and diffusion
10

The Financial Crisis, Capital and Resolution

securitisation and the credit squeeze · emergency lending and rescue · systemic oversight and capital · proprietary trading · living wills

Innovation, stability and failure in one chapter

The third part of the syllabus runs from regulating financial innovation, with securitisation and tokenisation as the case, through prudential regulation and capital to regulating for financial stability, with bank resolution and systemically important institutions as the case.

  • Securitisation and the originate-to-distribute model
  • Liquidity crisis and fire sales
  • Emergency facilities and the lender of last resort
  • Why one bank was sold and another failed
  • Fiscal rescue and the troubled asset programme
  • Systemic oversight and designation of non-banks

Its aim is an analytical map: why financial markets depend on law, which risks they generate, and how domestic and international regulators choose between competing responses, with Hong Kong and other jurisdictions used for comparison.

Nearly everything assessed rewards one habit, which is to name the market failure, the objective it threatens and the tool that answers it, and then to say what that tool costs.

How the marks and the pass conditions work

Two components make up the grade. Class participation and group presentations carry 30% and are assessed pass/fail, typically split as 20% for the oral presentation and 10% for participation.

The take-home examination carries 70% on the full grading scale. Attendance is a separate requirement: seminars are compulsory, and failing to attend 70% of compulsory classes without a satisfactory explanation may lead to consequences that include non-admission to the final examination, which would make it impossible to pass.

Check the course Moodle page for the current rules and notify any absence in writing.

Financial Markets, Law and Regulation

The opening chapter describes what a financial system does before asking how to regulate it.

Payments, pooling savings, choosing projects, watching over them and managing risk can each be done by several kinds of institution, and markets can substitute for banks in almost every role except payments.

That overlap is the reason the reading argues for regulating by function rather than by the name on the licence.

The Legal Construction of Finance

The first seminar's required reading turns the usual story around.

Instead of markets arising naturally and law correcting them, financial instruments exist because courts and regulators will enforce them, and the enforcement is uneven: commitments bend for central banks and large dealers and bind in full for households and small states.

The chapter shows how to use that lens on a debt crisis or a rescue.

Market Failures and the Goals of Regulation

The case for intervention starts from a modest default and requires a named failure: information gaps between sellers and buyers, harm spilling onto third parties, goods that nobody pays for, concentrated markets and predictable errors of judgement.

Each regulatory goal is tied to one of these, and when goals collide the reading asks who should own the trade-off and on what evidence.

Rule Design and the Precision of Rules

A rule can be clear, easy to apply and faithful to its purpose, but rarely all three at once.

The chapter teaches a way of choosing between a bright line, an open standard and a detailed table by asking which costs dominate in the setting, and it uses the chartering of banks to show that a vague standard is sometimes the efficient answer.

Regulatory Styles and Supervisory Strategies

Where the previous chapter looks at one rule, this one looks at a whole regime and its posture towards the firms it supervises.

It compares supervision built on risk scores, on reliance on management, on high-level principles and on deterrence, and follows the United Kingdom through three architectures, with Hong Kong's own adoption of risk-based methods and a fairness charter as local illustrations.

Behavioural Biases and Nudges

People stay with defaults, overlook costs that are not visible and weigh losses more than gains.

The chapter shows what that means for regulatory design: disclosure written for how people read, defaults chosen with care, and the danger that the same techniques can steer people against their interests when used without transparency.

New Governance Techniques and the Crisis

Flexible techniques had been praised for twenty years before the crisis exposed them.

The chapter takes four of them in turn, showing how each one's strength became its weakness, and closes with the organisational, functional and cognitive reasons that explain the failures better than a simple contrast between rules and principles.

Regulated Activities and Regulatory Strategies

The second part of the syllabus asks which activities should be regulated and by which tools.

The chapter turns that into a method, from the function an activity performs to the strategy and the person who should carry the duty, and it sets out the toolkit from entry controls through conduct, disclosure, prudence and governance to insurance and resolution.

Financial Globalization and International Regulation

Money now crosses borders far more easily than the authority to regulate it.

The chapter puts the scale of cross-border finance in numbers, explains the trilemma that forces every state to give up one policy goal, traces how one bank's failure travelled abroad, and sets out the instruments of international coordination and their limits.

The Financial Crisis, Capital and Resolution

The final chapter follows the crisis of 2007 to 2009 from securitised mortgages through emergency lending and fiscal rescue to the reforms that followed: systemic oversight, capital floors, a ban on proprietary trading by banks and plans for orderly failure.

It is the chapter a problem question on a failing institution is most likely to draw on.

Worked example · free

Match the failure to the tool before recommending anything

Q [9 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A regulator reviewing a retail investment platform finds three problems: customers cannot tell how the platform earns the returns it advertises, the platform keeps client money in its own operating account, and a sudden wave of withdrawals last month forced it to sell assets at a loss. It proposes a single remedy: a higher minimum capital requirement. Evaluate the proposal. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation and are not the University's marking scheme.
Three failure sources.Three failure sources. Information, contract and interconnection are the corners every later chapter builds from; a regulatory proposal should say which corner it addresses.The same features, working in reverseInformationprices drift from valueContractpromises not kept, fraudInterconnectionone failure spreadsthe case for regulation
Three failure sources. Information, contract and interconnection are the corners every later chapter builds from; a regulatory proposal should say which corner it addresses.
  • 3Name the market failure behind each problem separately.
  • 3Match each failure to the regulatory strategy that addresses it.
  • 3Judge the single remedy and state what it leaves untouched.
The opaque returns are an information asymmetry that harms users at the point of choice; the commingled client money is an agency cost after the contract; and the forced sales show liquidity risk from promising withdrawals on demand. Each calls for a different strategy: disclosure designed for comprehension, conduct rules on custody and segregation of client assets, and prudential liquidity requirements. Higher capital helps only with the last, and then indirectly, because capital absorbs losses but does not create cash. The single remedy therefore leaves two of the three harms untouched while adding cost, and a stronger recommendation pairs segregation and disclosure with a liquidity rule, naming the extra cost to the platform as the side effect accepted.
Sia tip — Before writing a recommendation, list the failures in one column and the tools in the next; any failure with an empty cell beside it is a gap the marker will see.
Glossary

Key terms

Market Failure
A situation in which an unregulated market does not produce an efficient outcome, such as an information gap, a spillover onto third parties, an underprovided public good, market power or systematic bias. It justifies considering intervention but does not settle it.
Information Asymmetry
A gap in which one party to a transaction, usually the seller of a financial product, knows materially more than the other, which can drive good products out and expose buyers to unsuitable ones.
Agency Cost
A loss that arises when someone acting for another, such as a fund manager or broker, can pursue their own interest through actions the client cannot observe.
Systemic Risk
The risk that distress at one institution or market spreads through interconnections, fire sales and runs to threaten the financial system and the wider economy.
Regulatory Perimeter
The boundary that decides which activities and firms are subject to a regulatory regime. Drawing it around legal form rather than economic function invites arbitrage.
Regulatory Arbitrage
The practice of structuring an activity so that it falls under a cheaper or lighter set of rules while carrying the same economic risk.
Principles-Based Regulation
A regulatory approach that relies on broad, purposive principles read for their intent rather than on detailed prescriptive rules, placing first judgement on the regulated firm.
Risk-Based Supervision
A way of allocating supervisory resources by the impact and probability of harm, which necessarily means choosing to look less closely at lower-ranked risks.
Meta-Regulation
Regulation that requires firms to design and demonstrate their own systems for managing risk and compliance, with the regulator overseeing those systems rather than prescribing behaviour.
Default Rule
The outcome that applies when a person makes no active choice, such as automatic enrolment in a savings plan with the option to leave.
Lender of Last Resort
A central bank's role of lending to solvent but illiquid institutions in a crisis, which can extend into lending against weaker collateral and creates moral hazard.
Resolution Plan
A document, sometimes called a living will, in which a large financial firm sets out how it could be wound down or restructured in an orderly way if it failed.
FAQ

LLAW6093B FAQ

What does the take-home examination look like?

The outline describes two questions, typically one problem-based question with complex patterns and one analytical question, both compulsory and equally weighted. The combined limit is 6,000 words including discursive footnotes, with bibliographic references excluded. It is released on Moodle at 1:00 p.m. on 24 November 2026 and due at 1:00 p.m.

on 17 December 2026, and it may be written alone or in a group of up to three from the same class.

How is the pass/fail participation component assessed?

Class participation and group presentations together carry 30% and are assessed pass/fail against four criteria: preparation and engagement, the structure of the argument, delivery and teamwork, and the quality of research. Bands run from Excellent to Poor and structure feedback rather than producing marks.

Online self-assessment quizzes count towards participation, and every member of a presentation group receives the same grade.

Is attendance compulsory, and can it affect whether I pass?

Yes. Seminar attendance is compulsory under Faculty policy for taught postgraduate law courses, and failing to attend 70% of compulsory classes without a satisfactory explanation may lead to a manual drop of your enrolment or to non-admission to the final examination, which carries 70% of the grade and without which you are likely to fail. Attendance is distinct from the 30% participation component.

Notify any absence in writing with documents, and check the course Moodle page for the current position.

How are the group presentations organised?

Each group receives a client brief built on a realistic scenario and presents for at most thirty minutes while the rest of the class plays the client and asks questions. Briefs and the calendar are released in week two and allocated first come, first served, enrolment closes on 22 September 2026, and presentations begin on 29 September 2026. Groups are normally four students, and dates and topics cannot be negotiated.

Can I use generative AI tools on the take-home paper?

Such tools are not discouraged, but their use must be declared on the cover sheet, naming the tool, the model and function and the purposes, with the key prompts listed in the bibliographic section of each answer. You remain responsible for every authority you cite, and misattributed or non-existent references weigh heavily.

The outline warns that an answer produced entirely by a tool may not pass because it tends to be generic.

What happens if I submit the take-home paper late?

The system deducts five points out of one hundred immediately and a further five for each additional day, and no script is accepted after 1:00 p.m. on 23 December 2026. Because a delay of even a few minutes past the deadline triggers the first deduction, and submission is through Moodle only, upload well before 1:00 p.m. on 17 December.

Do I need a background in finance to take this course?

No. The outline says the course does not presuppose a financial background and is designed both for students new to finance and for practitioners willing to re-examine the basics critically. What it does require is regular weekly preparation of readings, clips and self-assessment exercises, and the reading load is substantial for the course's credit profile.

Chapter questions

Questions students ask in each LLAW6093B chapter

What are the core functions of a financial system?
The reading lists five: providing a secure way to make payments at a distance, mobilising savings from those with a surplus, selecting the projects that should receive funding, monitoring those projects after funding, and helping firms and individuals manage risk. Most of them can be performed by banks or by markets. Chapter 01 · Financial Markets, Law and Regulation
What does it mean to say finance is legally constructed?
It means financial instruments are promises whose value depends on being enforced, so they exist only because a legal system will back them. Which promises are enforced, and across which borders, shapes how far a market can reach and which new instruments can be sold. Chapter 02 · The Legal Construction of Finance
Does a market failure automatically justify regulation?
No. The reading treats it as a starting point only. A regulator must also find an intervention that addresses the failure and show that its costs and side effects do not outweigh the benefit; otherwise a different remedy, or none, may be the right answer. Chapter 03 · Market Failures and the Goals of Regulation
Is a bright-line rule always better than a standard?
No. A bright line is easier to comply with and cheaper to apply, but it misclassifies cases its drafter did not foresee. The reading asks which cost dominates in the setting, and where misfits are expensive and cases are few, a standard can be the better choice. Chapter 04 · Rule Design and the Precision of Rules
What is risk-based supervision, and what is its weakness?
It ranks firms by the impact and probability of harm and concentrates resources where both are high. Its weakness is that low-probability, high-impact risks receive little attention, and a ranking model can be ignored in practice, as the reading's account of a mortgage lender's supervision shows. Chapter 05 · Regulatory Styles and Supervisory Strategies
What is a nudge in financial regulation?
It is a low-cost, choice-preserving tool based on evidence about how people decide, such as automatic enrolment in a savings plan, a simplified disclosure or a default that can be changed. It steers behaviour without forbidding any option. Chapter 06 · Behavioural Biases and Nudges
Did the crisis show that detailed rules work better than principles?
The reading finds no evidence for that. Detailed rules were outdated, gamed and left unenforced when their enforcers did not understand the activity, and a rule-based regulator missed a long-running fraud for years. Each technique had its own weaknesses. Chapter 07 · New Governance Techniques and the Crisis
How should a regulator decide whether a new activity needs regulating?
By asking what the activity does, which market failure it creates and which goal that failure threatens, and only then choosing a strategy. An activity with no failure behind it has no claim to regulation, and one drawn by label rather than function invites firms to move around the line. Chapter 08 · Regulated Activities and Regulatory Strategies
What is the trilemma in international finance?
It is the constraint that a state cannot have open capital markets, an independent monetary policy and a fixed exchange rate at the same time. Every monetary order in the historical reading gave up one of the three, and the choice shapes how a state can respond to a banking crisis. Chapter 09 · Financial Globalization and International Regulation
Why did the authorities rescue one investment bank but let another fail?
In the first case a private buyer was willing to proceed with central bank lending behind it. In the second there was no buyer, the firm lacked collateral the central bank could lend against, and no public body had power to absorb its losses. The failure then froze markets, which later reforms tried to prevent. Chapter 10 · The Financial Crisis, Capital and Resolution
Study strategy

How to study for the exam

Keep a two-column page for the whole semester: market failures on the left, regulatory tools on the right. After each seminar, add the case discussed and draw the line from its failure to the tool the class preferred, noting the side effect. By the time the paper is released you will have a map that turns a crowded problem into an ordered list of issues, which is exactly what the problem question tests.

Study LLAW6093B with AI

Your AI Law tutor for LLAW6093B

Stuck on a hard LLAW6093B question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Law tutor — ask any LLAW6093B Regulation of Financial Markets question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 26 of your The University of Hong Kong subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your LLAW6093B tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 55-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works