Rutgers University · FACULTY OF WORK & EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

37:575:100 Chap.3 Employment at Will and Workplace Rights

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 3 of 9 · 37:575:100

Employment at Will and Workplace Rights

The rule that frames Unit II

Week 6 starts from employment at will, the default rule of American employment: an employer may dismiss an employee for any reason, fair or unfair, or for none. The Maltby reading stresses that constitutional due process restrains government, not private companies, so most workers can lose their jobs, and the benefits attached to them, without a hearing.

Most US jobs are at will; other wealthy countries generally require a reason.

Where the rule came from

Maltby traces the doctrine to an 1877 treatise by Horace Wood, who cited four cases, none of which held what he claimed. Courts adopted the rule anyway, and in a 1936 Minnesota case even a promise of permanent employment did not stop a dismissal.

The exceptions

Three exceptions matter.

Anti-discrimination statutes, beginning in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act, forbid firing because of protected traits such as race, sex, religion, age, national origin or disability. Contracts are enforced when they set a term or require a reason, although verbal reassurances usually are not.

The public-policy exception protects workers punished for obeying a legal duty, such as reporting for jury duty, but courts apply it narrowly. Handbook promises rarely help, because most handbooks now say they are not contracts.

Wage and hour protections

The week also covers the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Employers must pay for every hour worked and pay one and a half times the normal rate beyond forty hours a week unless the job is genuinely exempt, which in Maltby's account also requires a fixed salary of at least $23,660 a year. Workers cannot waive overtime.

The just-cause alternative

Just cause means a legitimate, job-related reason for dismissal.

Every union contract requires it, Montana has required it since 1987, and New York City extended it to about 70,000 fast-food workers in 2021 with progressive discipline and layoffs by seniority.

The scale of the problem

Maltby estimates that about 150,000 people a year are fired without a legitimate reason and argues that almost none of them have a remedy under the existing exceptions.

The Businessweek reading reports polls in which 47% of Americans said they had been fired for a bad reason or none, and about two in three backed just cause, Republicans among them by a majority. Philadelphia protected parking attendants in 2019, and federal proposals have stalled in a closely divided Senate.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    The at-will default

  • 02

    Origins in an 1877 treatise

  • 03

    Statutory, contract and public-policy exceptions

  • 04

    Handbooks and disclaimers

  • 05

    Overtime and wage law

  • 06

    Just cause in Montana and New York City

Worked example · free

Does a handbook promise of warnings protect this worker?

Q [5 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A warehouse handbook describes a warning, then probation, then dismissal for rule breaking. Its first page says it is not a contract of employment. A worker is fired without warning after one late arrival. Assess the claim. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation, not a University marking scheme.
Figure 3.2.Figure 3.2. The order in which to test a dismissal against the exceptions in the Week 6 reading. Falling through every question means the firing is legal, however unfair it looks.Did the firing turn on race, sex, religion, disability or another protected trait?yesStatutory claimnoIs there a contract for a set term, or one requiring a reason?yesContract claimnoWas the worker punished for a legal duty or right, such as jury duty?yesPublic-policy claimnoLawful under at will
Figure 3.2. The order in which to test a dismissal against the exceptions in the Week 6 reading. Falling through every question means the firing is legal, however unfair it looks.
  • 1State the default: under employment at will no reason is needed.
  • 1Identify the implied-contract argument based on the handbook's discipline steps.
  • 2Apply the disclaimer rule: courts have held that such a statement overrides the handbook's procedures.
  • 1Conclude and note what would change the result, such as a union contract or a just-cause law.
The worker's best argument is that the handbook's discipline steps became part of the employment contract. Early cases accepted that argument, but employers responded by adding disclaimers, and courts have held that a statement that the handbook is not a contract overrides its procedures. The dismissal is therefore likely lawful under employment at will. The result would differ under a union contract or a just-cause law, which require a legitimate reason and, in New York City's fast-food law, progressive discipline.
Sia tip — Check the first page of any handbook in a scenario for a disclaimer before relying on its discipline procedure.
Glossary

Key terms

Public Policy Exception
A limit on at-will firing that protects employees punished for obeying a legal duty or using a legal right, such as serving on a jury.
Progressive Discipline
A sequence of warnings and proportionate penalties that must come before dismissal for ordinary shortcomings.
Overtime Exemption
The classification that removes a salaried professional, executive or administrative employee from the right to overtime pay.
FAQ

Employment at Will and Workplace Rights FAQ

Can an American employer fire someone for no reason?

In most jobs, yes. Employment at will lets a private employer dismiss a worker for any reason or none, unless a statute, a contract or the narrow public-policy exception applies, or the worker is covered by a union contract.

Does anti-discrimination law require employers to have a good reason?

No. It forbids dismissal because of a protected trait such as race, sex or religion, but it does not require a legitimate reason; as Maltby puts it, the law protects who you are, not what you do.

What did New York City's 2021 law change for fast-food workers?

It replaced at will with just cause for about 70,000 workers, requiring misconduct or poor performance, warnings and proportionate discipline, layoffs by seniority, and routes to arbitration or court when a firing is disputed.

How does the Week 6 rights check work?

It is a short quiz worth 1% that you can take and retake during Week 6 until you reach a perfect score of 10 points. It closes when the week ends, so complete it before moving on to the forum.

Study strategy

Exam move

Memorize the exceptions in order, statute, contract, public policy, and practise running three short scenarios through them. Retake the rights check until you reach 10 points during Week 6, then write one paragraph arguing for or against just cause using Montana and New York City as evidence.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 4 of your Rutgers University subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your 37575100 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
37575100 · Introduction to Labor Studies and Employment Relations - independent study guide on the AskSia Library. More Rutgers University subjects · Microeconomics across all universities