ATS1090 Practice of Journalism
The Complete Study & Assessment Guide · S2 2026ATS1090 Overview
- 6 credit points
- Undergraduate
- Semester 2, 2026
- Three published artefacts
Reporting practice in this 6 credit point course begins before prose is polished. Its route starts with public consequence and provenance, moves through story discovery and interview evidence, and then controls lead, attribution, visual treatment, feature structure and publication handoffs.
- Public Consequence Decide why a story matters, show where each claim came from, and keep legal and ethical responsibility active from pitch to publication.
- Beat Signal Turn a community signal into an answerable angle, a source plan, an interview sequence and observation that can survive editorial challenge.
- Judgement Ranking Rank the verified development, construct a clean lead, control quotation and build a story whose order reflects consequence.
- Editing Layers Improve accuracy and discoverability while keeping headline, caption and image faithful to the evidence in the story.
How ATS1090 is assessed
| Component | Weight | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment One: Story Brief | 20% | Story brief artefact |
| Assessment Two: News Story + Critical Reflection + Photograph | 35% | News package and reflection |
| Assessment Three: Feature Story + Critical Reflection + Photograph | 45% | Feature package and reflection |
The 2026 handbook publishes the broad types Report 20%, Article 35% and Article 45%. The current learning system supplies the detailed task names used here and the three current due dates.
Current ATS1090 dates
| Date | Item | Control |
|---|---|---|
| 24 August 2026 at 11:55 pm | Story Brief due | Current learning-system date. |
| 28 September 2026 at 11:55 pm | News Story package due | Current learning-system date. |
| 25 October 2026 at 11:55 pm | Feature Story package due | Current learning-system date. |
Dates are as published in Dates shown are from the current 2026 learning system; verify the live task page before acting.. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.
What ATS1090 covers
Move from a public-interest question to provenance, source work, controlled prose, visual verification and an accountable publication handoff.
News Value, Provenance and Public Responsibility
Decide why a story matters, show where each claim came from, and keep legal and ethical responsibility active from pitch to publication.02Story Discovery, Sources and Interviews
Turn a community signal into an answerable angle, a source plan, an interview sequence and observation that can survive editorial challenge.03News Judgement, Leads and Attribution
Rank the verified development, construct a clean lead, control quotation and build a story whose order reflects consequence.04Editing, Headlines and Visual Evidence
Improve accuracy and discoverability while keeping headline, caption and image faithful to the evidence in the story.05Feature Narrative and Publishing Workflows
Build a human-centred premise through scene and structure, then prepare reflection, headline and platform material as one accountable package.For journalism study planning, use the published assessment structure without inferring missing task detail. The 2026 handbook publishes the broad types Report 20%, Article 35% and Article 45%. The current learning system supplies the detailed task names used here and the three current due dates. Chapter 1, News Value, Provenance and Public Responsibility, begins with public consequence and closes with audience plurality.
Journalistic purpose is not satisfied by novelty alone; the reporting must clarify a change, conflict, risk, decision or lived condition. Map affected groups by how the change operates, seek voices with different constraints, and make the common policy facts separable from individual experience.
The publication limit is explicit: Treating diversity as a quotation quota leaves the underlying angle and evidence hierarchy unchanged. Chapter 2, Story Discovery, Sources and Interviews, begins with beat signal and closes with observed detail. Community reporting grows from repeated contact with institutions, places, records and people whose patterns become familiar over time.
Record timed intervals, visible notices and staff explanations, seek consent for identifiable detail, and present interpretation separately from direct observation. The publication limit is explicit: Adjectives such as chaotic or desperate substitute the reporter’s conclusion for the observable details that would let readers judge.
Chapter 3, News Judgement, Leads and Attribution, begins with judgement ranking and closes with draft audit. Editorial selection compares consequence, certainty, timeliness and audience need rather than treating every gathered fact equally. Reconstruct the comparison, disclose the system change, replace the unsupported doubling claim and ask whether the corrected result changes the lead.
The publication limit is explicit: Treating revision as punctuation repair allows a weak angle and overstated evidence to survive in fluent prose. Chapter 4, Editing, Headlines and Visual Evidence, begins with editing layers and closes with visual frame. A structural edit asks whether the lead, angle and evidence order serve the audience’s central question.
Review the wider sequence, disclose relevant context, verify time and location, and choose a frame that supports rather than exaggerates the reported claim. The publication limit is explicit: A technically authentic image can still mislead when its caption, crop or placement supplies a false context. Chapter 5, Feature Narrative and Publishing Workflows, begins with feature premise and closes with publishing handoff.
A feature premise states what the story explores, why the chosen people can reveal it and what wider evidence will test their experience. Rewrite the caption to match the reported claim, complete the rights and accessibility checks, and record who approves each element of the package.
The publication limit is explicit: Treating platform copy as marketing outside editorial control creates a second, less accountable version of the journalism. Rehearse reporting judgements by retrieving a mechanism, applying it to a changed situation and naming the strongest condition that limits the conclusion.
Reporting examples reveal their verification path; they are independent revision material and do not reproduce an official marking scheme.
Trace one story claim from source to publication decision
- 1Define the decision, representation or controlled variable before selecting a method.
- 1State the evidence and the mechanism that connects it to the proposed result.
- 1Complete the application with units, attribution or transformation visible.
- 1Name the boundary and the changed condition that would alter the action.
Key terms
- Public Consequence
- Journalistic purpose is not satisfied by novelty alone; the reporting must clarify a change, conflict, risk, decision or lived condition. Its use is bounded by this check: Equating public interest with whatever attracts clicks confuses attention with civic value.
- Value Hierarchy
- News values are selection criteria whose importance changes with audience, platform and the scale of consequence. Its use is bounded by this check: Prominence can displace impact when a recognisable person becomes the story despite contributing no material development.
- Provenance Trail
- Provenance records who supplied a claim, when it was obtained, in what form and whether the reporter observed or inferred it. Its use is bounded by this check: Attaching a source link without checking what the source actually supports creates the appearance, not the practice, of verification.
- Legal Threshold
- Defamation analysis begins by asking whether a person is identifiable and whether the material could lower their reputation in the eyes of others. Its use is bounded by this check: Adding “alleged” to an unsupported accusation is not a universal shield against defamatory meaning or procedural harm.
- Harm Balance
- Ethical judgement identifies the likely benefit of disclosure, the people who bear harm and whether a less intrusive route preserves the public value. Its use is bounded by this check: A signed release cannot settle whether a vulnerable source understood the likely reach or whether the material is necessary.
- Audience Plurality
- Audience knowledge determines which terms need explanation, which prior events require context and which channels make the work accessible. Its use is bounded by this check: Treating diversity as a quotation quota leaves the underlying angle and evidence hierarchy unchanged.
- Beat Signal
- Community reporting grows from repeated contact with institutions, places, records and people whose patterns become familiar over time. Its use is bounded by this check: Waiting for an official announcement gives institutions control over which changes become visible and when.
- Angle Hypothesis
- A topic such as housing is too broad to guide reporting; an angle specifies a current change, causal claim or consequence to test. Its use is bounded by this check: Protecting an early angle from disconfirming evidence turns reporting into confirmation rather than inquiry.
- Source Architecture
- Official sources can explain decisions and records, while affected sources reveal consequences that administrative summaries often miss. Its use is bounded by this check: Counting interviewees without tracing their relationships can make one institutional voice look like broad corroboration.
- Interview Sequence
- Preparation sets the interview’s purpose, checks known facts and identifies gaps without scripting the source’s answers. Its use is bounded by this check: A long list of compound questions lets the source answer the easiest clause and avoid the central evidentiary gap.
- Observed Detail
- Observation captures sequence, setting, interaction and physical evidence that retrospective interviews may compress or reinterpret. Its use is bounded by this check: Adjectives such as chaotic or desperate substitute the reporter’s conclusion for the observable details that would let readers judge.
ATS1090 FAQ
Which current task names and weights apply?
The current learning system names the Story Brief at 20%, the News Story plus Critical Reflection and Photograph at 35%, and the Feature Story plus Critical Reflection and Photograph at 45%. These detailed labels sit within the 2026 handbook categories Report, Article and Article.
When are the three published packages due?
The current dates are 24 August 2026 at 11:55 pm for the Story Brief, 28 September 2026 at 11:55 pm for the News Story package, and 25 October 2026 at 11:55 pm for the Feature Story package. Recheck the live assignment page before submission.
What separates a topic from a workable angle?
A topic identifies an area; an angle proposes a current, important and testable claim about that area. It names the development, affected audience and reporting question. Contrary evidence is allowed to change the angle, which is why it is a working proposition rather than a slogan.
How many sources are enough for a story?
A source count alone cannot answer adequacy. Trace independence, knowledge and purpose: who establishes the decision, who experiences its consequence, who interprets the evidence and who can challenge the dominant account. Several interviewees funded by one organisation may still represent one evidentiary source.
When should a direct quotation be retained?
Keep language that is distinctive, revealing or necessary for accountability. Paraphrase routine information more efficiently, but compare it with the recording and preserve qualification. A quotation should not repeat facts already stated or decorate a paragraph without changing what the reader understands.
What makes a photograph part of verification?
Record provenance, time, place, photographer and relevant consent; inspect the full frame or sequence; and write a caption limited to what is known. Cropping and placement can change apparent scale or causality even when the underlying file is authentic.
What belongs in a critical reflection?
Explain consequential reporting and production choices, evidence limits, ethical tensions, feedback and revision. A reflection is not a diary of effort or a summary of the finished article. It should show how a decision affected accuracy, representation, structure or audience understanding.
How is a correction handled responsibly?
Verify the error, correct it promptly and make the change transparent in a form proportionate to the original publication. Preserve the reporting record and consider whether the same weakness affects headline, image, social copy or other formats. A correction is also evidence for improving the workflow.
How to prepare for the assessments
Reporting practice in this 6 credit point course begins before prose is polished. Its route starts with public consequence and provenance, moves through story discovery and interview evidence, and then controls lead, attribution, visual treatment, feature structure and publication handoffs. Study one chapter by retrieval, one by a finished application, and one by a boundary comparison.
Rotate the order so the page layout does not become a cue. Keep a decision log with four columns—evidence, mechanism, result and limiting condition—and repair the first blank before rereading prose.
Your AI Arts tutor for ATS1090
Stuck on a hard ATS1090 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Arts and Humanities tutor — ask any ATS1090 Practice of Journalism question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.
