The University of Melbourne · FACULTY OF ARTS & HUMANITIES

AHIS10003 Chap.15 Where Art History Essays Lose Marks

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
14 Chapters6-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 15 of 15 · AHIS10003

Where Art History Essays Lose Marks

The Subject Guide publishes its own list of thirteen problems that it says frequently occur in undergraduate art history essays, and it is the most directly useful document in the subject and the one students most often skip. Seven of the thirteen are argument or structure problems, three are evidence or referencing problems, two are expression problems and one is a deadline problem.

That distribution is the message: essays here are lost in the planning far more often than in the writing. This chapter sets out all thirteen with the fix for each, counts what the subject's two H1 sample essays actually contain, reads the University grading descriptors as instructions rather than as verdicts, and closes with a six-item pre-submission checklist.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Not answering the question, and why the fix is upstream in the planning

  • 02

    Clarity, expression and spelling, and the subject's own remedy

  • 03

    Points that do not relate to the main thesis: a cutting problem

  • 04

    Over or under the word limit, both treated as equally serious

  • 05

    Late submission, and the 5% per day penalty

  • 06

    Insufficient evidence, and what counts as evidence in art history

  • 07

    Poor or non-authoritative references, and over-reliance on survey texts

  • 08

    Poor citation, websites, and recording the date you viewed one

  • 09

    Failure to critically engage, and why agreeing still requires a reason

  • 10

    Poor structure and poor signposting

  • 11

    Poor argument, and the courtroom test the subject offers

  • 12

    Imprecision in evidence and in argumentation

  • 13

    What two H1 samples actually contain, counted

  • 14

    The grading bands, and the one word separating the top two

Worked example · free

Four named problems in one paragraph, and the repair

Q [6 marks]. The marks used here are our own teaching weighting and are not a marking scheme published by the University, which sets no per-question marks for this subject. Diagnose this paragraph against the subject's list, then repair it: the artist used many interesting colours; some critics have said it is an important painting; it was made during a period of great social change and many artists were experimenting with new techniques; the colours are very effective and create a strong mood.
  • 1Name the imprecision: many interesting colours, very effective and strong mood identify nothing that could be checked.
  • 1Name the failure to critically engage: some critics have said attributes a view to nobody and takes no stance on it.
  • 1Name the irrelevant point: the sentence about other artists experimenting is general context doing no work here.
  • 1Name the missing evidence: four sentences with no visual detail and no source.
  • 2Rewrite at the same length with all four repaired.
A repaired paragraph names a specific colour relationship that can be checked against the picture, engages a named scholar and disagrees with them on stated grounds, drops the general context entirely, and ends by connecting the observation to the essay's thesis.
Sia tip — Run one test over your whole draft: for every general claim, is there a visible detail in the next clause? Imprecision and insufficient evidence are two of the thirteen problems and this single pass catches both.
Glossary

Key terms

Signposting
Letting the reader know where one topic ends and another begins, using paragraphs and opening sentences to break topics up logically.
Non-authoritative reference
Journalism, blogs, some websites or promotional material which, unlike peer-reviewed articles and books from reputable publishers, do not draw on evidence-based research.
Survey text
A broad overview work. Over-reliance on survey texts, to the exclusion of monographs, reviews and articles, is named by the subject as a cause of superficial essays.
Imprecision
Insufficient analysis of the text or artwork to give meaningful support to the argument, or vagueness in the argumentation itself.
FAQ

Where Art History Essays Lose Marks FAQ

What is the single most common way to lose marks in this subject?

Planning failures that only become visible on the page. Of the thirteen problems the subject names, seven are argument or structure problems: not answering the question, points unrelated to the thesis, poor structure, poor signposting, poor argument, imprecision, and failure to critically engage. Only two are about expression.

How far over the word limit can I go?

The subject FAQ names more than 10% over as the point at which a marking penalty applies, with a higher penalty and a possible grade cap at 25% or more. Both of the subject's H1 sample essays sit just inside that allowance: one states 1,092 words for a 1,000-word task and the other 2,182 for a 2,000-word task. Being under the limit is treated as equally serious as being over it.

What does a strong essay actually contain?

More apparatus than the minimum. The longer of the two sample essays carries eleven bibliography entries against a stated minimum of eight, which puts it above the ten at which the top research band begins, and fifteen numbered figures. The shorter carries four bibliography entries and six figures. Those counts are our own count of the entries in each sample; the word counts are stated by the essays themselves.

What separates an H2A from an H1?

One word in the descriptors. H2A meets all the key assessment criteria and exceeds in some; H1 meets all the key criteria and excels in most. It is the same essay doing more of its criteria very well rather than a different kind of essay, which means an H1 is reached systematically. Work that is also original, exciting or challenging is where the high 80s live.

Study strategy

Exam move

Read the thirteen problems once before you draft anything and once again before you submit, because they are a diagnostic list rather than general advice.

Then build the six-item pre-submission checklist the chapter ends with and run it every time: does the introduction contain an arguable claim, can every paragraph be traced to it, does every general claim have a visible detail under it, is every source introduced by name with your position stated, does every footnote give the exact page, and are you inside the limit with a conclusion that introduces nothing new.

Reading the whole draft aloud once covers expression as well.

Working through Where Art History Essays Lose Marks in AHIS10003? Sia is AskSia’s AI Arts and Humanities tutor — ask any AHIS10003 Where Art History Essays Lose Marks question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how AHIS10003 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 74 of your The University of Melbourne subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your AHIS10003 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 6-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
Unlock the full AHIS10003 Bible + 74 The University of Melbourne subjects
$0.99 Trial