UNSW Sydney · FACULTY OF FINANCE

RISK5002 Chap.6 Scenario Analysis and the Delphi Technique

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
6 Chapters3-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 6 of 10 · RISK5002

Scenario Analysis and the Delphi Technique

Scenario analysis builds plausible pictures of the future and works through their implications. Short-term work explores what follows an initiating event such as an emergency, while long-term work imagines credible futures decades ahead, like the IPCC socioeconomic pathways, without assigning probabilities. Its outputs are scenario stories, effects of plans under each future, emerging risks and leading indicators.

The Delphi technique gathers expert judgement through anonymous, iterative questionnaires until consensus forms, which protects against groupthink. This chapter covers both techniques under the IEC headings, summarises two Delphi rounds with a median and range, and practises the past question on how actuaries could use Delphi. Both techniques help when the future cannot be read from past data.

Scenario analysis widens the range of futures an organisation prepares for, while Delphi narrows expert opinion towards an agreed estimate.

The chapter compares their uses across business, finance, climate, technology, emergency planning and engineering, explains the lecture's aircraft inspection case in which Delphi produced human error probabilities, and shows how the wisdom of crowds depends on the same diversity and independence that Delphi protects.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Plausible scenarios and their implications

  • 02

    Short-term versus long-term horizons

  • 03

    Outputs and leading indicators

  • 04

    Delphi steps and anonymity

  • 05

    Groupthink and the wisdom of crowds

  • 06

    Delphi for scarce-data estimates

Worked example · free

Summarise two Delphi rounds on a strike probability

Q [4 marks]. Seven experts estimate the probability of a major port strike. Round 1 gives 5, 10, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 40%; round 2, after the anonymous summary circulates, gives 10, 10, 12, 15, 15, 18 and 20%. Summarise each round and judge whether consensus is forming. The mark allocation below is for self-assessment and is not a published university scheme.
Each dot is one expert's estimate of the strike probability: after the first round's anonymous summary was circulated, the seven estimates narrowed from a 35-poEach dot is one expert's estimate of the strike probability: after the first round's anonymous summary was circulated, the seven estimates narrowed from a 35-point range to a 10-point range while the median stayed at 15%, which is the movement towards consensus the Delphi rounds are designed to produce.0%10%20%30%40%Round 1Round 2median 15%range 35 pointsrange 10 points
Each dot is one expert's estimate of the strike probability: after the first round's anonymous summary was circulated, the seven estimates narrowed from a 35-point range to a 10-point range while the median stayed at 15%, which is the movement towards consensus the Delphi rounds are designed to produce.
  • +1Round 1: the median is the fourth sorted value, 15%; the range is 40 minus 5, or 35 points.
  • +1Round 2: the median stays at 15%; the range falls to 20 minus 10, or 10 points.
  • +1The centre held while the spread narrowed by 25 points, so the panel is converging.
  • +1Report 15% with a 10 to 20% band and the reasons outliers gave, then stop unless a tighter band is needed.
Both rounds have a median of 15%, and the range narrows from 35 to 10 points, which shows consensus forming. Reporting the band alongside the median shows how much uncertainty remains after the rounds.
Sia tip — Sort the estimates before reading the median; with seven values it is always the fourth.
Glossary

Key terms

Scenario analysis
Techniques that model how the future might unfold and trace each scenario's risks.
Leading indicator
An early signal that a particular scenario is starting to emerge.
Groupthink
Acceptance of a perceived group consensus without critical evaluation.
Consensus
Agreement among panel members reached through successive rounds of anonymous estimates.
FAQ

Scenario Analysis and the Delphi Technique FAQ

When should I use long-term scenario analysis?

Use it when an organisation must prepare for major shifts in technology, preferences or social attitudes over decades. Probabilities cannot be attached to such futures, but their consequences can be explored to build resilience and to choose indicators worth monitoring.

Why are Delphi responses anonymous?

Anonymity lets each expert answer independently, so senior or confident voices do not dominate and the panel avoids groupthink. Panellists still see the combined results and can revise their views in later rounds.

What are the weaknesses of scenario analysis?

It can be speculative and produce unrealistic results, and long-range scenarios seldom materialise in the form they were drawn. Its value lies in preparing for a range of futures rather than predicting one.

What makes a Delphi panel produce good estimates?

Quality depends on choosing experts who genuinely know the problem, calibrating them on the topic, asking clear questions and keeping responses anonymous and independent. Each round should circulate a fair summary with the reasons behind outlying views. A diverse, well-informed panel benefits from the same conditions that make crowds wise, while a narrow or ill-informed one can converge on a poor answer.

Study strategy

Exam move

For scenario analysis, practise naming the horizon first and then listing the four outputs for a case of your choice. For Delphi, rehearse the steps in order and run a small exercise with friends, summarising each round with a median and range. Prepare a short paragraph on how actuaries or any data-poor profession could use the method, ending with its main limitation.

Prepare one example of each scenario horizon from a field you know, ready to adapt in an exam, and practise explaining in two sentences why anonymity distinguishes Delphi from a workshop or brainstorming session.

Working through Scenario Analysis and the Delphi Technique in RISK5002? Sia is AskSia’s AI Finance tutor — ask any RISK5002 Scenario Analysis and the Delphi Technique question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how RISK5002 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

Related courses

RISK5001 · FINS5513

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 105 of your UNSW Sydney subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your RISK5002 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 3-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works
RISK5002 · Risk Analytics - independent study guide on the AskSia Library. More UNSW Sydney subjects · Microeconomics across all universities