The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · FACULTY OF EDUCATION

MILE5000 Chap.10 Designing and Reporting a Group Research Project

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
8 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 10 of 10 · MILE5000

Designing and Reporting a Group Research Project

A project worth seventy per cent

The group project is carried out in groups of four and reported twice: an oral presentation at the end of term worth thirty per cent and a research paper worth forty per cent, due on Friday 4 December.

Groups choose a theoretical perspective introduced in the course, identify an area within it, review the literature, build a rationale, frame research questions with hypotheses where appropriate, and collect and analyse original data.

Scope and method

The syllabus advises limiting research questions to one or two and gathering original data through methods that are justified and feasible, including suitable instruments and procedures.

It encourages regular communication, assigned roles and a timeline, and invites groups to seek guidance from the instructors throughout.

The presentation and the paper

The presentation explains the research questions, methodology, findings and implications, delivered coherently with every member involved, and may use visual aids, graphs or interview extracts.

Its duration and schedule are to be announced on the course site. The paper substantiates the presentation within 2,500 words excluding references and appendices, in APA style, with an introduction, a critical literature review, a main body on methodology, data analysis and findings, a conclusion on significance and future directions, and a reflection on what the group gained.

All instruments go in the appendices.

How marks are shared

Group members receive the same mark for the paper unless there are obvious differences in preparation, contribution or performance, or a dispute is justified with evidence. A written record of roles and contributions is the simplest protection.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    Choosing a theoretical perspective and an area

  • 02

    Limiting the project to one or two questions

  • 03

    Choosing a feasible instrument from the question

  • 04

    A group timeline and roles

  • 05

    What the presentation must cover

  • 06

    Sections the paper must document

  • 07

    Appendices and APA style

  • 08

    How group marks are assigned

Worked example · free

Narrow a project question until it is feasible

Q [6 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A group proposes the question 'How do motivation, identity and anxiety affect the English speaking of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong?' Narrow it into one feasible research question and name the instrument. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation and are not the University's marking scheme.
Question first, instrument second.Question first, instrument second. The syllabus asks for data collection methods that are both justified and feasible; the tree is one way to make the justification explicit.Let the question choose the instrumentWhat does the question ask?How much, or how many?Survey or rating scaleHow do learners perform?Language task or testHow do learners see it?Interview or journalThen ask: can four people collect it well in the time available?
Question first, instrument second. The syllabus asks for data collection methods that are both justified and feasible; the tree is one way to make the justification explicit.
  • 2Identify why the proposal is too broad.
  • 2Write one narrowed question.
  • 2Name a feasible instrument and sample.
The proposal combines three constructs, each needing its own instruments and theory, and a population too large for four people to sample in one term. A narrowed question is: do mainland Chinese postgraduate students in one Hong Kong programme report higher speaking anxiety in seminars than in informal conversation with classmates? A feasible instrument is a short anxiety questionnaire answered twice, once for each situation, by twenty to thirty students in the group's own programme, with a few follow-up interviews.
Sia tip — Cut a project question until it names one construct, one group of learners and one comparison; if it names more than that, it needs more than one term.
Glossary

Key terms

Research Question
The specific question a study is designed to answer, which should determine the choice of participants, instruments and analysis.
Research Instrument
A tool for collecting data, such as a questionnaire, language task, test, interview protocol or reflective journal.
Rationale
The argument, built from the literature review, for why a study is worth doing and how it fits existing work.
Paired Design
A design in which the same participants are measured under two conditions, so each person serves as their own comparison.
APA Style
The citation and referencing format required for the project paper.
FAQ

Designing and Reporting a Group Research Project FAQ

How many research questions should the group project have?

The syllabus advises limiting them to one or two. One question answered well fits the 2,500-word paper and leaves room for a proper methods section and discussion, while several questions usually mean several instruments and thinner analysis of each.

What goes in the appendices of the project paper?

Every instrument the group used: language tasks, tests or measurements such as aptitude or grammaticality judgement, surveys, interview protocols and reflective journals. Appendices sit outside the word limit, so they are the right place for full item lists and protocols that would otherwise crowd the main text.

What should the presentation include?

The syllabus asks for the research questions, methodology, findings and implications, presented coherently and engagingly with active involvement from each group member. Visual aids, diagrams, graphs and interview extracts can be used where they help, and details such as length and schedule will be announced on the course site.

Study strategy

Assessment move

At the first group meeting, agree roles and a dated timeline, and write the one research question in a shared document before anyone searches the literature. Revisit the question after the review; narrowing it then is cheap, while narrowing it after data collection is not.

Working through Designing and Reporting a Group Research Project in MILE5000? Sia is AskSia’s AI Education tutor — ask any MILE5000 Designing and Reporting a Group Research Project question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MILE5000 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 4 of your The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MILE5000 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works