The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · FACULTY OF EDUCATION

MILE5000 Chap.9 Writing a Critical Summary and Critique

- one subject, every graph, every model, every mark
7 Chapters4-page Bible
Our own words - no uploaded lecturer files
Updated for this semester
Chapter 9 of 10 · MILE5000

Writing a Critical Summary and Critique

The individual assignment

The critical summary and critique is worth thirty per cent and is due on Friday 23 October. You choose one article from a set of recent research articles supplied by the course and write a summary and critique in no more than 750 words excluding references.

The syllabus asks for careful, active and critical reading and requires the summary to reproduce the meaning of the article accurately in your own words.

What the summary must contain

The brief lists the contents: the context of the study and how it emerged from the literature;

the research questions, hypotheses or main arguments and why they matter; the design, setting, participants, methodology and analysis; the results and their significance; and the implications, discussed with reference to the questions or hypotheses.

What the critique must answer

The brief sets four questions: whether the research is designed well enough to answer its questions, including flaws in tasks, recruitment or analysis and their effect on validity;

how far the conclusions generalise to other contexts and participants; how you would modify the research in the light of your criticisms if you ran it as a pilot; and what an extension study could add.

The strongest critiques tie each flaw to a specific conclusion and pair it with a concrete repair.

Integrity and word economy

The syllabus states that copied wording cited without quotation marks is still plagiarism, and that a plagiarised assignment will not be accepted.

The 750-word ceiling is tight for nine parts, so plan the split before drafting and give the critique at least as much space as the summary.

In this chapter

What this chapter covers

  • 01

    The assignment brief and deadline

  • 02

    Five parts of an accurate summary

  • 03

    Four critique questions

  • 04

    Flaw, consequence and repair

  • 05

    Matching claim strength to design

  • 06

    Planning 750 words

  • 07

    Choosing an article you can critique well

Worked example · free

Turn a list of weaknesses into one critique point

Q [6 marks]. AskSia-authored practice. A draft critique says: 'The sample was small, the data were self-reported and the study was done in one country.' Rewrite it as one critique point that meets the brief. The marks shown are an AskSia study allocation and are not the University's marking scheme.
An AskSia planning split, not a University rule.An AskSia planning split, not a University rule. The brief sets only the 750-word ceiling. Giving the critique more room than the summary reflects the four questions it has to answer.One way to spend 710 of the 750 words, leaving room for revision60Context50Questions90Design70Results50Implications150Design flaws90Reach90Modify60ExtendSummary, 320 wordsCritique, 390 words
An AskSia planning split, not a University rule. The brief sets only the 750-word ceiling. Giving the critique more room than the summary reflects the four questions it has to answer.
  • 2Choose the weakness that most threatens the article's main conclusion.
  • 2Explain its consequence for that conclusion.
  • 2Propose a concrete modification for a pilot.
Suppose the article concludes that anxiety lowers speaking performance. The most serious weakness is that anxiety and performance were both self-reported in one questionnaire, because learners who rate their speaking as poor may also report feeling anxious about it, so the relationship could come from how learners see themselves rather than from performance. A pilot would measure speaking with a rated task rather than self-assessment, keeping the anxiety scale, so that the two measures come from different sources.
Sia tip — Choose one weakness and name the specific conclusion it damages; a weakness that could be said of any study earns little until it is tied to this study's claim.
Glossary

Key terms

Generalisability
The extent to which a study's conclusions would hold for other participants and settings.
Validity
The degree to which a study's design and measures support the conclusions drawn from them.
Extension Study
A follow-up that repairs a weakness of an earlier study or covers something it left out.
Pilot Study
A small trial version of a study used to test and refine its design before a full project.
FAQ

Writing a Critical Summary and Critique FAQ

How should I divide 750 words between summary and critique?

The brief sets only the ceiling, so the split is yours. Because the critique must answer four questions while the summary reports five parts briefly, giving the critique at least as much space as the summary is sensible. Leave some room for revision rather than drafting to the limit.

Can I quote the article in my summary?

You can quote with quotation marks and a citation, but the brief asks for the research to be presented in your own words, and the syllabus treats copied wording without quotation marks as plagiarism even when cited. Keep quotations for a phrase whose exact wording matters, and paraphrase everything else from your own notes.

What makes a critique point strong?

It names a specific feature of the design, explains which conclusion that feature weakens and why, and proposes a concrete change you would make in a pilot. Generic weaknesses such as small samples or self-report only become strong points when you show how they affect this article's particular claim.

Study strategy

Assessment move

Pick two candidate articles and write a one-line design sentence for each before choosing. Choose the one for which you can already name a flaw tied to a specific conclusion; an article you can describe completely after one careful reading gives you more to evaluate within 750 words.

Working through Writing a Critical Summary and Critique in MILE5000? Sia is AskSia’s AI Education tutor — ask any MILE5000 Writing a Critical Summary and Critique question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how MILE5000 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.

A+Everything unlocked
Unlocks this Bible + all 4 of your The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology subjects - and 1,000+ Bibles across every Australian university.
Sia - your MILE5000 tutor, unlimited, worked the way the exam marks it
The full 4-page Bible + practice bank with worked solutions
Chrome extension - sync your LMS so Sia knows your deadlines
Bilingual EN / Chinese on every Bible and every Sia answer
$0.99 Trial
30-day money-back · cancel in one tap · how it works