INFO 202 Chap.4 Digital Economy, Platforms and Regulation
Digital Economy, Platforms and Regulation
What the fourth week sets out to do
The fourth week opens the second part of the course, which the syllabus titles From analog to digital. Its description names three linked topics: the digital economy and its major platforms, the question of monopoly, and a comparison between today's platforms and monopolistic firms from before the digital era. The comparison is the analytical core.
Instead of treating large technology companies as a problem without precedent, you are asked to test which features of their market power are genuinely new and which repeat older patterns.
A&P as the pre-digital benchmark
Muris and Nuechterlein's 2019 article on what the A&P prosecution means for antitrust online returns to the federal case against the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, a grocery chain that became one of the biggest retailers in the country.
As the article is generally read, the authors treat that prosecution as a cautionary tale about penalizing a retailer for the efficiencies behind its low prices, and they apply the lesson to the internet era.
Treat this as their argument, attributed to them, rather than as a settled verdict of history.
Amazon and the FTC
The second reading, by Zapolsky and published by Amazon in 2023, responds to the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust lawsuit against the company. Its title states the company's position directly: if the government wins, shoppers pay more and wait longer, and sellers suffer.
Reading it well means recognizing it as advocacy from one party to a legal dispute, and weighing it against the government's allegation that Amazon unlawfully maintains monopoly power, which a court must decide.
The politics around enforcement
A Financial Times report from November 2024 adds a present-day view of how enforcement depends on politics.
It describes leaders of large technology firms hoping for a more permissive approach to deals, antitrust and AI after the presidential election, and it notes that several firms had hired start-up founders or licensed their technology rather than buying the companies outright, avoiding standard merger review.
It also complicates any simple party story: the landmark search case against Google was filed during Trump's first term.
Questions to carry into any platform case
Three questions give structure to a short answer about any platform. What market is the firm said to dominate, and do its customers or sellers have realistic alternatives? What conduct is alleged, as distinct from sheer size?
And who gains or loses if enforcers act, counting consumers, rival businesses and the sellers who depend on the platform to reach buyers? Working through all three keeps a comparison from sliding into either admiration or alarm, and it lets you use the A&P benchmark without assuming the answer.
What this chapter covers
- 01
The digital economy and major digital platforms
- 02
Monopoly power and what antitrust law actually targets
- 03
United States v. A&P as a pre-digital benchmark
- 04
Muris and Nuechterlein on antitrust in the internet era
- 05
The FTC's 2023 lawsuit against Amazon and Amazon's reply
- 06
Reading a company's response as advocacy
- 07
Acqui-hires, licensing deals and merger review
- 08
How elections shape antitrust enforcement
Worked example · free
Build a fair comparison between a pre-digital and a digital monopoly case
- 2Identify both firms, the plaintiffs and the reading attached to each case.
- 2State each side's core argument without treating a lawsuit as a verdict.
- 1Name the conduct-versus-size question that decides both cases.
Key terms
- Monopoly Power
- A firm's lasting ability to raise prices or exclude rivals without losing its market; in US antitrust, the usual offense is gaining or keeping it through exclusionary conduct, not simply having it.
- Antitrust Law
- The body of law that polices competition by challenging monopolization, anticompetitive agreements and harmful mergers, enforced in the United States by the FTC, the Department of Justice and private parties.
- Digital Platform
- A firm that runs a digital marketplace or service connecting large groups of users, such as buyers and sellers, and often gains power from its central position between them.
- Merger Review
- The process by which competition authorities examine a proposed acquisition before or after it closes and can challenge it if it would substantially lessen competition.
- Acqui-Hire
- A deal in which a large company hires a start-up's founders or staff, sometimes with a technology license, instead of buying the company, which can keep the deal outside conventional merger review.
Digital Economy, Platforms and Regulation FAQ
What was United States v. A&P about?
It was a federal antitrust case against the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, the grocery chain known as A&P, one of the largest American retailers before the internet era. It is read in this course through Muris and Nuechterlein's 2019 article, which uses the case to ask whether enforcers risk punishing efficient, low-price firms, a question they bring to the debate over internet platforms.
Why did the FTC sue Amazon in 2023?
The Federal Trade Commission alleges that Amazon unlawfully maintains monopoly power in online retail markets. Amazon rejects the claim, and its public reply argues that a government win would mean dearer goods, longer delivery times and damage to the sellers who use it. Because the case is a lawsuit, its allegations are claims to be proved in court, not established findings.
Is being a very large company illegal under US antitrust law?
No. Size, or even monopoly power gained by offering a better product, is not unlawful on its own. The legal problem arises when a firm acquires or keeps that power through exclusionary conduct that shuts out competitors, or when a merger would substantially reduce competition. This distinction is the center of most debates about big platforms.
What is an acqui-hire and why does it matter for antitrust?
An acqui-hire is when a large firm hires a start-up's founders or team, sometimes also licensing its technology, instead of buying the start-up. A 2024 Financial Times report says several big technology firms used this approach with AI start-ups, which kept the deals outside standard merger review. Regulators and scholars therefore look at how control is gained, not only at formal takeovers.
Exam move
Build a two-column table with A&P on the left and Amazon on the right, and fill four rows from memory: the firm, who sued, the reading tied to the case, and that reading's central claim. Underneath, write the single question that decides both cases.
Then pick any current platform in the news and write two sentences, one arguing its size reflects exclusion and one arguing it reflects serving customers, so you practice stating both sides fairly.
Working through Digital Economy, Platforms and Regulation in INFO 202? Sia is AskSia’s AI Information Technology tutor — ask any INFO 202 Digital Economy, Platforms and Regulation question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how INFO 202 is taught and assessed. Read this chapter free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.
