FIT4005 IT Research and Innovation Methods
FIT4005 Overview
- Level 4 unit
- Semester 2 2026
- Co-taught with FIT5125
- Two assignments and weekly quizzes
- Moodle unit site
FIT4005 IT Research and Innovation Methods at Monash University equips you to design, carry out and report research and innovation work inside an IT organisation. It is taught together with FIT5125 on one shared Moodle site, so both cohorts follow the same weekly materials, studios and quizzes.
- Assessed by Two written assignments and best eight of ten studio quizzes
- Hardest step Turning one interview into defined codes and themes
- How to prepare Justify every method choice against the research question
How FIT4005 is assessed
| Component | Weight | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Written: Assignment 1 | 40% | Individual; three tasks covering Weeks 1 to 6: research ethics slides (10 marks), a closed-question survey with rationale (10 marks), and a recorded interview with a coding scheme (20 marks); due Monday 14 September 2026, 11:55 PM |
| Written: Assignment 2 | 40% | Covers Weeks 7 to 12; due Monday 2 November 2026, 11:55 PM; the task brief is released on Moodle |
| Quiz / Test: weekly studio quizzes | 20% | Five minutes and one attempt in each studio; Weeks 1 and 2 are practice; the best eight of the ten graded quizzes from Weeks 3 to 12 count |
What FIT4005 covers
Twelve chapters follow the twelve teaching weeks, from framing a research question and planning ethics through interviews, statistics and intellectual property to the design methods that carry an idea to delivery.
What Research Is and Why Methods Matter
Research as systematic knowledge creation, the research process, basic versus applied research, and why every method has limitsWeek 1 reframes research as something every IT team does whenever it needs to know something it does not yet know. Most definitions share three features: research generates new knowledge, it relies on critical thinking, and it uses systematic methods.
- Research as systematic creation of new knowledge
- Research questions inside everyday product work
- The five-step research process
- Theory, observation and experiment
- Basic and applied research, science and engineering
- The four families of method in the unit
Research Ethics Across the Research Pipeline
Ethical codes, the National Statement principles, dimensions of human research, data custodianship and ethics at each stageEthics in this unit is a method rather than a formality.
- Why ethics is a supporting method
- Four areas of research ethics
- Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki
- National Statement values
- Ten dimensions of human research
- Data custodianship
Searching and Reviewing the Literature
Purpose and types of review, thematic structure, synthesis matrices, backward and forward search and indicators of qualityA literature review shows what is already known, so you neither repeat answered questions nor choose methods blindly.
- What a literature review is for
- Context reviews, field surveys and meta-reviews
- Chronological versus thematic arrangement
- Introduction, body and conclusion
- Backward and forward searching
- Synthesis matrices
Designing Surveys and Questionnaires
When a questionnaire fits, sampling, closed question formats, Likert and ranking items, and repairing faulty questionsWeek 4 covers the survey, one of the most common and easily deployed research designs, and the questionnaire that sits inside it.
- Survey and questionnaire
- Information a questionnaire can capture
- When a questionnaire is appropriate
- Simple random and snowball sampling
- Closed question formats
- Seven classic question faults
Planning and Conducting Research Interviews
Structured, semi-structured and unstructured interviews, schedules, prompts and probes, consent and interviewer skillsInterviews let you follow up, change direction and capture emotion, sensitive detail and the participant's own terms, which a fixed questionnaire cannot.
- Why interviews instead of surveys
- Strengths and weaknesses of interviewing
- Structured, semi-structured and unstructured
- One-to-one versus group interviews
- Writing and ordering an interview schedule
- Prompts, probes and closure
Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data
Qualitative approaches, Braun and Clarke phases, semantic and latent codes, reviewing and defining themesQualitative data arrives as large amounts of text, audio and video that are not research-ready until you make sense of them.
- Sense-making with qualitative data
- Seven approaches to qualitative analysis
- Thematic versus content analysis
- Braun and Clarke six phases
- Semantic and latent codes
- Reviewing and defining themes
Configuring a Research Study
Research question properties, gap-spotting and problematising, mixed methods, triangulation and resourcing a planWeek 7 turns questions into plans. Operationalising research means deciding the type, modality and scale of data, knowing that one question can be answered in several ways at very different costs.
- Operationalising research
- Four properties of research questions
- Gap-spotting and problematising
- Empirical, action and blue-sky research
- Qualitative and quantitative evidence together
- Triangulation and mixed methods
Descriptive Statistics and Data Visualisation
Datasets and data sources, centre and spread, outliers and skew, chart choice and data storytellingDescriptive statistics summarise what a dataset contains so you can see its key characteristics before drawing any conclusions. Week 8 is conceptual and practical rather than mathematical.
- Quantitative data in industry
- Observations, variables and data points
- Primary, secondary and open data
- Descriptive and inferential branches
- Mean, median and mode
- Range, interquartile range and standard deviation
Inferential Statistics and Hypothesis Testing
Population and sample, probability and non-probability sampling, hypothesis tests, variables and study designMost quantitative data is a sample, but the question is usually about a population. Week 9 explains how inferential statistics reason from one to the other and why that step is only valid when the sample is representative.
- From sample to population
- Representativeness and random sampling
- Probability sampling methods
- Non-probability sampling methods
- Hypothesis testing
- Parametric and non-parametric tests
Intellectual Property in IT Innovation
How research creates IP, prior work versus new work, publication and ownership, and patent filing in practiceOne of the main reasons organisations conduct research is to create new intellectual property.
- Why organisations research to create IP
- Intellectual property as creative product
- Prior work and new work
- Proprietary tools and ownership
- Publishing versus employer interests
- Communicating results safely
Discovering and Defining Design Problems
Design versus research, the Double Diamond, design research in context, affinity clustering and root causesWeek 11 introduces design methods and the first half of the Double Diamond. Design is presented as intentional problem solving rather than decoration, shaped by constraints and by people, and present at every layer of IT from interfaces to services.
- Design as intentional problem solving
- Human-centred design and its ethics
- Research versus design
- The Double Diamond
- Discover: immersion, extremes and context
- Define: aligning needs, goals and feasibility
Developing and Delivering Design Solutions
How Might We questions, divergent ideation, convergence criteria, prototypes, minimum viable products and agile deliveryWeek 12 completes the Double Diamond with Develop and Deliver.
- The second diamond
- How Might We questions
- Brainstorming, brainwriting and SCAMPER
- Crazy 8s and storyboarding
- Convergence on desirability, feasibility and viability
- Low-fidelity prototypes and MVPs
The twelve weeks move through four families of method: framing research (why methods matter, ethics, the literature), qualitative methods (questionnaires, interviews, thematic analysis), quantitative methods (configuring a study, descriptive and inferential statistics), and communicating and protecting new knowledge (intellectual property and the design methods of the Double Diamond).
The grade comes from two written assignments worth 40% each and weekly studio quizzes worth 20%.
Assignment 1 draws on Weeks 1 to 6 and has three tasks: ethical risks across a research pipeline, a closed-question survey with a rationale, and a recorded semi-structured interview with a two-level coding scheme. Assignment 2 draws on Weeks 7 to 12. Each quiz is five minutes in the studio, and the best eight of the ten graded quizzes count.
What the unit rewards throughout is justified choice: naming the method, tying it to the research question, and stating what it cannot tell you.
Worked example · free
Plan a mixed-methods evaluation of a new campus app feature
- +1Split the aim into two questions: how students experience the planner (meaning and trust) and whether planner users schedule study differently (a measurable comparison).
- +1Answer the first with semi-structured interviews of about 15 to 20 minutes, a schedule that moves from a warm-up to direct questions, and prompts for recent examples.
- +1Answer the second with app logs: compare study sessions per week for students who use the planner and students who do not over the same weeks, and describe both groups with medians and interquartile ranges before any test.
- +1Analyse interviews thematically: semantic and latent codes, grouped into themes that are reviewed against the data and defined as claims.
- +1Plan ethics stage by stage: voluntary recruitment without pressure from teaching staff, consent that explains recording and withdrawal, de-identified logs, and aggregated reporting.
- +1State limits: planner users may already be more organised, so log differences may not be caused by the feature; interviews explain reasons but do not show how common they are.
Key terms
- Research question
- A specific, clear, relevant and feasible question that guides the research process and decides which data and methods are needed.
- Research ethics
- The principles and practical safeguards that protect participants and data, built on merit and integrity, justice, beneficence and respect.
- Data custodianship
- The responsibility for storing, protecting and managing collected research data, including how it is treated once the study closes.
- Literature review
- A structured account of prior work that sets context, synthesises findings by theme and identifies the gaps that motivate new research questions.
- Closed-ended question
- A questionnaire item with predefined answer options, such as yes or no, multiple choice, a Likert scale, a rating scale or a ranking.
- Semi-structured interview
- An interview guided by a schedule in which the interviewer may skip, rephrase, reorder or add questions and prompts in response to the participant.
- Thematic analysis
- A qualitative method that codes data and develops themes capturing patterns of meaning across a data set, following six phases.
- Triangulation
- Combining findings from several sources or methods so that the weaknesses of one are offset by the strengths of another.
- Inferential statistics
- Statistical methods that use a representative sample to draw conclusions about a wider population, usually by testing hypotheses.
- Double Diamond
- A design process model with four phases, Discover, Define, Develop and Deliver, alternating divergent and convergent thinking.
FIT4005 FAQ
How is this unit assessed?
Two written assignments carry 40% each and weekly studio quizzes carry 20%. Assignment 1 covers Weeks 1 to 6 through three tasks on ethics, survey design and interviewing with coding. Assignment 2 covers Weeks 7 to 12 and its brief is released on Moodle. Only the best eight of ten graded quizzes count.
What does Assignment 1 ask you to produce?
Task A is four slides naming the two most significant ethical issues at each research stage with mitigations. Task B is a Google Forms questionnaire of closed questions with a rationale of at most 500 words. Task C is an interview schedule, consent form, a recorded 15 to 20 minute interview, a two-level coding scheme and a 600-word rationale.
How do the weekly quizzes work?
Each quiz runs in the studio with a password, a five-minute limit and one attempt. Weeks 1 and 2 are practice runs. From Weeks 3 to 12 there are ten graded quizzes and the eight highest scores count, which allows for a missed studio or a poor result without special consideration.
Can generative AI be used in the assignments?
The Assignment 1 brief permits it for generating initial ideas, locating information and improving clarity of writing. Each task submission must include a note naming the tools, the purpose and the output included. Validate every response yourself, because originality is part of how the work is judged.
Do students enrolled under the co-taught code study different content?
The unit materials show the two codes sharing one Moodle site, identical learning outcomes and synopses, the same weekly studios and quizzes, and a single assessment table, so the content and tasks described in this guide apply to both cohorts.
How much statistics is involved?
Two weeks focus on statistics, and the Week 8 lecture describes its approach as conceptual and practical rather than mathematical. Expect to compute and interpret means, medians, spread and outliers, choose suitable charts, and reason about samples, variables and hypothesis tests rather than derive formulas.
Which chapters matter most for Task C of Assignment 1?
Task C combines two weeks. Chapter 5 covers interview types, schedules, prompts, probes and consent, and Chapter 6 covers thematic analysis with codes and themes. Plan the schedule with the coding in mind, because Task C is worth half of the Assignment 1 marks.
Questions students ask in each FIT4005 chapter
- Why does a technology professional need research methods?
- Because product decisions turn on questions such as whether a redesign changes user behaviour or how a new algorithm compares with the old one. Answering those reliably needs a method chosen for the question, not opinion or habit. Chapter 01 · What Research Is and Why Methods Matter
- Where do the four ethical values come from?
- They come from Australia's National Statement, the national guideline for human research ethics, issued in 2007 and revised in 2018. The lecture presents merit and integrity, justice, beneficence and respect as criteria for judging situations that no specific guideline covers. Chapter 02 · Research Ethics Across the Research Pipeline
- Should a review in an IT project be chronological?
- The Week 3 lecture says a purely chronological review is not generally considered appropriate in IT and computer science, because it reaches current work late. Group sources by theme and, if helpful, keep a time order inside each theme. Chapter 03 · Searching and Reviewing the Literature
- When is a questionnaire the right tool?
- The Week 4 slides list four conditions: you have a good idea of what answers to expect, respondents can read the items or have them administered, you want counts and frequencies, and you want to generalise to a larger population. Chapter 04 · Designing Surveys and Questionnaires
- Which interview type does Task C require?
- Task C asks for a 15 to 20 minute semi-structured interview with a fellow Monash student, recorded on Zoom after a signed consent form, ending with a proper closure. The schedule needs an introduction, questions and prompts. Chapter 05 · Planning and Conducting Research Interviews
- How is thematic analysis different from content analysis?
- The Week 6 materials describe content analysis as categorising what is said and how often, while thematic analysis centres on what participants meant and the motivations underneath, developing patterns of meaning across the data set. Chapter 06 · Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data
- What makes a research question good?
- The Week 7 slides list four properties: it guides the research process, it is specific and clear, it is relevant, and it is feasible. Two questions from one brief should also be distinct from each other. Chapter 07 · Configuring a Research Study
- Does Week 8 require mathematical derivations?
- No. The lecture describes its approach as conceptual and practical, focused on applying measures rather than deriving them. You should be able to compute and interpret the measures and choose a suitable chart. Chapter 08 · Descriptive Statistics and Data Visualisation
- Why does representativeness matter so much?
- The Week 9 slides state that valid statistical inference depends on the sample resembling the population it stands for. That is why random sampling is used: it reduces the bias that would otherwise make conclusions about the population unreliable. Chapter 09 · Inferential Statistics and Hypothesis Testing
- When should IP be considered in a research project?
- The Week 10 lecture says IP has to be considered when planning research, not just afterwards. Data collection, analysis, design activities and dissemination can all affect what you may later claim or publish. Chapter 10 · Intellectual Property in IT Innovation
- How is design different from research in this unit?
- The Week 11 lecture says research gathers evidence to understand reality and asks what is happening and why, while design gathers evidence to improve reality and asks what could happen and how. Each depends on iteration, feedback and evidence. Chapter 11 · Discovering and Defining Design Problems
- What does SCAMPER stand for?
- The Week 12 lecture expands it as Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to other uses, Eliminate and Reverse: seven prompts that each transform an idea to see whether a stronger version appears. Chapter 12 · Developing and Delivering Design Solutions
How to prepare for the assessments
Treat the unit as a toolkit of justified choices. For each week, write one sentence on what the method is good for and one on what it cannot show; those sentences become the rationale paragraphs both assignments need. Build Assignment 1 in the order the weeks run: ethics before collection, the questionnaire from mini-topics, and the interview schedule with the coding scheme in view.
Arrive at each studio having done the pre-workshop material, because the five-minute quiz follows the week's distinctions closely. For the second half, practise reading data before testing it: describe centre, spread and outliers, then ask whether the sample can support a claim about the population.
Finish with intellectual property and the design weeks, since Assignment 2 is the only written task that lists the intellectual property outcome.
Your AI Information Technology tutor for FIT4005
Stuck on a hard FIT4005 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Information Technology tutor — ask any FIT4005 IT Research and Innovation Methods question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.