LING20010 Language, Society and Culture
LING20010 Overview
- Semester 2 2026
- Second-level subject
- No final examination
- Two hurdle requirements
LING20010 Language, Society and Culture is a second-level University of Melbourne subject that studies language through a sociolinguistic lens.
- Assessed by A research article review, an in-class test, a major project and participation.
- Central challenge Turning raw counts into accountable rates and explaining what they mean socially.
- How to prepare Learn each phenomenon with its method, then design and write up your own variable study.
How LING20010 is assessed
| Component | Weight | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Review of research article | 20% | 1,000 words (plus or minus 10%) critically reviewing one of two assigned research papers; due Week 5, Monday 24 August 2026, 5pm. Listed on Canvas as the critical review of a research article. |
| In class written test | 25% | Held in person in the Week 10 lecture, 1pm Monday 5 October 2026: a closed-book Canvas test of 30 multiple-choice questions on topics to the end of Week 9. The handbook describes it as 800 words equivalent. |
| Major project | 45% | Research project of 2,200 words (plus or minus 10%) on data you collect; due Monday 2 November 2026, 5pm, during the examination period. A short research proposal, not assessed, was due before the Week 9 tutorial. |
| Participation and engagement | 10% | Contributions to small-group tutorial discussion, Padlets and discussion boards throughout the semester. |
| Hurdle requirement: attendance · hurdle | At least 80% attendance at tutorials; students are expected to attend lectures. | |
| Hurdle requirement: assessment · hurdle | All pieces of assessment must be submitted, and each must be complete and a genuine attempt at the task. |
The four graded weights total 100% and match on the 2026 handbook page and the subject's assessment summary. The two hurdle rows carry no marks but must be met to pass: tutorial attendance of at least 80%, and submission of every assessment task. Completion of the in-class test was also announced as a hurdle requirement. Confirm attendance records and submission settings on the subject Canvas page.
Current LING20010 dates
| Date | Item | Control |
|---|---|---|
| 24 August 2026 | Review of research article | Due 5pm, Week 5. |
| 5 October 2026 | In class written test | 1pm, in the Week 10 lecture, in person. |
| 2 November 2026 | Major project | Due 5pm, examination period. |
Dates are as published in the Semester 2 2026 assessment summary on the subject LMS. Confirm exact deadlines and submission settings in the live LMS.
What LING20010 covers
The chapters follow the lecture sequence: the variationist toolkit first, then the social factors that shape variation, then grammatical variation, change, contact, landscapes and the fieldwork methods behind the major project.
Sociolinguistic Variation, Variables and Variants
Variables and variants: round-bracket notation; dialect, sociolect and idiolect; stereotypes, markers and indicators; overt and covert prestige; the principle of accountabilitySociolinguistics begins by refusing to treat a language as one uniform system.
- Variation in lexicon, phonology, grammar and intonation
- Variables and their variants
- Dialect, sociolect and idiolect
- Stereotypes, markers and indicators
- Overt and covert prestige
- Accountability and the envelope of variation
Style, Attention to Speech and Audience Design
Style-shifting: variation within one speaker; Labov's sociolinguistic interview and attention to speech; Bell's audience design and referee design; speaker design and dialect performanceOne speaker does not sound the same all day. This chapter covers style-shifting, the variation within a single person that follows changes in addressee, setting, goals and imposed tasks, and the three accounts the subject compares.
- Intraspeaker variation and style-shifting
- Labov's sociolinguistic interview
- Attention to speech and triangulation
- Bell's audience design and referee design
- Speaker design and dialect performance
Language and Social Class
Class and prestige: open and closed stratification; objective and subjective measures of class; the New York department store survey; the crossover effect; change from above and below; Philadelphia, Sydney and Belton HighClass is one of the most widely used social factors in sociolinguistics and one of the hardest to define.
- Closed and open stratification
- Objective and subjective measures of class
- The New York department store survey
- The crossover effect
- Change from above and change from below
- Class studies in Philadelphia, Sydney and Beijing
Age, Apparent Time and Generational Change
Real and apparent time: panel and trend studies; apparent time and its stability assumption; age grading, lifespan, generational and community change; quotatives across age groupsEvery language changes all the time, and this chapter covers how sociolinguists catch change while it is happening.
- Panel studies and trend studies
- Apparent time and the critical period
- Age grading and peak-and-retreat patterns
- Lifespan, generational and community change
- Quotatives across age groups
- The Golden Age principle
Social Networks and Communities of Practice
Network ties: ego networks, density and multiplex ties; the Network Strength Scale in Belfast; the weak-tie model of change; brokers; communities of practice and their three criteriaClass categories get results, but they do not show how speech norms are passed between people. This chapter turns to the personal network: who a speaker is actually tied to, how dense those ties are, and whether each tie carries one role or several.
- Ego networks, density and multiplex ties
- The Network Strength Scale
- Cane Walk, Belfast and Grossdorf
- The weak-tie model and brokers
- Communities of practice
- Jocks, burnouts and nerd girls
Language, Gender and Sexuality
Beyond the binary: sex and gender as non-binary categories; Labov's gender paradox and its criticisms; direct and indirect indexing at Belton High; transmasculine voices; Podesva's study of falsettoThis chapter replaces the old variable of speaker sex with gender, a social identity produced through action, and notes that neither sex nor gender is binary.
- Sex, gender and the end of the binary
- Labov's gender paradox
- Network and inequality explanations
- Direct and indirect indexing
- Transmasculine voices and pitch
- Operationalising sexuality
Language, Ethnicity and Race
Ethnicity and race: ethnicity as constructed and contrastive; ethnolects, repertoires and multiethnolects; African American English copula patterns; racialisation, raciolinguistics and the dictation testEthnicity and race are both socially constructed, but the subject studies them with different lenses.
- Defining ethnicity
- Ethnolects and ethnolinguistic repertoires
- African American English copula patterns
- Multiethnolects
- Racialisation and raciolinguistics
- Language tests and migration in Australia
Language, Identity and Social Meaning
Acts of identity: convergence, divergence and maintenance; focused and diffuse systems; the three waves of variation research; indexical fields, styles, personae and bricolageIdentity implies both sameness and difference: an identity people claim for themselves and one others ascribe to them.
- Acts of identity
- Convergence, divergence and maintenance
- Focused and diffuse systems
- Speech communities and communities of practice
- The three waves of variation research
- Indexical fields, personae and bricolage
Grammatical Variation and the Variable Context
The variable context: defining the envelope of variation; s-form verbs in Ned Kelly's Jerilderie Letter; referential and functional equivalence; rates per thousand words; hypervariationVariationist analysis depends on knowing exactly where speakers have a choice.
- Defining the envelope of variation
- Categorical and neutralised contexts
- S-form verbs in the Jerilderie Letter
- Referential equivalence and neutralisation
- Functional equivalence
- Hypervariation and rates per million words
Language Change
Domains of change: language families and Grimm's law; lexical, semantic, sound and syntactic change; grammaticalisation of going to; the S-curve; social mediation of change and the Golden Age principleLanguages never stand still, and this chapter connects the variation studied so far to change over time.
- Language families and Grimm's law
- Lexical, semantic, sound and syntactic change
- Grammaticalisation and phonological reduction
- Orderly heterogeneity and the S-curve
- Networks, ideologies and prescriptive grammar
- Why languages change
Language Contact, Pidgins and Creoles
Contact outcomes: contact situations; Thomason's intensity scale; borrowing, calques and substrates; koines, mixed languages, pidgins and creoles; variation in Australian KriolContact between languages is almost universal, and its outcomes range from a few borrowed words to entirely new languages.
- Contact situations and outcomes
- Thomason's intensity scale
- Borrowing, calques and substrates
- Koines, mixed languages, pidgins and creoles
- Rethinking creole origins
- Variation in Australian Kriol
Linguistic Landscapes
Signs and policy: defining a linguistic landscape; sign producers, types and functions; Spolsky and Cooper's conditions; Reh's four kinds of multilingual writing; Picton, Tokyo and KyivPublic signs are a record of which languages are visible in a place, who put them there and for whom. This chapter defines the linguistic landscape following Landry and Bourhis and links it to language policy as practice, belief and management.
- Defining a linguistic landscape
- Producers, sign types and functions
- Spolsky and Cooper's conditions
- Reh's four kinds of multilingual writing
- Picton, Tokyo and Kyiv
- Coding signs for a project
Sociolinguistic Fieldwork and Research Design
Research design: research questions and hypotheses; stratified samples; data sources and the sociolinguistic interview; consent and data management; the research proposal and report structureThis chapter turns the subject's concepts into a method for the major project.
- Research questions and hypotheses
- Objectivity, reliability and validity
- The observer's paradox and the sociolinguistic interview
- Stratified and representative samples
- Informed consent and data management
- The research proposal and report structure
It asks how social and cultural factors shape the details of the way people speak, and how language in turn represents and enables social life: the categories we sort people into, the relationships we build and the communities we belong to. No linguistics background is assumed.
The subject is taught on campus, with two lectures a week and a tutorial in each of Weeks 2 to 11, and its core textbook is Meyerhoff’s Introducing Sociolinguistics.
The lectures begin with the toolkit of variationist sociolinguistics: the variable, its variants and the principle of accountability, which says a count only means something against every chance a speaker had to use a form.
They then apply it to style, social class, age, social networks and communities of practice, gender and sexuality, ethnicity and race, and identity, before turning to grammatical variation, language change, language contact and linguistic landscapes. A fieldwork lecture prepares students to collect and analyse their own data.
Assessment has no final examination.
The handbook lists a 1,000-word review of a research article (20%), an in-class written test (25%), a 2,200-word major project due in the examination period (45%) and participation and engagement (10%). To pass, you must also meet two hurdle requirements published on the subject Canvas page: attendance at no fewer than 80% of tutorials, and submission of every piece of assessment as a genuine, complete attempt.
The in-class test, held on 5 October 2026, was 30 multiple-choice questions on topics to the end of Week 9, so the remaining task for most students is the research project, due at 5pm on Monday 2 November 2026.
What makes the subject demanding is not memorising study names.
The test study guide says students do not need the details of particular studies but do need the general phenomena in each area and the methods researchers use. The project then asks you to apply those methods yourself: define a variable, justify its variable context, sample speakers, count accountably and interpret the result.
Worked example · free
Counting youse against every chance to use it
- 1Name the variable as (plural you), the function of addressing more than one person, with youse as one variant.
- 1Define the variable context as every occasion on which each speaker addressed a group.
- 1Calculate the rates: 4 divided by 8 is 50% for A, and 8 divided by 32 is 25% for B.
- 1Conclude that A favours youse twice as strongly, even though B produced more tokens.
Key terms
- Sociolinguistic variable
- A sociolinguistic variable is an abstract linguistic function, written in round brackets such as (ing), that speakers can realise in more than one way.
- Variant
- A variant is one concrete form that realises a variable, such as the alveolar or velar ending of (ing).
- Principle of accountability
- The principle of accountability requires counting every occasion on which a form could have occurred, not only the occasions on which it did.
- Variable context
- The variable context, or envelope of variation, is the set of places where speakers genuinely choose between competing variants.
- Covert prestige
- Covert prestige is the local value attached to forms the wider community looks down on, such as toughness or loyalty.
- Audience design
- Audience design is Bell's account of style, in which speakers shift their speech according to who is listening and how far those listeners are ratified.
- Apparent time
- Apparent time is a method that infers change by comparing speakers of different ages recorded in one community at one time.
- Age grading
- Age grading is a pattern in which a variant belongs to a stage of life and fades as speakers grow older, without any change in the community.
- Multiplex tie
- A multiplex tie links two people through more than one role, such as being both relatives and workmates.
- Community of practice
- A community of practice is a group of people brought together by mutual engagement in a shared enterprise, with a shared repertoire.
- Indexicality
- Indexicality is the capacity of a linguistic form to point to social meanings about the speaker or the situation beyond its referential meaning.
- Ethnolect
- An ethnolect is a variety of a language spoken by members of an ethnic group and used to express identity and solidarity.
- Linguistic landscape
- A linguistic landscape is the visibility and salience of languages on the public and commercial signs of an area.
LING20010 FAQ
Is the subject assessed by a final examination?
No. The handbook lists four graded tasks: a review of a research article worth 20%, an in-class written test worth 25%, a major project worth 45% and participation worth 10%. The major project is due during the examination period, at 5pm on Monday 2 November 2026, but it is a written research report, not an examination.
What are the hurdle requirements?
There are two, and both must be met to pass. Tutorial attendance must reach at least 80%, which means 8 of the 10 tutorials from Week 2 to Week 11, and lectures are expected. Every piece of assessment must also be submitted as a complete, genuine attempt. Both rules are set out on the subject Canvas page.
What was the in-class test like?
It was held in person in the Week 10 Monday lecture on 5 October 2026: a closed-book test of 30 multiple-choice questions taken on a laptop through Canvas, covering topics to the end of Week 9. Questions asked for the best definition, example, reason, term or chart interpretation, sometimes in the negative.
How hard is the subject?
No linguistics background is assumed, and the arithmetic is limited to counts and percentages. The challenge is breadth and method: thirteen lecture topics, each with its own studies, and a major project in which you must define a variable, justify its variable context, sample speakers fairly and interpret your own counts.
What does the major research project involve?
It is a 2,200-word report, plus or minus 10%, on data you collect yourself. Topics range from age, style and identity to reality television, a YouTuber's accommodation and linguistic landscapes. The project advice suggests sections for introduction, background, methods, results, discussion and conclusion, with tables and figures outside the word count.
Can I use generative AI for my assignments?
Not to produce anything you hand in. The subject requires every submitted sentence to be written by you. Asking GenAI for comments on a draft, or using it carefully to check your understanding of a concept, is allowed, and each assignment ends with a declaration of whether and how you used it.
Questions students ask in each LING20010 chapter
- Why is free variation the wrong description of most variables?
- Older grammatical descriptions treated alternating forms as random, but sociolinguistic research shows the choice is shaped by linguistic and social factors. The effects are probabilistic, so a factor raises or lowers the chance of a variant without fixing it. Chapter 01 · Sociolinguistic Variation, Variables and Variants
- What did Labov's sociolinguistic interview contain?
- It moved a speaker through tasks needing different attention: reading minimal pairs, reading a word list, reading a passage and talking with the interviewer about life and experiences. That let him compare the same speaker across styles within one session. Chapter 02 · Style, Attention to Speech and Audience Design
- How did Labov decide which class a clerk belonged to?
- He did not measure the clerks individually. He ranked three stores by prestige, using their address, the newspapers they advertised in and their prices, and treated each store's staff as representing that social level. Chapter 03 · Language and Social Class
- Why can apparent time underestimate the rate of change?
- If individuals keep changing in the same direction as the community during their lives, older speakers no longer sound like they did when young. The age gap then shrinks, so apparent time can understate how fast the change really moved. Chapter 04 · Age, Apparent Time and Generational Change
- How is a community of practice different from a social network?
- A network describes ties between individuals. A community of practice is a group that comes together around a shared enterprise, with mutual engagement and a shared repertoire, so it adds what people do together to who they know. Chapter 05 · Social Networks and Communities of Practice
- Is the gender paradox a real contradiction?
- Meyerhoff argues it is only a true paradox if the same women who lead non-standard change are also the ones using more standard forms. Grouping speakers into a binary can create the appearance of contradiction from two different sets of women. Chapter 06 · Language, Gender and Sexuality
- What makes ethnicity a constructed category?
- It is not biological. It is defined in contrast with other groups, shaped by both self-ascription and others' ascription, and expressed through language alongside descent, values and outward signs such as food and dress, so it shifts with situation and perspective. Chapter 07 · Language, Ethnicity and Race
- What is the difference between a focused and a diffuse system?
- When people first accommodate to one another, their linguistic behaviour is variable, or diffuse. Over time, patterns with particular people and contexts become regular and predictable, or focused, as English in Australia did between 1830 and today. Chapter 08 · Language, Identity and Social Meaning
- Why can't you just count every verb with -s?
- Many verbs offer no choice: modals and most past tense forms never take -s, third person singular subjects always do, and others never do. Including them would mix choice with obligation and hide the real rate in the contexts where Kelly decided. Chapter 09 · Grammatical Variation and the Variable Context
- What is the evidence that going to became a future marker?
- It now combines with subjects that cannot travel anywhere, such as a building that is going to collapse, and with events that involve no journey at all, such as weather that is going to change. Those uses make no sense as travel, so the construction must encode futurity. Chapter 10 · Language Change
- What is the difference between a pidgin and a creole?
- Traditionally, a pidgin has reduced structure and limited domains, and a creole develops when a pidgin stabilises, expands its functions and becomes children's first language. Scholars such as Mufwene now argue that creoles arose more gradually and in different settings. Chapter 11 · Language Contact, Pidgins and Creoles
- Why do linguistic landscapes matter to sociolinguists?
- Blommaert argues that signs lead to practices and practices lead to people. Studying which languages appear, who produced them and for whom reveals language policy, attitudes, vitality and the status of communities in an area. Chapter 12 · Linguistic Landscapes
- What makes a good variable for the project?
- It must be frequent enough in your data, or suited to a survey, and you must be able to code it reliably by ear. The project advice warns that many diphthong variables are gradient and need acoustic analysis, so they suit an honours thesis better. Chapter 13 · Sociolinguistic Fieldwork and Research Design
How to prepare for the assessments
Revise in the order the subject builds. Start with the variationist toolkit, because every later topic reuses it: be able to write any variable in round brackets, list its variants and explain why a raw count misleads. For each social factor, from style and class to networks, gender, ethnicity and identity, learn three things: the phenomenon, the method researchers used to study it, and one study that illustrates it.
The subject's own test guide stressed phenomena and methods over study details. For the major project, work backwards from the write-up: draft the methods section first, with the variable, variants, variable context, speakers and consent, because a clear methods section makes the results and discussion easier to write.
Calculate every rate from raw numbers you can show, keep your recordings and consent statements, and read your discussion against the literature that produced your hypothesis. Finish with a reread that checks the question in the introduction is the one your conclusion answers.
Your AI Arts tutor for LING20010
Stuck on a hard LING20010 question? Sia is AskSia’s AI Arts and Humanities tutor — ask any LING20010 Language, Society and Culture question and get a clear, step-by-step explanation grounded in how the course is actually taught and assessed. Read this whole study guide free, then take your hardest questions to Sia.